Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Speeding Rant

  • 19-04-2005 1:26pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,513 ✭✭✭


    What is it with people who are too feckin dumb to be aware of the posted speed limits. Lately, every single time I drive at the limit I get some eejit driving 5 feet from my back bumper who would obviously go faster if I wasn't there. This happens in all speed limit zones but is most obvious in 50 and 60 km/h zones. Even in areas which are well known for speed traps and gatsos (eg N4 near Liffey Valley) probably 9/10 cars break the speed limit.

    I don't believe that these people are thinking
    "i know the speed limit is 60 km/h, I'll take a chance and do 80 km/h"
    I would prefer it if they were as at least it would show they are aware of what they're doing. I am guilty of this myself when overtaking. No excuses - if I'm caught by the Gardai i'll accept my punishment without question.

    But I reckon the majority of speeders are simply not concentrating on what they're doing and are completely oblivious to the speed limit. They never check their speedo and drive at whatever speed they feel "comfortable" at or whatever speed the car they're tailgating is travelling at :rolleyes: They'll do more or less the same speed no matter what the speed limit is, they'll dawdle along motorways and N roads at 80 km/h and will barely slow down at all for 50 km/h zones. They'll overtake you when you're doing 50 in a 50, then when you enter a 100 zone, you'll catch up with them as they dawdle along hogging the white line :mad:

    Then there are others who have somehow "misread" the signs. I have had people swear to me that the current limit on N roads and dual carriageways is 120 km/h.

    So much for "check the signs, check your speed" :rolleyes:

    BrianD3


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 782 ✭✭✭gibo_ie


    so let them... If there is only one lane, stick to your guns within the speed limit, they will have to back off, on the other hand if you are in the outside (the passing) lane; get out and let them past, it is up to people themselves and the Gardai to police speeds not you.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,148 ✭✭✭The General


    i just bump these sort of people off the roads and keep driving and i never get caught, you should try this


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,513 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    I'm not trying to enforce the speed limit and I never hog the overtaking lane on dual carriageways/m-ways. However it makes me MAD to get tailgated on a single carrigeway road just because the moron behind is too thick to notice and obey the posted limit.

    Just recently I was driving through some roadworks near Mullingar. Speed limit 60 km/h which I was exceeding slightly according to the speedo. That wasn't good enough for the tosser in the van behind who drove right up my arse and flashed me a few times. In the mirror, I could see him ready to explode in his cab. What did he expect me to do? Speed up? Drive into the cones to move out of his way? C*nts like that deserve a belt across the face with a wheelbrace.

    BrianD3


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,372 ✭✭✭The Bollox


    oh man, your rant cracked me up, its so true tho! and the sad fact is that the ppl who do that (speed when they are not supposed to all the time) are rarely caught, but the regular joe like you are me, if we do it once we have a feckin garda on our ass!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,787 ✭✭✭prospect


    A similar thing happened to my uncle years ago.
    He put on his hazards and slowed down gradually to a stop (between cones during road works).
    He got out of the car, nice and easy, closed the door, locked it (no zappers back then). Ambled past the asshole, to the third car which was behind the ass (only 3 cars on the road), apologised to that driver for the slight delay. Turned and walked back up to the ass, knocked on the window and politely asked, 'Is there a problem?' and believe it or not, the guy replies 'no' !!!!
    Frightened the be-jay-sus out of him :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,389 ✭✭✭✭Saruman


    Yes i drive at the speed limit as much as i can.. in some cases under. Since i got my current car which is a 1.6 Primera. However i was more likely to break it in my 1.2 clio!! Im just more comfortable. Yes i have had people up the arse but if you want to piss them off more you could (and i dont condone it) put your foot on the break and slow more.. they will hopefully piss themselves if they think they might hit you.. since its THEIR fault!! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 351 ✭✭declanoneill


    This reminds me of something that happened to me the other day, I was in a 50k zone and was doing about 40 because the car in front of me (who was a learner) was doing the same. There was enough space for about a car and a hlaf in front of me. Some fool in a colt comes up behind me going like a bat out of hell, swerves over to the other side of the road to get around me and goes into the gap between myself and the learner, waits for a car to pass in the opposite direction and swerves out again, floors it and forces a car on the other side of the road tight against the kerb to avoid hitting him. The colt then takes off at mach 10. Honestly does he really think it's worth it to save a few minutes?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,787 ✭✭✭prospect


    Saruman wrote:
    put your foot on the break and slow more.. they will hopefully piss themselves if they think they might hit you..

    Oh, that reminds me of a neat trick, only works during day time:
    When they are just about to climb into your boot, turn on your lights...
    This will turn on the back lights aswell, they will 'think' you hit the brakes and have a mild heart attack...
    I have done this once or twice, and at the same time accellerated. The combination of me speeding up, and them breaking opens up a big gap fairly quickly and they will get the message. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,471 ✭✭✭elexes


    break suddenly ..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,643 ✭✭✭magpie


    Unfortunately the speed limits do not reflect reasonable speeds / stopping distances of modern cars otherwise this would not be an issue.

    I usually turn on the hazards if anyone gets too close to me.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,513 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    I wouldn't be on for brake testing tailgaters, however turning on your lights might be a safe alternative. But what sort of an eejit can't tell the difference between brake lights and tail lights? Answer: a ****ing Irish driver!

    One thing I have found that seems to encourage them to pull back is to operate your windscreen washers. Because of the airflow over the car, much of the water will end up on the tailgater's windscreen giving him something to think about for a few seconds.

    BrianD3


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 473 ✭✭528i


    37mph? I think it's you that wants a welt of that wheelbrace, that's like complying with those laughable 15mph roadworks signs,.. should count yourself lucky you werent dragged outa that car beaten into a pulp by mr.white-van-man.

    Ps. anyone who deliberately holds up a line of more than 5-cars should be pucked senseless [male or female] and their car mashed into a 2ft cube by JCB's before being flung into the outreaches of space by a huge catapult.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,613 ✭✭✭Big Nelly


    Talking about spanner head....now I can say that sometimes I have been know to break the speed limit but was funny last week....

    Was heading down the N3 and there is this muppet in front of me in and old heap of s**t Fiesta...now years ago when my car was in garage I was driving one of a similiar model and I know they cant pass out for Sh*t.....anyway he was in front of me for a good few miles and every car he came across he was right up as close as possible half way across the white line trying to pass out....then everytime he passed out the traffic coming towards him had to pull in.....like after about 3-4 times cars flashing and beeping and he still didnt realise he was a clown and his car cant pass out for sh*t

    So I had enought.....passed him out just before a straight part in the rd(know the rd like back of my hand for my pains) so anyway he is right on my arse now in his little Fiesta.....so I let him come up really close and see there is a line of cars in other direction.....so I slow right down to 20-30 miles an hour and start waving at him out of the back window...he is losing the plot...so I see that he will be able to pass out and just hit the power(was in a 1.9Tdi) and off down the rd....poor wee Fiesta sitting there and 2-3 cars behind him fly by him.....funny as hell it was!!!

    Ahh young fellows! they will never learn!!! all I can remember was an LH reg! navy blue 94 or 96 Fiesta


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 370 ✭✭base2


    if 9/10 people in your own estimation are breaking it then your the dickhead. That 36mph limit is ****ing ridiculous. I'd drive right up your hole if I couldnt overtake you just to make sure you knew you were acting the dickhead.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 473 ✭✭528i


    So I had enought.....passed him out just before a straight part in the rd(know the rd like back of my hand for my pains) so anyway he is right on my arse now in his little Fiesta.....so I let him come up really close and see there is a line of cars in other direction.....so I slow right down to 20-30 miles an hour and start waving at him out of the back window...he is losing the plot...so I see that he will be able to pass out and just hit the power(was in a 1.9Tdi) and off down the rd....poor wee Fiesta sitting there and 2-3 cars behind him fly by him.....funny as hell it was!!!
    Thats pretty immature, what if it had been an emergency and he was taking his wife to hospital or something ?

    he'd probably need his lungs checked out following the pume of smoke from that Tdi aswell :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,423 ✭✭✭fletch


    BrianD3 wrote:
    One thing I have found that seems to encourage them to pull back is to operate your windscreen washers. Because of the airflow over the car, much of the water will end up on the tailgater's windscreen giving him something to think about for a few seconds.

    BrianD3
    Excellent idea.....thanks for that!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,423 ✭✭✭fletch


    528i wrote:
    Ps. anyone who deliberately holds up a line of more than 5-cars should be pucked senseless [male or female] and their car mashed into a 2ft cube by JCB's before being flung into the outreaches of space by a huge catapult.
    I agree strongly with this suggestion. For example there was a car on the M50 this morning sitting in the outside lane from Ballymount all the way past Tallaght. She passed about two cars in that time, the rest of the time, the inside lane was completely empty. She was doing about 50mph with at least 10 cars behind her wanting to go past her....eventually one car undertook her & then the rest followed suit. So by her hogging the outside lane, she encouraged at least 10 other people to break the law in frustration.
    Had she actually glanced in her mirror once in that 3 mile distance & noticed the train of cars behind her & moved over, all of those cars would not have been forced to break the law.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,613 ✭✭✭Big Nelly


    528i wrote:
    Thats pretty immature, what if it had been an emergency and he was taking his wife to hospital or something ?

    he'd probably need his lungs checked out following the pume of smoke from that Tdi aswell :rolleyes:

    He was a young fellow in a Fiesta...I was watching him for miles beforehand.....there was no emergency!!! he was just a spanner

    Pume of smoke???? you must be getting Tdi mixed up with the Fiesta!! black smoke I call it!!! burning petrol and oil and everything it was!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,647 ✭✭✭impr0v


    Some people consider themselves to be in their own little kingdom once they climb into their car, anybody else on the road isn't another person, it's an obstacle to them. If they have not left enough time to get where they are going, then the obstacles have to be negotiated even quicker, regardless of what type of timescale anyone else is on, or what risks they have to take to do so.

    Having said that, It's my opinion that sensible driving should take precedence over limits at times.

    Take the roadworks for example, the 60km limit is a temporary limit advertised by the contractors in line with safety recommendations and is undoubtedly necessary at certain parts of the site. However, at other locations, it is obviously eccessive to reduce one's speed to 60kmh, if there is a clear carriageway, good visibility etc. I would be very surprised if the limit has a legal standing as the local bylaws would need to be modified to enact the limit and then modified again once the construction was finished. The limit is advertised to a large extent to defend against potential claims resulting from any damage incurred during the roadworks.

    Another example is going a through a village on a National Primary Road early in the morning. It's frustrating to encounter somebody crawling through a deserted village in the dead of night. While they are obeying the law, to the letter, their speed is in my opinion excessively slow. I'm not advocating blazing through the village with the afterburners on, i'm saying it would be more realistic to travel at a speed which still gives you ample opportunity to react to any situation which might arise, but which takes account of the fact that any incident is much less likely to arise at this time of night than it is in the middle of the day.

    However, no matter how one employs good judgement, or obeys limits, there will always be someone who wants to go faster and will advertise that fact by being an ignorant and dangerously aggressive driver.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,787 ✭✭✭prospect


    Lads, the speed limit is the speed limit.

    I too think that a ot of limits around the country are far too low, but having said that, i stick to them. I ain't paying €80 and getting penalty points for no-one. So if you are behind me doing 100km/h in a 100km/h zone, and there are no passing oppertunities, then you can get as close as you like, and flash all you want, because i am not risking points pour vous!

    (Note, I do always allow faster cars to pass when possible, because if you want to go fast, that is your choice. Reason - an't stand someone doing 80km/h in a 100km/h zone, and running their right wheels on the white line so others can't get past, and therefore i wouldn't do it to someone who wants to break the limit)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,316 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    Remember when someone I knew was being tailgated, so he sped up, turned around, and played a bit of chicken. The other driver stopped & reversed quickly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 610 ✭✭✭green-blood


    oh goody rant time

    only last week on one of the foggier/drizzly mornings I was on the way into work on the m50 ya know that stupid 100k/62mph section from Firhouse on, anyway I was happily cruising at 65-70 passing 2 artics in the inside lane when I get that uncomfortable feeling, ya know the one that some bloke is standing just too close to you at the bar (yikes) anyway there he was glued to my back bumper flashing..... hmm, I'm over the limit passing 2 trucks, in the wet... was he nuts, yep.

    anyway we get past the trucks and there is a micra 100 yards up the road doing 55 in the inside lane, no way am I pulling in for this twat only to get stuck between 2 artics and granny, so I stay where I am. My rather clever new friend decided there was enough space for him to undertake me..... uh uh buddy, I'm not getting undertaken by a 1.4 almera... I soooo love the turbo in my saab. I didnt see him again, I hope he didnt scare the granny in the micra!!

    my fav speeding spot is from the redcow to newlands cross, its a stupid 60k limit but hey its signed what more can you do, there are always vans there, so I stick to it "ish" anyway if you fancy turning right at newlands down to Clondalkin you pretty much need to get over to the right most lane asap, but every cork twat thinks you're causing a hld up in the "fast lane bai" ... nutters.

    speaking of braketesting, another day same road I indicated before the 300 meter board to leave the m50 at Balinteer down the hill heading for dundrum, anyway another clever chappy on a large offroad bike decided this was a good time to undertake me on the hardshoulder.. wally. Anyway I obviously prevented him getting to the birth of his first child as he went nuts and overtook me down to the roundabout and brake tested me..... again in the wet on his motorcycle... I'm in 2 tonnes of SAAB.... numptie


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,513 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    impr0v wrote:
    Take the roadworks for example, the 60km limit is a temporary limit advertised by the contractors in line with safety recommendations and is undoubtedly necessary at certain parts of the site. However, at other locations, it is obviously eccessive to reduce one's speed to 60kmh, if there is a clear carriageway, good visibility etc. I would be very surprised if the limit has a legal standing as the local bylaws would need to be modified to enact the limit and then modified again once the construction was finished. The limit is advertised to a large extent to defend against potential claims resulting from any damage incurred during the roadworks.
    The thing about the roadworks I referred to is that the signs which have been installed are "proper" ones, not the usual haphazard signs that you get at roadworks. There are also a lot of the signs - they are installed every few hundred metres or so and there is no doubt as to what the limit is supposed to be. I'm not sure about the legal situation with temp speed limits but I'm not going to take a chance on it just to facilitate the driver behind. The place is an ideal location for a Gatso van or speed trap.

    BrianD3


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,709 ✭✭✭Balfa


    I get that uncomfortable feeling, ya know the one that some bloke is standing just too close to you at the bar (yikes) anyway there he was glued to my back bumper flashing
    That's funny, because when i'm driving, cars don't just magically appear behind me out of the blue. They approach from distance and I use observation and anticipation to understand the road situation, where everyone will be in the next few moments, and take suitable action. I would've timed my passing of slower traffic so as not to interfere with other drivers who choose to drive faster than me. The fact that you couldn't notice another car right on your bumper AND flashing his lights suggests that you're just plain not a good driver, which might explain why he was irritated with you.
    I'm not getting undertaken by a 1.4 almera... I soooo love the turbo in my saab.
    Ahhh, i see. So you did actually do what he wanted and speeded up. Maybe you're not so bad after all, allowing him to get through traffic quicker like that. Of course you did choose the most obnoxious and dangerous way to do it, but hey, each to their own.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 147 ✭✭Ivan E


    Where I do echo the sentiments of those saying that there's no way you should have 5 cars behind you, it really depends on the situation and the road. There's nothing worse than being on the M50 and coming across two cars side by side doing the exact same speed. Obviously the driver in the inner lane is correct to drive at whatever speed they desire but the other one quite clearly needs a kick in the head.

    I tend to find the N4 coming in by Liffey Valley the most frustrating. At 50kph its far too slow. And you are always going to get drivers passing you as you try and get in the right lane and keep to the limit. The reason it bothers me is that there is always a good chance of a tripod being further up the road waiting to get you. Yet there are always those drivers who seem quite willing to risk it.

    One thing that does help me is that I drive a relatively high performance car and that helps in that I tend to get a bit more respect on the road from the normal speedsters and I do actually have the power to pull away and get myself in the right areas of the road that I feel comfortable with. Its amazing the difference the car makes with regards how other drivers will approach you. The faster the car, the more willing a lot of drivers seem to stay in behind you and keep at your pace. Whereas if you are in a smaller car, you tend to be treated a lot worse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 147 ✭✭Ivan E


    Having said that I would have done exactly the same as green_blood...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,709 ✭✭✭Balfa


    Ivan E wrote:
    Whereas if you are in a smaller car, you tend to be treated a lot worse.
    I drove a daihatsu domino in my day, and never had problems with respect :D Of course I rarely had other cars catching up with me, but when i did, i would do my best to accomodate them, slowing down if necessary, pulling in as tight as i could (using the hard shoulder if available), and letting them pass.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 473 ✭✭528i


    wait a minute, you've got a saab 900 turbo aswell then ? did you get it for free like greenbloods ?

    NCT have a lot to answer for with crocks of shyte like that [having to cheek to speed] on our roads I tell ya.. suppose its better than holding up dacent ppl in almeras with a mini 850 all the same dough :cool:


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,235 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    the_syco wrote:
    Remember when someone I knew was being tailgated, so he sped up, turned around, and played a bit of chicken. The other driver stopped & reversed quickly.
    (TED produces a crude drawing of a mans head. On the inside of the head, there is a label "Dreams", on the outside, "Reality". He adresses DOUGAL)
    Ted: Have you been studying this chart like I told you?

    methinks the_syco is a bit like dougal


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,709 ✭✭✭Balfa


    kbannon wrote:
    (TED produces a crude drawing of a mans head. On the inside of the head, there is a label "Dreams", on the outside, "Reality". He adresses DOUGAL)
    Ted: Have you been studying this chart like I told you?

    methinks the_syco is a bit like dougal
    Haha! too true :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,709 ✭✭✭Balfa


    There was enough space for about a car and a hlaf in front of me. Some fool in a colt comes up behind me going like a bat out of hell, swerves over to the other side of the road to get around me and goes into the gap between myself and the learner

    A car and a half is roughly (i'm being generous here) six metres. So you were driving six metres behind him? Do you remember that little bit in the rules of the road that suggested one metre behind the car in front for every mile an hour you're doing? So you were doing six miles an hour at the time? No wonder the colt wanted past you so badly!!!

    I do generally drive above the speed limit (about +5mph, but sometimes more), but i always leave huge distances (i always need that huge distance to plan my overtaking and accelerate up to speed in the Domino :) ). I can't stand people who sit right on the bumper. The worst thing is when people sit right on the bumper of the car in front and have absolutely no intention to overtake. This prevents other people from overtaking as safely as possible as they have to pass both cars at once.

    You should be leaving a lot more than a car and a half between you and the one in front.


    edit: one more thing: the original poster suggested that people who speed do so simply because they're not paying attention and don't realise it. I very much doubt this is the case. I'm sure most of us just choose to do it. No matter how bad a driver is, one thing they're usually aware of (especially if they're bad drivers in the fast sense, rather than the slow sense) is their speed. Now being aware of other road users, as green blood has shown us, seems to be a lot harder for most people.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 473 ✭✭528i


    //one metre behind the car in front for every mile an hour you're doing? //

    60M ? or 12 car lengths at the legal limit ? this can't be right.. are they landing an aeroplane or something, what kind of retards dream up this stuff :rolleyes:

    6mm is more than adequate if you're driving a bmw.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 351 ✭✭declanoneill


    I admit I don't usually leave 1m for every mile per hour I'm doing, but I never sit on peoples bumpers either. That aside unless it was an emergency there's no reason he should have wanted to overtake to cars and go shooting off like a rocket beyond being a little boy racer, in which case he deserves to die screaming.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 443 ✭✭DBK


    It's the same with speed ramps on roads. I nearly had some bloke run up my ass cause I slowed down to go over a speed ramp. A$$hole. Then he overtakes me and hits the next speed ramp like the dukes of f*cking hazzard. Bloody idiots. :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,423 ✭✭✭fletch


    DBK wrote:
    It's the same with speed ramps on roads. I nearly had some bloke run up my ass cause I slowed down to go over a speed ramp. A$$hole. Then he overtakes me and hits the next speed ramp like the dukes of f*cking hazzard. Bloody idiots. :mad:
    Don't know if this applies to your situation just described, but personally I hate those people that accelerate between ramps & slow down as each one approaches. I prefer to maintain a steady speed through them all, leaving one wheel on the flat(where possible) so as to smooth out the bump. Plus I use less petrol not accelertating & braking for each ramp.
    Anyone else got any thoughts?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 179 ✭✭klaus23


    fletch wrote:
    leaving one wheel on the flat(where possible) so as to smooth out the bump.?

    That's the worst thing you can do... wears out your driveshafts and can knock the tracking out. Another bad habit people have is hitting the bump with their foot on the brakes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,709 ✭✭✭Balfa


    fletch wrote:
    I hate those people that accelerate between ramps & slow down as each one approaches. I prefer to maintain a steady speed ... any thoughts?
    I maintain a steady speed, too. but it certainly doesn't bother me what other people do! :) It's always about tradeoffs and happy mediums, though. You may as well claim to coast gently from one car park exit a mile down the road to another car park entrance. You'll be rolling at about 3mph by the time you reach your next turn, but you'll save plenty of petrol :)
    klaus23 wrote:
    That's the worst thing you can do... wears out your driveshafts
    That smells thoroughly brown to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 906 ✭✭✭FuzzyWuzzyWazza


    fletch wrote:
    She was doing about 50mph with at least 10 cars behind her wanting to go past her....eventually one car undertook her & then the rest followed suit. So by her hogging the outside lane, she encouraged at least 10 other people to break the law in frustration.
    It's not breaking the law as long as you do not exceed the speed limit, you are permitted to 'undertake' in the driving lane if the traffic in the overtaking lane is moving slower then the traffic in the driving lane.
    fletch wrote:
    Had she actually glanced in her mirror once in that 3 mile distance & noticed the train of cars behind her & moved over, all of those cars would not have been forced to break the law.
    I reckon that as long as she was able to see out of the corner of the mirror she wasn't using for fixin her hair/makup/or checking on the kid in the back, she wouldn't be arsed about moving out of the way, probably thinks 'well I am not breaking the speed limit, and I am entitled to drive in whatever lane I like, they can just go around me'

    Drives me up the walls!!!! That and people who's car only do around 100kph, they zoom past you in the 60 or 80 zones only for you to blow past them when you hit the motorway and they are still doing the same speed :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,816 ✭✭✭Calibos


    I enjoy testing the acceleration of my car up to the legal limit when it is safe to do so. ie coming off a slip road onto an empty motorway, I enjoy flooring it up to the speedlimit. Its nice having the power to quickly and safely pass a line of artics (in the lefthand lane) in the overtaking lane before I get back into the left hand lane. So I am not anti speed or acceleration persay, but to be honest it really is a waste of time at the end of the day.

    For example last week I was bringing an old fridge from Bray to a re-cycling centre in Wicklow town for my mother. She was in my brothers car with an old washing machine. On a side note, what a lovely drive that is now with all the new bypasses! Anyway, needless to say we took it very easy on the way down. On the way back however I left the old dear behind and made 'good progress' if you know what I mean. Pretty much adhering to speed limits but lots of overtaking in the overtaking lane. In and out of the lefthand lane the whole journey. Passed out a neighbours car about half way home and he had disappeared from my rearview very quickly.

    .....We all pulled into our estate at the same time. All I had gained was the privelege of being the car infront.

    So while I enjoyed the motorway/dual carriageway drive as 99% of the time I just drive within Bray and would drive that way again traffic and conditions permitting, if for some reason I couldn't then tbh I wouldn't get frustrated like a lot of drivers do when they feel they aren't making 'good progress' because I know that at the end of the day in all likelyhood I'll arrive at my destination at pretty much the same time anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 906 ✭✭✭FuzzyWuzzyWazza


    528i wrote:
    6mm is more than adequate if you're driving a bmw.
    Knob head


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 610 ✭✭✭green-blood


    thanks balfa, I feel suitably chastised.

    528 - he paid me to take the swedish lump off his hands

    just as further info, the chap joined the m50 at the knocklyon/firhouse junction, I had already moved to the outside lane to over take the pair of artics struggling up the hill.

    He moved to the outside lane immediately (without indicating) and raced up my ar.se. Is that observant enough for you. It was a red Almera 5 door, 03 KE and he was wearing a suit and glasses... I misbehaved, yeah...sorry Da


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    It's not breaking the law as long as you do not exceed the speed limit, you are permitted to 'undertake' in the driving lane if the traffic in the overtaking lane is moving slower then the traffic in the driving lane.

    I don't think that is actually correct. AFAIR to can only pass on the left if the traffic in the right hand lane are stopped while waiting to turn right accross oncoming traffic or if both lanes are in heavy traffic and the inside lane happens to be travelling faster.

    In the case where someone is holding up the overtaking lane and you move to the clear inside lane and undertake, you are breaking the law.

    MrP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 610 ✭✭✭green-blood


    nope. that would mean if somebody was to stop in the outsidelane you would be stuck there indefiitely...

    you shoudl drive in the left most available lane unless ovrtaking. If the left most lane is available and is moving faster than any other lane you may indicate and move to that lane when safe. Nothing unsafe or illegal about that.

    what is numptie-ish is where a faster moving car, especialy one way over the limit moves to a left lane and back to the righ lane undertaking a fellow wally sitting in th outside lane when the inside is available


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,788 ✭✭✭MrPudding


    I think you will find I said that where traffic is stopped in the right hand lane it is acceptable to pass on the left. I should have have said "for example, where traffic is stopped while waiting to turn right......" I never suggestest that you would have to wait if a car in the right lane had stopped.

    We are actually more or less saying the same thing, try reading my post again.

    MrP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 443 ✭✭DBK


    fletch wrote:
    Don't know if this applies to your situation just described, but personally I hate those people that accelerate between ramps & slow down as each one approaches.

    Nah, I'm not the type to race up to speed ramps, brake hard, over speed ramp, rinse and repeat. It was the first speed ramp on the road and I slowed down, not by a whole lot as I wasn't driving that fast in the first place. Man, it mad when you see people not even bothering to slow for the ramps. The nearly hit the roof of their car and do it again on the next one. What the hell are they thinking? :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 964 ✭✭✭Boggle


    Man, it mad when you see people not even bothering to slow for the ramps. The nearly hit the roof of their car and do it again on the next one. What the hell are they thinking?
    That if the ramps are higer than 10cm they can claim for any damage maybe??

    Seriously though, the ramps that you see around now are a joke and clearly exceed the max height. As far as I'm concerned I should be able to drive up a road at the speed limit (note I said should be able to - not would) - if that limit is too high then lower it but dont build mini mountains for me to bounce off...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 610 ✭✭✭green-blood


    I'm confused - why would a car be stopped ona motorway waiting to turn right!!!!!! :-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,423 ✭✭✭fletch


    I'm confused - why would a car be stopped ona motorway waiting to turn right!!!!!! :-)
    Maybe they were waiting to merge on to the M50 at half 5 in the evening


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,765 ✭✭✭ds20prefecture


    DBK wrote:
    Nah, I'm not the type to race up to speed ramps, brake hard, over speed ramp, rinse and repeat. It was the first speed ramp on the road and I slowed down, not by a whole lot as I wasn't driving that fast in the first place. Man, it mad when you see people not even bothering to slow for the ramps. The nearly hit the roof of their car and do it again on the next one. What the hell are they thinking? :confused:

    In my own car, I drive at a constant 30mph over speed bumps, without slowing and with no hitting of heads. I made the mistake of trying that in my friend's 4.0 Lexus/Toyota coupé - ouch. Don't they need suspension in Japan?

    Generally, as a driver of a very slow left hand drive car, I get the hell out of the way. Having said that, there's nothing worse than having spooled up to 70 or 80mph on the motorway only to lose all that momentum to some half wit asleep in the outside lane with the finger up their nose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,267 ✭✭✭DubTony


    It's not breaking the law as long as you do not exceed the speed limit, you are permitted to 'undertake' in the driving lane if the traffic in the overtaking lane is moving slower then the traffic in the driving lane.

    The rule is simple. The only time you are permitted to overtake in the left lane is to go past slowly moving traffic. That'd be the cars doing 20, 30 or maybe at a stretch 40 km/h. So when you're in a line to pay a toll and the left lane has less cars than the right lane, it's ok to undertake. It's very definitely not ok at 60 to 100 km/h. Sure, sometimes for sanity's sake it has to be done. But it's still illegal, as is hogging the overtaking lane.

    Tony


  • Advertisement
Advertisement