Lockdown in State of Victoria: a threat to democracy?

political analyst

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/aug/24/victorian-plan-to-extend-state-of-emergency-by-12-months-prompts-human-rights-concerns

Legal groups have warned against Victoria’s plan to extend its state of emergency by 12 months, arguing that to comply with human rights obligations parliament should favour the “most limited possible option” when granting extraordinary powers.

Victorian law currently allows the government to declare a state of emergency for four weeks at a time and to extend that declaration for up to six months.

On Monday the premier, Daniel Andrews, said he would ask parliament to extend the allowable period for a state of emergency to 12 months, and then renew it, allowing Victoria to remain in a state of emergency until September next year.

Considering that the fatality rate for Covid is a fraction of 1%, the proportionality of the Covid restrictions imposed by Daniel Andrews - and by governments in other jurisdictions throughout the world - is questionable.

I suspect that democracy is under threat in the State of Victoria - and Daniel Andrews' slight resemblance to Kim Jong-un certainly doesn't help public perception!

Strumms

Don’t be overly focused on the death rate.

Covid has infected 24 million people worldwide in the 8/9 months since it was discovered.

The strains placed on health services globally... in terms of money many billions have been spent worldwide already fighting covid.. in terms of other medical services and treatments that people require especially those in rehabilitative need are cancelled as resources and manpower are moved to fight and help with covid.. the long term effects of people not getting treatments in good time ? Might not recover and also be financial drain on the state going forward.

I’m was in need of physical rehab that was 85% complete before covid hit...

I was lucky I had at my disposal the ability to see what was happening and buy a couple of grands worth of gym equipment to augment what I had , if I didn’t have the spare cash ? Fuçked or at best delayed returning to full health.

Peregrinus

I can see all kinds of plausible objections to, and concerns about, the lockdown regulations, but I'm not seeing the "threat to democracy", and the linked Guardian article doesn't mention any threat to democracy.

Can you explain your suspicion that democracy is under threat?

political analyst

Peregrinus wrote: »

I can see all kinds of plausible objections to, and concerns about, the lockdown regulations, but I'm not seeing the "threat to democracy", and the linked Guardian article doesn't mention any threat to democracy.

Can you explain your suspicion that democracy is under threat?

It's simple - the reference to human rights obligations.

Peregrinus

political analyst wrote: »

It's simple - the reference to human rights obligations.

Overly simple, perhaps? "Human rights" and "democracy" are not the same thing at all. Democracies don't always respect human rights, and less-than-democratic countries are sometimes quite good at respecting human rights.

political analyst

Peregrinus wrote: »

Overly simple, perhaps? "Human rights" and "democracy" are not the same thing at all. Democracies don't always respect human rights, and less-than-democratic countries are sometimes quite good at respecting human rights.

Wrongful imprisonment is much more common in undemocratic countries.

circadian

Sweet Jesus. Threat to democracy.


Are you going to head down the Bill Gates health passport/tracking/enforced vaccination/new world order route?

political analyst

circadian wrote: »

Sweet Jesus. Threat to democracy.


Are you going to head down the Bill Gates health passport/tracking/enforced vaccination/new world order route?

Of course not! A 6-week lockdown because of a viral infection with a very low fatality rate is disproportionate.

political analyst

https://7news.com.au/lifestyle/health-wellbeing/victoria-police-filmed-handcuffing-pregnant-woman-over-anti-lockdown-facebook-post-c-1286738

Peregrinus

political analyst wrote: »

Of course not! A 6-week lockdown because of a viral infection with a very low fatality rate is disproportionate.

The fatality rate is not the only issue here. There is also the virulence of the virus (i.e. how infectious it is) and the extensive less-than-fatal injuries it can inflict.

There's also the factor that the low fatality rate is the producte of good and intensive treatment, which is only possible so long as case numbers are kept low enough. If infection rates rise beyond a certain point, the fatality rate will also rise. Thus the lockdown may not be so much unnecessary in light of the low fatality rate as necessary in order to maintain the low fataility rate.

Tl;dr: The proportionality of the response is a more complex calculation than you seem to think. Plus, you seem to have abandoned the attempt to argue that it's a threat to democracy.

political analyst

Peregrinus wrote: »

The fatality rate is not the only issue here. There is also the virulence of the virus (i.e. how infectious it is) and the extensive less-than-fatal injuries it can inflict.

There's also the factor that the low fatality rate is the producte of good and intensive treatment, which is only possible so long as case numbers are kept low enough. If infection rates rise beyond a certain point, the fatality rate will also rise. Thus the lockdown may not be so much unnecessary in light of the low fatality rate as necessary in order to maintain the low fataility rate.

Tl;dr: The proportionality of the response is a more complex calculation than you seem to think. Plus, you seem to have abandoned the attempt to argue that it's a threat to democracy.

Nevertheless, it's still relevant to my OP. I said I suspected it was a threat to democracy - I didn't claim to know it was a threat to democracy. Therefore, I left the door open for the likelihood that I was wrong.

I haven't heard of any legal challenge to the Victoria lockdown so far. This isn't just about Covid in Victoria - this is about alleged rights violations by the Andrews administration. I'm no lawyer but I think the pregnant woman who was arrested in Melbourne is in with a chance of success. Sure, look at the Australian Supreme Court judgement in the Cardinal Pell case!

Peregrinus

political analyst wrote: »

Nevertheless, it's still relevant to my OP. I said I suspected it was a threat to democracy - I didn't claim to know it was a threat to democracy. Therefore, I left the door open for the likelihood that I was wrong.

Given that you still haven't offered any reason at all for your suspicion that it's a threat to democracy, I think the likelihood is fairly high.

political analyst wrote: »

I haven't heard of any legal challenge to the Victoria lockdown so far. This isn't just about Covid in Victoria - this is about alleged rights violations by the Andrews administration. I'm no lawyer but I think the pregnant woman who was arrested in Melbourne is in with a chance of success.

SFAIK she hasn't launched any proceedings challenging the legality or propriety of her arrest.

She has been charged with incitement to the commission of an offence - that is the charge she was arrested on. The objection seems to be that the charge is disprortionate to the gravity of her conduct; other people who did similar things were simply warned. Over-zealous enforcement by the police is a human rights issue, but I think it's a bit of a stretch to present it as a threat to democracy.

political analyst wrote: »

Sure, look at the Australian Supreme Court judgement in the Cardinal Pell case!

I'm not seeing the parallel, to be honest. The issue in Pell's appeal to the High Court was whether, on the evidence, he had been rightly convicted. This woman hasn't been convicted at all (and may never be).

Del Griffith

Australia is bat **** crazy about this virus. I've a friend over there who moved from VIC to QLD - met getting off the plane by army and forced military escort direct to a hotel where they were monitored to ensure absolute quarantine for 2 weeks, at their own expense. Completely OTT.

mandrake04

Del Griffith wrote: »

Australia is bat **** crazy about this virus. I've a friend over there who moved from VIC to QLD - met getting off the plane by army and forced military escort direct to a hotel where they were monitored to ensure absolute quarantine for 2 weeks, at their own expense. Completely OTT.

But the rest of us are happy enough with that arrangement, especially in QLD they had total of 6 deaths and only had 15 cases in the last week most ...if not all are in Hotels. Personally in NSW I haven’t heard any people complain about the measures most people understand why they are there and just accept it...especially when you are free living pretty much normal life everything is open and has been since June/July What’s the point of punishing the majority of the population for the actions of the few.

I think there is definitely more hysteria in Ireland....shit that just doesn’t make any sense. I was explaining to my wife that the schools were closed for 6 months LOL, Pubs are still closed unless they serve pizza, chicken wings or some other shit for 105 mins and people are still living with a heap of restrictions but yet they kept the airports open.

Manach

Abrogation of the right to protest ( across all aspects of the political spectrum) / assembly isn't a knock on foundations on a democratic states?
Undermining one the core aspects of a demoncratic society that of free assmebly, in the case of the young pregnant mother by arresting her for trying to organising a protest, is what appears to be happening here. Historically when such freedoms were been wrested away from the Ancien Regiem, cicra 18th/19th century Europe, the impact of infectous diseases were an order of magnitude worse than that of Covid-19. That did not stop the protesters then, nor should it stop them now.

political analyst

https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/courts-law/antimask-lawyers-asking-for-200k-for-class-action-against-vic-government/news-story/6cbcc0a1efa03d433371f4b69f7e51c1

Lawyers who last month urged Melburnians to reject the chief health officer’s mandatory mask directive are asking for $200,000 worth of donations to take Daniel Andrews, Brett Sutton and Jenny Mikakos to court.

G&B lawyers, based in Sydney, created a crowd-funding page to raise money for a class action against the Victorian Government on Thursday which has so far received almost $10,000.

They claim they are under “instructions” to file the action in the Supreme Court of Victoria on behalf of Victorians who have suffered directly because of “actions going well and truly beyond their powers”.

Peregrinus

Manach wrote: »

Abrogation of the right to protest ( across all aspects of the political spectrum) / assembly isn't a knock on foundations on a democratic states?

The right to protest isn't being abrogated. You can certainly protest against laws you don't like; you just can't protest in a way that violates the social distancing rules. You don't get an exception if the laws against which you are protesting are the social distancing rules themselves.

Obviously, you can characterise violating the social distancing rules in order to protest those very rules as a form of civil disobedience. Fair enough. But a key point about civil disobedience is that it is, in fact, disobedient; accepting the conviction and punishment that ensues is part of the protest. The Mahatma was very clear about this.

In this particular case though, the woman who was arrested for organising the protest meeting, it doesn't seem that this was intended as a form of civil disobedience. From newspaper reports, by her own account she did not realise that the protest meeting she was trying to organise would itself have been a breach of the law.

TRANQUILLO

Manach wrote: »

Abrogation of the right to protest ( across all aspects of the political spectrum) / assembly isn't a knock on foundations on a democratic states?
Undermining one the core aspects of a demoncratic society that of free assmebly, in the case of the young pregnant mother by arresting her for trying to organising a protest, is what appears to be happening here. Historically when such freedoms were been wrested away from the Ancien Regiem, cicra 18th/19th century Europe, the impact of infectous diseases were an order of magnitude worse than that of Covid-19. That did not stop the protesters then, nor should it stop them now.

I don't understand how even the most contrary internet debater can think what's going on at the hands of the authorities in Australia is ok.

TRANQUILLO

Peregrinus wrote: »

The right to protest isn't being abrogated. You can certainly protest against laws you don't like; you just can't protest in a way that violates the social distancing rules. You don't get an exception if the laws against which you are protesting are the social distancing rules themselves.

Obviously, you can characterise violating the social distancing rules in order to protest those very rules as a form of civil disobedience. Fair enough. But a key point about civil disobedience is that it is, in fact, disobedient; accepting the conviction and punishment that ensues is part of the protest. The Mahatma was very clear about this.

In this particular case though, the woman who was arrested for organising the protest meeting, it doesn't seem that this was intended as a form of civil disobedience. From newspaper reports, by her own account she did not realise that the protest meeting she was trying to organise would itself have been a breach of the law.

They didnt have a problem with having protests in Australia during the pandemic when it pertained to BLM.

Videos available upon request.

political analyst

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Victorian_state_election

The next election in Victoria is scheduled for 26 November 2022. I don't think voters will either forgive or forget the way in which Dan Andrews has handled the pandemic. After all, #dictatordan has been trending on Twitter.

political analyst

TRANQUILLO wrote: »

They didnt have a problem with having protests in Australia during the pandemic when it pertained to BLM.

Videos available upon request.

Assistant Commissioner Cornelius explained that.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/sep/03/victoria-police-arrested-pregnant-woman-facebook-post-zoe-buhler-australia-warn-lockdown-protesters

In response to a journalist who drew comparisons between the anti-lockdown protests and a Black Lives Matter protest held in June, Cornelius said there was a clear reason for the difference.

The Black Lives Matter protests were held under stage two restrictions, and the protest planned for Saturday was under stage four, he said.

“There’s a huge difference,” he said. “During the Black Lives Matter protest, we were operating under a very different set of rules. Under the Black Lives Matter protest, leaving home to protest was a permitted activity. There were restrictions on it, so the restriction was you can leave home to protest with a group up to 10 people, and in multiple groups, so long as there’s a 100m distance between each of those groups.

“Now, in stage four, and also in stage three, which applies to regional Victoria, when those restrictions came in, public protest was removed as a permitted reason. That is the rule that applies now, and that applies to the individual arrested yesterday … those rules did not apply during the Black Lives Matter protest”.

He added that the organisers of the Black Lives Matter rally had told protesters to abide by the restrictions at the time.

“Here’s the thing – the organisers of the Black Lives Matter protest were on record saying we’re telling people who are coming to protest to comply with the [health] directions.”

TRANQUILLO

political analyst wrote: »

Assistant Commissioner Cornelius explained that.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/sep/03/victoria-police-arrested-pregnant-woman-facebook-post-zoe-buhler-australia-warn-lockdown-protesters

It was stage 3 in Ballarat on the day of her arrest.

And the BLM protests in Australia were not socially distant on the day. The jack boots were not as heavy handed that day.

TomSweeney

Melbourne police going around like little SS thugs, yeah ... no trouble with democracy at all folks!!

Risteard81

political analyst wrote: »

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Victorian_state_election

The next election in Victoria is scheduled for 26 November 2022. I don't think voters will either forgive or forget the way in which Dan Andrews has handled the pandemic. After all, #dictatordan has been trending on Twitter.

He belongs in gaol.

So do the so-called leaders of Ireland.

John O.Groats

Risteard81 wrote: »

He belongs in gaol.

So do the so-called leaders of Ireland.

The "unelected junta" is it?

Peregrinus

political analyst wrote: »

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Victorian_state_election

The next election in Victoria is scheduled for 26 November 2022. I don't think voters will either forgive or forget the way in which Dan Andrews has handled the pandemic. After all, #dictatordan has been trending on Twitter.

Andrews' problem is not that he has instituted tough measures; it's that the tough measures he has instituted have not been sufficiently tough, or sufficiently early, to prevent a significant wave of CV19 infections. Victoria had 622 new infections last week and 1,158 the week before, and currently has 406 people being treated in hospital.

Western Australia also has draconian infection control measures; I would need a permit to leave the state, and these are almost impossible to get. Don't even talk about getting a permit to enter the state. If I could get one, I would still be taken from the airport to quarantine for 14 days at my own expense in a hotel guarded by the WA police and/or the Australian army. People who evade or breach quarantine are jailed. At an earlier stage of the pandemic, even travel within the state was similarly restricted.

The economic consequences have been horrendous, as you'd imagine for a state whose economy is almost entirely dependent on external trade. But these measures have worked. We've had zero community transmission since April. We currently have 5 active cases, all of them people who arrived from outside the state and were diagnosed while in quarantine.

And the state government is unbelievably popular - like, North Korea-levels of popularity. This week the Premier, Mark McGowan, has an approval rating of 91%. The Covid restrictions are supported by 92%. Projections for the next state election, due in March 2021, have the Labor Party romping home.

But all that would change dramatically if, despite the restrictions, we had a second wave of infection. McGowan would then discover what if feels like to be Daniel Andrews.

The lesson is clear; in Australia at any rate, people will put up with, and even support, stringent restrictions, but they want the restrictions to work. What they resent is restrictions that don't work. It's not the restrictions that cause them to turn against the government; it's the CV19 infection rate.

sandbelter

Peregrinus wrote: »

I can see all kinds of plausible objections to, and concerns about, the lockdown regulations, but I'm not seeing the "threat to democracy", and the linked Guardian article doesn't mention any threat to democracy.

Can you explain your suspicion that democracy is under threat?

The Victorian Constitution doesn't have an equivalent of Section 3 of the Commonwealth Constitution ensuring the right to judicial oversight. Effectively what you have is internment without trial. Bureaucrats are making laws, police are enforcing them with no court appeal.

For the record, the lady the arrested was in Ballarat which is not subject to Stage 4 lock down, she was in zone 3 and compliance with local Covid was explicitly mentioned in the face book posting. The terms of the conditions of the march were identical to the earlier Black Lives matter marches.

Parliament has not sat since March and won't until March 2021, the Victorian government was hoping to extend the rule by decree until Sept 2021.

The health minister has refused to answer the oppositions questions on the heath crisis and replied back in writing with one word answers. Today NSW has taken over the tracing teams in Victoria as the state health department has been so inept. This is definition of unaccountably.

In the Melbourne metropolitan region everyone is under curfew (in practice house arrests), street are patrolled by the Police, drones are flying over the city to scan registrations to insure you are within your 5km radius which applies to anywhere within this zone: https://www.vic.gov.au/coronavirus-5km-from-home-map.

You can be stopped and be asked for identification at any time within this zone.

None of this has been subject to any scrutiny by parliament, which remains suspended.

The police state has been introduced to mask this, it makes Boris Johnson look competent. This a very brief summary of the state of play and why the state has been put into a democratic freezer.
https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2020/09/victorias-arrogance-left-it-a-virus-basket-case/

political analyst

TRANQUILLO wrote: »

It was stage 3 in Ballarat on the day of her arrest.

And the BLM protests in Australia were not socially distant on the day. The jack boots were not as heavy handed that day.

So you're accusing the Assistant Commissioner of being dishonest?

political analyst

sandbelter wrote: »

The Victorian Constitution doesn't have an equivalent of Section 3 of the Commonwealth Constitution ensuring the right to judicial oversight. Effectively what you have is internment without trial. Bureaucrats are making laws, police are enforcing them with no court appeal.

For the record, the lady the arrested was in Ballarat which is not subject to Stage 4 lock down, she was in zone 3 and compliance with local Covid was explicitly mentioned in the face book posting. The terms of the conditions of the march were identical to the earlier Black Lives matter marches.

Parliament has not sat since March and won't until March 2021, the Victorian government was hoping to extend the rule by decree until Sept 2021.

The health minister has refused to answer the oppositions questions on the heath crisis and replied back in writing with one word answers. Today NSW has taken over the tracing teams in Victoria as the state health department has been so inept. This is definition of unaccountably.

In the Melbourne metropolitan region everyone is under curfew (in practice house arrests), street are patrolled by the Police, drones are flying over the city to scan registrations to insure you are within your 5km radius which applies to anywhere within this zone: https://www.vic.gov.au/coronavirus-5km-from-home-map.

You can be stopped and be asked for identification at any time within this zone.

None of this has been subject to any scrutiny by parliament, which remains suspended.

The police state has been introduced to mask this, it makes Boris Johnson look competent. This a very brief summary of the state of play and why the state has been put into a democratic freezer.
https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2020/09/victorias-arrogance-left-it-a-virus-basket-case/

It's a charter of rights in Victoria. All state governments and the federal government of Australia have to adhere to the Australian Constitution.

If those protesters are convicted, they can appeal.

biko

When elections are cancelled - then and only then is there an actual threat to democracy.

Risteard81

biko wrote: »

When elections are cancelled - then and only then is there an actual threat to democracy.

Nonsense.

biko

Maybe you're unclear of what democracy is?
It is simply "a form of government in which the people have the authority to choose their governing legislation".

Risteard81

biko wrote: »

Maybe you're unclear of what democracy is?
It is simply "a form of government in which the people have the authority to choose their governing legislation".

They've also suspended the state parliament.

And illegally forcing people to wear stupid gas masks outside.

Dan Andrews is guilty of treason and must be punished accordingly to a more severe extent than currently permitted by law.

biko

Risteard81 wrote: »

And illegally forcing people to wear stupid gas masks outside.

I think it'd be better if you didn't exaggerate.

They aren't gas masks.
As to your claim of legal standing - at the outset of the pandemic, the government declared a state of emergency.
It invoked section 198 of the Public Health and Wellbeing Act 2008 and conferred on Chief Health Officer Professor Brett Sutton emergency powers to make directions to prevent the spread of COVID-19 as he or his delegates saw fit.
The powers, still in effect, are broad and include restrictions on movement and, now, compulsory masks in public.

Risteard81

biko wrote: »

government declared a state of emergency.

I refer to it as a State of Terror.

I have family living in Melbourne so am very familiar with what's going on there.

feargale

political analyst wrote: »

Considering that the fatality rate for Covid is a fraction of 1%, the proportionality of the Covid restrictions imposed by Daniel Andrews - and by governments in other jurisdictions throughout the world - is questionable.

Please tell us what price you put on a life, or on the lives of 1% of the world's population.

political analyst wrote: »

I suspect that democracy is under threat in the State of Victoria - and Daniel Andrews' slight resemblance to Kim Jong-un certainly doesn't help public perception!

Oh sweet Jesus! Another one who judges politicians on the shape of their faces! Elvis for president!

Peregrinus

sandbelter wrote: »

The Victorian Constitution doesn't have an equivalent of Section 3 of the Commonwealth Constitution ensuring the right to judicial oversight. Effectively what you have is internment without trial. Bureaucrats are making laws, police are enforcing them with no court appeal.

For the record, the lady the arrested was in Ballarat which is not subject to Stage 4 lock down, she was in zone 3 and compliance with local Covid was explicitly mentioned in the face book posting. The terms of the conditions of the march were identical to the earlier Black Lives matter marches.

Parliament has not sat since March and won't until March 2021, the Victorian government was hoping to extend the rule by decree until Sept 2021 . . .

Risteard81 wrote: »

They've also suspended the state parliament.

Not to be offensive, but I stopped reading at this point. The Victorian Parliament most recently sat on Friday. There are no sitting days this week - it's a scheduled break - but parliamentary committees are meeting. Both houses are sitting again next week. This "suspended for a year" claim has absolutely no basis in reality; Parliament has been functioning as normal. It's had normal sitting dates for the whole of 2020, except for the month of May. Where are you this "suspended for a year, to be extended" nonsnse from from?

I'm not going to fact-check your other claims (and I'm not saying they are all wrong). But this particular claim is so far from reality, and is so easliy debunked, that I have to suspect that you are getting your information from sources that are unreliable, if not downright dishonest, and that they are giving you a wholly false picture of what is happening in Victoria, and how Victorians feel about it. I fear you may be a victim of fake news.

Dravokivich

Risteard81 wrote: »

I refer to it as a State of Terror.

I have family living in Melbourne so am very familiar with what's going on there.

How? I've friends living in Australia and by all accounts, they don't seem to be under any kind of threat from the state.

Peregrinus

Risteard81 wrote: »

I have family living in Melbourne so am very familiar with what's going on there.

Not that familiar, if you're under the impression that Parliament has been suspended.

HBC08

Del Griffith wrote: »

Australia is bat **** crazy about this virus. I've a friend over there who moved from VIC to QLD - met getting off the plane by army and forced military escort direct to a hotel where they were monitored to ensure absolute quarantine for 2 weeks, at their own expense. Completely OTT.

Ive an Australian friend who was on a repatriation flight back into QLD from Peru in April who had the same,she was happy to do it.They dont fook about over there.

Gael23

Australia is pursuing a policy of eradication which they don’t have to look far to see it won’t work

Pauliedragon

Queensland is a bit mad aswell. A woman from Canberrra which hasn't had a case in 60 days travelled there to say goodbye to her dying father. He died while she was in quarantine and they wouldn't let her got to the funeral. They allowed her a private viewing in the funeral home in full PPE with security guards around her.

Peregrinus

Gael23 wrote: »

Australia is pursuing a policy of eradication which they don’t have to look far to see it won’t work

Correction: Most Australian states are pursuing a strategy of zero community transmission (though Victoria isn't).

Western Australia, South Australia and the Northern Territory have pretty well acheived it. Queensland is getting there.

So, yeah, with a bit of luck and a fair following wind it can be done. And the sooner and more effectively you do it the less it costs you. Social restrictions have an economic cost, but less of a cost than uncontrolled infection.

mandrake04

Tasmania hasn’t had a new case in 30 days, no active cases.

Even NSW pop 7.5m has 51 cases in the last 7 days, 115 active cases. 15 in hospital and 6 in ICU. Almost everything is open since June/July, You can get just a beer no problem just social distance. Even the brothels are open.

political analyst

feargale wrote: »

Please tell us what price you put on a life, or on the lives of 1% of the world's population.

Travel by motor vehicle isn't banned in areas where there are high numbers of fatal accidents.

Chocolate fiend

Risteard81 wrote: »

I refer to it as a State of Terror.

I have family living in Melbourne so am very familiar with what's going on there.

Some of us actually live here, and are not relying on second hand information. No need for your hysteria, it doesn't help.

Risteard81

Chocolate fiend wrote: »

Some of us actually live here, and are not relying on second hand information. No need for your hysteria, it doesn't help.

I lived there much longer than you have.

State of Terror is accurate.

Chocolate fiend

Risteard81 wrote: »

I lived there much longer than you have.

State of Terror is accurate.

Do you live here now?

feargale

political analyst wrote: »

Travel by motor vehicle isn't banned in areas where there are high numbers of fatal accidents.

No but travelling at high speeds generally is.

Though some people would probably see that as yet another infringement of fundamental human rights. :rolleyes:

Peregrinus

political analyst wrote: »

Travel by motor vehicle isn't banned in areas where there are high numbers of fatal accidents.

Actually, this is a good example, but it works the opposite of the way you intend.

Motoring isn't banned, but it is heavily restricted and regulatated by a vast body of rules, regulations and punishments - far more than we have for pandemic protection. We have driver testing, driver licensing, compulsory insurance, compulsory vehicle inspection and certification, speed limits, traffic restrictions, parking restrictions, laws requiring motorists to identify themselves to the police and to prove their compliance with licensing and insurance requirements - the list is endless. Plus there's a massive and permanent investment in infrastructure to minimise the risks from traffic - road markings, road signs, pedestrian bridges, underpasses, bypasses. Cities have been substantially reconfigured to manage traffic risk, at huge expense. And, even now, the police spend far more time enforcing traffic laws against more people than they spend on enforcing quarantine laws and other pandemic restrictions.

It's a permanent and ever-growing vast body of laws, measures and penalties that outweighs by an order of magnitude the temporary measures taken to control the pandemic, despite the fact that currently the pandemic is the worse threat to life. Road deaths in Victoria average around 250 per year; the state has already had more than three times that number of CV19 deaths this year, and we're only 8 months in.

So, no, this is not disproportionate. Not at all.

Paddygreen

Victoria is the example we should follow. Time the Irish leadership took off the velvet glove. Admonish those who don’t follow the rules.