Is goldeneye rogue agent any good.

gamer

I,m just wondering has anyone here played goldeneye rogue agent, is it worth buying,i know it gets a bad review on eurogamer,but i liked 007 nightfire on the ps2.I just like stealth fps games like sof etc.

shinzon

by all accounts and reviews its a very poor game

Shin

Retr0gamer

no

rainbow kirby

Takes a dump all over the good name of the N64 classic. This game should never have been made.

Jim

EA sell out.
Its what you would expect.

femmedujour

Really, I heard it was good. What makes it so bad?

Jim

The IGN interwiew is somewhat funny.
Cba finding the link.

jonnybadd

Its slow, you make a head shot once every five or six shots you make at someones head i.e. the accuracy is appaling, story is rubbish, levels are too meh..., no excitment and the slowness makes it even worse. Multiplyer online is a laugh occasionaly. Overall i'd give it 5/10 average as a stand alone fps. The fact that its called goldeneye makes people poo-poo on it a lot worse i feel

Horsefumbler

A lot of the eEA james bond games have been ****e. Although the first one they made for the N64, The World Is Not Enough, was actually quite good

Headshot

its crap

elvis2002

i had a play on the xbox in a shop, I thought it was the xbox but the game is really really slow. Maybe im expecting too much from a FPS on a console but its astonishingly bad. Tripe i would say. Its embarrassing that Goldeneye is actually still 100 times a better game although many magazines and what not will try and tell you its a fantastic game. Its terrible, Nightfire is actually much better. A good enough game on the PC. Dont waste your money. Rent it out!.

d22ontour

there is only 1 goldeneye and it aint the usual ea bond rubbish maybe they might improve it in their yearly updates

evad_lhorg

elvis2002 wrote:

i had a play on the xbox in a shop, I thought it was the xbox but the game is really really slow. Maybe im expecting too much from a FPS on a console but its astonishingly bad. Tripe i would say. Its embarrassing that Goldeneye is actually still 100 times a better game although many magazines and what not will try and tell you its a fantastic game. Its terrible, Nightfire is actually much better. A good enough game on the PC. Dont waste your money. Rent it out!.

that's exactly what i saw. it was terribly slow and the controls were absolute rubbish.

elvis2002

quake 2 is better

Retr0gamer

Which is saying something since Q2 is crap.

Deadwing

Retr0gamer wrote:

Which is saying something since Q2 is crap.

Q2 was cool...
But i preferred Q1 cause of the nailgun...god i loved that gun lol.

Basically you should know the drill by now: James bond game + EA = overhyped, well marketed, piece of sh!t.
And a well marketed piece of sh!t, is still a piece of sh!t.

Retr0gamer

Off topic but Q2 was crap. The art direction was brown textures flooded with coloured lighting that looked really out of place, enemy AI that was dumber than an LCA student despite the hype, and really boring weapons and level design. Multiplayer was alright. If it wasn't for the Edge it would have been much worse.

Deadwing

Retr0gamer wrote:

Off topic but Q2 was crap. The art direction was brown textures flooded with coloured lighting that looked really out of place, enemy AI that was dumber than an LCA student despite the hype, and really boring weapons and level design. Multiplayer was alright. If it wasn't for the Edge it would have been much worse.

Oh sod off and play some obscure japanese rpg noones ever heard of

Retr0gamer

and you can play your soulless american action games. Now everybody is happy