Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Poll Options - "Excellent / Average etc." Or "Rating (1-10)"?!

  • 29-09-2005 11:18pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,201 ✭✭✭✭


    Which would you prefer to have when you vote in the discussion threads for episodes?

    You can either choose to leave it like it is now...

    - Excellent! / Good / Average / Poor / Terrible!

    ... or a rating system from 1 - 10:

    - 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10.

    Am leaving your choice in the poll private but the poll will close next Monday (3rd October) with the preferred rating system being implemented in the discussion thread for the next episode, "2X03 - Orientation" airing next Wednesday.

    The decision is yours!

    What would you prefer for polls? 10 votes

    Excellent! / Good / Average / Poor / Terrible!
    0% 0 votes
    Rating from 1 - 10
    100% 10 votes


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,216 ✭✭✭✭monkeyfudge


    I think a number rating system would work better.

    I'd rarely vote excellent myself as I always feel there should be some room for improvement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,201 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    Cheers for the feedback, monkeyfudge!

    I'm starting to think a rating system would be more accurate than the current options!

    Keep votes coming!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,295 ✭✭✭jonnybadd


    Could we not have a rating system that goes 4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42? or would it be altogether too cheezy?

    I prefair the Excellent --> Terrible way of things, if my suggestion isn't a goer!


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 18,003 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    I'd rarely vote excellent myself as I always feel there should be some room for improvement.
    And, by the same token, we'd hardly ever see anyone vote "Poor" or "Terrible", espeically given the fanaticism on this forum.

    What I'd like to see is a 1-10 system with 5 marking an average episode of "Lost". Note what I said: an average episode of *Lost*. Otherwise, again, the results will end up skewing in the 7-10 mark, imbalacing the system. They can't all be great episode of "Lost" - we should have a median of 5 as a baseline and work off of there. Which is why I gave 2x02 a '6'. It's more precise...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,367 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42 gets my vote...


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,731 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    I voted for good, poor, terrible, but then I saw the geeky 'numbers' system and liked that better.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 620 ✭✭✭Spider_Baby!


    ixoy wrote:
    And, by the same token, we'd hardly ever see anyone vote "Poor" or "Terrible", espeically given the fanaticism on this forum.

    What I'd like to see is a 1-10 system with 5 marking an average episode of "Lost". Note what I said: an average episode of *Lost*. Otherwise, again, the results will end up skewing in the 7-10 mark, imbalacing the system. They can't all be great episode of "Lost" - we should have a median of 5 as a baseline and work off of there. Which is why I gave 2x02 a '6'. It's more precise...
    Why not just suggest 1-5, then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,753 ✭✭✭qz


    Yeah, 4,8,15,16,23,42 would be cool.

    We have no lives :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,842 ✭✭✭steveland?


    Stickied until we decide democratically :)

    I like the idea of 42, 23, 16, 15, 8, 4 though...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 259 ✭✭Lantis


    I'm terrible at rating between 1-10, so I went for the first one.

    4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42 is a good idea though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,811 ✭✭✭Stompbox


    Yeah 4 8 15 16 23 42


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,753 ✭✭✭qz


    Hopefully the 4,8,15,16,23,42 would throw off the likes of L5 and those that only vote Terrible! for the sake of it. :rolleyes:


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 9,035 Mod ✭✭✭✭mewso


    And we all have 1 hour to select a number or the whole forum is deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7 silvergal


    1-10 sounds good

    Tis simple

    I like simple ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,201 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    Well.... that confirms it!

    1 - 10 rating will now be the standard system in polls from now on!

    Thanks for voting all!


Advertisement