moon landing

loppy1011

well well why do we keep bringing this up does it really matter if they did or didnt but one question we should ask is how the **** did they film it and send the images back to earth when they only had radio communactions with the rocket

Riamfada

Does it really matter? seriously. Who cares. If the Original was faked then Neil Armstraong is a big Fake! But Im sure someone has been there by now. And guess what! Its a rock! With Dust on it! That sits there! Weeeeee flying acrosss the sky! But well observed there Loopy. You should post that on the Nasa forum. :P

elexes

it dosnt reely but it would prove the americans lied then and there willing to do it for anything they want

Riamfada

That goes without question mate. It dosent take and Un weapons inspector to figure that one out :P

Samba

how the **** did they film it and send the images back to earth when they only had radio communactions with the rocket

The Americans have also constantly lied about their technological capabilities, anyone remember the mobile phone incident with one of Kennedys Body gaurds?

To those who don't (this could well be urban legend, who knows..) a body gaurd at the time of the shooting was seen holding and talking through a device which was tiny even in comparison to todays mobile phones.


They denied it was a wireless cellular device at the time but it was later admitted (I think by Clinton, he was also the president to conceed allegations over Mind manipulation and control tests which were conducted by the CIA for many years, which also ties in with the whole Lee Harvey Oswald theory and John Lennons killer.

(dont quote me here, may have been a seperate incident and person who admitted this)


Back to the moon landing, perhaps it was faked, that we will find out when the Chinese launch their unmanned rocket, at the same time who should we trust?

It would be very much in the interest of the Chinese to make such an allegation for various reasons.

Sposs

One thing that always had me wondering is how they were able to video tape the actual landing,surely thay had to land with the camera first?

dragon heart

Originally posted by Sposs
One thing that always had me wondering is how they were able to video tape the actual landing,surely thay had to land with the camera first?

ppls are goin to give loads of excuses to if its fake or not!!! just sit back and let sumone else worry about it like me!!!

cerebus

Originally posted by Samba
It would be very much in the interest of the Chinese to make such an allegation for various reasons.

Samba brings up an interesting point, something that any moon-hoax conspiracy theorists would do well to consider.

It isn't that hard to work out where a radio signal is coming from and how far away the transmitter is.

So, cast your mind back to July 20th, 1969 - Apollo 11 (and symbolically, the US) lands on the moon, and proudly proclaims the news to the world. Lets not forget it was the middle of the cold war, and relations between the US and the Soviet Union were pretty chilly.

I find it hard to believe that the Soviets (and the Chinese) would have let the US get away with these claims if the radio signals were not actually coming from the moon - remember, it is easy to check. Don't you think they would have mentioned it if they were actually coming from a soundstage in Nevada? (Or wherever a crackpot's pet theory suggests - better not lump all the tinfoil hat wearers under the same umbrella)

[Edit]Edited to remove some potential for misunderstanding - hope it is clearer now[/Edit]

Samba

[edit]Really stilly misunderstanding [/edit]

daveirl

This post has been deleted.