sexless or blindness??

BEAT

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8004291/

nothing has been proven yet but wow.

If you had a choice, you could have sex again but be blind,
or never have sex again and keep your vision...
what would you choose?

LadyJ

I picked blindness tbh but jesus,tough call!
I reckon I could still have fun without sight but not without sex.

danniemcq

hmmm i'm gonna have to go with my sight

ShiverinEskimo

Sight - totally. At least then I can see a fit chick and at least imagine what i'd do to her - (I just summed up the last 9 months of college life in one sentence)

We had a similar conversation ourselves in college - would you rather be born blind, or go blind at the age of 20 (we picked 20 because we needed a cut off point - by then you pretty much have seen a lot)

I went with losing me sight at 20 because then at least people can describe things to me and i will know what they mean when they say blonde, blue eyes, etc etc..

Only Human

If you were blind looks wouldn't be an issue at all.

Dr. Loon

Blind. You can touch, feel etc. Kind of like the question deaf or blind? Again I'd go blind as if I was deaf I wouldn't be able to hear music, which is very important to me.

LadyJ

But think about it,if you were blind then you'd have more options! You wouldn't be concerned about looks as much so you'd be far less shallow and still be able to have sex.

ShiverinEskimo

nah, i reckon a lot of sex is looking at someone and wanting them so bad - lingerie, what they are wearing, how they look during the action, nah, it just wouldn't be the same.

LadyJ

ShiverinEskimo wrote:

nah, i reckon a lot of sex is looking at someone and wanting them so bad - lingerie, what they are wearing, how they look during the action, nah, it just wouldn't be the same.

But it wouldn't matter because the choice was either blind sex or no sex at all!

Blisterman

I choose blind, because I see every day.

segadreamcast

That story's funny because of the old wives tale that went around many years ago to the tune of "if you masturbate too much, you'll go blind". It seems as though they were right after all.

I'd rather be sexless than blind - there's so much more to the world than carnal cravings tbh.

Blisterman

Did you actually read the artical?
Viagra makes you blind, not sex. I didnt read it before my last post.

segadreamcast

Blisterman wrote:

Did you actually read the artical?
Viagra makes you blind, not sex. I didnt read it before my last post.

Yeah I gathered it from the headline...

The primary use for viagra is sex, isn't it?

angeldelight

Definitely sight! It'd be awful to be blind. No sex? meh

monkeyfudge

NoelRock wrote:

The primary use for viagra is sex, isn't it?

Really? ****! I've been taking it to clear up a head cold... no wonder I was having trouble fitting into my underpants...

segadreamcast

monkeyfudge wrote:

no wonder I was having trouble fitting into my underpants...

Are you sure that isn't just because you ate too much of that 'dough from a polyethylene bag'?

BEAT

NoelRock wrote:

- there's so much more to the world than carnal cravings tbh.

You hit the nail on the head

mp3guy

Blindless, so the catholic church was right...

DublinWriter

Jesus wept, are you all on monkey glands and rushed rhino horn?

Give me my sight, anyday.

ShiverinEskimo

DublinWriter wrote:

Jesus wept, are you all on monkey glands and rushed rhino horn?

Give me my sight, anyday.

Poetic and right. Fantastic.

billy the squid

NoelRock wrote:

That story's funny because of the old wives tale that went around many years ago to the tune of "if you masturbate too much, you'll go blind". It seems as though they were right after all.

I'd rather be sexless than blind - there's so much more to the world than carnal cravings tbh.

There is a miniscule amount of truth to that old wives tale. shaking due to mastaurbation could cause retinal detatchment.

nah, i reckon a lot of sex is looking at someone and wanting them so bad - lingerie, what they are wearing, how they look during the action, nah, it just wouldn't be the same.

ah but without vision you dont care if your target is pug ugly, as long as he/she is putting out. thus increasing both your choice and your chance of getting some. you are forsed to look for "the beauty within" girls like all that ****. and get narky if they think your only after the legover.

I chose blindness.

and then they go and put this image on the page that the story is on
http://m3.doubleclick.net/viewad/844751/8-stat_300x250_bgShape2.gif

smorton

id defo have to go with my sight. its not like i get any anyway so ive lost nothing

daRobot

Give me my sight anyday.

ferdi

ShiverinEskimo wrote:

Sight - totally. At least then I can see a fit chick and at least imagine what i'd do to her - (I just summed up the last 9 months of college life in one sentence)

agreed.

i feel your pain man.

Sarky

Sex.

With the lights off.

Best of both worlds.

jesus_thats_gre

How the **** could you choose to be blind over having no sex.. I hope my dad strikes ye all down!!

Shyster

lol i hate these debates about choosing to be blind or something else....if any of you wear contacts/glasses you know how bloody annoying it is not being able to see something, never mind not being able to see anything. sexless anyday.....course it depends do you mean ANY sexual act?!