Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

United States freezes UN dues over snub

  • 10-05-2001 9:49pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,580 ✭✭✭✭


    from www.Ireland.com

    United States freezes UN dues over snub

    The House of Representatives today voted to freeze the final payment of US arrears to the UN until it regains its lost seat on the UN Human Rights Commission.

    Brushing aside objections from the White House, the chamber voted 252-165 to make the third and last arrears payment - of $244 million due next year - conditional on Washington's return to the Geneva-based commission.

    The measure does not affect this year's $582 million arrears payment, protecting it from a wave of outrage in Congress over last week's vote to remove the United States from the 53-member UN Human Rights Commission.

    Supporters said the measure was a modest compromise that allowed Congress to register its anger over the UN snub without unraveling a long-sought 1999 deal that allows payment of the US arrears in exchange for a lowering of US dues and peacekeeping contributions.

    The measure, attached to a bill that authorises fiscal 2002 and 2003 spending for the State Department and related agencies, gives UN members time to return the United States to the commission next year, they said.

    "Actions have consequences. Our UN friends have an option - if they would like to get the payment, they will vote the United States back on the commission, said Democrat Representative Mr Tom Lantos of California.

    But opponents said Washington should not use its debts as bargaining chips and should not punish the United Nations for the UN Economic and Social Council's vote elevating France, Austria and Sweden to the commission's three open slots for Western nations.
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    So do we vote the Americans out of the UN now?


    Changing call sign to SIERRA PAPA OSCAR OSCAR FOXTROT.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 589 ✭✭✭Magwitch


    The Issue of arrears has been boiling for years (decades actually). The US bank roles alot of the UN BUdget and uses paying bits of that debt off as a bargaining chip.

    I think the SDI and Kyoto have finally tipped the scales and made for decisive action by other countries. With both Kyoto and SDI the US has gone too far.

    Washington must be crapping itself, it cannot come out fighting against he entire world. Dubbyah will have pie on his face at the end of this, on several issues.

    Keep your powder dry and your pants moist


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,264 ✭✭✭✭Hobbes


    <font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Magwitch:
    Washington must be crapping itself, it cannot come out fighting against the entire world.
    </font>

    careful what you wish for.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 589 ✭✭✭Magwitch


    US contributes 200 million to the UN anti aids program in Africa. How utterly cynical. 8.8 billion still needed. As a public relations excercise with the UN members Geroge W has really fvcked up, what an insult.

    The previous US administration had already identified aids as a "clear and present danger" to the security of the united states. The reason? Decimation of entire African countries would cause wide spread instability.
    This status is given only to the greatest crises, and even then rarely. The Bush administration has chosen to ignore this and use it instead as a really dumb PR exercise. How utterly stupid!


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement