Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all,
Vanilla are planning an update to the site on April 24th (next Wednesday). It is a major PHP8 update which is expected to boost performance across the site. The site will be down from 7pm and it is expected to take about an hour to complete. We appreciate your patience during the update.
Thanks all.

Alan Kelly stepping down

Options
123457

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    This'll be the second coronation in recent years



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Respect the labour grass roots for hanging in there. The decision makers are the problem. While Ivana is the only candidate, great *slow hand clap*



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,363 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I don’t disagree with you, and the restriction to certain third level institutions, excluding the TUs, is problematic also, but we did have a referendum on the Seanad in recent years, and we collectively voted to keep it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,363 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    It’s not my party, but you’re going to get dizzy from shifting the goalposts like that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,703 ✭✭✭✭padd b1975


    Not at all.

    In fact I'm quite looking forward to watching her crash and burn



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    Sir, you've spent two whole days singing the praises of a very mediocre politician who is going to be leader of an extremely mediocre political party, no one who isn't a member of said party would be taking on allcomers like you've done.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,363 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Wrong again, I’m not a party member, and I’m not sure that Bacik would be the right leader. If people want criticise her based on the facts, then fire ahead. If they want to make up sh1t, I’ll continue to take them on.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    All I said was she was unlikely to be re-elected in Dublin Bay South. Remember the Labour logo in the by-election posters was as small as an FF candidates logo in 2011.

    One trick donkey,imo



  • Registered Users Posts: 66,844 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    They'll make Ivana the new leader, stagnate some more and maybe then decide they need to completely revamp. Maybe.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,363 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    It will be a very tough battle in DBS for sure, not sure that anyone of the incumbents is safe. Anything could happen, but it is too soon to be making predictions,


    Im not sure that she’s the right leader for Labour, and I’m not sure that taking the leadership now is the right thing for her.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,017 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    We also had a referendum - that was passed - that said that all third-level institutions should be represented equally in the Seanad, but 40 years later, that little bit of democracy has still been nicely ignored.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,363 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    True, though that’s no particular reflection on Bacik.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,017 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    On Bacik, her acclamation as leader won't make any difference to Labour, one way or the other - as borne out in today's Sindo poll. 21% less likely to vote for Labour with her as leader, 17% more likely (or maybe it's the other way around). When your party is at 3% in the polls, 4% of 3% is a rounding error.

    No, it's a reflection on every party that's been in government since 1979 for failing to implement the democratically mandated will of the people. Which would include Labour. And you'd think maybe the Dublin University and NUI senators, recognising their privilege, might have brought it up over the years? Once or twice, like.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,363 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Are you sure that they never brought it up? Once or twice like?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,904 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Bacik is the massive favourite with the bookies but shes an awful choice. She'll move Labour further towards the urban, middle class, very socially liberal demographic thats her base. Which is limited in numbers around the country to begin with, but is also already heavily competed for by the SocDems and Greens.

    What remains of Labour's traditional working class vote is going to evaporate under her. SF will be delighted, they'll be the ones who gain most from a Bacik leadership.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,006 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    She'll move Labour further towards the urban, middle class, very socially liberal demographic thats her base. Which is limited in numbers around the country to begin with, but is also already heavily competed for by the SocDems and Greens.

    Yes but Labour under Bacik (less so under Kelly, though he tried) can plausibly compete with the Greens and Soc Dems on that turf, and maybe even best them. Whereas going head to head with SF at present as the party of the angry working classes can only end in failure and ridicule. Remember Labour are not realistically looking to return to Gilmore Gale days at the next election, they are battling for survival, and holding 4 or 5 seats (about 3% of total Dail seats) would be a very decent return. And IMO going ultra-woke under Bacik might do just enough to secure them that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    A lot of the ultra-woke are likely not registered to vote



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,904 ✭✭✭Blut2


    That turf isn't big enough to be worth competing with two other, more established, parties for. There are at absolute most 10 urban, socially liberal seats of that nature in the entire country. And the two other parties both have significantly stronger claims to it - the SocDems are a lot more woke, diverse, and young, and the Greens have the environmentalism/climate change drive. Labour chasing it will involve them losing more voters than they'll gain.

    Bacik isn't even remotely secure in her own seat with that policy platform, in the most socially liberal constituency in the country. Dublin Bay South has 4 TDs - one will be safe SF, one safe FG. Then the remaining two will be split between Bacik, Jim O'Callaghan and Eamon Ryan.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,363 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I wouldn't be sure that Andrews would be all that safe at all there. He seems to have zero national profile. What was the last time you heard him on RTE or Newstalk as the SF rep. I've never seen any sign of him doing a public meeting or even getting uppity about Sandymount cycle route or similar. He seems to have kept a remarkably low profile. Of the incumbents, I'd say O'Callaghan is probably the safest, given his profile, with Bacik, Ryan, FG, Andrews all fighting for the remaining seats, which could go any direction.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,904 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Andrews was comfortably elected in 2020 and SF have risen from 24%~ of the vote then to polling at 33-34% consistently now. People like Violet-Anne Wynne getting elected show that a lot of SF voters just vote for the brand name, they don't actually care about the TD in question that much.

    Its very, very unlikely that Andrews doesn't get elected in the next election if SF's polling numbers hold up - nevermind if they keep increasing, as they have done for the last few years. If SF hit 40%+ in the polls its more likely SF get two seats than zero.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,091 ✭✭✭Augme


    I don't think Bacik is a particular strong candidate as a party lesder but the biggest problem for labour is that she is the best choice.


    Someone mentioned earlier that Labour best chance is to compete with the Soc Dems and Greens and possible best them. I don't think they have any chance of doing that given the current state of quality of Labour politicians. They have very few politicians that stand out or will generate alot support.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,005 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    It's a long time ago now,but there was a time when The Labour Party did in fact resonate with "Ordinary People" and at least some of it's leaders fought a good fight for those "Ordinary People"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Cluskey


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Agree. They need to ditch the academic type new Labour shite and get back to relating to the working public. Thats why Bacik is a bad pick IMO.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    New party name would be needed,

    No Manual Labour doesn't really have a great ring to it



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,017 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid



    If they did, it was likely while clutching their pearls in a "Won't someone think of the northsiders' children out there in... DCU? Yes, DCU!" way, because 40+ **** years after the referendum, it's still not been acted on. If any of them were serious about it, it would have been very easy to embarrass the government into doing something about it. A PQ every two months. A "Really, Minister?" evisceration of Dermot Ahern when he introduced the crime of blasphemy to the statute books "because it's in the constitution and people voted for the constitution so we have to act on that..." Something? Anything?



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,363 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I don’t disagree, but i has never gotten any serious public momentum.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,291 ✭✭✭jmcc


    Perhaps it means that one should respect one's betters especially if they attended Trinners. :) It is the kind of forelock tugging that is rarely seen these days.

    Regards...jmcc



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    All this talk about Labour and the working-class is hs. They've been the party of the urban liberals since the '70s, the days of Conor Cruise O'B and David Thornley.

    Was listening to Bacik on the radio at lunch time, she's Thornley without the problems that unfortunate individual had. Big improvement communications skills-wise on AK.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,007 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    It's likely people are already on the verge of leaving the party.

    Ivana never even truly identified as Labour unless she was fighting fighting a seat in the Dail.

    Bizarre that Labour have got into a position of electing someone like Bacik.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    Have they all gone to join the Russian army or what? 12 days and not a whimper



Advertisement