Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Joan Jett at her finest....

  • 13-12-2002 2:23pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 79 ✭✭


    This letter was written to Rolling Stone by Joan Jett after their ''Women In ‘Rock’'' issue was published, but was not printed by their editors:

    I tried to find some cleverly worded way to express my disgust with your ''Women in Rock'' issue, but what I have to say is really quite simple: You guys are completely retarded.
    By RS standards, Rock is no longer a style of music but a trendy costume to be whipped up by expensive stylists and slapped onto the latest pop tart barbie doll. Give a girl some tight pants and a spiky bracelet and POOF! She ROCKS!
    Your poor choice of cover girls and featured artists brings to mind the Sports Illustrated swimsuit editions. There is nothing necessarily wrong with the models inside… but we all understand that they have NOTHING TO DO WITH SPORTS--Which just might be offensive to women who are interested in sports or who might even be (gasp) real athletes.
    Yes, Britney has a talented stylist and yes, somebody gave Shakira a Guns & Roses t-shirt to wear..but they ARE NOT NOW NOR WILL THEY EVER BE ROCK.
    Maybe it''s naive of me to expect any glimmer of rock''n''roll credibility OR respect for women from a magazine whose cover shot is regularly a naked underweight actress. The thing is, I AM a woman musician with a rock band, and as we all are, I am STARVED for any little crumb of recognition that real women rockers might be thrown. So like a sucker I find myself short another five bucks ..and ... enough to write my first letter to an editor. Avril Lavigne gets some studded accessories from Hot Topic so now she''s ''upholding the brazen tradition of teenage outrage''???!! Are you SERIOUS? And could someone please explain to me why people keep insisting on referring to PINK as rock? Wasn''t she doing the white girl hip hop thing a minute ago? Yeah, she performed on the Aerosmith tribute show --big deal..she was on the Janet Jackson tribute show just before that--Whatever''s trendy. WHO CARES. She''s a Spice Girl reject...but I digress.
    Jewel and Mandy friggin'' Moore have full page features as Rock Icons… Meanwhile Joan Jett gets one line. ONE LINE. Joan Jett & the Blackhearts, who have never stopped touring, recently did 10 days in the Middle East playing for the troops stationed in Afghanistan. In AFGHANISTAN, Joan would come onstage wearing a birkha, which she ripped off and stomped on before blazing through the purest and nastiest rock show ANYWHERE. But even in the RS WOMEN IN ROCK issue, a story like that gets ONE SENTENCE on the bottom of the last page of “Random Notes.”
    Britney''s Rock credentials? Well, she butchers the song ''I Love Rock''n''Roll'' on her latest record, and when asked about it the genius replies ''Well, I''ve always loved Pat Benatar.'' And SHE is your Rock issue cover girl?? You should be REALLY embarrassed.
    Sleater Kinney was the only rock group listed on the cover..and they got only half a page. Ashanti, the R&B back up singer who can''t seem to do anything without ''featuring Jah Rule,'' has two pages.
    What about the Donnas? The Yeah Yeah Yeahs? The Distillers? A mag like RS has the power to shine important light on groups like these-- instead they are afterthoughts, and that valuable spotlight is wasted on the same overexposed pop princesses WHO HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH ROCK.
    In your own letter from the editor you have the hypocritical ... to say ''rock radio won''t touch female artists, while the pop factory keeps churning out soundalike clones, and ambitious musicians with something to say find themselves left out in the cold.''
    The pages that follow those words are a blatant display that Rolling Stone magazine is happily working for the factory now too.
    If the issue had been called ''Women in Music''..or maybe ''Some Cute Girls with Top 10 Records out Right Now''..I would have no beef with it. Corny as it may sound, ROCK is something which is still meaningful and even sacred to some of us. Use the word ''rock'' in bold letters next to a picture of Britney Spears, and you''re turning your whole publication into a joke...and an offensive joke at that.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 279 ✭✭sodiumlightbaby


    wouldn't be a fan of hers but spot on, she speaks the truth !


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 83 ✭✭Muppet Monarchy


    Word.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 726 ✭✭✭lamda


    Why is she speaking about herself in the third person though??? I dont trust people who do that ... it's shifty


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 702 ✭✭✭roxy


    Yeah that is a bit weird.

    Did she not sign it Joan Jett maybe? Perhaps she wanted to give the impression that the letter was written by a fan of hers....


Advertisement