Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

What does the future hold for Donald Trump? - threadbans in OP

1107110721074107610771189

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Trump is also underperforming vs. the polls.

    In New Hampshire the polls said he should have won by 18 points. He only won by 11.

    In South Carolina the polls said he should have won by 28 points. He won by 20.

    The polls say he should have won Michigan by 58 points. He won by 41 points.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,289 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    The key question is how will those voters that aren't voting for him in the Primaries choose to behave in November?

    Their behaviour and perhaps reactions to any legal outcomes during the next few months will be critical.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,496 ✭✭✭✭ELM327




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,184 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Where they irrelevant before the primaries or is just since the primaries ended?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    Trump ahead in AZ, GE, NV, PA, WI, MN...that is not a good picture at all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,496 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Primary polls are relevant to the specific party, if there's a challenge. Once a candidate is decided, the primary polls arent relevant

    It's a very good or very bad picture depending on your allegiances. As a GOP/Trump fan I'm much more optimistic than I was at this time in 2016 or 2020. With the right targeted canvassing and ad spending, Trump has every chance of winning this. And, playing devil's advocate, if he does it's 110% the fault of the democrats for not ousting Biden.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,549 ✭✭✭Raoul Duke III


    I really hope you are a disappointed Trumpist come the day after the election - but I will agree with your point on Biden. He is very, very vulnerable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,730 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    The Dems would have looked far weaker if they turned on their incumbent sitting President, considering a) the economy has grown during Biden's term, b) sitting Presidents always have a huge advantage going for re-election (Trump is one of the very few who failed to be re-elected), and c) the line from the GOP would have been that the Dems are showing they made a mistake supporting Biden for the last few years, why would you trust them now?

    The only thing people can really point to Biden on is "He's older than he was 4 years ago". Yes, he moves slower than he did, looks more frail, and mixes up his words a bit more. That's not enough for the Dems to have pulled the ripcord on him for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,754 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    Like the colleague I mentioned earlier in the thread who said to me with a straight face "Trump is a character but Biden is a crook!".

    Me: ??? Er... 🧐 Are you maybe confusing their names or something??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    How'd ya like dem drug prices, economy, student debt forgiveness?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,496 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    I'm sure there are many more out there that share your view re "disappointed trumpist"

    I'm almost concerned with DJT leading in the polls that people or the backroom staff will be too complacent.

    Yes, I agree with most, it would have been difficult, but Biden had originally said he only wanted one term. If he could have been persuaded to not run again, it would have been better for the democrats IMO.

    I certainly would not be a fan of student loan forgiveness if I had paid my student loans in full or in part already, and others got theirs for free. The american economy is not all great either, unless you work in tech and have avoided the layoffs! Theres a large part of the country struggling. I wouldn't put the economy, student loan (partial) forgiveness, or drug prices as something Biden should be pushing. None are likely to win swing voters. Biden needs to hold blue states and win multiples of tossup states like WI, AZ, PA - although the GOP are leading in most of those in most polls.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Why are you against drugs (like insulin) being affordable?

    What is Trump doing to lure swing voters? From my (biased - I cannot abide the rapist) position, all I see is him whining about how unfair it is that the courts are after him, or that Joe Biden is old (like he is some spring chicken himself!)


    I'm not as worried. Polls are no longer reliable. When was the last time polls were right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,971 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    Why are you against drugs (like insulin) being affordable?

    Because they don't need insulin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,730 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Same with "I certainly would not be a fan of student loan forgiveness if I had paid my student loans in full or in part already, and others got theirs for free."

    Which amounts to "I wouldn't be a fan of people not having to be in debt for decades if I had been in debt for decades"

    The failure of previous governments to tackle the absurd cost and impact of student loans on people does not mean successive governments should enforce and protect that cost and impact on future generations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,676 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    One of the most telling statistics regarding the US disdain for their sick, poor & weak is IMO at least, the rate of amputation encountered by diabetics in the US.

    The US is no place to have a chronic illness if one isn't wealthy. The diabetes angle hits home as it's an illness that I suffer (and if memory serves? You too?)

    My diabetes would quite literally bankrupt me within a couple of years stateside. Whereas here, and in most other developed countries. It is afforded a level of support in health spending that assures complications are avoided. Avoiding complications and keeping people healthy? Keeps people productive and contributing longer, it raises economic output.

    The retreat from Truman's National Healthcare plan for post WW2 and the wedding of social care, social democracy and public healthcare to Communism, was a masterful stroke by US health insurers at the time. It's a smear that has stuck like a limpet.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I said before and will say it again: my wife has a long term illness that requires a steroid injection every 2 weeks to maintain health of her legs. Thanks to our drugs scheme it's "only" 144 every month; if we lived in America we'd be on skid row because this otherwise innocuous drugs cost thousands.

    To be against lower drugs pricing is just at best misanthropic and a real "fúck you I'm fine" kinda attitude towards those whose illnesses are unavoidable, deleterious and require constant medicinal intervention.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Yes, I agree with most, it would have been difficult, but Biden had originally said he only wanted one term. If he could have been persuaded to not run again, it would have been better for the democrats IMO.

    If Trump had just faded away into obscurity like any other ex-president then I'm sure Biden would not be considering a second term and would have happily retired himself and left it to a straight fight between two new contenders. But with a lunatic ex-president still on the scene the Democrats have to play their incumbent presidential hand to counter any recognition bonus Trump might have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,018 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 768 ✭✭✭dontmindme


    Ranting??...jeez...you're getting as bad as them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    Yes ranting



    “The radical left Democrats are at it again. They're constantly making up stories about me because their candidate is a mental and physical basket case. There's never been anything like it. He's also the worst president in the history of our country. He went on a very poorly rated show last night, and he talked about Donald Trump and his wife, I don't know the name of my wife.


    He was referring to the fact that at CPAC (Conservative Political Action Conference), where I had a sold out speech, the biggest audience they've had in years, I think maybe ever. I made the statement that Melania was very popular because when I mentioned her name, the audience went wild. I then looked at the two people, man and wife, Matt and Mercedes Schlapp, and I said, ‘Wow, they really like the first lady.’ So this got taken as the fact that I thought Mercedes was the first lady, has nothing to do with that.


    These people are really dishonest. They are absolutely something. They have a horrible candidate who's a horrible president. They make up things constantly. You take a look at when I use Barack Hussein Obama and I interject him into where it's supposed to be Biden, and I do it purposely for comedic reasons and for sarcasm because a lot of people say that Obama's running the country, not Biden, because he's sleeping all the time. They say, ‘Oh, I don't know the name of the president.’ Or when I imitate this guy getting off a stage, what they do is they say, ‘Oh, he had trouble getting off a stage.’ I have no trouble getting off a stage. Anybody that watches what I do at rallies would say, ‘Wow, that's amazing. He can go two hours without a teleprompter, not making even a little mistake.’ Very few people, maybe almost nobody, can do what I do.


    So here's the story. The disinformation of the Democrats is unbelievable. They do it because they have a horrible candidate.




    “Don't associate me with the mental midget that you portray because I want to tell you, he should not be leading this country. And hopefully on November 5, he's not going to be. We're going to have a big election, we're going to have a big victory, and we're going to make America great again.”



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 768 ✭✭✭dontmindme


    That's just his normal delivery and you know it...you're trying to say now the content of what he said constitutes ranting? Gimme a break.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,232 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Yes, its a rant. What possible reason is there for him to record a video, and post it, about a TV show and POTUS making some jokes?

    He wasn't laughing about it, he is clearly p1ssed. And went out of his way to go on about that, and other non-related things.

    Not sure what you think a rant is but it pretty much the definition of it. The fact that it is his normal mode is true enough, and should be telling you something about the man that claims to be a stable genius and wants to be taken seriously for the position of POTUS



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    So you can make sense of what he's saying and think he's using normal syntax??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,781 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    That's a rant. Just because it's his normal delivery, means nothing. It just means he normally rants.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I think you've become a little neutered to the style of Donald Trump. The man seems a singularly unhappy, bitter and angry individual and his default style of speaking is akin - or just actually - a rant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,667 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Trump's buttons are so easily pushed it's ridiculous. It's an absolutely glaring weakness. The Biden campaign needs a whole department that just thinks up ways to make Trump as angry as possible so as to maximise the possibility of independent voters voting against him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,282 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    Yes, ranting.

    And raving. He's a raving loon.

    Many people say, probably all of them, that he's the looniest loon of all time. Bigly. Really really yooooge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,095 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Calling it normal delivery does not make it normal. He rants all the time, this was another one of them, a normal human would not rant like he does, but that is mainly due to his very sensitive ego and thin skin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,573 ✭✭✭combat14


    Judge in Mar-a-Lago case likely to delay trial

    Aileen Cannon appears inclined to reject prosecutors’ proposed timeline as Trump lawyers push for delay in classified papers case

    The tension was underscored by a further fraught exchange between Cannon, who at one point cut off the assistant special counsel David Harbach mid-sentence to remark she knew they disagreed with her – to which Harbach responded with an equally curt “we do”.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement