Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on [email protected] for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact [email protected]

the sexual offences act 2006

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 18,689 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    You are asking the wrong question. The only place the age of the accused comes into play is that they can have the defence available to them to a charge under S3 that the victim consented, but only when they are younger than the victim, or not more than 2 years older. And the victim has to have been older than 15.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So you're saying two people who have sex underage can get done for it under s.2?



  • Registered Users Posts: 25,713 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    A girl would be protected by s. 5. A boy could be prosecuted. But as a policy matter there wouldn't usually be a prosecution in such a case unless there were aggravating factors.

    (IIRC there was a case about 10 years ago in which a 15-year old boy was prosecuted and convicted for having sex with a 14-year old girl. He wasn't charged with rape but the facts strongly suggested that the sex had been non-consensual.)



Advertisement