Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why use a MAC for musicmaking??

  • 20-12-2004 11:50am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 337 ✭✭


    Hi,
    I'm a PC user, only used a MAC in work for a few months so i don't know a whole bunch about the machines.
    A friend of mine wants to get into making music on a computer... he has very little computer knowledge.
    I'm telling him he should get a PC cos it'd be cheaper, easier to upgrade etc, but he has his heart set on an apple just because he did a bit of research and a lot of professional types use apple gear and software called reason and q-base (sp?)...
    Any aspiring djs/liam howlett types out there that could recommend the best way to go?
    Can you get decent music programs for PC?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 450 ✭✭krinpit


    You can get cuebase and reason for the PC. I think they're both very very expensive applications.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 229 ✭✭kramxw


    krinpit wrote:
    You can get cuebase and reason for the PC. I think they're both very very expensive applications.

    Garageband ?

    Comes free with new Mac's.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 707 ✭✭✭deevey


    most music applictions at this stage (bar a few, acid / soundforge which are PC only) are avalable for both platforms.

    Personally i'd go for an apple due to the solidness / lack of bugs in OSX, i used to use PC only, and got fed up of continuous tweaking to get it to perform properly for audio or video, not to mention installing shedloads of various plugins all promising somthing special only to find 50 others already installed that do the same thing .. just end up with garbage files and empty folders after you remove them .. having to delete files manually etc..etc.. rant blagh...


    here are good things about PC :

    cheaper to build and get hardware for, e.g. soundcards etc... although most professional ones are cross platform as well.

    On the program side of things.... ...

    Sequencer programs

    cubase (x platform)
    ableton live (x platform)
    reason (x platform)
    cakerwalk (x platform)
    logic (mac only now, older versions only for PC)

    plugins

    absynth (x platform)
    fm7 (x platform)
    arturia moog (x platform)

    Editing programs

    soundforge (pc only)
    acid (pc only)
    Bias Peak (mac only)
    recycle (x platform)

    Only a few samples of progs, for every one on PC there a mac equivilant and vice versa.

    my feeling is go with the Mac, OSX is a rock solid operating system, (havent actually rebooted my ibook in 3 weeks!) and you dont have to strip half the applications out and never use it on the internet to keep it that way, due to spyware, security holes all over etc...

    Theres more then enough plugins and programs to keep anyone happy... quality over quantity.

    laters

    Steve C


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 49 SteveFE


    PC might be cheaper, but that's about as far as it goes. Reasons?

    1. On board audio - Macs have always had it and it's always been damn good. With the variety of inexpensive external USB and Firewire in-out boxes now available it's even better, but the internal A-D converters are still great quality. Also something like an eMac has pretty decent built-in speakers (not that loud but OK for listening to a playback). I use an eMac with an M-audio USB box and a couple of AKG D770 mics for the odd live recording thing, straight to stereo using the free bundled SoundStudio app and the results are great. I can also fit the whole lot into the front seat of the car and have it set up ready to record in about two minutes, including starting up the Mac :D

    2. Ease of use - OSX is simple and pretty idiot proof.

    3. Bundled apps - as mentioned above, GarageBand is free with all Macs and is not bad for simple recordings. I got a limited (in number of tracks and features, but still highly useable) copies of Live 3 and Reason bundled with the M-audio box.

    3. Security - simply put, you can use OSX and forget about viruses, worms, trojans etc. They may exist for X but you'll be very very unlucky to get hit by one. Windies machine OTOH will need perpetual patching and antivirus updates, which if your mate is not a techie, he won't be very adept or happy about doing.

    Other general advice. Buy as much RAM as possible with whichever puter he decides to get. Music progs love RAM and eat it for breakfast lunch and dinner. 512MB or 1GB is about right. Also biggest feasible HD - even a 40 or 80GB disk fills up quick with multitrack audio.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 49 SteveFE


    www.osxaudio.com is a top Mac audio/music site by the way. Good forums and lots of news/reviews.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 707 ✭✭✭deevey


    oh yeah and, the latency on built in audio is about 1/4 what onboard PC's will have. :)

    Oh also you could get him to check out the protools mac for sale in the for sale section ... deffo worth while if he's halfway serious here the digi 001 goes for 400 + on ebay alone, he gets the mac + plugins + monitor + fully licenced industry standard software ...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 49 SteveFE


    Editing programs

    soundforge (pc only)
    acid (pc only)
    Bias Peak (mac only)
    recycle (x platform)



    And SoundStudio is bundled free with new Macs and does loads of things.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,846 ✭✭✭✭eth0_




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 147 ✭✭seagizmo


    eth0_ wrote:
    One other great advantage is that mac (well mine does anyway) ignores all copy protection. I have yet to find a pseudo-cd that doesn't work in my powerbook.

    If that is not a reason to use a Mac, I just don't know ;)

    SG


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 337 ✭✭MunkyHed


    I know you all have really pushed the apple thing but i still just hink they're too expensive. A much more powerful PC can be built for the same money you pay for an apple. Thanks for the info tho, i'll forward it to my buddy who'll have to make some decisions!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 74 ✭✭red-not-blue


    I agree about the Mac to a point but I've yet to find an equivelent to Cool Edit Pro on the Mac which is a great pity as the two would be perfect together.

    R-N-B


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,264 ✭✭✭RicardoSmith


    The differences between Mac's and PC's are quite subtle. At the end of the day it depends which hardware and software you prefer. Which best suits you and your use. Its a matter of personal choice. In general terms they are very similar. Either makes a great music platform. Its not always about having the fastest hardware sometimes a certain combination of software and hardware just works well.

    Just make sure you don't confuse what you think is best, with what is best for your mate.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 182 ✭✭David Stewart


    There is no doubt that the economies of scale mean that the base price of a PC will always be less than that of a Mac. But remember when comparing them that many of the features that are standard on a Mac are optional on a PC so the final price difference may not be that large. Also, when you buy from Apple you are buying from one supplier. I have an iMac with built in Harmon Kardon speakers, an ATI Rage graphics card, Firewire ports, Ethernet and an internal modem. But I have one installation disk. My father has a Dell with a sound card, a graphics card, speakers and an internal modem. He also has installation disks for each of them. When he upgraded from Windows ME to XP we had to source new drivers for the modem. When Apple updates its OS, it updates everything.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,264 ✭✭✭RicardoSmith


    Its not ecomomy of scale. You can build a PC as cheap or as expensive as you want. You could build a €300 or a €30,000 PC !!!

    A PC is like lego, you can build it anyway you want, configure it anyway you want. A Mac is much more limited. Which means its simpler to operate. That both an advantage and a disadvantage. With a PC you have more choice.

    Also comparing an iMac with a Stand PC is not a valid comparison. Why not compare it against a G4 tower with 3rd party add in cards and the process is the same. An iMac is like a laptop. My Sony Laptop comes with one CD with everything on it. So do a lot of PC Laptops.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 70 ✭✭PRE_10_DER


    just get a pc,, at least you can upgrade a pc.. don't worry about latence or onboard sound.. if you're friend is serious in any way,, he'll get some decent monitors and a soundcard/interface.. get the mbox factory bundle for 600e, it comes with a version of reason and a fully functional version on pro tools,, it's a pro set up.. with some additional plug ins.. plus the mbox is an audio interface with 0 latency and excellent pre amps..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 486 ✭✭acous


    How much of an issue is upgradability? Really? CPU sockets change all the time, so once you want to upgrade you'll need a new motherboard. What's left... RAM? graphics card? audio interface? hard drives? upgradable on both platforms. Don't get me wrong, it's important alright, but it's a lot less important than some people think imho. The price you pay for it is possible incompatibility between components... which undoubtedly comes in the form of horrible glitches at crucial points in the production process :)

    I think the benefits of OS X outweigh the upgradability issue anyway. Here's another link to go with etho_'s: http://developer.apple.com/audio/coreaudio.html. CoreAudio is better than DirectX. OS X is better than Windows :P. Go Mac :).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,264 ✭✭✭RicardoSmith


    Acous wrote:
    ....The price you pay for it is possible incompatibility between components... which undoubtedly comes in the form of horrible glitches at crucial points in the production process ...

    If you're only finding that out at crucial points your process sucks. Apples aren't immune to glitches either. OSX has its problems too. Neither system is perfect. Its a matter of personal preference more than anything else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 486 ✭✭acous


    Come on, a glitch can appear at any time. It was just a joke anyway. Apples arent immune but from my experience OS X is a fair bit more solid. I can probably dig up some stats to back that point up if you'd like. Apple machines are definately more solid than PCs on average, if only for the fact that you can build a really crappy machine if you get the wrong stuff.

    I don't want to start a "my OS is best" war (though i own more PCs than macs), otherwise I would argue os X's superiority a little more :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,264 ✭✭✭RicardoSmith


    Theres very little difference between Macs and PC's. Like I've been saying it comes down to personal choice. Theres no PC vs Mac war. Apples Worldwide market share continues to decline each year and fell to 1.8% in 2004. At the moment the most successful thing its selling is the iPod. Nice machines, but theres not that much difference between them and PC's any more. Both platforms have problems, same as any computer. Telling someone who has no problems with their windows machines and servers, that they are more solid carrys no weight. You're likely to be dismissed as someone who doesn't know what they are doing.

    As for buying advice. Theres no difference between both platforms. Personally the low tech advantages that Apples used to have for creatives, has been diminished with OS X which is a lot more complex than OS 7,8 or 9.

    But they still over a different user experience. Which some prefer. Try before you buy. OS X looks better for sure. For that alone gets some brownie points.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 49 SteveFE


    Personally the low tech advantages that Apples used to have for creatives, has been diminished with OS X which is a lot more complex than OS 7,8 or 9.

    But they still over a different user experience. Which some prefer. Try before you buy. OS X looks better for sure. For that alone gets some brownie points.

    Is this a statement of fact or a matter of opinion? :D OSX is NOT more complex than OS7, 8 or 9, it's different, and in many ways a damn sight easier. I remember the fun and games I had getting MIDI gear to work with OS9, installing Opcode extensions all over the place and going through millions of setup screens, just to get a USB keyboard to trigger QuickTime sounds and talk to an external sound module. All this is detected and set up virtually automatically in X.

    OSX looks better - gee thanks. We kind of knew that already ;)

    The point I made about an OSX box not needing A/V patches and security plugs every week still stands. If OP's mate wants to use his machine for general internet stuff and he's not techie, he'll just LOVE keeping his Windies box updated and worm/spyware/malware-free won't he?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,264 ✭✭✭RicardoSmith


    I've introduced new users to OS 6,7 8 & 9 and also OS X. I can only go by that experience. Same way I think XP is woeful for new users. W2K is much better.

    So your saying that all MIDI, USB gear, will work perfectly, first time on OSX.

    Security through ignorance - brilliant. Security through obscurity (1.8%) is what you're actually talking about. So are you suggesting on a Mac you don't need to have a your AV reguarly updated? Great plan!

    Its a unix box, there are virus'es and exploits for it. Just not as many. That 1.8% again. A stupid user can compromise that easily too.

    Again the issues are the same on both platforms.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 486 ✭✭acous


    Theres very little difference between Macs and PC's. Like I've been saying it comes down to personal choice.
    Yes, the biggest factor in choosing for most people will be personal preference. The difference between Mac boxes and PCs are subtle. The difference between OS X and Windows is less subtle though. OS X comes out on top in almost every objectively assessable area I can think of... graphics, audio, networking etc.
    Telling someone who has no problems with their windows machines and servers, that they are more solid carrys no weight. You're likely to be dismissed as someone who doesn't know what they are doing.
    How is this relevant? Just because one person has no problems with their machines doesn't change the fact that a higher percentage of windows machines experience problems.
    Theres no difference between both platforms.
    Ahem.
    Personally the low tech advantages that Apples used to have for creatives, has been diminished with OS X which is a lot more complex than OS 7,8 or 9.
    True, however OS X still shows an advantage over Windows in any usability studies that I've seen.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,264 ✭✭✭RicardoSmith


    I'm not going down the route of subjective opinions on biased stats, as all Mac vs PC arguments always are. Fact is that that the majority of computing is done on Windows PC's. So people are more familiar with them, and they work fine. If they didn't people and business'es wouldn't use them. Macs are good computers but they are a niche product in a decreasing market. I'm happy using either, the advantages and disadvantages of both systems all balance out for me, and I don't have a problem using either. They are just machines. Either you know how to use them or you don't.

    MunkyHed - Either PC or Mac is fine, but sounds like your mate has already decided on a Mac anyway. Asking for an opinion in a Mac forum is only going to give you one answer anyway. What did you expect?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,163 ✭✭✭ZENER


    Asking for an opinion in a Mac forum is only going to give you one answer anyway. What did you expect?

    */ Puts hand up */

    Please sir ! Me sir, me me me !!!! :D

    ZEN


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 486 ✭✭acous


    I'm not going down the route of subjective opinions on biased stats, as all Mac vs PC arguments always are.
    Biased stats are all we'll ever have. Opinions on the implementation of the various subsystems are always going to be subjective all right (but you can do a feature by feature comparison). I have to admit that I thought it was a commonly accepted view that OS X was ahead of the curve at the moment in the world of operating systems.
    Fact is that that the majority of computing is done on Windows PC's. So people are more familiar with them,
    yup.
    and they work fine. If they didn't people and business'es wouldn't use them.
    nope. They don't work fine. Regardless of the reasons behind it, viruses and spyware are a massive headache for the majority of home PC users. XP SP2 helps a little now. There are lots of reasons why people use Windows over OS X including hardware cost, cost of replacing software, compatibility with entrenched systems and familiarity.
    Macs are good computers but they are a niche product in a decreasing market.
    I don't agree that they're a niche product. What niche are they attempting to serve?
    I'm happy using either, the advantages and disadvantages of both systems all balance out for me, and I don't have a problem using either.
    Me either. I think OS X is *better* but I prefer using Windows because it's more familiar to me. My XP machine has been trouble free for... 62 weeks. Well, besides the order of my start menu items being occasionally randomised. I know a bit about computers though, the problems are generally with people who don't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 337 ✭✭MunkyHed


    Plenty of reading there for me after the christmas alright. Thanks for your views lads.
    What i was looking for here is someone to throw one undisputable reason why people use MAC systems to generate music.
    I don't think there is any point in goin down the road of comparing the operating systems on such a general basis. I know a lot more about windows than i ever will know about macOS especially from a troubleshooting point of view so i'll nearly always choose windows but from the music aspect i just don't know!
    A lot more research will have to be done into this subject and more threads posted in other forums to really be sure on a good decision.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,264 ✭✭✭RicardoSmith


    Feature count and creep is very Microsoft. Amused to see it used here. :)

    SP2 is not a replacement for a security policy and quality AV solution. People should be aware of the issues. Its like having a internet usage policy for your kids. You should be aware of the issues. If you choose to be ignorant, thats you're lookout.

    I've worked in IT for 10 years, I worked in companies where we had thousands of PC's. Maybe 10 or so Mac's. About 95% of the people I know use PC's. I know people with Mac's because I have one, and I come from a design background having worked in it for years. Saying all those thousands of PC's and the systems that run on them don't work fine is just absurd. Theres no credibility in that line of argument with any IT Professional.

    I'm more likely to have a user ask me where is the doc gone that the've been working on for month without saving is gone, after a power outage. Than have a problem that is OS specific. Same with home users. The differences in hardware are invisible to most users once they've become familar with a system.

    As you say theres lots of reason for choosing a PC over a Mac. But actually cost isn't one of them. Theres been lots of report illustrating that the cost of a Mac systems, even the G5 iMac is lower than an equivilent PC. So people are choosing on other criteria. Personally I think that most Mac people don't realise that the main issues are things you've mentioned like the cost of replacing software, compatibility with entrenched systems, familiarity with what they know, retraining users et. Most people will buy what everyone else or what they have at work. They don't want something they see as different.

    The niche market is 1.8% of people who choose Macs. You'll find most PC users have no empathy for the PC. They see it as a machine. Whereas most Mac users are fanaticial about their Mac's. They tend to be a certain type of user. Either use Macs in college or work, are creative people who want to be different, people who just like the Apple experience and style. Apple is a as much about style and elegance than it is about computing. People who buy expensive household appliances like a Dualit Toaster for 200 quid. Or a Stark orange Juicer are more like to have a Mac than a PC. They tend to be the creative types.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,264 ✭✭✭RicardoSmith


    MunkyHed wrote:
    ....
    What i was looking for here is someone to throw one undisputable reason why people use MAC systems to generate music.....

    There isn't any technical reason. There may have been 5 years ago but not now. Like I said its about the computing experience and style. Its a subjective opinion. If you are someone who has no contact with windows computers and doesn't want to know squat about computers, then maybe the Mac is a good choice. But you will end up having to learn something about computers regardless. Its like want to be able to drive a car, but not learn to drive or know anything about mechanics. It just can't be done. You have to maintain it by at least putting in fuel and getting it serviced.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 49 SteveFE


    There isn't any technical reason. There may have been 5 years ago but not now. Like I said its about the computing experience and style. Its a subjective opinion. If you are someone who has no contact with windows computers and doesn't want to know squat about computers, then maybe the Mac is a good choice. But you will end up having to learn something about computers regardless. Its like want to be able to drive a car, but not learn to drive or know anything about mechanics. It just can't be done. You have to maintain it by at least putting in fuel and getting it serviced.

    Did we fall out earlier? You talk an awful lot of sense, I wasn't having a go :D

    OP's mate being a muso and all, he may just find the experience and style arguments convincing. We musos are shallow creatures and tend to go for that sort of thing. You do need to do some maintenance with OSX (permissions repairs etc) but I stand by my AV argument - I've used Macs for well over ten years professionally, including a large-ish network on broadband, and never EVER been brought down by a virus. I understand that it's advisable to exercise some caution in not transferring PC viruses via email, and that AV is generally good practice, but I don't use it on my home system because I don't need the hassle.

    One last argument. An eMac, fully loaded with max RAM and big drive, will leave OP's mate a hell of a lot more desk space for his audio peripherals than anything else on the planet :) The built-in speakers are great for doing radio-style mixes (should save on the cost of a pair of those weenie things - Auratones?)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,264 ✭✭✭RicardoSmith


    Nah. I like Mac's but theres only so much techo babble I can take. I've never had a PC "brought down" (depending on what that means) either. eMac's are nice as are iMacs. But you'd be better off with an iBook in my opinion. Buy a TFT as 2nd monitor. Maybe a full sized keyboard and mouse if you felt that you needed it. I have the similar rig only based around a sony laptop.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 486 ✭✭acous


    Yeah yeah, OS X is bloated :) It's possibly it's worst problem. It does have enough redeeming qualities, IMHO. I maintain that it's ahead of the curve.

    As far as security, SP2 is better than nothing. The biggest factor for me is the firewall being enabled all the time. People should be aware of the issues but they're generally not. Most people know they need a virus scanner these days, but thats about it. What you're talking about is corporate networks. This is about a guy making music.

    I don't work in computers. In my spare time I look after a few small windows networks in the area. I don't have any software trouble with them, generally. I also help out the people I know with computer trouble as any decent geek would. There's a high percentage of macs around here - I guess cos there's a lot of artists. I know this is all circumstantial evidence, I just want to show you where I'm coming from. The problems I get from pc users are typically "i can't connect to the internet" or "the internet isn't working right", of course 90% of the time it's a spyware and virus infestation. Other times it's a blue screen on boot after installing something dodgy. The problems I get from mac users are more varied... "iTunes is stuck", "I can't turn off my computer" :), "safari won't open". There isn't any real technical reason for this, people using windows seem to be more likely to download crap because there's more windows crap out there. It is security through obscurity. OS X hasn't been tested in a similar environment so it's anyone's guess as to how it would perform.

    Cost can be a factor for some people, even if it shouldn't be. For example, the G5 iMac is good value for what you get, but it doesn't compare to the 'bargain' of a €600 dell. People do get what everyone else has though. In the ~15 people I help out with macs, many went with apple because of their excellent laptop hardware, many others chose macs because they used them before or knew people who had them. The tend to turn into fanatics. No idea why :) None of them buy ultra expensive household appliances though.

    I agree that there's no single big reason for musicians to use a Mac. The little reasons I mentioned (CoreAudio etc.) have only small benefits to end users at the moment and are no more significant than the rest of the computing experience.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 49 SteveFE


    Acous wrote:
    The problems I get from pc users are typically "i can't connect to the internet" or "the internet isn't working right", of course 90% of the time it's a spyware and virus infestation. Other times it's a blue screen on boot after installing something dodgy. The problems I get from mac users are more varied... "iTunes is stuck", "I can't turn off my computer" :), "safari won't open". There isn't any real technical reason for this, people using windows seem to be more likely to download crap because there's more windows crap out there. It is security through obscurity. OS X hasn't been tested in a similar environment so it's anyone's guess as to how it would perform.

    Just to introduce an unwelcome note of snobbery;) I read somewhere that the typical Mac buyer's social alignment was on a par with those who drive Saabs, i.e. a bit better off than average, and educated. Does that tie in with your experience? Must admit, the only Maccies I know who I'd define as "working class" (whatever that is) are those who've discovered the benefits through practical work experience, rather than those who've made a style choice. Same goes for me. I was computer-illiterate before being forced into using a Mac in the print business, and had I had to use a PC at that time (ca System 7 / DOS / early attempts at Windies), I probably would have changed career and stayed illiterate :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,264 ✭✭✭RicardoSmith


    How did you make "decision" if you were forced into it, via work. Thats not a decision. :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,101 ✭✭✭Kingsize


    i have an old g3 blue mac which was kindly donated to me by a mate ( with reason installed )which got me seriously into makin music on the computer i do love macs although i think its easier to get up & running on a pc especially if you are on a budget.you can now buy a half decent pc for about 400 squid & if you look in the right places get top notch software /& upgrade bits for about the same price which is still cheaper than a mac.
    if your mate is anyway serious he probably should not use his music pc for the internet, or at least use a dual boot system to minimise any possible "viral" damage.I currently do most of my stuff on the pc which can sometimes be a pain but i would never have been able to get to this stage on my old mac...& could not afford a top notch mac


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 337 ✭✭MunkyHed


    Kingsize wrote:
    i have an old g3 blue mac which was kindly donated to me by a mate ( with reason installed )which got me seriously into makin music on the computer i do love macs although i think its easier to get up & running on a pc especially if you are on a budget.you can now buy a half decent pc for about 400 squid & if you look in the right places get top notch software /& upgrade bits for about the same price which is still cheaper than a mac.
    if your mate is anyway serious he probably should not use his music pc for the internet, or at least use a dual boot system to minimise any possible "viral" damage.I currently do most of my stuff on the pc which can sometimes be a pain but i would never have been able to get to this stage on my old mac...& could not afford a top notch mac

    Best post so far!!! Nice n simple! like meself! yuck yuck!! :D

    He's not usin the machine for internet at all as he doesn't have a landline installed even so looks like my PC know how will be used to build a damn good system andplenty of software to be bought methinks!


  • Advertisement
Advertisement