Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Poll Puts Rainbow Ahead

  • 10-06-2005 8:53pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭


    RTE just carried the results of an MRBI poll carried out last week on the state of the parties. FF have slipped by 6%, FG are at their best result in 5 years, Labour, the PD's and SF are all up, Greens no change and the Independents down 3%.

    This gives the potential coalitions...
    FF\PD 36%
    FG\Lab 39%
    FG\Lab\Greens 43%

    I think the parties were as follows
    FF 32% -6
    FG 25% +3
    Lab 14% +2
    SF 11% +2
    PD 4% +2
    Greens 4% -
    Ind 9% -3

    It would seem the people approve of the Labour decision to enter a pre-election pact. It's a long to the election - but good news for the next government.

    Also - given the PD's and the Greens are neck and neck perhaps we might have some different colours in a potential rainbow.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 66 ✭✭CaptainPeacock


    It seems it was a good decision to eliminate FF from a Labour pre-election pact, but I thought it was obvious. They need to convince marginal Labour people not to vote for FF at all. If there was any chance of a FF/Labour coalition then people would continue to vote for FF or give them second choices and FF/PDs would be back in 2007. And where would that leave us? FF/PDs back in government for a third term to disagree on everything for another 5 years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,044 ✭✭✭Andrew 83


    If those percentages were the seat outcome in the election it'd be interesting to see whether Sinn Féin and FF could come to some sort of an agreement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,608 ✭✭✭✭sceptre


    Andrew 83 wrote:
    If those percentages were the seat outcome in the election it'd be interesting to see whether Sinn Féin and FF could come to some sort of an agreement.
    I don't want this to turn into another one of those Sinn Fein threads (not your fault, it's a perfectly good question to ask) but I reckon FF would happily sign a pact with the devil's daughter for all our souls if it kept their clammy hands on ministerial seals and cars for another five years. Coming to an agreement with any TD or group of TDs in the Dail wouldn't bother them in the slightest. Regardless of the noises coming from backbenchers and in particular our four-day week Foreign Affairs minister. Let's not forget that in the last election, Michael McDowell managed to compare Bertie Ahern to an Eastern European dictator who knocked down a big section of his historic capital to build a massive building effectively as a monument to his will, consorted with Arab terrorists, spied on American industry, sent half his country into starvation by exporting much of the countries food and condemned many of his countries unwanted children to a hellish childhood in rundown state run orphanages where the government-sanctioned sharing of transfucion needles pushed the country into second place in Europe for childhood HIV infections. And they still entered a coalition with each other, regarding the election campaign bile as merely that, and happily gave McDowell one of the plum jobs which he happily accepted.

    Make no bones about it - while Ahern and FF may not like certain parties in the Dail (the cynic would say all but their own) and they may fear losing votes to these parties they're not above horse-trading with anyone or anything to remain in power.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭Nuttzz


    still enough for a FF/PD/Ind government there, the shinners will spend another dail in the wilderness


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    sceptre wrote:
    while Ahern and FF may not like certain parties in the Dail (the cynic would say all but their own) and they may fear losing votes to these parties they're not above horse-trading with anyone or anything to remain in power.

    But all parties will horse trade.

    Labour hitching their wagon to FG has left a door open for SF on the left.

    I would like to see a stable government and not one held together by self serving independents playing parish punp politics.

    They won't be an election for 2 yaers so there is a lot to play for on the part of everybody concerned.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,644 ✭✭✭✭nesf


    sceptre wrote:
    but I reckon FF would happily sign a pact with the devil's daughter for all our souls if it kept their clammy hands on ministerial seals and cars for another five years.

    I'd extend that to cover most political parties in Ireland. Politics is all about winning after all...

    Then again, maybe I'm a cynic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,452 ✭✭✭Time Magazine


    Cork wrote:
    They won't be an election for 2 yaers so there is a lot to play for on the part of everybody concerned.
    Don't be so sure. Could be a very wise move in Bertie's eyes if he tried to pull a general in a year. In fact, imagine if he called it now, FF/PD's could well squeeze it - and that's before the SSIA's etc come in.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 25 Gemsbok15


    I think its likely that Fianna Fail will call an election when the first of the SSIAs come into play next year as they are starting to run out of steam if the North stabilises don't be surprised if FF consider SF as bed partners its not inconceivable nor is a cosying up to Labour, regardless of pre election pacts the way things look at the moment the rainbow still ain't got enough to form a govt


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,615 ✭✭✭NewDubliner


    The longer Bertie waits the more likely that yet another scandal will surface.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭Nuttzz


    Gemsbok15 wrote:
    I if the North stabilises don't be surprised if FF consider SF as bed partners its not inconceivable

    thats a rather big if, la-la land wont settle for quite sometime, so no government for the shinners just yet.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,895 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    if the North stabilises don't be surprised if FF consider SF as bed partners its not inconceivable nor is a cosying up to Labour

    No matter how embarrassing it might be for a TD to drunkenly mow down a member of the electorate, it is nothing compared to the sort of havoc/humiliation going into government with SFIRA can bring. Imagine the FF Justice minister pronouncing about combatting serious armed robberies, money laundering and gangland executions and then finding out his coalition partners are commiting them?

    A government like that has the life expectancy of choclate cake in a fat farm.

    I reckon Bertie will wait till the SSIAs hit, when people are feeling wealthy, and then hell remind them why theyre feeling wealthy - Fianna Fail. FF and the PDs have already fallen out of love, so if Bertie gets enough seats hell dump the PDs and maybe swing a deal with the idealogically bankrupt independants. Who knows, maybe even the Greens can be persuaded to come on board if they get some enviromental concessions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,488 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Could be a very wise move in Bertie's eyes if he tried to pull a general in a year.
    I dunno about that. Tens of thousands of public servants and their familes in the greater Dublin area will be voting ABFF because of the decentralisation fiasco - the longer they wait to call the election, and the more the plan gets scaled back, the less this problem will be. FF are trying to stick Parlon with the blame for this mess but it'll hurt FF far more than the PDs.

    In Cavan there was a great fire / Judge McCarthy was sent to inquire / It would be a shame / If the nuns were to blame / So it had to be caused by a wire.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    ninja900 wrote:
    I dunno about that. Tens of thousands of public servants and their familes in the greater Dublin area will be voting ABFF because of the decentralisation fiasco

    After pocketing big wage increases in wages (compared to the private sector) due to benchmarking in return questionable returns for efficiencies - I'd say they won't be fleeing from FF.


    The SSIAs are going to be a big factor. It will be interesting to see if Brian Cowen will come up with another type of savings or pensions account.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,042 ✭✭✭Metrobest


    I see FF/PDs in power for the next seven years as they win the next election handsomely. Come the next election, people are going to ask themselves: "Am I better off now than I was five years ago?" The answer will be a resounding "yes" as the SSIA money is splurged with gusto and Mary Harney's reforms start to pick up speed.

    People are not ready to trust Fine Gael and the Labour Party in power. Fine Gael needs to ditch its rural baggage (that includes Enda Kenny!) and Labour needs to give up its socialist pretensions. The Greens need to get smart about Europe and realise that motorways do win votes in marginal constituencies. The PDs need to keep plugging away with their reforms as they will be rewarded with votes in Leinster constituencies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,577 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Cork wrote:
    stable government
    Stable: Resistant to change of position or condition; not easily moved or disturbed
    Cork wrote:
    ...horse trade ....

    ...hitching their wagon ....

    .... stable government ......


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 66 ✭✭CaptainPeacock


    Metrobest wrote:
    I see FF/PDs in power for the next seven years as they win the next election handsomely. Come the next election, people are going to ask themselves: "Am I better off now than I was five years ago?" The answer will be a resounding "yes"
    Would those people be the new "working poor" we hear about?
    as the SSIA money is splurged with gusto and Mary Harney's reforms start to pick up speed.
    What reforms?
    People are not ready to trust Fine Gael and the Labour Party in power. Fine Gael needs to ditch its rural baggage (that includes Enda Kenny!) and Labour needs to give up its socialist pretensions.
    Bertie Ahern, leader of Fianna Fáil: "I am a socialist."
    The Greens need to get smart about Europe
    Europe is dead. See: EU Constitution.
    and realise that motorways do win votes in marginal constituencies.
    Yes, they'll win you votes if you're campaigning against motorways. People are wise to that motorway madness now, and they know it's not working. See: Centralisation, Commuter Hell, M3.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    Victor wrote:
    Stable: Resistant to change of position or condition; not easily moved or disturbed

    There is nothing wrong with stable government.
    People are wise to that motorway madness now.

    Judging by car sales and house prices around commuter distance from Dublin - I think this is not the case.

    FG and Labour have yet to come up with policies. It will be interesting to see their vision.

    It does seem to be taking them a while. How many months since the Mullingar Accord?

    Maybe they'll wait before the campaign kicks off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,007 ✭✭✭Moriarty


    Europe is dead.

    hehehehehehehe


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,615 ✭✭✭NewDubliner


    Cork wrote:
    After pocketing big wage increases in wages (compared to the private sector) due to benchmarking in return questionable returns for efficiencies - I'd say they won't be fleeing from FF.
    The increases have been mostly forgotten and clawed back in taxes. The coalition's insults to the public service will not be so easily forgotten by the staff or their families. While FGLAB could do equal damage, they will have the advantage of being able to throw out the unworkable bits of FFPD decentralisation scheme without losing face.

    A double whammy will come from the many towns who've been misled into thinking that they would somehow benefit from the scheme. Just wait until they find out that there will be no new jobs (unless you're a cleaner) and no new houses will be needed because the majority of the staff are just changing their commutes.

    It's just a matter of time before the FF ministers realise that Parlon got the easy job of buying 'property solutions' while they get to grapple with filling the empty buildings and massive recruitment & re-training bills.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 66 ✭✭CaptainPeacock


    Cork wrote:
    Judging by car sales and house prices around commuter distance from Dublin - I think this is not the case.
    The people concerned would like to

    a) live near the centre of Dublin but can't because it's too expensive, or

    b) live in a different part of the country but can't because all the jobs and development are Dublin-centred.

    Just because they engage in centralisation and motorway madness, doesn't mean they like those things or would vote for them. They become commuters because it's their only way to live and work. You're not telling me that people's ideal is spending 4-5 hours a day in their car, in stop-start traffic? Do you think those people like motorways?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭bonkey


    You're not telling me that people's ideal is spending 4-5 hours a day in their car, in stop-start traffic? Do you think those people like motorways?

    Yes, they do like motorways.

    People choose to live in areas with better transit capability because...it has better transit capability. They can get where they're going faster.

    Motorways are not the solution to Dublin's traffic problems, but while they remain the only game in town, people can choose to remain with what they have, or be offered potentially shorter commute times due to improved roads.

    It certainly is a no brainer: These peoples' ideal most certainly is not to sit in traffic for 4-5 hours a day, so when someone comes along and promises to cut an hour off that with a motorway (whether accurate or not), you can be damn sure they're tempted, because 3-4 hours is a damn sight preferable to 4-5 hours, even if neither is ideal.

    jc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,488 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Cork wrote:
    After pocketing big wage increases in wages (compared to the private sector) due to benchmarking
    Hold on a sec.
    Just because we've all read that countless times in the Indo doesn't make it true.
    Most (by no means all) private sector workers enjoyed large pay rises in the late 90's boom, while at that time most (but by no means all) public sector workers were tied into 1.5% a year under the national agreement - less than inflation.
    Five years later, part of this loss is being made good - not backdated - yet the media continue the whinging, it suits their agenda.
    Hey if you think the public service is so well paid, why not join it? Parlon thinks Revenue can recruit IT graduates for €28k gross (the executive officer starting salary) to replace all of the Dublin IT staff who are being relieved of their positions. He's in f*cking dreamland.

    In Cavan there was a great fire / Judge McCarthy was sent to inquire / It would be a shame / If the nuns were to blame / So it had to be caused by a wire.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,882 ✭✭✭Mighty_Mouse


    It would be cool (if I had the motivation) to look at posts from a few years ago screaming about how SF will never ever ever be in government in the South.

    Ironic.

    Personally I reckon it;s innevitable. FF/SF government - both republican parties (apparantly FF are too), FF would rectify the image damage done by PD's right wing perception, SF would be in a powerful situation to assure British and Irish gov support in the north.

    I reckon it would be a good thing for the country/north


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,379 ✭✭✭toiletduck


    You've got to be joking. Anyways, I think the next government will be FF/PD and a few independents if necessary.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5 red-rover


    SF dont actually want to go inot government in the south until the election after 2007, it cramps their long term calender and timetable. however if on the off chance that FF made overtures it is unlikely that they would say no. its unlikely that will happen nor will they be disappointed
    Red Rover..the blog


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 66 ✭✭CaptainPeacock


    bonkey wrote:
    People choose to live in areas with better transit capability because...it has better transit capability. They can get where they're going faster.
    Or if they can't afford to live in Dublin city centre. So they move out and the roads get clogged up with the new arrivals all travelling to Dublin and we're back to square one. That's my point.
    Motorways are not the solution to Dublin's traffic problems, but while they remain the only game in town, people can choose to remain with what they have, or be offered potentially shorter commute times due to improved roads.
    Motorways between low and high centres of population do not decrease journey times, for the reason outlined above. The demand always increases to fill the remaining motorway space and equilibrium (5 hour round trip) is reached again.
    It certainly is a no brainer: These peoples' ideal most certainly is not to sit in traffic for 4-5 hours a day, so when someone comes along and promises to cut an hour off that with a motorway (whether accurate or not), you can be damn sure they're tempted, because 3-4 hours is a damn sight preferable to 4-5 hours, even if neither is ideal.

    jc
    I was giving people credit for a certain amount of intelligence when I said that they are getting wise to the motorway madness and the wider=faster falsehood of motorway building. They went through all this before in Britain, but we couldn't expect people to look across there to learn lessons.

    And besides, with FF/PDs motorways aren't built for commuters' sake; they're built for the benefit of those that build (and toll) motorways.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,443 ✭✭✭✭bonkey


    I was giving people credit for a certain amount of intelligence when I said that they are getting wise to the motorway madness and the wider=faster falsehood of motorway building.

    I'd say you're being too generous.

    Anecdotally, I know no shortage of people who have bought around Dublin based on where the latest motorway expansions were going. I hear no shortage of people saying "when the new road opens...."

    The problem is that they're kinda right - journey times will shorten. The problem is that its only a short-term shortening. The road will shorten the journey, which will cause more people to see that as a favourable route, more builders to choose to build along that route because its not filled to capacity, and you're back where you came from.

    But its still the only game in town and thats the problem. Given a choice of 4-5 hours, getting slowly worse, or 4-5 hours, dropping to 3-4 hours in a year's time, increasing back up from there....its still a net win, so its still a no-brainer.

    jc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    red-rover wrote:
    it cramps their long term calender and timetable]

    SF has long term plans all the way to Irish Unity? right.

    First, the Shinners have to get rid of the IRA and become a 100% constitutional democratic party.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,895 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    It would be cool (if I had the motivation) to look at posts from a few years ago screaming about how SF will never ever ever be in government in the South.

    Ironic.

    Well, maybe you could help us out by pointing out where SFIRA is being credibly touted as a serious prospect for a FF led coalition? The Daily Provo? An Phoblacht? The IRB?

    They *still* havent gone away you know.
    I reckon it would be a good thing for the country/north

    It would in a way - the fall out from the scandals would finally electorally annialate an aging Fianna Fail support base, and call SFIRAs bluff demonstrating that theyve nothing but bigoted ultra-nationalist rhetoric and marxist textbooks for a manifesto.
    The people concerned would like to

    a) live near the centre of Dublin but can't because it's too expensive, or

    b) live in a different part of the country but can't because all the jobs and development are Dublin-centred.

    Its a either or equation that the government cant do much about really, beyond Khmer Rouge style intervention regardless of whose in power.

    a)You can have a 20 minute walk to your Dublin job if you want it.

    b)You can have a nice house at less than Dublin prices if you want it.

    You cant have both because quite simply a lot of other people want the same thing and are willing to pay for it . I want the 20 minute walk to work so I bought a place in the city center. You might want the 4 bedroom house with backgarden and all for the family. I pay the high prices, you get the 4-5 hour drive. Ill struggle on somehow, youll have to as well. If youre really sick of the 4-5 hour drive, then sell up and buy a place closer to your job.

    Simple economic forces arent going to turn around at the mere sight of the mighty Rainbow alliance.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 295 ✭✭cal29


    Sand wrote:
    d


    Its a either or equation that the government cant do much about really, beyond Khmer Rouge style intervention regardless of whose in power.

    a)You can have a 20 minute walk to your Dublin job if you want it.

    b)You can have a nice house at less than Dublin prices if you want it.

    You cant have both because quite simply a lot of other people want the same thing and are willing to pay for it . I want the 20 minute walk to work so I bought a place in the city center. You might want the 4 bedroom house with backgarden and all for the family. I pay the high prices, you get the 4-5 hour drive. Ill struggle on somehow, youll have to as well. If youre really sick of the 4-5 hour drive, then sell up and buy a place closer to your job.

    Simple economic forces arent going to turn around at the mere sight of the mighty Rainbow alliance.


    There are Loads of things that could be done

    including improving public transport
    facilitating industries to set up or move out side of dublin
    freeing up developement land around Dublin

    why should it be a 4 or 5 hour drive and not a 45 / 60 minute train journey for example

    why not move the jobs out to where people are living than have the uneconomical option of having thousands of people forcing there way into Dublin

    And why are we building commuter homes 100 miles from the city when there is vast tracts of suitable land much closer to the city

    all of these things could be done by any Government and would improve people lives


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 82 ✭✭hill16


    I think its great Sinn Fein support is up,cause it will piss off the middle class indo reading West Brits, many of who post on this board. :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,034 ✭✭✭Rock Climber


    hill16 wrote:
    I think its great Sinn Fein support is up,cause it will piss off the middle class indo reading West Brits, many of who post on this board. :D

    Really?

    Sinn Féin support is not up, it's just back to where it was prior to the McCartney scandal and the northern bank robbery.

    That can be read as meaning a fifth of Sinn Féin voters only had a soft distaste for the carry on with regard to the McCartney Murder etc and werent really upset by it at all.
    Whereas 80% of their supporters couldn't in reality give a fiddlers when asked anonymously.

    Meanwhile the rest of the electorate, 89% of them to be precise are with the other parties in the Dáil in a genuine enough disgust of what happened and ongoing criminality not to make the move to Sinn Féin.
    That would be the only logical conclusion with respect to Sinn Féin that one could draw from the poll.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Off topic posts have been either moved to the decentalisation thread or sent to the recycle bin as appropriate.

    Now keep this on topic please, if you want to talk about decentralisation, theres already a thread open on that so keep that there thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    Jesus SF back to 11% already, I'm a bit surprised tbh after all the bashing they got over the McCartney murder and the Bank robbery. Now it will be interesting to see what they rise to, I think 14%-16% before the next election is possible especially if Adams can deliever total decommisioning.

    As for FF going into government with SF, I don't think that will happen, not because I don't think FF would go for it, I mean if they needed a few TD's to hold onto Power Bertie would take anybody, but I don't think SF would go for it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    irish1 wrote:
    I mean if they needed a few TD's to hold onto Power Bertie would take anybody, but I don't think SF would go for it.

    There is a difference going into government with the support with of people like Milred Fox and parties like SF.

    I think after the murder of Gerry McCabe entering government with SF would be the death knell for FF.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,049 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    irish1 wrote:
    ....I think 14%-16% before the next election is possible especially if Adams can deliever total decommisioning.
    But SF and the IRA are seperate entities, no? :rolleyes:

    I'm actually not in slightest bit surprise that extremists like SF are gaining ground. The bland mix of FF/FG/PD/LAB do little to inspire.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    murphaph wrote:
    The bland mix of FF/FG/PD/LAB do little to inspire.

    I agree - All the talk is on FG/Labour - but where are the policies?

    Opposition partys don't seem to be putting anything out there for debate.

    Government needs to show us what they are actually doing about issues like heath reform.

    I feel that SF has absolutely nothing to offer the electorate but they will trieve on voter dis-illusionment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    murphaph wrote:
    But SF and the IRA are seperate entities, no? :rolleyes:

    Yes they certainly are but if you know anything about the peace process you will know that unless Adams can convince the IRA that a United Ireland can be achieved through decmocratic politics the IRA won't disarm and they certiainly won't disarm because Paisley or any other Unionists wants them to.

    Without SF the IRA will not go away and I think most people on this Island know that, like them or hate them without SF there is no peace process.

    *hope thats not too far off topic


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    In All Fairness...

    Regardless of what he may privately or publically think of them - how Ahern can argue against SF being in a coalition in the South and argue for their inclusion in the north is beyond me.
    Jesus SF back to 11% already, I'm a bit surprised tbh after all the bashing they got over the McCartney murder and the Bank robbery. Now it will be interesting to see what they rise to, I think 14%-16% before the next election is possible especially if Adams can deliever total decommisioning.
    That would be a monumental achievement that would have them surpassing Labours weakest electoral achievements.
    I would treat such high expectations with the same amount of salt tbh as I would staunch pro FF supporters or FG on their growth ie I'd be inclined to view them as the aspirational expectations of staunch supporters rather than the more measured analysis of people more independent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,049 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Earthman wrote:
    In All Fairness...

    Regardless of what he may privately or publically think of them - how Ahern can argue against SF being in a coalition in the South and argue for their inclusion in the north is beyond me.
    I agree. Ahern as no right telling the northerners that they must accept SF's mandate without also accepting their mandate down here. I hate SFIRA and I'd be well pi$$ed off with Ahern telling me that I had to accept SFIRA!!! Arrgghh he's a twat.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,577 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    Earthman wrote:
    Regardless of what he may privately or publically think of them - how Ahern can argue against SF being in a coalition in the South and argue for their inclusion in the north is beyond me.
    Actually in a roundabout way, "thats politics".


Advertisement