Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Pope will vist Ireland in 2018(mod warning in Op)

17810121315

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 403 ✭✭brickmauser


    Glenster wrote: »
    The correct word is pederastophobia

    The hostility and hatred and bigotry on this thread stinks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,460 ✭✭✭Bubbaclaus


    RobertKK wrote: »
    Give or take for the first 1,000 years of Christianity it was only the Catholic church that existed, all the other forms of Christianity have their origins in the Catholic church.
    Roman Catholicism is the founding religion of all Christian religions.
    Therefore your statement as highlighted is contradictory as you do have issues with Christianity since all the break off churches like Protestant churches have their origin in the Catholic church.

    The Catholic church is the 2nd biggest provider in the world of both healthcare and education after state provided healthcare and education.
    In some poor countries it is only the church who provides these services which help people to get out of poverty.
    If you teach a person to read and write, do maths and learn them science, it is the basis to remove oneself from poverty.
    Even in rich countries like the US, 15% of hospitals are catholic hospitals.
    The Catholic church for 2010 spent $170 billion to provide services to people.

    From the economist:

    http://www.economist.com/node/21560536
    There is a lot more in that link.

    I'm fully aware that the CC is a money machine and owns and runs tons of educational and healthcare assets.

    Doesn't override the fact that the manner is which they are run is deplorable in many cases Female reproductive rights are non-existent in CC run hospitals for example, as well as Hell's Angel herself Mother Theresa getting pleasure in the suffering of others because it "brought them closer to god"), and the narcissism and power by the people involved resulted in our great country being ruled by an iron fist and allowed paedophiles to have a free reign on us for decades without any fear.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 14,058 Mod ✭✭✭✭JupiterKid


    RobertKK wrote: »
    Isn't it shocking the Catholic church views the family from a Catholic perspective, they don't invite people to attend or ask if they are same sex couples or unmarried families or single parents, people are free to attend but should not be shocked that viewpoints at a catholic event are from a Catholic perspective.
    The hostility and hatred and bigotry on this thread stinks.

    What do you expect? That posters would be falling over themselves to fawn over the Pope and his church, a church that did untold damage to this country and its most vulnerable people?

    If anything, I'm surprised that there isn't more anger and hostility expressed over this planned papal visit. More indifference I'd say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,161 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    TBH because of my age i don't really care that much about what the Catholic Church did in the past in the same way i don't care what the IRA did, I often find a lot of the people who are very angry at the church are people who have never actually suffered under it, anyone who's in their 20s or even 30s has never really had to live under the control of the church, therefore i find their anger somewhat ridiculous, I understand older people having a deep hate for the church but many who do have never actually experienced things like industrial schools, laundries ect. I don't care about the Church, i feel no anger toward it, i personally think it's all a big fairy story but hey if people find some good in it as long as they leave me alone i'm fine with that. I really feel people who claim to not care about the church spend far too much time talking about it and getting themselves worked up into a rage over something they claim has no importance in their lives.

    Some people on Boards get so worked up about 'the Brits' you would swear they fought the Tans back in the day. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,626 ✭✭✭Glenster


    Imagine the uproar if The Red Cross had sheltered paedophiles for years and had wilfully disrupted attempts to stop the spread of aids in the third world.

    And refused to hire women.

    And then went around in golden robes and was one of the largest landowners in the world but paid no taxes.

    And then the spokesman for The Red Cross decided to make a visit to Ireland.

    I have nothing against religion per se (do what you like if you want to is my slogan) but I don't believe they should be treated differently than any other organisation.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 427 ✭✭Boggy Turf


    Is he here to renegotiate that disgraceful dodgy deal that has screwed the taxpayer?

    http://www.broadsheet.ie/2013/07/18/indemnity-and-the-religious/
    The June 2002 deal between Fianna Fail (above) and 18 religious orders, brokered by Michael Woods while serving as Minister for Education, awarded indemnity against all legal claims if…
    …they paid €128m in cash and property.
    Total liability was estimated at €300m even though no detailed analysis was carried out by any government department. The Government estimated there would be 2,000 claimants. In the end, there were more than 14,000.
    Total liability is currently estimated at €1.2bn

    They never paid for their crimes. I don't understand how people still darken their doors. They must be weak minded.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,755 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    PressRun wrote: »
    A top to bottom indictment of the crimes committed by members of the Catholic church in this country. And we've had nothing but a half-hearted apology by the people who aided and abetted the trauma inflicted on people like this man.



    If people want to go and see the Pope in his own city, go for it. But why on earth we should be giving the VIP treatment to the head of an organisation who committed truly unforgivable crimes in this country is beyond me.

    Had you a problem with the Queens visit?

    After all she is the head of the British Armed forces who had a nasty habit of murdering Irish people.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,383 ✭✭✭Boulevardier


    Papal visit in 2018?

    Yawn. Wake me up when he's gone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,045 ✭✭✭54and56


    RobertKK wrote: »
    The Pope is coming for the world meeting of families, it is a catholic event to celebrate the family as viewed from a catholic perspective. Which popes have attended in the past.
    It is not a state visit like the Queen's visit was.

    Good, so hopefully we won't see any of the States resources wasted on it or any of our office holders kissing the ring other than in a persona Catholic capacity. It's akin to an AC/Dc concert really. Big international show being put on in Dublin for fans of the act. Angus Young arrives in, hops into a limo, straight to the Merrion Hotel, chills out for a few hours, goes to the concert, puts on his show, collects his cash and hightails it onto the next gig. No need for any special treatment and no need for state resources to be wasted. Any crowd or traffic control costs are paid for by the concert promoter. End of.
    RobertKK wrote: »
    They won't be in Dublin castle having a state feast.
    Who's "they"? I thought the Pope was a single person not a group of people.
    RobertKK wrote: »
    It is the Pope visiting for a catholic global event, I watched it on CNN last year, there will be people from around the world at it
    Exactly, just like an AC/DC concert. I met people from the UK, the US, Australia and China at their concert in the Aviva a couple of years ago.
    RobertKK wrote: »
    It is more than just about Ireland.
    "More" than just about Ireland? It's not at all about "Ireland". It's about practising Catholics having a get together for a few days in Ireland.

    Last time I checked Irish Catholics did not equal "Ireland" any more than Irish Jehovah Witnesses, Irish Muslims or Irish Hindus equal Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,045 ✭✭✭54and56


    Boggy Turf wrote: »
    They never paid for their crimes. I don't understand how people still darken their doors. They must be weak minded.

    Its easy to issue a verbal apology and to even sound sincere when you are evading the payment of €1,000,000,000 in damages due to the victims of your sadistic paedophile crimes.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,045 ✭✭✭54and56


    Had you a problem with the Queens visit?

    After all she is the head of the British Armed forces who had a nasty habit of murdering Irish people.

    There is a big difference between the historical victims of war between two nations/peoples (including barbaric "crimes" and torture carried out during such wars) which is healed and forgiven over time as each protagonist reaches and maintains a mutually respectful accommodation with the other (UK and Rep of Ireland, France and Germany, Japan and the US, Vietnam and the US etc etc etc) and an organisation who systematically sexually, physically and psychologically abused children and the weakest adults in the society they professed to serve and when confronted with their behaviour by the brave few who stood up to them not only did the Catholic church make arrangements to facilitate the continuation of the abuse by moving its employees to new locations where they could carry abusing undetected but they spent whatever it took on the finest legal resources to ensure they didn't have to compensate their victims.

    If you can't spot the difference between the two situations I'm not sure you're looking very hard!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,775 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    I don't need to reply when some can only see sexual abuse and generalise it so much to paint a picture that sexual abuse was the job of the church.

    If people only want to see the bad and dismiss the good, then it is like looking at a picture in the dark.
    You will only see what your mind is allowing you to see or imagine.

    With the lights on one can see the good and the bad and not see a picture painted by some here which is only the bad.

    If people only want to look at the bad, it also gives a picture of the person who only wants to dwell in the dark.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,875 ✭✭✭A Little Pony


    Glenster wrote: »
    The correct word is pederastophobia

    The hostility and hatred and bigotry on this thread stinks.
    He won't turn up if he reads this thread!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,755 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    There is a big difference between the historical victims of war between two nations/peoples (including barbaric "crimes" and torture carried out during such wars) which is healed and forgiven over time as each protagonist reaches and maintains a mutually respectful accommodation with the other (UK and Rep of Ireland, France and Germany, Japan and the US, Vietnam and the US etc etc etc) and an organisation who systematically sexually, physically and psychologically abused children and the weakest adults in the society they professed to serve and when confronted with their behaviour by the brave few who stood up to them not only did the Catholic church make arrangements to facilitate the continuation of the abuse by moving its employees to new locations where they could carry abusing undetected but they spent whatever it took on the finest legal resources to ensure they didn't have to compensate their victims.

    If you can't spot the difference between the two situations I'm not sure you're looking very hard!!

    My granduncle was an innocent man tortured and murdered by the Tans who were soldiers who had the monarch as their head of state and just because it happened a long time ago it doesn't mean his suffering and others as well should be regarded as nothing.

    But the Queens visit was showing that it's time to start the healing process, and the Popes visit should be seen in the same way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    The British army were run out of here on a rail fornearly a century before the UK queen showed her face.


    We still have to get shot of the Roman church before we start talking of healing


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,875 ✭✭✭A Little Pony


    Bambi wrote: »
    The British army were run out of here on a rail fornearly a century before the UK queen showed her face.


    We still have to get shot of the Roman church before we start talking of healing
    How can you get rid of the Catholic Church? You have them all over the Island. I can literally walk a mile to one near my home.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,775 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    Bambi wrote: »
    The British army were run out of here on a rail fornearly a century before the UK queen showed her face.


    We still have to get shot of the Roman church before we start talking of healing

    Are you suggesting the extermination of people, given the church is it's people?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,583 ✭✭✭Straight Talker


    Let them have their little party.Of course they will say with defiance that the church is not dead.The church is still alive etc.But make no mistake about it the days of the catholic church setting the agendas in this country are well and truly over.

    Cork 1990 All Ireland Senior Hurling and Football Champions



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,460 ✭✭✭Bubbaclaus


    Let them have their little party.Of course they will say with defiance that the church is not dead.The church is still alive etc.But make no mistake about it the days of the catholic church setting the agendas in this country are well and truly over.

    And thank **** for that. Once the 8th is repealed on top of Marriage Equality coming in last year we will move further and further away from the Medieval, deplorable and unforgivable era of Catholic Church rule.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    How can you get rid of the Catholic Church? You have them all over the Island. I can literally walk a mile to one near my home.

    And I'd say you do every summer :p


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    RobertKK wrote: »
    Are you suggesting the extermination of people, given the church is it's people?

    That is absolutely to most obvious and logical inference to draw from that post. Congratulations


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,775 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    Bambi wrote: »
    That is absolutely to most obvious and logical inference to draw from that post. Congratulations

    The word church refers to people.
    Catholic comes from universal.
    So it is universal people.
    You said "We still have to get shot of the Roman church before we start talking of healing"
    So with church meaning people...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 787 ✭✭✭ArKl0w


    We'd better get rid of all soccer coaches too,they must have all been at it
    Bloody Soccer


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,078 ✭✭✭HellSquirrel


    RobertKK wrote: »
    Are you suggesting the extermination of people, given the church is it's people?

    Er, I would -suspect- s/he's referring to the power that the Roman Catholic Church still holds in Irish society and decision making rather than mass murder. I dunno, it's AH. But I'll give them the benefit of the doubt on not advocating religious genocide!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,775 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    Er, I would -suspect- s/he's referring to the power that the Roman Catholic Church still holds in Irish society and decision making rather than mass murder. I dunno, it's AH. But I'll give them the benefit of the doubt on not advocating religious genocide!

    Well there are cases of non religious committing genocide against religious.
    No one can be too careful these days...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,460 ✭✭✭Bubbaclaus


    RobertKK wrote: »
    Well there are cases of non religious committing genocide against religious.
    No one can be too careful these days...

    Don't worry, God has the biggest genocide of all planned (Armageddon).

    Tuesday week I believe.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    Bubbaclaus wrote: »
    Don't worry, God has the biggest genocide of all planned (Armageddon).

    Tuesday week I believe.

    Well, If it ends all this babbling I'm in favour of it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 427 ✭✭Boggy Turf


    http://waterfordwhispersnews.com/2016/11/29/pope-to-visit-zero-mass-grave-sites-during-visit/


    Pope To Visit Zero Mass Grave Sites During Visit
    Pope Francis made the announcement of his visit earlier this week, prompting fleeting thoughts in the minds of those affected by the Catholic church’s views on ‘fallen women’ over the last hundred years that they might be getting some sort of apology from the pontiff at a special ceremony or something.
    However Franko’s ‘bucket list of places to visit in Paddyland’ features almost zero mention of visiting people whose lives were torn apart by paedophile priests or the subsequent Vatican-endorsed cover-up, nor indeed of the mass-grave site of over 800 babies at a Mother & baby home in Tuam, Co. Galway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,059 ✭✭✭Simi


    ArKl0w wrote: »
    We'd better get rid of all soccer coaches too,they must have all been at it
    Bloody Soccer

    It's not the same though. If the abuse had been covered up by FIFA, and they'd protected and moved around the soccer coaches allowing them to continue abusing kids, and then intimidated the victims who came forward and tried to discredit them, it'd be kinda similar.

    If that were the case we'd quite understandably investigate FIFA officials for acting like a pedophile ring.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,045 ✭✭✭54and56


    Simi wrote: »
    It's not the same though. If the abuse had been covered up by FIFA, and they'd protected and moved around the soccer coaches allowing them to continue abusing kids, and then intimidated the victims who came forward and tried to discredit them, it'd be kinda similar.

    If that were the case we'd quite understandably investigate FIFA officials for acting like being a pedophile ring.

    Fixed that for ya.


Advertisement