Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

U.S. kills Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri in drone strike

Options
2»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 81,626 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    If you say so. I don't watch them, I read the watchdogs about it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,035 ✭✭✭MFPM


    While few will mourn the passing of this man, once more the US demonstrates that they do what they wish, when they wish, not a word of critique of their actions...Biden dressing it up as justice for the victims of 9/11, what about the victims of US wars in the Middle East or do they not matter?



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    What would you do? Send him a bouquet of flowers and ask him nicely to hand himself in?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,691 ✭✭✭donaghs


    Watchdogs, ok…

    Anyway, back to Al Zawahiri.

    This article from a Pakistan newspaper on July 21st mentions that Al Qaeda are supposed to be growing in strength in Afghanistan, and that Al Zawahiri is living freely and communicating there.

    I hadn’t been following news on him so when the news of his death broke, I assumed it was a big surprise that he was in Kabul.

    The Guardian ain’t exactly praising Biden for this killing, but surely they did didn’t expect him ask the Taliban to extradite him? In which case he’d vanish. Does this mean the post-Trump goodwill towards Biden is fading?



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,675 ✭✭✭buried


    Well, they could have sent in some Delta Force lads to capture a 70 year old living in sleepy luxury next to other luxurious mercenaries living on Kabul's Rodeo Drive? Send him back to New York to actually account for his vicious crimes in a liberal democracy? He actually wouldn't have liked that.

    "You have disgraced yourselves again" - W. B. Yeats



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,035 ✭✭✭MFPM


    So you're OK with open season by any country against it's enemies.....you OK with Al Qaeda hitting back against the US? Hamas taking out Nethanyahu for example for the victims of 2014? Where do we stop...or is just OK for the US to do it because you know 'democracy', 'human rights', the 'rule of law', 'internationa law'...am I missing anything?



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,675 ✭✭✭buried


    Hopefully the CIA gets wind of Lisa Smiths new address and sends some drones, because arguably that wan is actually far more dangerous than anything Zawahiri had to offer.

    "You have disgraced yourselves again" - W. B. Yeats



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,691 ✭✭✭donaghs


    How would you get a team of people into Kabul, snatch him, and get them out again? Where would they take of and land from? Etc. Etc.

    The Bin Laden operation was a short trip from an Afghan airbase near the Pakistan border to Abbotabad and back. The US don’t have a presence in the area anymore.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,076 Mod ✭✭✭✭igCorcaigh


    More than a few will mourn his passing. AQ and IS are not in any way in the same league as the militaries of any recognised national power. We have to not loose sight of what a danger these groups pose to all our security.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,675 ✭✭✭buried


    The place is a fourth world warzone, I'm quite sure that if the Americans actually wanted to take him alive, they could have well managed it, they have done so in far more unsecure zones also out of their control, such as various nations in South America, Mexico, etc where they drop out the various druglords they don't like numerous other times every single year. They obviously didn't want to take him alive and account for his crimes, for whatever reason.

    "You have disgraced yourselves again" - W. B. Yeats



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,035 ✭✭✭MFPM


    Not the point, the point is the US took direct military action outside its borders to take out someone they claim was involved in an attack 21 years ago....if China did that, or Venezuela or Cuba - would the US be saying fair enough lads, you were right? You know there would be an international outcry.

    As for 'our' security that really depends on your place in the world doesn't it - who poses the biggest threat to Venezuelan or Chilean or Bolivian security - Al Qaeda or the US?



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,076 Mod ✭✭✭✭igCorcaigh


    When it comes to the people who blew up teenage girls at a concert in Manchester, or crushed families to death in Nice, I know who the bigger threat is. And I do agree with you about the abuse of power by the US and allies. No argument there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    This guy was in the thick of actively targetting and killing as many civilians as possible for three decades. If the US had found and wasted him in this manner in the weeks after 9/11 no one would have batted an eyelid.

    They weren't going to get him out of Afghanistan where they have limited resources now - and the guy was protected by the Haqqani Network (who in turn enjoy the patronage of the Pakistani ISI*), so just drone execute him and be done with it.

    Justice was a long time coming to him, and he probably thought he was home and hosed in a friendly country when he stepped out on his balcony.

    *In fact, it's likely the Pakistanis gave him up after years of sheltering him in secret - and they owed the US big time after the Bin Laden debacle. They were always going to get the top of the AQ tree in one way or another, and I actually find it funny that anyone is surprised or feigning outrage about an arch terrorist of the highest order meeting their end in such a manner.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,691 ✭✭✭donaghs


    Lots of sites claiming Pakistan gave him up. Indian news story linking it to badly needed loan from the IMF

    https://m.timesofindia.com/world/us/us-eliminates-zawahiri-in-drone-strike-did-pakistan-sell-him-out-for-imf-bailout/amp_articleshow/93300112.cms



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,035 ✭✭✭MFPM


    I've no difficulty with that point in reference to those victims...but is there a hierarchy of victims, are those blown up by Al Q or ISIS more deserving of 'revenge' than those murdered by US drone strikes or Israeli or Saudi bombing in Palestine or Yemen...



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Highly likely that Pakistan gave the US his head. Half the new Taliban Government is in the ISI's pocket via the Haqqani network.

    The Pakistani security services are the kings of double-dealing. They were probably sheltering him for years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 81,626 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Watchdogs, ok…

    You should try it. It's much more efficient than trying to watch television.

    Given up for a bailout tracks. We'll see.



  • Registered Users Posts: 85 ✭✭Realtai


    This ^^^

    I guess this news story is a great way to deflect the fact that Biden is two faced and useless.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,691 ✭✭✭donaghs


    The “bailout” idea is just an idea. I wouldn’t trust it as I’ve only so far seen it in Indian media, and they tend to take a dim view a of Pakistan, especially when it comes to Pakistans dealing with extremists.



Advertisement