What Do U Want To See More?

User45701

What Do U Want To See More?

SGA Season 2 Episode 1
SG1 Season 9 Episdoe 1

SGA Had the clif hanger but as i said in that other thread SG1 is SG1

User45701

SGA Season 2 Episode 1

hey ixoy mr angry do u want to see season 2episode 1 because season 1 ended on a clif hanger or do u like SGA better?

ixoy

User45701 wrote:

hey ixoy mr angry do u want to see season 2episode 1 because season 1 ended on a clif hanger or do u like SGA better?

The cliff-hanger for myself. SG1 wrapped itself up neatly enough, so that it doesn't demand an immediate resolution whereas SGA does. I'm quite interested though in the changes coming to SG1, so as a season I'm looking forward to it as much as SGA, just not its first episode.

senordingdong

Actually the 'first' episode of Sg-1 will be a three parter'.

Personally, I think some of the ideas for season 9 are bad ones, I think they should use this season to tie up all the loose ends with the otehr races now that al-l the bad guys are dead.
i.e. the ree'tu, the re'ole (sp?) tok'ra and especially the aschen.

senordingdong

Then the SGC can go public in the middle and the second half can be about the implications of this....or at least a few episodes.

ixoy

Umm but they dealt with the possibilites of going public in S8's "Covenant" and touched on it a number of times elsewhere. I doubt we'll see the SGC going public as a result.

I would really like them to tie off a number of the other arcs alright, not least some of those mockingly touched upon in "Citizen Joe". Going through S2/S3 currently, I defintely think the Re'tou are something that should be returned to and not just Niirti's Re'tou tech. These were meant to be a serious threat but for some unfathomable reason, they've not been touched. One possibility I can think of - and maybe someone can back me up on it - is that the episode where they were introduced "Show and Tell" was written by Jonathan Glassner, who has departed the franchise. I imagine he has creative control over their use and maybe he's forbidding them being reused in the show, in much the same way as, for example, the Terry Nation estate stalwarted the use of the Daleks because they had control over them, and not the BBC. Just a theory.

There's also the Achen, as you say, to be covered. Wouldn't mind seeing those damned Furlings too rather than a new race. Would like to see Aris Boch's fate (for a one-off) and see if Jack left behind a kid in "100 Days". Would prefer to see the NID/Covenant type storylines finished off (it looks like they are). Not too sure if SG1 or SGA should cover more history of the Ancients.

Not too sure how I feel about a new threat. I've vague notions of what it's about but trying to remain spoiler free. Will still be greatly looking forward to the triple-whammy of great programming coming to Sci-Fi Friday soonish...

senordingdong

I mean going public properly, liek they intended to do in Lost City, not the crap they came out with in Covenant.

I think your explanation of the Re'tou thing is the most logical.

I read a spoiler about the Aschen arc, I think they said it was supposed to be cleared up in season 8 but alas...
Also, I don't think we'll ever get to see the Furlings, perhaps somethgin of an 'in-joke' amongst the writers?....or mayeb the perosn who thought them up left.

Come to think of it, there are a million and one loose ends that haven't been tied up, the young Jack clone being another one, I guess we have a 10thseason in the bag!

The new threat isn't so much a let down/disapointment in itself, as much as it is dissapointing that they are not tieing up the loose ends...how can I explain it without ruining it?......let's see.
The Stargate programme was set up to try defend against the Goa'uld, then we met the replicators who were worse etc....
Then we were supposed to find the key to defeating them both in Atlantis (which is a differnet kettle of fish altogether) but instead it was found in our galaxy, and both of these un-beatably tough bad guys got wiped out in two episodes.

Now, all of a sudden, this new super enemy, who as the writers say would wipe the floor with the Goa'uld and Replicators, appears out of nowhere, with no mention previously etc...
That's why I think it's a bad idea as opposed to tieing the loose ends.

Like introducing a new charcter to the SG-1 team instead of using a character that's already in the show.

ixoy

senordingdong wrote:

Come to think of it, there are a million and one loose ends that haven't been tied up, the young Jack clone being another one

They did want to revisit this one. AFAIK they wanted Young Jack for "It's Good To Be King" but the problem is that Michael Welch, who plays him, is fully committed to the show "Joan of Arcadia", which he signed up for. So it's going to be problematic getting him in for an SG1 episode.

mr_angry

I have to admit that I'm looking forward to SG:A much more because of the cliff-hanger. We all know that barring a major contractual dispute, there's no way Shepard is gonna hit that hive ship!

And we'll get to see the Deadalus (sp?) at last. I still consider SG-1 the better show, but the way the series ended didn't leave me with the same sense of anticipation as the ending of Atlantis.

Seed

SGA Season 2 Episode 1

I like both. They've both got a charm to them. But I'd probably have to go with SG1.

What I'd actually like to see more of is..Ya know the episode where Apophis made Teal'c betray SG1 and he subsequently had all those flashbacks? Well, more Jaffa stories like that.

MrPinK

ixoy wrote:

Would prefer to see the NID/Covenant type storylines finished off (it looks like they are)

Never really liked the NID storylines, but I'm sure we'll see the return of Kinsey and the Trust somewhere along the line.

The big question is, will they have yet another episode of recylced clips? Both seasons 7 and 8 had one, will they go for three seasons in a row?

senordingdong

Wasn't Kinsey killed in season 8?

Damn right there'll be another clip show!

MrPinK

He was last seen taking one of the wrist devices that control the transporter from a dead Trust guy. When the other Trust guys come on to the bridge a few minutes later, just before the ship gets blow up, there's no sign of Kinsey.

ixoy

senordingdong wrote:

Wasn't Kinsey killed in season 8?

He merely appeared to die in "Full Alert". It's quite possible he escaped the ship he was on before it got blown up.

Damn right there'll be another clip show!

Hell yeah! SG1 has had clip shows from S1's "Politics", S2's "Out of Mind", S6's "Disclosure" and S8's "Citizen Joe". "Citizen Joe" showed it could be quite inventive too. We expect them nowadays, particularly with SGA eating into the budget a little.

MrPinK

ixoy wrote:

SG1 has had clip shows from S1's "Politics", S2's "Out of Mind", S6's "Disclosure" and S8's "Citizen Joe". "Citizen Joe" showed it could be quite inventive too.

Didn't think Disclosure was S6, that makes it three in a row already then. S7 had "Inauguration".

senordingdong

ixoy wrote:

He merely appeared to die in "Full Alert". It's quite possible he escaped the ship he was on before it got blown up.

Wasn't he host to a Goa'uld at that point....I thought it was a bit of a Col.Simmons-esque fate.

User45701

SGA Season 2 Episode 1

one charactor i wanted to live was Kernel Sanders? iis that his name Q?
Q with a gouauld in his head i liked that

JohnK

I'd love to see more SG1 but if I could only choose one then it would be Atlantis. Its just fresher at the moment i think.

senordingdong

User45701 wrote:

one charactor i wanted to live was Kernel Sanders? iis that his name Q?
Q with a gouauld in his head i liked that

Eh....do you mean Colonel Simmons?
The bloke that was taken as a host and then blown out the cargo bayof the prometheus?

The bloke that played Q in Star Trek?

User45701

SGA Season 2 Episode 1

sanders simmons i was so very close but i had a feeling i had it wrong neway ye him he would hav emade a ogod long running charactor