Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

TCD Cancel Richard Dawkins.

«134

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,230 ✭✭✭jaxxx


    Typical snowflakes knee jerk reaction to anyone or anything that dares threaten their cotton wool covered lives. Pathetic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,330 ✭✭✭Bellbottoms


    https://www.universitytimes.ie/2020/09/the-hist-will-not-be-moving-ahead-with-richard-dawkins-address/

    Cancelled because it would make some students 'uncomfortable'. An important part of personal development during university is engaging with different ideas and learning to form your own opinion. Regardless of whether Dawkins is right or wrong, engaging with talks such as this is a valuable part of the college learning experience.

    That's my view - have I missed something?

    I would be suprised if anyone didn't know about his views on Islam. I suspect his views on sexual assualt are more problematic. I am not aware of his views. Nor are the expanded upon in the article.

    Does anyone know what they are refering to?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 508 ✭✭✭d8491prj5boyvg


    I would be suprised if anyone didn't know about his views on Islam. I suspect his views on sexual assualt are more problematic. I am not aware of his views. Nor are the expanded upon in the article.

    Does anyone know what they are refering to?

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/18/richard-dawkins-sexist-atheists-bad-name

    He's said some objectionable things, all the more reason to challenge him.


  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    ...as we value our members comfort above all else”
    The Historical society of the country's best university. Sad world we live in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,050 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Richard Dawkins is a highly intelligent fella with interesting viewpoints, but has the social niceties of a marispan dildo.

    Still, that's no reason to cancel him. Cancel culture is a load of rubbish. Silencing people so they do not offend others is just stupid.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,994 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    He has always been opposed by religious fanatics.

    These ones are just woke instead of theologically driven.

    Same mentality.

    Society is much more conformist and controlling now than even 20 years ago.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,211 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    He thinks jews are like the most intelligent and have contributed most to science and humanity out of any group apparently.

    Im like well then why doesnt he listen?

    On a rare serious note though.

    Its a shame to cancel him.

    However I can understand why people have been offended by things he has said. And he should answer for them.

    Cancelling him kind of lets him off the hook ..he can just print his views or tweet them....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,994 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    He thinks jews are like the most intelligent and have contributed most to science and humanity out of any group apparently.

    A view which will tank his reputation among much of the modern left.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,055 ✭✭✭JohnnyFlash


    Students being a shower of self-important dickheads. Some things never change.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,211 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Danzy wrote: »
    A view which will tank among much of the modern left.
    Much of the modern left is jewish and inspired by jewish thought and teaching.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 546 ✭✭✭Ekerot


    Not the biggest fan of Dawkins, but I cringe hard when I see someone being stopped from talking because of a few complaints backstage.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,474 ✭✭✭Obvious Desperate Breakfasts


    CaNceL cULtUrE dOEsN’t eXiSt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,667 ✭✭✭Treppen


    Much of the modern left is jewish and inspired by jewish thought and teaching.

    Have you got an example of that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,921 ✭✭✭buried


    I don't agree with Dawkins viewpoints, and I wouldn't be a fan of organised religion, I just don't dig his refusal to accept the possibility of a reality beyond what is perceptible to human senses in our evolving minds. No need to cancel the mans stand on anything, it should be a relished opportunity to debate with him calmly and civilly in a open arena or forum. This statement of "we value our members comfort above all else" is some real laughable craic, who are they going to book instead? Some lad dressed as Santy Claus handing out I-pads and double espresso backflapacinnos?

    Make America Get Out of Here



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 21,898 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    Much of the modern left is jewish and inspired by jewish thought and teaching.

    What do you mean by “Jewish thought and teaching”? I assume you don’t mean the Torah and the Talmud.

    Many early socialist thinkers were Jewish, but their religion was irrelevant to the work they produced.

    Re: Dawkins being cancelled. Dawkins has been attacked for many years by the religious right. Why are people having a go now at the left ?

    they/them/theirs


    And so on, and so on …. - Slavoj Žižek




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,402 ✭✭✭McGinniesta


    I'm not a particular fan of the man.

    However, this cancel culture nonsense has gone too far. To ban people because they may express an opinion that you dislike is beyond annoying.

    This should apply to all equally.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 Jimmy Twotimes


    Had a look at the facebook page, it's the usual lefty crap.

    So students want to be part of a debating society but don't want to encounter any people or ideas that make them 'uncomfortable'? It's all so tiresome.


  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Brian? wrote: »
    Re: Dawkins being cancelled. Dawkins has been attacked for many years by the religious right. Why are people having a go now at the left ?

    "Why would people have a different reaction to a different situation?".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,402 ✭✭✭McGinniesta


    Had a look at the facebook, it's the usual lefty crap.

    So students want to be part of a debating society but don't want to encounter any people or ideas that make them 'uncomfortable'? It's all so tiresome.

    I cant understand it myself.

    Surely the whole point to a debate is that you have to challenge someone with an opposing viewpoint.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,211 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Treppen wrote: »
    Have you got an example of that?
    Are you kidding!

    YES!

    71% of jews voted for hilary.

    Chomsky.

    Bernie Sanders.

    Hannah Arendt

    https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/jews-and-liberal-politics/

    And yes the far left ..the crazy people you are thinking of..EXACTLY what you are thinking of ....left and fast accelerating...that is how left.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 838 ✭✭✭The_Brood


    As someone who is not an atheist I disagree with Dawkins on many important matters, but the far-left that dominates academia, pop culture, and much of politics seeks to actively censor and cancel everything and anything remotely connected to science, history, and reason.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 Jimmy Twotimes


    Much of the modern left is jewish and inspired by jewish thought and teaching.

    Oh I'm sure it 's all just a massive coincidence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,994 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Brian? wrote: »
    Dawkins has been attacked for many years by the religious right. Why are people having a go now at the left ?

    Many no longer differentiate between the two, understandably.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 838 ✭✭✭The_Brood


    Brian? wrote: »
    What do you mean by “Jewish thought and teaching”? I assume you don’t mean the Torah and the Talmud.

    Many early socialist thinkers were Jewish, but their religion was irrelevant to the work they produced.

    Re: Dawkins being cancelled. Dawkins has been attacked for many years by the religious right. Why are people having a go now at the left ?

    It's obvious that Dawkins' viewpoints won't endear him to any of the major faith groups. That's not surprising or the question here.

    But this is not a religious group that is 'canceling' him, this is (at least once upon a time but certainly not recently) a forum that is supposed to stand for learning, researching, and discussing important matters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,201 ✭✭✭Man with broke phone


    Liberals going too far with censorship and fascism is the reason we have Trump and Brexit and all them things the liberals dont want.

    Why cant they just be liberal?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 Jimmy Twotimes


    Liberals going too far with censorship and fascism is the reason we have Trump and Brexit and all them things the liberals dont want.

    Why cant they just be liberal?

    Because liberalism is a mental disorder. How else can you explain it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,943 ✭✭✭Deebles McBeebles


    Looking forward to seeing the videos of copies of The God Delusion on someones BBQ though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Funny thing is the Minister of Higher Education (Simon Harris) will keep quiet on what's beginning to replicate American college culture, but when he snakes his way into the FG leadership in 5-10 years, they'll consider him Right Wing or Far-Right no matter what he does.

    Political in doctrine of young people cannot be allowed in state funded education systems. All points of view need to be represented. This isn't America where they are mostly private funded. You can't just make up your own fundamental rules on campus.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭nthclare


    They'll cancel anything that's deemed a threat to the truth, difference of opinion or makes someone have a laugh or a point that's validated.

    I'm not a fan of Dawkins stance on spiritual matters etc
    I like reading his theories about evolution, but the whole God delusion book is used as coaster in my sitting room.
    As an agnostic I find his God stuff more of a well thought out resentment with a bit of insightful reading, but it's just the same aul shoite I see in atheist debates, they all plagerise him, as if they're reading from the holy book.

    I don't see why he's been cancelled, he's entitled to say what he thinks.
    I couldn't give a toss.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83 ✭✭yuridwyer


    Had a look at the facebook page, it's the usual lefty crap.

    So students want to be part of a debating society but don't want to encounter any people or ideas that make them 'uncomfortable'? It's all so tiresome.

    Read "don't want to debate with someone who would wipe the floor with them without even getting out of first gear". Boo-hoo......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,731 ✭✭✭jam_mac_jam


    If he makes you uncomfortable don't go to the talk. What an absolute pack of babies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,211 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Brian? wrote: »
    What do you mean by “Jewish thought and teaching”? I assume you don’t mean the Torah and the Talmud.

    Many early socialist thinkers were Jewish, but their religion was irrelevant to the work they produced.

    Re: Dawkins being cancelled. Dawkins has been attacked for many years by the religious right. Why are people having a go now at the left ?


    I do mean the Talmud also. Tzedakah.

    https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/3250289/jewish/Is-Judaism-Socialist-or-Capitalist.htm
    The roots of socialism are firmly grounded in a Torah institution

    Obligatory charity.


    There are mitzvot that agree with a socialist mentality property return during yovel.

    The mishna in particular is concerned with social justice.

    Halacha demands charity ..and collects it by force if necessary.


    Halacha limits the free market. You can't pay one sixth less or more than an items worth. Even if both parties agree.

    Capital crimes in halacha are only against people not against property.

    And the two great crimes from the prophets ..Idolatry and oppression of the poor. Only oppression of the poor is equal to idolatry.

    Halacha also limits free market competition.
    The Torah requires that the sale of all real estate (except houses in walled cities) be in the form of a leasing arrangement ; all such property returns to the original owner in the fiftieth - Jubilee - year (Leviticus 25 :8ff). This is called the "land sabbatical." In addition, the Torah commands that we cancel, at the end of each seventh year, all outstanding debts which were due before then (Deuteronomy 15:1-3). This is called the "money sabbatical."These sabbaticals are limits which the

    Torah imposes upon our right to property in order to benefit the needy. The land sabbatical protected the people of Israel from deteriorating into a majority of tenant farmers working land owned by a small elite.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,055 ✭✭✭JohnnyFlash


    Brian? wrote: »

    Re: Dawkins being cancelled. Dawkins has been attacked for many years by the religious right. Why are people having a go now at the left ?


    Maybe both should be 'attacked' for this nonsense? They both act pretty much the same way anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,211 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Maybe both should be 'attacked' for this nonsense? They both act pretty much the same way anyway.
    This can be true.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,415 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    'Woke-ism' of the day thread
    |
    |
    v


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,638 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    It was the Hist that cancelled dawkins not Trinity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,772 ✭✭✭Montage of Feck


    How can you be a liberal and oppose free speech? How can you be a socialist and oppose scientific reasoning? How can you be far left and oppose atheism?
    Political debate is increasingly making no sense in the old left/right sense while student politics is just plain bonkers.

    🙈🙉🙊



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,211 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    socialism is in my very blood!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,943 ✭✭✭✭the purple tin


    Funny thing is the Minister of Higher Education (Simon Harris) will keep quiet on what's beginning to replicate American college culture, but when he snakes his way into the FG leadership in 5-10 years, they'll consider him Right Wing or Far-Right no matter what he does.

    Political in doctrine of young people cannot be allowed in state funded education systems. All points of view need to be represented. This isn't America where they are mostly private funded. You can't just make up your own fundamental rules on campus.


    American students are pretty much running their colleges now.
    They have the staff bricking it because even one complaint now can get you sacked and probably end your career. The deans are too scared to back up their staff anymore and always side with the students no matter how ridiculous the complaint is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 Jimmy Twotimes


    Liberals going too far with censorship and fascism is the reason we have Trump and Brexit and all them things the liberals dont want.

    Why cant they just be liberal?

    They make me think of hardcore protestant types who want to create utopia on Earth (which is hell for normal people) Calvinists and Lutherans and such like.

    They want to 'improve' you by making you conform to their nutty beliefs:

    White men are evil
    Borders are racist
    There 7000 genders
    We must worship the LGBTQXYZDFTRSAGTRD people

    The Taliban of progressives.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,211 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    It was the Hist that cancelled dawkins not Trinity.
    Its dawkins that cancelled trinity!;)

    I can understand how muslims (of which there are many studying in trinity partic sciences ) might feel hurt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 Jimmy Twotimes


    Its dawkins that cancelled trinity!;)

    I can understand how muslims (of which there are many studying in trinity partic sciences ) might feel hurt.

    So what if they feel hurt?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,211 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    So what if they feel hurt?
    If they feel hurt. I feel hurt.

    If you feel hurt. I feel hurt.

    I think the right comes off more invulnerable. Harder ....but perhaps this is not the case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 Jimmy Twotimes


    American students are pretty much running their colleges now.
    They have the staff bricking it because even one complaint now can get you sacked and probably end your career. The deans are too scared to back up their staff anymore and always side with the students no matter who ridiculous the complaint is.

    And yet for all their big talk about racism and oppression and blah blah blah, they'll never say a bad word about China because they need to suckle in the Chinese teat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,330 ✭✭✭Bellbottoms


    I cant understand it myself.

    Surely the whole point to a debate is that you have to challenge someone with an opposing viewpoint.


    Not necessarily. Dawkins is renowned for not debating creationist, this might of changed. But his arguement is that by debating them. You are giving them a legitimatcy.

    I don't know the full facts here. I don't know what Dawkins said about sexual assaults that people are having a problem with. And I cannot saying if I agree with him being invited or not.

    And unless you know what he said. You shouldn't be defending him or supporting the decision either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 473 ✭✭The pigeon man


    It's sad to see that people worry more about comfort than freedom of speech.

    During my time in college I have been challenged, brought out of my comfort zone to learn new things that are you use to me during my working life.

    If there is a disagreement with a lecturer you should engage in a coherent, reasoned debate to address the issue, not shut down the speaker.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 Jimmy Twotimes


    If they feel hurt. I feel hurt.

    If you feel hurt. I feel hurt.

    I think the right comes off more invulnerable. Harder ....but perhaps this is not the case.

    But you don't feel hurt if the Christian students are offended.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,211 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    But you don't feel hurt if the Christian students are offended.
    I do not. I feel hurt if they are HURT. Not offended.

    These are very different things.

    Damaged ..hurt ...either endangered or physically or emotionally hurt.

    Something can breach a view (offense) you hold without hurting you.

    Christians are less vulnerable. Partic in Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43 Jimmy Twotimes


    I do not. I feel hurt if they are HURT. Not offended.

    These are very different things.

    Damaged ..hurt ...either endangered or physically or emotionally hurt.

    Something can breach a view (offense) you hold without hurting you.

    Whatever. Not my problem if Muslims are so fragile they get 'hurt' by Dawkins.

    Perhaps they should have a debate over it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    If they feel hurt. I feel hurt.

    If you feel hurt. I feel hurt.

    I think the right comes off more invulnerable. Harder ....but perhaps this is not the case.
    The likes of Dawkins stimulate the mind to question and explore. He may not be to everyone's liking, mine included, but he does produce some provocative positions worth examining.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement