Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Beginner

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,645 ✭✭✭Shrimp


    the first one doesn't have enough contrast


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭PurpleFistMixer


    Contrast in the first one looks fine to me. Nice tones in that picture. It looks kind of like the banky bit in the right corner was just a protrustion into the shot, though. Perhaps if it extended across the entire bottom if only a little, it'd look more like a framing element as opposed to a corner thingamabob.

    Second one's nice too, I like the way the further trees are in darkness. Gives it a good feeling of depth. Problem I find with photographing trees in a forest though, is that if you're photographing them head on (as would be usual, since that's how you see trees normally) you end up cutting out the top or the bottom of the tree, which can make the trees look like they're floating in space, not connected to the ground anywhere. I have yet to come up with a way to photograph trees head on and not face this problem, so I usually just go for the arty pretentious angles instead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 299 ✭✭Alqua


    Problem I find with photographing trees in a forest though, is that if you're photographing them head on (as would be usual, since that's how you see trees normally) you end up cutting out the top or the bottom of the tree, which can make the trees look like they're floating in space, not connected to the ground anywhere.
    I see what you mean, but I suppose we could just... take pictures of tiny trees and sort the problem. :p

    Those were just two of a load of random photos I took one day in February.
    The first one was a complete accident, as I didn't mean to have the flash off!
    I couldn't get the bank to come accross any further though, because I was sitting out on a jetty and if I tried to get in more of the bank I'd have taken the jetty.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 472 ✭✭Metacortex


    The first one is nice but it is very flat and needs a better level of contrast.
    Also,its taken at a bad angle. Those weeds (?) are very distracting and my eye keeps getting drawn to them instead of what is past the weeds.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,726 ✭✭✭gerryk


    From a compositional point of view, the first one is a little boring... try cropping off the right most quarter and the bottom quarter. I like the tones though.

    I like almost everything about the second... good depth, nice colouring. It could be improved upon by 1. shooting from a different angle to add more interesting shadows, and 2. by shooting from a lower viewpoint to make the trees seem taller and more imposing.

    You'd swear I was more than the amateur I am from how critical I am :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 299 ✭✭Alqua


    Don't worry about being critical, all comments help! ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,726 ✭✭✭gerryk


    I should have added a final point... keep snapping :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 299 ✭✭Alqua


    Thank you, I certainly will.


Advertisement