If you were an American would you support Bush??

joe.

Just curious more than anything?

kaimera

yes.

Gothic Warrior

NO. F*CKING. WAY.
No explanation needed.

Rew

Nah, hes a nut job.

Coumtay

If you were a dog would you lick your own balls?

Blackjack

No, and it would appear that a large proportion of Americans (although not a large enough proportion) wouldn't support him either.

kaimera

Blackjack wrote:

No, and it would appear that a large proportion of Americans (although not a large enough proportion) wouldn't support him either.

the minority obviously.

Bodan

No , i'd move to Canada and try and convince them to invade the States . Weapons of mass destruction speech with actually some evidence this time

Neil3030

Unfortunately if i lived in Bible belt yes because he is for everything I would be and if I lived in a metropolitan city no, because he would be for everything I were against. I believe voting patterns followed this trend?

baggins

Isnt that fact that the majority of us dont wouldn't support bush what makes us different from the americans? if you were over there being fed media BS, maybe you would. i would like to think that i wouldnt, but who knows???

Rew

kaimera wrote:

the minority obviously.

Suppose it all depends on how many you manage to get struck off the voting register

Neil3030

Ease up now Mr. Moore!

kaimera

Rew wrote:

Suppose it all depends on how many you manage to get struck off the voting register

but of course. anything for the cause

Rew

Neil3030 wrote:

Ease up now Mr. Moore!

Moore is also a nut job who twists things to suit him self but taking his ageanda out of the picture there is still alot of truth there.

MrPinK

baggins wrote:

if you were over there being fed media BS, maybe you would

I think media influence is an overstated reason for Bush support. A large proportion of Americans just agree with his stance on religion, abortion, stem cell research and gay marraige, his complete disregard for other countries' interests, and his prioritising of big business over that pesky environment. And they even like the fact that he's a bit slow and mispronounciates his words.

Raphael

I feel this should be addressed, where the hell's our atari jaguar

JohnK

Not a chance in hell!

elivsvonchiaing

Hate the cúnt - but have to say there is no alternative! Right now - I would vote Hillary in 2008 - if theres collection cans for mercenaries to assasinate Jeb Bush outside my local - I will give generously Unless he concedes defeat of course - just can't see this!

Hmmm on rethink - Galinha Starovoitova was murdered 'coz people didn't want her (want the truth to come out!)- think this could also be true with MM's skeletons in closet :cool:

Tiriel

screwball scramble lucky nut-job

elivsvonchiaing

Cork_girl wrote:

screwball scramble lucky nut-job

Agent Cork_Girl - there is no way I can release todays instructions based upon that sign on. Oh ****! I'm locked - please ignore everyone Locked outta me head - so feeling sociable - the correct sign-on - is : srcew-billiard- lucky -wing-nut.

This will grant you the launch codes to the Marccettis's

A Dub in Glasgo

Are you mad???

The answer is no

Blisterman

Where's I wouldn't vote?

MrPinK

Not voting would be equivalent to not supporting him.

Hobbes

MrPinK wrote:

Not voting would be equivalent to not supporting him.

Unless your not voting actually meant he won.

MrPinK

Hobbes wrote:

Unless your not voting actually meant he won.

Unless you would have voted for him if you did vote, in which case not voting would be supporting the other candidate.

zoro

MrPinK wrote:

Unless you would have voted for him if you did vote, in which case not voting would be supporting the other candidate.

Not voting supports neither candidate. It's just a pity there's no "none of the above" option.

My mother has always said that if you don't vote then you can't complain about any mistakes that the government make during their term.
Flawed logic in my opinion. If you didn't want EITHER party to be elected, then don't vote. Choosing not to vote is a right as much as voting itself is.

Blisterman

I wouldn't support either candidate. Maybe Nadar, but I don't know his policies.

pork99

Rew wrote:

Moore is also a nut job who twists things to suit him self but taking his ageanda out of the picture there is still alot of truth there.

With Michael Moore there is a certain amount of "he would say that wouldn't he". For a really damaging critique of Bush's "war on terror" read this

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0743260244/qid=1105960897/sr=2-2/ref=sr_2_27_2/202-3170847-8845422

especially the last 2 chapters. Richard Clarke is not a right-on student/looney lefty but a highly experienced and credible counter-terrorism official having lead the White House Counter-terrorism Strategy Group under 3 presidents

MrJoeSoap

94.34% against. I somehow doubt theres any way even Bush could manipulate those numbers. Although...

DoctorGonzo

The very future of humanity depends on exposing government-sponsored terrorism and how the globalists pose as our saviors whem in fact, they are the terrorists.

He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name. This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666" (Rev. 13:16-18).


Nobody shud comment on the war without seeing this..did u know george bush and john kerry are cousins?

Download Alex jones's "The road to tyranny"
http://forums.armageddononline.org/archive/index.php/t-2555.html

mayordenis

not arsed reading this thread but simply no god ****ing no lets put this down to eating ok kerry is bland, boring and generally unimaginative lets call him potato, does the job right.
Now lets consider Bush we'll call him dog ****e not so appetising hes a travesty of a pharce of a mockery of a shambles.

DoctorGonzo

Wake up people!!! the vote doesent matter y is it in the 290,000,000 americans only 2 candidates can be elected? the global elite make u think you have a choice when u dont.george bush and john kerry are cousins they both attended yale unversity and the secret society "Skull and Bones" they admitted this. the media runs the election and even if kerry won the NEW WORLD ORDER wins anyway.

The very future of humanity depends on exposing government-sponsored terrorism and how the globalists pose as our saviors whem in fact, they are the terrorists.

He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name. This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666" (Rev. 13:16-18).


Nobody shud comment on the war without seeing this..did u know george bush and john kerry are cousins?

Download Alex jones's "The road to tyranny"
http://forums.armageddononline.org/archive/index.php/t-2555.html

Hobbes

zoro wrote:

My mother has always said that if you don't vote then you can't complain about any mistakes that the government make during their term.

True, but it would make you responsible for any actions that person took. If the president was to ooh say start decapitating babies and drinking thier warm blood you can't use the excuse of "Well I didn't vote for him, what do I care what he does".

Trojan

DoctorGonzo wrote:

The very future of humanity depends on exposing government-sponsored terrorism and how the globalists pose as our saviors whem in fact, they are the terrorists.

He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name. This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666" (Rev. 13:16-18).


Nobody shud comment on the war without seeing this..did u know george bush and john kerry are cousins?

Download Alex jones's "The road to tyranny"
http://forums.armageddononline.org/archive/index.php/t-2555.html

This is the 3rd time you have posted this exact post on boards.ie. That is what we call spamming. You are being watched, and could be banned from several or all boards. Please read the rules, and the Charters of all boards you post on.

Do not reply to this message here (or you will definitely be banned). Any comments (and/or complaints) on the topic of this message should be posted on the "Feedback" board.

Thank you.
Your friendly moderators.

Blisterman

Anyway, if there were more candidates. Bush would have had a better chance of winning, because most Kerry votes were people just voting against bush.

Blackjack

kaimera wrote:

the minority obviously.

Thanks. This clarifies precisely what I meant by not a large enough proportion for anyone who did not understand.