We've partnered up with to offer a space where you can talk directly to Peter from and get an exclusive discount code for a free job listing. If you are recruiting or know anyone else who is please check out the forum here.
If you have a new account but can't post, please email Niamh on [email protected] for help to verify your email address. Thanks :)

Covid vaccines - thread banned users in First Post



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,343 ✭✭✭✭ King Mob

    Aaaaannnd back around to the dancing medical staff again...

  • Registered Users Posts: 14,443 ✭✭✭✭ Dohnjoe

    I can envision the news stories now..

    "Shock as internet poster on conspiracy theory forum uncovers staggering death figures from the vaccines, stuns global medical science"

    The poster offered incredible scientific insight to their discovery, "I just saw a figure on the VAERS thing and added a few zeros to it, I mean it has to be big right"

    National statisticians, virologists, mortuary analysts, regulators and medical experts from all around the world stumped as their hundreds of reports and studies turn out to be incorrect.

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,695 ✭✭✭ Pinch Flat

    Thanks for the deflection - you've just negated your commwnt previusly about respect to healthcare workers. You've no idea. Anyway getting back to the point- who's going to replace the healthcare workers? Maybe we'll see a few bitchute phds taking up the slack.

    Post edited by Pinch Flat on

  • Registered Users Posts: 965 ✭✭✭ DrFrost

    You really need to let go of this "Twitter" obsession in your head, lol. Say it to Dohnjoe, not me.

    I jumped in initially to dispute the other deluded lad who was claiming there was "zero safety concerns" with the jab.

    Of course I don't know the exact number. How would anyone. Well over your 100k figure, anyway. You're next 🤣

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,695 ✭✭✭ Pinch Flat

    "Citing his recent research, courtesy of a twitter meme, this shocking discovery will send shock waves through medical staff, all of whom were lined up and forced to take this experimedical nanotechnology that's already killed millions"

  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 965 ✭✭✭ DrFrost

    Is that supposed to be directed at me? I said at least 100k deaths and serious side effects due to the needlecraft. Learn to read properly, ya dope 😄

    Post edited by DrFrost on

  • Registered Users Posts: 965 ✭✭✭ DrFrost

    This is one of the major issues. Government and their "partners" big pharma (as Trudeau refers to Pfizer in Canada) putting pressure or coercing people into taking a shot or two per year. I don't think they'll get away with the discriminatory vaccine passport this time around, thankfully.

    Lot of the same dummies who were openly calling for medical discrimination last year, are now shouting "MY BODY, MY CHOICE" in relation to the Roe v Wade ruling 🤣

  • Registered Users Posts: 14,443 ✭✭✭✭ Dohnjoe

    I read it just fine. Just to confirm, you personally believe at least 100k people globally have been killed/maimed by these vaccines?

    How many lives would you say the vaccines have saved?

  • Registered Users Posts: 965 ✭✭✭ DrFrost

    Out of 10.77 billion doses administered, yes, I believe at least 100k have been killed or suffered severe side effects linked to the mRNA nanotech needlecraft. Sudden death syndrome, strokes, heart attacks, "died in his sleep"... all that good stuff on the rise the past year. Gotta love the media trying to explain it away with "climate change", "post-pandemic stress", or my recent favourite, "gardening"... Lol. Hint: it's not. Then throw in myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clots, Bell's Palsey and the host of other side effects we keep hearing about and seeing... Yes, obviously over 100k internationally. Easily.

    Don't know re: lives saved by vaccine. Median age of Covid deaths in Ireland pre-waxx rollout was 83.. the same as that for all deaths.

    Don't worry anyway, Dohn; you're probably like Mr. Burns in that all your diseases cancel each other out. You'll be alright. Mob is done for, tho, haha.

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,343 ✭✭✭✭ King Mob

    Again, it's were your beliefs come from. You're parroting what the grifters on there say.

    Ok, so you believe it's over 100,000 deaths due to vaccines but less that 500,000. Cool

    That's not an issue then according to your own metrics.

  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭ Fr0g

    I'll just leave this here shall I?

    1000 peer reviewed medical studies on vaccine injuries. All collated in one place for your convenience.

  • Registered Users Posts: 965 ✭✭✭ DrFrost

    Never said "over 100k but less than 500k". That's just you doing that weird thing you keep doing. I said "at least 100k". That's all. Accept it, ya big baby, haha.

    Love the way you talk about "grifters", yet you on here shilling for big pharma, a multi-billion dollar operation with a sh*t safety record and huge compensation payouts 🤣 Btw, you can't sue them if you get fkd up - they're indemnified this time 'round. Thank you for your sacrifice, guinea pig.

    Alright, enough, man; I'll be on here talking boll*x all day like yourself otherwise 😄 Have a good one 🤙

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,343 ✭✭✭✭ King Mob

    Another twitter dump. You have not read any of those studies.

    Also, a reminder that you rejected a study presented to you and you claimed it was fraudulent based on nothing.

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,343 ✭✭✭✭ King Mob

    Lol and there's that accusation again. Didn't take you very long to fall back on it.

    You said:

    Well over your 100k figure, anyway

    You keep avoiding answering this very simple question in every way you can. It's very telling.

    Ok. You believe about 100,000 people have been killed by the vaccine.


    According to you guys, that's not a big deal.

  • Registered Users Posts: 965 ✭✭✭ DrFrost

  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭ Fr0g

    Yours wasn't a scientific study. It was based on pure speculation.

    But you want to reject a 1000 completely out of hand. No I haven't looked at them all. I don't need to. Do you understand what peer reviewed means?

  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭ Fr0g

    BTW Twitter is a medium for communication. Don't confuse it with the message. You need to get over this obsession with Twitter. It isn't the only source of information. In fact it's a bit of a cess pool tbh.

    Anyway Twitter wasn't the source. Glad to clear that up for you

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,343 ✭✭✭✭ King Mob

    And dodging the point again to fall back to silly insults.

    Typical really.

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,343 ✭✭✭✭ King Mob

    No, it was a scientific study. You have no idea what it was based on because you didn't read it. You just saw that it had a conclusion that you didn't like, so you decided that it was a fraudulent paper. That's it.

    Yes, I know what peer review means. The paper you lied about was peer reviewed.

    I'm not rejecting any studies. I'm just pointing out that because you are dumping shite from twitter again, and didn't bother to actually look into anything yourself or even think for yourself, you've no idea what any of those studies say or claim or support.

    The issue isn't with twitter specifically. It's just the place where grifters are able to spout nonsense and find easy marks like yourself who will reliably believe everything they are told and won't question the grift.

    Honestly now, how do you go about confirming something is true when you read it on twitter or watch it on youtube? Be specific. Tell us your process.

    Or is there no process?

    Also, I will take it from your complete lack of response or reaction that you agree with drfrost's claim that the vaccine has killed upwards of 100,000 people.

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭ manonboard

    Yes i understand its similar to flu boosters. I get a flu booster nearly every second year or so to deal with a lung issue I have. Kind of dangerous for me to miss it depending on how medication is helping or not helping me in any specific year.

    I think its not accurate to say we are not signing up to something. By normalizing and encouraging people to get the covid jab each 9 months etc. We are indeed signing up to a new social norm. Lets be clear, I have not stated in any fashion that i dont think people should get it. I think its perfectly good for now, but i have no problem at all with people questioning where the boundary for them lays. Do i want to get a flu shot and a covid shot each year?

    I have contracted covid twice. Once after 2 shots, again after the 3rd. It was pretty harmless to me. Hopefully that's because of the shots i got. Given how easy it was on my body I would be open to missing a shot and seeing how my body handles it. The shots absolutely obliterated me each time. Each time progressively worst. The third shot REALLY hit me hard. I think its perfectly reasonable for people to question/decide if their particular boundaries are ok with yearly shots or if its just too much to ask of people.

  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 965 ✭✭✭ DrFrost

    Re: healthcare workers, of course I respect them. Who doesn't.

    What I didn't respect was the "stay at home - the hospitals are rammed" propaganda coming out during the lockdowns, whilst all these retarded dance videos in empty hospitals suggested the opposite. The real question is "who was behind that propaganda"?

    Look at that video I linked. There's over a thousand comments. Every single one is wondering the same thing.

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,343 ✭✭✭✭ King Mob

    You respect them, but they are all involved in a giant global conspiracy to trick people into taking fake vaccines.

    Do tell, who was behind this "propaganda"?

    Why did they do it when it apparently gives the game away?

  • Registered Users Posts: 14,443 ✭✭✭✭ Dohnjoe

    Okay, this is your personal "figure". Not 50k, not 200k, but 100k. And what's your methodology for this figure? are there different amounts for each country or how does it work?

  • Registered Users Posts: 14,443 ✭✭✭✭ Dohnjoe

    Okay, however it doesn't have anything to do with "social norm". It's medical science. We have a new virus that mutates, ergo we may have to get boosters each year.

    It doesn't matter how hard or soft the shots/Covid hit you personally or even anecdotally. On a national level, boosters reduce the chance of people dying from Covid, therefore they are encouraged of obvious reasons. If you personally don't want to take them, then fine.

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,343 ✭✭✭✭ King Mob

    And what's funny is how often conspiracy theorists have told us that the virus with a 99.9% survival rate (their figure) is no big deal and nothing to worry about.

    But now according to them we've only 100,000 cases of serious injury (not just death, despite the question being asked) in 10,000,000,000 vaccines.

    that's a survival rate of 99.99%. The virus is still 10 times more deadly according to conspiracy theorists.

  • Registered Users Posts: 965 ✭✭✭ DrFrost

    Nurses didn't have to be "in on" anything. They were just entertaining themselves as they had nothing else to do.

    1. Mob gets told to stay at home because the hospitals are warzones
    2. Mob sees videos of bored nurses dancing in empty hospitals
    3. Who told Mob to stay at home, and why?

    Fck sake 😄

  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭ Fr0g

    As I've said before it was based on mathematical modelling using assumptions. I know that because I looked at it. I'm sure the maths is correct it's the assumptions (i.e. numbers plucked out of the air, having no basis in reality) I have a problem with.

    I check all my sources. I have checked enough of those 1k studies and/or seen them before to know that that are legitimate

    The truth is leaking out. Either you can't see it yet or you don't want to. If you don't like peer reviewed scientific studies what would it take to change your mind?

    If I drove a truck load of evidence up to your door would that be enough? 2 truckloads? How many would be enough?

    The only reason you keep saying "Twitter dump" is because you have no other argument. No other way of rubbishing perfectly valid information. You have no idea where I get my info.

  • Registered Users Posts: 5,827 ✭✭✭ $hifty

    I check all my sources. I have checked enough of those 1k studies and/or seen them before to know that that are legitimate


    You did nothing of the sort. Stop trying to act all Billy Big Bollocks and just own up to the fact that you're talking rubbish.

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,343 ✭✭✭✭ King Mob

    Lol. You're lying again.

    You claimed that study was fraudulent. You're claiming that they are just making up data.

    And all without reading the actual paper.

    How do you check sources? What specifically do you do?

    I keep saying twitter dump, because you guys keep dumping stuff from twitter that you don't check or look into.

    I believe it's twice now you've flipped between "I don't get my information from twitter" to "I get my info from twitter, it's totally valid."

    Where did you first see that list of studies. If it wasn't from twitter, where did you hear about it?

  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 23,343 ✭✭✭✭ King Mob

    And questions dodged as always.

    You are claiming that they are in on it.

    You believe they had nothing to do. Yet they were also saying that they were busy.

    The medical professionals know full well what was being said about them. If people were saying they were too busy, yet knew that they weren't, why don't they say anything about it?

    Can you point to any of the people in any of those videos saying that they weren't busy or they had nothing to do?

    Of course you don't. You'll just ignore this point because you can't address it.

    So again: who was behind this "propaganda"?

    Why did they do it when it apparently gives the game away?

    I don't think you can answer this because as always, you're just parroting something you read on twitter and you're not able to make up stuff on your own.