Concerned Women for America

Winters

http://www.cwfa.org/

Yes there is such a thing. The site even has Family Voice on the site, a magazine that had top quality story's such as: Today's Trojan Horse, Gay activists aim to silence opposition and influence curricula in the schools.

Id advise to have a look if you wish to live your life the moral christian way .... as such.

“I feel sorry for this baby, because no child deserves to be born, or adopted, into a homosexual household [and deliberately denied a father],” said Peter LaBarbera, senior policy analyst for the Culture & Family Institute of Concerned Women for America.

“This baby girl already has lost a fair shot at life because she is growing up in an intentionally fatherless home,” LaBarbera sighed

DiscoStu

No doubt friends of Tipper Gore.

Roll on the Christinan Taliban, bring back the Spanish Inquisition(but could we trust our morals to those foreign devils?) and lets the make this world a ****in better place for all, except those who dont think like we do.

Conservatisim, dont ya just love it.

sceptre

Now let's see: would I rather a child be brought up by two women/two men or by two bigotted idiots?

Tough choice:rolleyes:

Snowball

Originally posted by DiscoStu
No doubt friends of Tipper Gore.

rolf

Bard

Originally posted by Snowball
rolf

Rolls on Laughing Floor?

... or do you mean the dog from The Muppet Show?



The existence of CWFA is utterly unsurprising, to be honest. Such extremes in society are bound to exist. At least there's enough of us around who are capable of actually seeing through obvious bullshit...

Sangre

Originally posted by Bard

The existence of CWFA is utterly unsurprising, to be honest. Such extremes in society are bound to exist. At least there's enough of us around who are capable of actually seeing through obvious bullshit...

Okay now you're the one who is judging!
Even if you don't agree with it doesnt mean you can call it bull****, you're just being hypocritical. As long as they dont force their beliefs leave them be

Bard

Originally posted by Sangre
Okay now you're the one who is judging!
Even if you don't agree with it doesnt mean you can call it bull****, you're just being hypocritical.

Ah, no actually... do you know what being hypocritical is?

If I were being hypocritical, I would be professing a belief or opinion that I myself do not believe in. This isn't the case.

And I'll call it bullshit if I want to, thanks very much, especially if I believe that that's what it is. Go tell someone else how to speak.

Sangre

Originally posted by Bard
Go tell someone else how to speak.

OKay I will!
/me stomps off looking for next victim

Makaveli

How can a man be in Concerned Women for America? I would have thought the whole concerned women bit might have ruled him out.

seamus

Originally posted by Makaveli
How can a man be in Concerned Women for America? I would have thought the whole concerned women bit might have ruled him out.

Well, you see that's one of the modern wonders of equality. If you created a Concerned Men for America organisation, you would have to allow women in, or face annihilation by complaining PC-freaks. Once a part of this organisation, women would vote for a change in the name of said organisation, because it doesn't reflect the feelings of the membership.

Of course, Concerned Women for America must allow men to join, to avoid looking hypocritical, but in a bizarre twist of modern logic, any male members who vote for a change in the name would be cast out as oppressive mysogynists(?), looking to stamp down women by removing them from the name of the organisation........

Anyway, back on topic

Peter LaBarbera, senior policy analyst

Can anyone tell me, WTF is a 'policy analyst'? Sounds like a synonym for 'Senior bull**** creator' :rolleyes:

Groups like this exist everywhere, but get a better airing in America due to the constitution and the general paranoia of the population and a bunch of other crap.

swiss

How can a man be in Concerned Women for America? I would have thought the whole concerned women bit might have ruled him out

I know, sounds a little queer to me 0_o

The issue of homosexual parenting is one that I feel will crop up more and more as attitudes and laws regarding homosexual relationships become more and more liberal. I don't claim to know everything about homosexual parenting, in fact I doubt if I'll ever have kids myself, but at least I'm not pulling a double standard by on one hand claiming that homosexual parenting will cause strife for the children, and then creating that strife by protesting against the institutions that are in place to try to help homosexual parents cope with raising a child.

adding that even pro-homosexual research shows that children raised in homosexual households are more likely to identify as “gay,” experiment with homosexuality, be promiscuous, and exhibit other unhealthy tendencies.

Woo - even "pro homosexual" reports shows it. Well that's rock solid proof for me anyway. I don't even need a link to these reports, if it's reported on the cwfa website, it must be true. There is, after all, no ulterior motive or mandate other than to report the facts on this website, right.

Riiiiight.

Objective reporting and analytical studies about homosexual parenting will help me decide about the merits and demerits of allowing homosexuals to parent children, not ultra conservative dogma from hypocrites.

seamus

ROFL, I completely missed that swiss

adding that even pro-homosexual research shows that children raised in homosexual households are more likely to identify as “gay,” experiment with homosexuality, be promiscuous, and exhibit other unhealthy tendencies.

Aside from your good point of the lack of proof of these 'findings'. More likely than whom? Do a comparative study of children from heterosexual families, and you'll find they're pretty damn promisicuous (who isn't, given the opportunity? ), and tend to 'exhibit other unhealthy tendencies' :eek: OMG, Unhealthy tendencies?!! Lock them up, lord knows we can't have unhealthy people infecting the genepool!! :rolleyes:

I'd love to get into a big flame war with these people but tey're probably so narrow-minded and stubborn, I'd go insane before I actually taught them anything.

Snowball

Snowball changed Bard from reply mode to discussion mode

Bard

Originally posted by Snowball
Snowball changed Bard from reply mode to discussion mode

what the chuff are you on about?

Victor

Originally posted by DiscoStu
bring back the Spanish Inquisition

I don't know the formal name, but the "Spanish Inquisition" still exists.