should i be worried, need MAP?

LegacyUser · 22-09-2005 5:23pm #1

was just with this guy last night, he stayed the night and while we didn't have sex we were messing around for the night, both naked and so lots of contact. he did get carried away a few times and kept trying to have sex but I didnt want to, and besides we had no condom so i kept saying no (but there wld have been alot of genital contact, without sex) I didn't think anything of it at the time cos he didnt come or anything so i didnt think there was any problem. from a female point of view this is the worst time of the month for me to be messing around (alcohol made me forget that at the time), but i wasnt worried until my friend said this morning that maybe i should be ... i mean what are the chances of any accident in this kinda situation? should i still be worried? i really dont know if i can face going to a GP, i heard so many stories of ppl getting moral lectures etc ... i didnt think not sleeping with him was irresponsible, and dont feel like getting told off for having some fun??

advice pls - only have a day or two to figure this out

Boston · 22-09-2005 5:30pm

Even if I believe a doctor would tell you off, (which btw is BS), when the choice is a lecture or getting pregnant, there is no choice.

btw, Pre-Cum is more potent then the regular stuff.

Bluebells · 22-09-2005 5:54pm

Some doctors judge you and give lectures. At the end of the day if there was ANY chance you could have become pregnant or have an std (which you could since there was sexual contact) for the love of god go to the doctor. For the sake of an uncomfortable chat you could save yourself a lot of trouble in case anything did happen. If you dont really know the guy get screened for std's.

The suffolk street surgery (its a well women clinic aswell) was great for me and they dont judge or lecture, 40euro for student visit.

snorlax · 22-09-2005 6:10pm

if your in college you can get the morning after pill for 10euro in your student health centre, an it's definetly worth it if it puts your mind at rest.

Nevyn · 22-09-2005 7:17pm

Go to your Dr.

seamus · 22-09-2005 7:20pm

LiouVille wrote:

btw, Pre-Cum is more potent then the regular stuff.

No it's not.

TerrorFirmer · 22-09-2005 7:23pm

seamus wrote:

No it's not.

Interesting. I would have assumed if anything it'd be a watered down version so to speak. Anyone shed any definative light on the status of "pre-cum"?

Nevyn · 22-09-2005 8:09pm

It does contain some sperm; who swim like little buggers,
can live inside a female for 72 hour waiting to get to an egg and cause conception and it only takes one of them.

Go to the Gp and find out and get the MAP.

dudara · 22-09-2005 8:39pm

The odds are against you getting pregnant, when compared to full intercourse, but it can still happen, as any ejaculate that escapes from the penis will contain sperm.

Get yourself to a doctor asap, and request the MAP. You only have 2 day window (open to correction on this one) to get the MAP after unprotected sex

D-Generate · 22-09-2005 9:15pm

Bang
Study on pre-cum

Nevyn · 22-09-2005 11:22pm

was that most pre ejaculate samples did not contain any sperm

If these results are confirmed, they may dispel the myth

Proof that just about anything id provible via links on the internet.
Do not risk it, really go to the dr now rather then later better the MAP
then an abortion or a commitment to a child for at least the next 18 years
if you are not ready.

should i be worried, need MAP?

Comments