NWO(new world order)????????

CerebralCortex

What can I believe when I hear about the NWO(new world order) and the conspiratorial nature of history?

This is the site that got me interested in this topic.
http://www.threeworldwars.com/

Gillo

To be honest, I don't beleive it. yeah there might be a group called NWO but I find it hard to believe they rule the world. Bilderberg, yeah a group of top business men and politicians, it's a perfect "networking party" and a good way to build up contacts.
A lot of the facts don't stand up under scrutiny.

hawkmoon269

I agree with Gillo, groups like Bilderberg would have a hard time orchestrating history even if they wanted to. The world is too uncertain and unstable.

Then again I'm in the Freemasons myself so I would say that (joke).

omnicorp

We would know something.

MeatProduct

omnicorp wrote:

We would know something.

What do you mean? That we would know if there was such a large scale deception?

Nick

DadaKopf

Came across [url=-http://www.eurozine.com/article/2002-02-13-hardtnegri-en.html]this[/url] today, and it makes interesting reading.

To understand the world system, or the process of history or whatever, requires us to simultaneously accept and reject two things: (1) there is a single source of power that shapes global order (conspiratorial view), and (2) that global order emerges spontaneously from the anarchic interplay of economic forces (market fundamentalism).

Interesting idea - global order is and is not, simultaneously, the product of both of these processes.

This is what the authors call 'Empire'.

Captain Trips

CerebralCortex wrote:

What can I believe when I hear about the NWO(new world order) and the conspiratorial nature of history?

This is the site that got me interested in this topic.
http://www.threeworldwars.com/

I would also say that no one group would have themselves branded "NWO". The world more logically is made up of millions of little groups, coming under bigger umbrella groups that use media to roughly "organise" what would be chaos.

E.g., The US is a disjointed and rural population, so media helps solidify view into a more controllable bipartisan system - otherwise it would be simply chaos. In the EU, the recent criticism regarding the vote rights in the parliament for each country had to be reviewed as it was slowing down the processes - i.e., we all speak different languages so media influence across the EU is less. But maybe more balanced.

Then say, the corporations aka, the Bilderberg group (yes very real and publishes their meetings every year). The G7, G20 name your club, it's there. At one time it was the construction corporations, before that it was the East and West India Companies - not companies like we say, but organisational structures of power. The PNAC, CFR (read Foreign Affairs - their journal published every two months, get it in Eason's).

If you work for a company, way at the top, the CEOs and managers are also part of another club - with other companies. They each vye for power but need to watch each other's back against say another company/group.

It's a natural order that IMHO humans seek. All vye for power, and depending on where you live, you'll be for it or against it. The Anglo-Saxon countries have been ruling things for quite some time now, Mr. Anderson.....:)

There's no"conspiracy" - it's common sense. You ever been in a club? Ever in say even a soccer or rugby club? Imagine you take that 15 years forward, or not even, maybe 10. You'll throw work and money the way of someone you know over someone you don't. That's how it works, and that's how these "NWO" groups each have developed. Including, e.g., the Yale societies, much like old London societies. Each helps each other and the overall group benefits.

There is no conspiracy. Everything is in plain sight, if you just choose to look.