Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Nokia 6230 or Nokia 7260

  • 08-06-2005 8:55pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,723 ✭✭✭


    Well lads yer the ones in the know so which phone is the better option for me as a upgrade as both are available to me?

    HELP!!!


    KIND REGARDS KIERAN


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭Fabritzo


    6230 is better. The 7260 is cooler, it's main downfall looks to be that it hasn't an inbuilt mp3 player, but I think it's a series 60 nokia, that means one can be got for it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,244 ✭✭✭drdre


    i would really recommend the 6230(6230i)it is much better than the 7260. i have used the 6230 for ages and its amazing and practical.

    give it a try to believe it:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,723 ✭✭✭kmb


    The 6230 seems very dark whereas the 7260 is vibrant colours though lacking in facilities.

    Really not sure.....Thinking hard,need to do upgrade today,hopefully.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭wolfman


    The 7260 is not as "mainstream" as the 6230 and will not hold its value like the 6230 does, but if you are not planning on changing it soon, that won't be an issue
    The other thing is, the 7260 is actually just a Series 40 phone like the 6230 also. It is not a series 60, so you will not be able to get Symbian apps for it.

    The 7260 still only has a 128 * 128 screen and underneath the fancy cover, its a Nokia 3220, but with FM radio added.

    Also, it does not have the sync functionality that the 6230 has and memory is very small allowing very limited additions to the phone, whereas the 6230 has more on-board memory and also has the mmc card slot, which allows you to use up to 1GB memory cards for MP3's etc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,630 ✭✭✭Blaster99


    The 7260 is more expensive than the 6230 and has a lot less features. The 7260 looks nice, that's what you're paying for.

    The 6230 is Series 40 DP2 whereas the 7260 is Series 40 DP1. There are some notable differences, particularly in performance.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,553 ✭✭✭wolfman


    They are both actually Series 40 Version 2 and both are Java Midp 2.0


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,723 ✭✭✭kmb


    So looks aside,the 6230 is electronically better with more gadgets on it?

    maybe i should go this way so.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,630 ✭✭✭Blaster99


    Yes, the 6230 is better. Another thing that may or may not affect you, is that you can't get a car kit for the 7260. Or rather, you can't get a cradle for it. The 6230 has bluetooth which means that it's easy to get a car kit and you can actually get stuff on and off the phone (like photos and MP3's) without having to pay for a very expensive USB cable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,723 ✭✭✭kmb


    Thanks for the advice guys,got the 6230 this evening and am delighted with it.


    kind regards kieran


Advertisement