Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Bye-Elections Tallies and Results

  • 12-03-2005 12:18pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭


    Well the main thing to note here is the very bad turnout.

    Turnout in Meath is around 40% and 37% in Kildare North, thats very poor indeed.

    The first set of tallies have also being released:
    With over 82% of the boxes open in Meath, tally figures, which are unofficial, put Fine Gael's Shane McEntee in the lead with 34.3%.

    He is closely followed by Fianna Fáil's Shane Cassells with 33.1% of the vote.



    Sinn Féin's Joe Reilly is polling at 12.2%, followed by Labour's Dominic Hannigan at 10.5%. The Green Party's Fergal O'Byrne is at 3%.

    The votes tallied are from across the constituency.

    With 90% of the boxes open in Kildare North, tally figures put the Independent candidate, Catherine Murphy, in the lead with 25.04% of the vote.

    She is closely followed by Fianna Fáil's Áine Brady with 24.7% of the vote.

    Fine Gael's Darren Scully is at 16.35%, followed by Labour's Paddy MacNamara at 18.1%. The Progressive Democrats Kate Walsh is at 8.44%.

    The boxes opened are representative across the constituency.


    On a personal vote Joe Reilly is doing very very well with over 12% of the vote, Sinn Fein collapse??? Where is it I can't see it.

    His Transfers are probably going to decide the seat.

    More updates as they come

    Edit* Updated figures taken from Rte.ie


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    Going by these tallies Fianna Fáil's Shane Cassells has 33.1% and Fianna Fáil's Áine Brady has 24.7%. Thats very low when you consider what the opinion polls have been saying lately. I believe FF's vote has dropped in both constituency's since the last election!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    Meath final tally just in:
    Turnout 40%, FG 34.1, FF 32.4, SF 11.8 and Labour 11.3


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Interesting.
    I saw cassells a few times on tv and,gosh he came across very badly in my view.
    Meath and Kildare and Wicklow for that matter are changing given that 1000's of new voters are moving into them as commuters,making them less the heartlands of whatever party they were.

    If Cassells is behind mcentee in the first count when it comes and by as much as 3% then he's in trouble given that all other parties are anti government ones.

    As Regards O' Reilly, he's a hard working local representative already,I'd not expect his catchment vote to decline given the work that goes into it.A lot of the vote that Sinn Féin pulls doesnt actually transfer and is to a large extent a vote that will not come out for the other parties,at least thats the impression I have.
    Lets see if thats borne out when we see how many of O'Reilly's votes are non transferable, maybe its changing?

    Iirc, meath was a constituency with a labour t.d at one point or nearly with one? could someone clarify that,I wouldnt like to be in Pat Rabbittes shoes if SF have a higher first preference vote there than labour.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,148 ✭✭✭✭Raskolnikov


    irish1 wrote:
    On a personal vote Joe Reilly is doing very very well with over 12% of the vote, Sinn Fein collapse??? Where is it I can't see it.
    That's a very good performance from Reilly considering the circumstances. He narrowly missed out on a seat in 2002 with 8% of the vote, come the next elections, he'll take it.
    irish1 wrote:
    Fine Gael's Shane McEntee in the lead with 34.3%.

    He is closely followed by Fianna Fáil's Shane Cassells with 33.1% of the vote.
    Will Reilly's transfers be relevent? If so then Fine Gael will certainly lose out on a seat.
    irish1 wrote:
    The Progressive Democrats Kate Walsh is at 7.7%.
    That's a terrible showing by the PD candidate, she's down 4% on 2002. With any luck this oppressive rabble will be wiped off the political map come the next general election.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,907 ✭✭✭Badabing


    The turnout is very dissapointing, is their anyway they can get people to come out and vote, how about polling on a saturday or sunday when most people are off work or perhaps politicans keeping their promises :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,148 ✭✭✭✭Raskolnikov


    Earthman wrote:
    Iirc, meath was a constituency with a labour t.d at one point or nearly with one? could someone clarify that,I wouldnt like to be in Pat Rabbittes shoes if SF have a higher first preference vote there than labour.
    http://electionsireland.org/result.cfm?election=2002&cons=178

    If anything, Labour have done well in Meath to take 10% of the vote. They've now got a chance at taking a seat in the next general election.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    Earthman wrote:
    As Regards O' Reilly, he's a hard working local representative already,I'd not expect his catchment vote to decline given the work that goes into it.A lot of the vote that Sinn Féin pulls doesnt actually transfer and is to a large extent a vote that will not come out for the other parties,at least thats the impression I have.
    Lets see if thats borne out when we see how many of O'Reilly's votes are non transferable, maybe its changing?

    Iirc, meath was a constituency with a labour t.d at one point or nearly with one? could someone clarify that,I wouldnt like to be in Pat Rabbittes shoes if SF have a higher first preference vote there than labour.

    Joe Reilly is a very strong member of Sinn Fein, I believe he is a member of the negiotaion team involved in the peace process. Sinn Fein's vote does not seem to have been damaged in Meath at least, despite all the media coverage and continous bashing from McDowell and co.

    Earthman, Labours vote has nearly trebled in Meath since the last election, while Sinn Feins vote has increased by approx 3%. Historically Sinn Fein's transfers have gone mostly to FF but with the ammount of Bashing in recent weeks I believe that may change a little.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Earthman, Labours vote has nearly trebled in Meath since the last election, while Sinn Feins vote has increased by approx 3%.

    oh I must be thinking of prior to 2002,I seem to remember labour having either a t.d there or nearly one at some stage,but yes they appear to have more than doubled their vote on 2002.
    Looks like a seat there for mcentee.

    I'd like to see an analysis of where each of the stronger candidates are getting their vote and how that will be affected by the constituency split at the general election.
    There should be reliable raw data at this one to calculate what may happen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    Well I'm not certain about other candidates but I believe Joe Reilly's vote is primarly coming from Navan.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,761 ✭✭✭cdebru


    irish1 wrote:
    Well I'm not certain about other candidates but I believe Joe Reilly's vote is primarly coming from Navan.

    david davin power says he took 1500 votes out of navan that is about25% of his vote

    he says the east west split of the county will not suit him as it would split his vote in half


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    From RTÉ
    In the first count in the Kildare by-election, Fianna Fáil's Áine Brady is ahead of the Independent candidate Catherine Murphy by just 216 votes.

    Áine Brady polled 6,201 compared to Catherine Murphy's 5,985.

    Fine Gael's Darren Scully is running in third place with 4,630 first preference votes.

    Independent candidates, Gerry Browne and Seanán Ó Coistín, with 226 and 211 votes respectively, have been eliminated.

    The counting of votes is continuing in the Meath by-election. First count results are not expected until 5 or 6pm this evening.

    I dont see where FF are going to get the transfers from to stay in front,they've lost by-elections when they have had large-ish leads in the first count.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    Earthman wrote:
    From RTÉ


    I dont see where FF are going to get the transfers from to stay in front,they've lost by-elections when they have had large-ish leads in the first count.

    Governments don't fare well in bye elections.
    Sinn Fein's vote does not seem to have been damaged in Meath at least, despite all the media coverage and continous bashing from McDowell and co.

    Michael McDowell only let us know a few truths about SF/IRA.

    It is called democratic politics.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,764 ✭✭✭Valentia


    Joe Reilly has a massive personal vote. This is a buffer and gives a false impression of what some may think as Sinn Fein support. The Labour vote is a big improvement and sets Dominic Hannigan up very well for the next general election. He is new to Labour and is a new councillor, so his performance is amazing.

    The Meath Chronicle have shown itself for the Fianna Fail propeganda rag that it is. That poll, and the front page this week was a barefaced ad for Fianna Fail. Serious questions will have to be asked about its impartiality. Fair enough if it wants to Murdockise itself but let it be upfront about where it stands and not pretend to be neutral so that it can maximise its advertising.

    The final outcome on this one depends on whether Hannigan or Reilly go out first. They may even be eliminated together. Hannigan out first: Fine Geal win. Anything else looks like Fianna Fail, although word is the Sinn Fein transfers are "going all over the place".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,132 ✭✭✭Dinner


    Second count in Kildare North shows Brady is still ahead, just....


    Aine Brady (Fianna Fail) 6,255
    Paddy McNamara (Labour Party) 4,545
    Catherine Murphy (Independent) 6,189
    J J Power (Green Party) 1,621
    Darren Scully (Fine Gael) 4,660
    Senator Kate Walsh (Progressive Democrats) 2,023

    EDIT: by count 4 Murphy leads by 676 votes.
    ElectionsIreland.org


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,148 ✭✭✭✭Raskolnikov


    Cassells is 800 votes behind McEntee and McEntee still has Labour transfers to get from Hannigan. It's safe to say that McEntee has taken Meath.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,761 ✭✭✭cdebru


    Valentia wrote:
    Joe Reilly has a massive personal vote. This is a buffer and gives a false impression of what some may think as Sinn Fein support.
    .


    I think it is funny they were all on telling us SF is finished a few weeks ago when SF increases it vote in the meath by election they write it off as a personal vote

    bollox if it was just a personal vote it would not have gone up besides that joe o'reilly has been accompanied by every SF personality under the sun it is not like he has distanced himself or ran as an independent

    much to the dismay of the SF bashers the SF vote has withstood everything thrown at it the opinion polls show little or no slippage and here is a real poll and the SF vote is up on the last GE

    perhaps the SF vote was affected but if it was how high would it have been without the events of recent weeks


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,093 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    Cork wrote:
    Michael McDowell only let us know a few truths about SF/IRA.

    Michael "in America we Trust" McDowell.

    Keep bashing them, and they'll... oh, you get the idea.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    cdebru wrote:
    perhaps the SF vote was affected but if it was how high would it have been without the events of recent weeks

    Without a doubt in my mind it would be higher, maybe 14 or 15%.
    The celebrity factor together with this being a by election would have saw to that.
    much to the dismay of the SF bashers the SF vote has withstood everything thrown at it the opinion polls show little or no slippage and here is a real poll and the SF vote is up on the last GE
    What Sinn Féin bashing? I only saw constructive criticism.
    I'll posit that O'Reilly does indeed have a loyal support base,typical of any Sinn Féin support base in recent years and that the renowned Sinn Féin election machine got their vote out better than the others as per usual, it was important that they do so,and thats why the place was flooded with SF personalities.
    Their higher turn out in itself would have made a big impact on their percentage when theres an over all low turn out.
    Higher general election turnouts where larger amounts of people turn out because they know that they are voting to keep or change a government tell a better story.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,286 ✭✭✭Gael


    Earthman wrote:

    Iirc, meath was a constituency with a labour t.d at one point or nearly with one? could someone clarify that,I wouldnt like to be in Pat Rabbittes shoes if SF have a higher first preference vote there than labour.

    Correct Earthman. Brian Fitzgerald won a seat for Labour in 1992, lost it in 1997 and then left Labour in protest, at it's merger with Democratic Left.
    He is currently an independent council.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Incidently I see no one has mentioned here that the independent candidate Catherine murphy has been declared the winner in Kildare north.

    http://www.rte.ie/news/2005/0312/byelection.html


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,286 ✭✭✭Gael


    Two bits of history made tonight in Kildare. First constituency in the country to not have any FF TDs and also the first time a woman was ever elected there since the founding of the state.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 160 ✭✭Roisin Dubh


    irish1 wrote:
    Going by these tallies Fianna Fáil's Shane Cassells has 33.1% and Fianna Fáil's Áine Brady has 24.7%. Thats very low when you consider what the opinion polls have been saying lately. I believe FF's vote has dropped in both constituency's since the last election!

    Totally unrepresentative of a General Election. The FF vote dropped by 16% in Limerick East by-election in the first FF-PD term and they lost 6 by-elections but were resoundingly re-elected in 2002.

    No Government has won a by-election since 1982. Of either party. This is not representative. People like to use by-elections to keep a government on its toes and to stop it getting more complacent and to that end they never seem to vote for government candidates of either political persuasion.

    Also, the turnout is very low. Much lower than in the General election, adding to its unrepresentativeness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,286 ✭✭✭Gael


    Totally unrepresentative of a General Election. The FF vote dropped by 16% in Limerick East by-election in the first FF-PD term and they lost 6 by-elections but were resoundingly re-elected in 2002.

    No Government has won a by-election since 1982. Of either party. This is not representative. People like to use by-elections to keep a government on its toes and to stop it getting more complacent and to that end they never seem to vote for government candidates of either political persuasion.

    Also, the turnout is very low. Much lower than in the General election, adding to its unrepresentativeness.

    That theory would have a lot of weight to it, if this loss was not in the wake of the disastrous local elections. One by-election on it's own can be ignored as a blip. But the legacy of the locals belies that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 160 ✭✭Roisin Dubh


    Gael wrote:
    That theory would have a lot of weight to it, if this loss was not in the wake of the disastrous local elections. One by-election on it's own can be ignored as a blip. But the legacy of the locals belies that.

    I strongly disagree. In the UK in the 1980's, Labour tended to win the local-elections, and under Labour, the Tories and Lib Dems have tended to outperform them in the local-elections. Yet they were re-elected in 2001 and the Tories were re-elected in the 1980's and 1992.

    Governments DON'T win by-elections! Law of nature!

    For example, I voted FG in the Euro and local-elections but there's no way I will elect a Government containing Labour. Why? It is far too soft on immigration for my liking, and was out of touch in the referendum, even with its own voters.

    FF should make immigration a major General Election issue, and should remind the public repeatedly of how Labour opposed the Citizenship referendum. If they do that then I guarantee you it will work.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,578 ✭✭✭Slutmonkey57b


    Interesting that a SF voter's second preferences would transfer to FF, given that one is theoretically a marxist socialist party while the other is the main bastion of thatcherism.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 160 ✭✭Roisin Dubh


    Interesting that a SF voter's second preferences would transfer to FF, given that one is theoretically a marxist socialist party while the other is the main bastion of thatcherism.

    They are both Republican parties that is obviously the reason.

    I don't at all agree with you about them being Thatcherite. FF haven't had the guts to stand up to the unions like she did, or sell off as much of the public-sector as she did.

    Comparisons with Thatcherism are incredibly exaggerated. Thatcher privatised British Energy, British Airways, British Gas, the state-owned banks, and a lot more.

    What has this Government privatised? Eircom and TSB and ICC. That's it! The unions still have an effective veto on reform in the public-sector.

    The PD's policies are Thatcherite. I think that sometimes the hardline Thatcher took on NI obscures the many good things she did in the UK. She came to power at a time when the whole of the UK seemed to have been take nover by unions, with the dead going unburied, rubbish remaining uncollected etc. In fact, the unions brought her to power because the British public were so sick of them.

    If the Irish unions overplay their hand, they too may find that what goes around comes around. If anything this Government is too soft on the unions.

    Far from, being Thatcherite, FF are a centrist party with no ideology other than republicanism and occasionally populism.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,286 ✭✭✭Gael


    I strongly disagree. In the UK in the 1980's, Labour tended to win the local-elections, and under Labour, the Tories and Lib Dems have tended to outperform them in the local-elections. Yet they were re-elected in 2001 and the Tories were re-elected in the 1980's and 1992.

    Governments DON'T win by-elections! Law of nature!

    For example, I voted FG in the Euro and local-elections but there's no way I will elect a Government containing Labour. Why? It is far too soft on immigration for my liking, and was out of touch in the referendum, even with its own voters.

    FF should make immigration a major General Election issue, and should remind the public repeatedly of how Labour opposed the Citizenship referendum. If they do that then I guarantee you it will work.


    I see where you're coming from but that doesn't hold water for FF. They've always done well, locally and nationally. They did just as well in 1999 locals as they did in 2002. The fact that we use PR in this country also makes comparisons with Britain dubious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    Interesting that a SF voter's second preferences would transfer to FF, given that one is theoretically a marxist socialist party while the other is the main bastion of thatcherism.

    Sinn Féin is not a Marxist party. Fianna Fáil wouldn't be a proper Thatcherite party even though it would often be steered in that direction by a Thatcherite PD party.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 160 ✭✭Roisin Dubh


    Gael wrote:
    I see where you're coming from but that doesn't hold water for FF. They've always done well, locally and nationally. They did just as well in 1999 locals as they did in 2002. The fact that we use PR in this country also makes comparisons with Britain dubious.

    Your point might have some validity but for the national opinion-polls showing FF on 37% - an 8% rise since the local-elections. I firmly believe that the electorate draws a LOT of distinction between General Elections and by-elections/local-elections.

    Mid-term blues but the Government will be re-elected. Immigration will be a major reason.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Werent the labour and SF candidates eliminated at the same time...
    Thereby making it impossible to assess where the transfer votes were coming from.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    I believe that to be the case Earthman.

    Roisin Dubh, I think FF have taken a real beaten here and are now left with NO TD in Kildare North. I would also tend to take the result of an election all be it a bye-election far more serious than an opinion poll.

    I work in Kildare North and everyday I laugh at the ammount of houses been built in Sallins and Clane without any real increase in schools or roads. The Celtic tiger has been with us long enough to have developed our infrastructure, but it has not happened and now these areas are suffering badly.

    If Mr McCreevy had put the same interest in developing schools and roads as he did in Punchestown Race Course, FF might have a North Kildare TD. You reap what you sow and FF will reap a lot of bad results in the next General Election, but hey at least we'll have a nice race course ;)


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    irish1 wrote:
    I work in Kildare North and everyday I laugh at the ammount of houses been built in Sallins and Clane without any real increase in schools or roads. The Celtic tiger has been with us long enough to have developed our infrastructure, but it has not happened and now these areas are suffering badly.
    But dont the building companies pay a development levy to the county councils?
    Local councillors surely have been negligent in not providing some services.
    Schools are a department issue, yes.The expenditure on Roads is a council issue as is water and sewrage and to an extent creche facilities and the like etc.
    If Mr McCreevy had put the same interest in developing schools and roads as he did in Punchestown Race Course, FF might have a North Kildare TD. You reap what you sow and FF will reap a lot of bad results in the next General Election, but hey at least we'll have a nice race course
    That may well be the case, but do you really think that if McCreevy stayed and that this was a general election that he would have lost his seat? I doubt it.
    You must take into account that Mccreevy's supporters were very píssed off at the manner of his removal to Brussels and a lot of them didnt canvass.
    I actually know of some who didnt vote at all, they were that keen to teach Bertie a lesson on this occasion and those were FF supporters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    Earthman wrote:
    But dont the building companies pay a development levy to the county councils?
    Local councillors surely have been negligent in not providing some services.
    Schools are a department issue, yes.The expenditure on Roads is a council issue as is water and sewrage and to an extent creche facilities and the like etc.

    Well I agree some issues are the responisblity of the council, but the government has failed the people of North Kildare on many issues.
    Earthman wrote:
    That may well be the case, but do you really think that if McCreevy stayed and that this was a general election that he would have lost his seat? I doubt it.
    You must take into account that Mccreevy's supporters were very píssed off at the manner of his removal to Brussels and a lot of them didnt canvass.
    I actually know of some who didnt vote at all, they were that keen to teach Bertie a lesson on this occasion and those were FF supporters.
    Well I would argue then that McCreevy's vote was more of a pesonal vote than a party vote. I mean who wouldn't vote to have the Minister for Finance in your constituency, Charlie looked after his upper class supporters quite well but he has left behind some very serious issues e.g. the lack of schools.

    I mean who could argue that schools should have come before an extension to a race course :confused:


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    irish1 wrote:
    I mean who could argue that schools should have come before an extension to a race course :confused:
    I thought that the Curragh race course was in the south Kildare constituency?
    It's located halfway between Newbridge and Kildare town anyway, both of which are in the Kildare south constituency.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,761 ✭✭✭cdebru


    Interesting that a SF voter's second preferences would transfer to FF, given that one is theoretically a marxist socialist party while the other is the main bastion of thatcherism.

    the fact that the labour and SF were eliminated at the same time means that it would be impossible to know where the votes came from or indeed if they were second preference
    the second preference could have gone to candidates who had already been eliminated so they could have been 3rd 4th 5th etc preferences

    and it is not that surprising that some SF voters would transfer to FF. SFs vote comes mostly fro m working class areas that historically FF have always done well in
    and of course preference votes always throw up surprises the last assembly elections up the north Ian paisleys surplus when divided 32 votes went to sinn fein now what is that all about


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    Its in the same county Earthman, I really don't see how it matters that it's in another constituency. The point is the former TD for the area pushed through a project that saw a lot of money spent on a race course while in the same county schools are very badly needed.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    irish1 wrote:
    Its in the same county Earthman, I really don't see how it matters that it's in another constituency.
    He's not a co.councillor so his remit since the boundary change was actually only the north constituency, yet he poured money into a race course in the south and more rural part of the county(did he do that before the split by the way)I wonder did that bring jobs to rural south Kildare? would there have been any spin off in terms of money to local businesses? There is a large racing industry located there, with a lot of employment,argueably its no different than grant aiding U.S industries that provide a lot of jobs eg intel(though the latest tract to them has been vetoed by the E.U)
    It's a grey area of argument to be asking which is more important , pumping money into an industry that provides jobs locally or pumping it into services.
    Obviously it would be better to be pumping it into both ergo theres an argument for extra expenditure but not one for favouring one over the other.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    Earthman wrote:
    He's not a co.councillor so his remit since the boundary change was actually only the north constituency, yet he poured money into a race course in the south and more rural part of the county(did he do that before the split by the way)I wonder did that bring jobs to rural south Kildare? would there have been any spin off in terms of money to local businesses? There is a large racing industry located there, with a lot of employment,argueably its no different than grant aiding U.S industries that provide a lot of jobs eg intel(though the latest tract to them has been vetoed by the E.U)
    It's a grey area of argument to be asking which is more important , pumping money into an industry that provides jobs locally or pumping it into services.
    Obviously it would be better to be pumping it into both ergo theres an argument for extra expenditure but not one for favouring one over the other.
    Well Earthman I think schools should come first, I would welcome any extra jobs to the area, but I think you'll find it hard to get people to fill those jobs if there's no schools in the area for their children.

    The infrastructure should come FIRST Earthman not the houses or jobs, thats what good planning is all about.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    irish1 wrote:
    The infrastructure should come FIRST Earthman not the houses or jobs, thats what good planning is all about.
    Oh I agree, but apart from schools, much of the infrastructural needs are looked after by the co council are they not? haven't they failed in a lot of instances?

    By the way, my own local national school just got a huge extension including a sports hall,part paid for by the state and the parents and yet this county hadnt a government minister at the time it was sanctioned...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    Oh I agree, but apart from schools, much of the infrastructural needs are looked after by the co council are they not? haven't they failed in a lot of instances?

    Local authorities get development levys from building contractors to cater for roads, public parks etc.

    This stuff has more do do with deficiencys of local government.
    The infrastructure should come FIRST Earthman not the houses or jobs

    They are many empty advance factorys around this country. If you put in the infrasturture - the jobs will not automatically come.

    If that was the case - all advance factories would have occupants which is not the reality.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    Yes Earthman as I already said some issues are the responisblity of the council, but the Government has failed to provide the schools or the new roads.

    I think even the FF candidate in the Bye-election accepted that the provision of schools in the county was a real issue that the government had failed to resolve.

    I may be over simplfying my point here, but I really don't see how anyone including FF supporters could support the extension of a race course over the provision of schools in a county.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    Cork wrote:
    Local authorities get development levys from building contractors to cater for roads, public parks etc.

    This stuff has more do do with deficiencys of local government.



    They are many empty advance factorys around this country. If you put in the infrasturture - the jobs will not automatically come.

    If that was the case - all advance factories would have occupants which is not the reality.
    Cork, I stated that the main issue here is schools and if you believe that housing estates should be built before schools, roads etc you are seriously deluded.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    irish1 wrote:

    I may be over simplfying my point here, but I really don't see how anyone including FF supporters could support the extension of a race course over the provision of schools in a county.

    Irish1 - Name another Irish government that has spent more on education?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    Cork - Throwing money at a problem doesn't gurantee a solution, the population is nearing 5 million but imo we still have an infrastructure to cater for 3.5 million.

    Also name an Irish Government that has had as much money to spend.

    You can't seriously suggest that Punchestown race course is more important than providing schools?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    irish1 wrote:
    You can't seriously suggest that Punchestown race course is more important than providing schools?

    FF did not build the Punchestown race course.

    FF have achieved much in getting this country back to work - but I think they never took any credit for the Punchestown race.

    Are you referring to the Event Centre?

    That project had zero impact on the education budget.

    The capital budget for schools has been increased by multiples.

    Is the event centre worthwhile - I don't know.

    But I believe that schools/event centre is not an either/or arguement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    Cork wrote:
    FF did not build the Punchestown race course.

    FF have achieved much in getting this country back to work - but I think they never took any credit for the Punchestown race.

    Are you referring to the Event Centre?

    That project had zero impact on the education budget.

    The capital budget for schools has been increased by multiples.

    Is the event centre worthwhile - I don't know.

    But I believe that schools/event centre is not an either/or arguement.
    Maybe not to you but I think people who live in the area will disagree, on one hand they see money been poured into Punchestown race course ( I believe thats where the event centre is located) on the other hand they can't find a school to send their children to.

    You see the type of reply you gave is the very reason why FF now have no TD's in Kildare North. People don't care what budget the money for the event centre came from, it came from the tax payers money and it came before schools.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    irish1 wrote:
    People don't care what budget the money for the event centre came from, it came from the tax payers money and it came before schools.

    So you are saying - savings could be found elsewhere to be put into schools?

    Social Welfare being a high spending department?
    Money could be saved if Bertie would put fincail sanction on SF?

    But in all seriousness the facts are - the school capital budget is large.

    But that said the department of Education needs to plan better and stop relying on exclusively on census figures.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,956 ✭✭✭✭Villain


    Not large enough obviously!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,924 ✭✭✭Cork


    irish1 wrote:
    Not large enough obviously!

    that too can be said for health, social welfare and education.

    But much money is being spent in all these areas.

    Sure money has to be wisely by both central and local government.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,093 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    Are you trying to justify the €14.8 million given to build the "agricultural and equestrian event centre" at Punchestown? This was the FULL amount to build the centre!

    http://archives.tcm.ie/businesspost/2003/11/23/story850229515.asp


  • Advertisement
Advertisement