Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

What the hell is this?!?!?!? (Possible Ghost in a Photo?)

  • 11-12-2001 10:53am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 450 ✭✭


    Well folks, about 10 minutes ago, we took these photos of a chair in the corner of the room.... first photo was taken without a flash, second and third ones with a flash. Now these pictures were taken with NOTHING obstructing the lens.. I cant explain it like.. maybe some of you can! Ive thrown links up to the FULL size pictures exactly as ive taken them off the camera... this is a bit mad like.. the building we're in has a pretty long history so who knows!?!

    Links:

    http://www.cfxdesign.net/P0001705.JPG No Flash
    http://www.cfxdesign.net/P0001706.JPG With Flash (THIS BE THE WEIRD ONE!)
    http://www.cfxdesign.net/P0001707.JPG With Flash


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,274 ✭✭✭Monty - the one and only


    looks like a hair on the lense


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 450 ✭✭Chief


    Could me Mont0r m8... but how did it cast that bloody shadow? Havent a clue like.. any photography experts about that could explain? we checked the lens whenever the picture popped up on the LCD screen on the camera and there was nought there.. of course we're skeptical but it still seems a bit weird :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 512 ✭✭✭beaver


    Heh, I think ghosts are noted for not showing up in photography :) A fibre or something on the lens catching the light from the flash I'd say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,225 ✭✭✭Scruff


    first physical evidence of a cosmic string????

    no, wait if it was its gravity would have ripped u, ure house and the planet apart. :D

    probably a fibre of some kind.
    u mightn't be able to see it but it could have been there. Ever look at the sky for a few mins when its clear blue (rare event i know) and see all these little squiggly things going past?
    well they're actually on the outside of your eye ball and are microscopic but a funny lensing effect and the blue light lets you see them.

    similar kinda thing could have heppened with the camera.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,046 ✭✭✭Dustaz


    thats no more a ghost than me arse :)

    Look at the bottom of the frame, the flare fades out. Its a reflection of the flash from something. If it was a 35mm camera my first guess would be be flash reflection, or possibly a light leak somewhere (it looks very like that) but since its a digital camera its almost defintly a hair on the lens.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,574 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    It could be inadvertant exposure of the negative before processing ....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,265 ✭✭✭MiCr0


    Originally posted by Victor
    It could be inadvertant exposure of the negative before processing ....

    looks like its a digital camera though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 450 ✭✭Chief


    It is indeed from a digital camera, still pretty weird lookin though, problem is i cant see where it could have reflected the flash from... oh well another unsolved mystery perhaps :) cheers for the theorys laeds!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,468 ✭✭✭Evil Phil


    I have photo's at home with exactly the same thing in them. It's the strap on the camera.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,984 ✭✭✭✭Lump


    Its either a hair or lens flare........ Ghost HA.


    John


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,488 ✭✭✭SantaHoe


    The only spooky thing about those photos is....
    Why were you taking pictures of a chair?
    <cue twilight zone music>


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,264 ✭✭✭✭Hobbes


    I would go with Camera Strap. I think one of the camera sites (Kodak?) shows loads of pictures with werid things in them and explains what the person did wrong.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 517 ✭✭✭hacktavist


    Jesus christ its a ghost bananna like..
    Like Dead Santa said why would you take photots of a chair..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,335 ✭✭✭Cake Fiend


    I'd say it's a small hair or eyelash. The way it's kind of ribbed would agree with that (that's how hairs grow, especially curled - in stages)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,524 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    If that blackness is actually a shadow then it is because the strap is partly covering the flash which is... on ... the .. right hand side of the camera?? To prove Evil Phil's point - is the strap a slim stringy kind of one or a flat material type. In fact go wild and post a link to a picture of the strap of your camera below!

    But really the problem is definately the fact that you are taking photo's of chairs, if it was something interesting that you were photographing you wouldn't be so amazed at the old "strap trap quandry". :p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 450 ✭✭Chief


    Here's a wee update folks, this is the exact way the camera was held for the photo (except that it was in front of my mates face :)) , you have to tilt a long way for the strap to go over the lens or flash. This is the way he ALWAYS takes a photo, especially ones of the furniture.

    camera.jpg

    I suppose we take photos of the furniture because we work in a furniture company and its the easiest way to get an image of them onto our digital catalogue :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 397 ✭✭T.G Catter


    The ppl who took photos, ru in dcu?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,079 ✭✭✭Mr.Applepie


    Originally posted by Chief
    I suppose we take photos of the furniture because we work in a furniture company and its the easiest way to get an image of them onto our digital catalogue :)

    My guess is no he's not in dcu but i could be wrong and if i am....chief we need to meet up but im not which makes me right!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,478 ✭✭✭GoneShootin


    my god his head is a digital camera !!!

    nehoo the GHOST seems to be a cery circular pattern, so this ghost seems to be well organised....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,524 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    Yep, it's the thin part of the strap, it was caught as it was swinging slightly from left to right.
    :eek:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 972 ✭✭✭havok*


    Originally posted by Gordon
    Yep, it's the thin part of the strap, it was caught as it was swinging slightly from left to right.
    :eek:

    I'd have to agree with that, it would also explain why its only in one of the photos...


Advertisement