Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Differential Notation

  • 23-09-2005 10:50am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭


    I understand this formula perfectly:
    [U]f(x+h) - f(x)[/U]
          h
    

    I get why it gives the tangent of the line etc etc etc.

    But I can't seem to figure out why things are written in the form df/dx, and why those things can be treated like fractions. I got by with this in the leaving no problem (involved learning a little bit off) but now in college they're throwing these things all over the shop and it's a little hard to follow.

    Can anyone explain this please?


Comments

  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 10,501 Mod ✭✭✭✭ecksor


    A search for "Leibniz notation" might get you some more information.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7 danmcn


    the first expression you mention is Newton's notation.
    the df/dx expression is part of Leibniz's notation for calculus.
    They are exactly equivalent.

    the idea is that df and dx are infinitesimally small "elements".
    Suppose we take f(t) is a function of time, then dt is a infinitesimally small element of time and df is an infinitesimally small element of the function, then it stands to reason that df/dt is an infinitesimally small element of the CHANGE of the function wrt time.

    important to note that df and dt are generally not invariant, they are functions too.
    eg df(t)=t.dt
    =>df/dt=t

    its probably hard to grasp from this little note, but look up "Leibniz notation" as ecksor said, or even "differentials" in a book or on the net.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭nobodythere


    Ah I see... So it's kinda the same formula in a different way. I totally get it now... Thanks very much


Advertisement