Post Your 3dmark-03 Score

CombatCow

It was only a question of time so here it is,I no that this benchmark dosent accuratly portray real game scenario's but it's nice to know what other people got and what kinda system they were using.

AMD XP 2000+ @ ( 1.75GHZ )
512MB DIMM SDRAM PC133
MSI GF4TI4400 @( core 310 ) ( mem 610 )
WIN 2K

SCORE = 1,168

I would be very intrested in what the rest of you got.The scores are NOT compareable between - 3dmark 01 and 3d mark 03

CHEERZ COMBATCOW

BKtje

Will tell ya in 6 hrs after its finished dloading.

Matt Simis

P4 3.65 GHz
512MB DDR 434 CAS2
Radeon 9700 Pro (Core 400, Mem 330)
WinXP SP1

Score - 5589

Nothing tweaked, first run. ATI D3D settings set to Quality.


Looks like I cant submit my score at the moment, Futuremark.com still under pressure?

I also noticed that despite the FPS being around 40 for most of it, it seemed to jerk and freeze every 10 seconds or so (smooth pause, smooth again..).



Matt

CombatCow

Yup i hear you there it's like a bloody powerpoint slideshow.Iv been reading a few posts by people who have geforce 4's and guy's that have radeons and there seems to be a huge gap ( 4000 points ) between the two cards with similar system setups.


COMBATCOW

sutty

Read the other post about it here. Nvidia droped out of the 3dmark project. So there is no support for the cards. But ATI still are in there so there is. 3dmark 03 is not a fair test of system speed in a gaming envireament. Its compleatly sided to ATI cards

Matt Simis

Originally posted by Combatcow
Yup i hear you there it's like a bloody powerpoint slideshow.Iv been reading a few posts by people who have geforce 4's and guy's that have radeons and there seems to be a huge gap ( 4000 points ) between the two cards with similar system setups.


COMBATCOW

Yep, as fast as the P4 and Radeon are, my score shouldnt be FIVE times higher than yours!


Matt

Stephen

1332 marks.

XP1800+, not overclocked.
512mb PC2100 DDR Ram (cl 2.0)
MSI GeForce 4 Ti4200 at stock speeds
Windows 2000 Pro SP3
Nvidia 41.09 drivers D3D quality set to "Blend".

Praetorian

Got 1800 Points on my machine

P4 @ 2550 Mhz
GF4 4600 Stock speeds

3D Mark 2k3 is not biased towards ATI. Its biased towards DX9 cards...IE the Radeon 9700 / Pro
OR Geforce FX. In fact the GF FX Scores better.

I'm waiting for R350 (6 weeks?) I want a big jump in performance...the 9700 isnt quite big enough for me! :P

Matt Simis

Thats all down to interpetation. No games im aware of support PS1.4, yet 3DM uses it when it detects it. Games probably will only ever support PS1.1 and then 2.0+ in about 2 years. Therefore supporting 1.4 is not very useful as a games benchmark. It should be an option, but the default should be PS1.1.



Matt

Lenny

Xp 2100+ @ 1.720Ghz
512 DDR PC2700 Cl 2.5 ram,
Radeon 9700 pro 128DDR
W2k

I got 3026 score, nothing tweakeven though in the second games I was getting fps as low as 6!

Lenny

Just after updating my drivers for the vid card
my score is now 4282

BabyEater

What sort of scores wher you's getting in 3D Mark 2001

TacT

11,200 odd in 3dmk2001se (patched)
haven't even bothered with 2003 yet, cba downloading it

2100+ ti4200, 512 ddr, k7s5a

Praetorian

Almost 14 k in 3dmark 2k1

Cant wait for my R350

Matt Simis

Overclocked the Video card more: 5690

See the breakdown here:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=112415

Ignore the Radeon memory speed Futuremark reports, its really at 340MHz.

I get around 18.5K 3dmarks of the 2001 flavour (only overclocking, no SW cheats).



Matt

CombatCow

This is wot i think of 3dmark2003.

3DMARK 2003 OFFICIAL ATI RADEON BENCHMARKING SOFTWARE ( pi$$ off nvidia )


COMBATCOW :mad:

BKtje

Finally got round to doing it today.

xp2000+@ 1.75ghz.
512mb
radeon 9700pro (core:351mhz mem:317.4mhz )
w2k

got just under 13,000 on 2001se

4642 under 2003

KdjaCL

798

I thought my pc was good.
Can play any game Ut2 in 800x600, Bf1942 in 1024x768 Doom 3 ran okish.
1.7 XP
G3 ti 500
512 Ram

Seems weird i got such a low score when the card performs perfectly on any game i stick on.

New Dets Nvidia had reayd the 42.68 are supposed to add greatly to your score havent tried them yet.

Weird im still playing UT2 on 800 and no Lag or jerkiness even when its fairly intense.

Mate with a 9100 ATi the on komplett for €99 got 4102 and i got 798.

Somfin not right and there is nothing wrong with my Pc setup.

kdjac

JustHalf

If anyone uses 3DMark 2003 as a serious benchmark, they've lost the plot.

MoSeS_.

2400+ XP & 2.3GHz (185X12.5)
Radeon 9800 pro, can't remember what the timings were for the graphics card

3DMark 2003 - 6106

Haven't got 2001

joePC

XP2500 @ 2.2Ghz (11x 200fsb)
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro
1Gb PC3200 (400Mhz)

3D Marks 2001 = 18436
3D Marks 2003 = 6054

Not Bad...............

Giblet

XP2500 @1.8
9600 Pro
512 2700

3300.

Ryo Hazuki

CivilServant

2003

---

Score: 4982
Date: 2003-12-16
CPU: AMD Athlon XP 2105 MHz
GPU: ATI RADEON 9700 PRO
324 MHz / 311 MHz
OS: Microsoft Windows XP
Res: 1024x768@32 bit


2001

---

Score: 15532
2100+ @ 200 x 10.5, Radeon 9700 Pro @ stock with Cat 3.6 Twinmos PC3200 CL 2.5 512 MB

CyberGhost

3.06/533
Rambus 512
Rad9K7

3DMark03 - 2998 - whaaaa?
3DMark01 - 16671 - shame!

Big Chief

AMD XP3000+ (not oc..)
1gb PC3200 DDR Ram
Radeon 9800 Pro

3d marks 2003 = 5514

when the first test came on i thought it looked kinda positive with it staying over 100fps most of the way... then came the other tests

Matt Simis

ATI bias? Pfff:

3D2K3 score: 7100

AMD Athlon64 2700MHz
512MB DDR450
FX5950 Ultra - 5656 WHQL drivers.


Nothing much tweaked, Ill do some overclocking and rerun.



Matt

Matt Simis

Ill rerun 3DM2k3 tomorrow (it takes too long..), but I ran AquaMark:
53,400 - a personal best.

Athlon64 2733MHz
512MB DDR455 (only single channel as this is not an FX chip)
FX5950 256MB Ultra - 5656 Drivers - 560 Core, 950 (stock) memory.

3DMark01 still scores rather poorly on this system:

22,900.


Matt

astrofool

the athlon 64 is really a beast when it comes to games and 3dmark2001, i get 20,000+ on a 64-3000+ at stock with a 9800xt. My 3dmark03 score was around the 7000 level on a clean boot/install.

MR DAZ

3D mark score = 5114


System = P42.8ghz, 2gig rambus memory, ATI 9800 pro, etc..........

Woden

Originally posted by joePC
XP2500 @ 2.2Ghz (11x 200fsb)
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro
1Gb PC3200 (400Mhz)

3D Marks 2001 = 18436
3D Marks 2003 = 6054

Not Bad...............

hi joe very interested in your scores, i get about 17200 on my system at stock but i have 512mb ram and was interested in the effect of another 512mb on 3dmark01 and 03. my stock 3dmark03 score is about 5500 i think.

i can't seem to break 18000 on 01 even with oveclocking the graphics card to greater then XT frequencies, i actually get a better response from 3dmark03, so if you really bored one day and fancy benchmarking your system with only half the ram that would be cool

data

Dingatron

3D mark score = 5565

XP2400 @ 204 X 9.5
2 X 256 MB GEIL PC3500
2 X WD RAPTOR RAID 0
RADEON 9800 PRO

unkel

Originally posted by ding
XP2400 @ 204 X 9.5

Wow - how the hell do you manage that? 204 on a 133 cpu :ninja:


EDIT: and why these settings? Your CPU itself is slightly underclocked, even though the bus is extremely fast

Dingatron

I have the A7N8X mb. Nice board. I wanted to make better use of my memory by running it at 200 mhz while also using nforce dual channel mode. Reading some of the forums at NforcersHQ.com and its better to run 200 X 10 rather than 133 X 15. My first attempt using 200 X 10 corrupted the bios :mad: so I tried 204 X 9.5 which runs stable with CPU temp of 34 C idle and about 42 C full load. I know its under clocked but not going to mess too much untill I get another bios chip. Also running stock cooling and happy enough with performance now. Next thing is water cooling methinks!

Kevok

Thats probably how he got the 204 fsb speed. AMD MBs tend to get very unstable around 200fsb, I should know, I've been trying to get it for the last 6 months.

CombatCow

Im just after over clocking my pc for the first time yesterday and im quite happy with the results evan tho the clock speed has not increased that much.

Its a barton 2800+( watercooled ) and it's now running at 12x 190fsb =2280mhz

It gave me roughly 2,000 points in 3dmark01(16,000) and 40 fps extra in ut2k3 flyby and 14 fps extra in the botmatch. ( 221/71 )

Id say because i have pc2700 DDR and no active cooling on the northbridge and a crap psu, i couldent get a higher clock,but im happy with it for now.

Thanks for the link to the other forum with the guide dataisgod.


CombatCow

unkel

Originally posted by ding
while also using nforce dual channel mode. Reading some of the forums at NforcersHQ.com and its better to run 200 X 10 rather than 133 X 15

Yes iirc the dual channel mode doesn't really kick in on socket A mobo under 200 FSB

Dingatron

You're right there. Huge increase in memory bandwidth after uping it to 204 MHz.

PS. Unkel. Never got that email from your mate about the PC's for the school?

Matt Simis

Originally posted by Kevok
Thats probably how he got the 204 fsb speed. AMD MBs tend to get very unstable around 200fsb, I should know, I've been trying to get it for the last 6 months.

I was running a Barton 2500 at 225x12 without much bother 12 months ago on an nForce2..


Matt

OfflerCrocGod

Originally posted by Kevok
Thats probably how he got the 204 fsb speed. AMD MBs tend to get very unstable around 200fsb, I should know, I've been trying to get it for the last 6 months.

What are you on about!!!!, Kevin I know for a fact that you have a 2500+ they OC to 3200+ speeds easily if you have a chipset that supports it and PC3200 RAM you should hit 200+ FSB speeds without a hitch. What is the limiting factor?, what chipset are you using?, from what I heard the nForce2 non Ultra400 could hit 200Mhz no prob at all and the Ultra400 was not hugely different from it at all :dunno:, weird.

Kevok

I have a 2800+, and everytime I try and oc past 178mhz fsb I get an overclock fail and have to clear the CMOS.

It's an EpoX 8RDA+, nforce2 mobo.

Woden

what ram do you have though? don't have pc3200 ram your ram won't be designed to run at 200mhz and that could be limiting your overclock, you may also have to increase the core voltage or up the ram voltage to get the fsb up higher, usually its ok to put 2.8v through the ram (vdimm)

Kevok

Corsair 1GB DDR XMS3200LLPT TwinX (2x512MB) CAS2 (MY-018-CS)

Got it from overclockers.

Woden

nice ram almost identical to my own (the pc3500 corsair stuff uses the same chips as the pc3200 LL version)

push 2.8v through it and see if it makes a difference its still under warranty at the value i checked with corsair, and i needed to do this i think to help stability, also if your 2800+ is unlocked try dropping the multi to 11 and upping the fsb to 200mhz.

its best to find the fsb limit of your machine first, by giving it a real low multi and see how high you can go.

good luck

data

Kevok

I'll give it a go, 3 weeks off from UCD it's not like I have anything else to do. :dunno:

Woden

3 weeks of from ucd also but i'm in the labs for them

Col_Loki

I was running a Barton 2500 at 225x12 without much bother 12 months ago on an nForce2..

Yea ive had my board at 244 x 9.5 , fully stable. Although different multipliers tend to give different FSB stability (or so i found on my NF7-S).

OfflerCrocGod

Originally posted by Kevok
I have a 2800+,

Practically certain you told me 2500+.....no matter it should still OC to 3200+ no prob.

Originally posted by Kevok
and everytime I try and oc past 178mhz fsb I get an overclock fail and have to clear the CMOS.

It's an EpoX 8RDA+, nforce2 mobo.

Well your prob would be your chipset, since your PCI bus is locked, well try increase the Volt not only to the RAM but also to the CPU, also I dont think your MB has an unlocked multiplier....try getting the latest and greatest BIOS for your MB, see if that helps stability when OCing.

OfflerCrocGod

Originally posted by Dataisgod
3 weeks of from ucd also but i'm in the labs for them

Which labs would those be data?;).

Woden

chemistry this week, physics next , no sitting around at my computer at 6 in the evening farting around at all at all

Col_Loki

On the 3dmark subject im getting.........

5.5k 3dmark03
17k 3dmark01 ,

Thats with my 9700pro overclocked and CPU running as per SIG.