Bit of advice from the experts on a change of car

Lex Luthor

Going to be going into the market soon and will be selling the diesel SUV

I'll be getting a company vehicle so the requirement to have a diesel is no longer there and my wife is going to have this new car

Basically she does mostly town driving, her job is 2-3km from the house and she will be doing school hops daily

There will be the odd requirement during the months of March-Oct that we take trips up the country and may take the new car but that one way trip is about 150km and then the opportunity to charge is available

so not sure whether to go full electric of PHEV

budget is 40k and have looked online at the Kuga PHEV in ST Line spec which would allow me to add a few extras
The ST Line X pushes it too close to 40k

Suggestions please? I prefer the high driving style of an SUV type vehicle hence the kuga rather than a hatchback

We'll still be keeping a small petrol hatch in the family as the older son will be using this going forward

thanks

KCross

Electric Crossovers in the €40k bracket are Niro and Kona.

They've 400km+ range so way beyond what you need in terms of range.

I wouldnt bother with a PHEV when you have your company vehicle to fall back on. You would really only look at those if you were a one car house or a two car house but your electric car didnt have the range you needed so the PHEV would be the fallback.

Lex Luthor

KCross wrote: »

Electric Crossovers in the €40k bracket are Niro and Kona.

They've 400km+ range so way beyond what you need in terms of range.

I wouldnt bother with a PHEV when you have your company vehicle to fall back on. You would really only look at those if you were a one car house or a two car house but your electric car didnt have the range you needed so the PHEV would be the fallback.

gotcha, good point
any thoughts on the Peugeot e 2008?

KCross

Lex Luthor wrote: »

any thoughts on the Peugeot e 2008?

No experience with it. Not aware of anyone on here having one either but some people do have the e208 and are very happy with it so I'd say the e2008 is a safe enough bet too if its a car you like the look and price of.

Book a test drive I guess and share your own opinion on it!

JPA

What will be the daily and weekly mileage?

Seems like a large budget for small mileage based on what you have said.

kanuseeme

The Kia e-Niro
Go Electric with Kia

From €39,495

Ireland's Best Selling Plug-In Hybrid Niro phev

From €32,495

Just get the petrol kona and save 20 k or so

Outlander, Grandland,

You could save a few bob, by going to the uk and buying a year old car ect.

Not a SUV but give a look at this https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202008052113714?onesearchad=New&onesearchad=Nearly%20New&onesearchad=Used&year-from=2020&transmission=Automatic&radius=1500&body-type=MPV&body-type=SUV&make=BMW&fuel-type=Hybrid%20%E2%80%93%20Petrol%2FElectric%20Plug-in&sort=price-asc&advertising-location=at_cars&postcode=ls298jn&page=1

its only 6 months old and vrt should be under 2000 euro with 50 km range on battery.

zg3409

With such low mileage you won't save anything on fuel. I would have thought a diesel is not suited to such short trios. An outlander is petrol plug in, and you could do all local trips on electric only. Its quite inefficient on long runs and with Mitsubishi pulling out of Europe warranty claims might be a problem. Either way no money to be saved and you seem to want to spend big. An Ioniq 28kWh will reliably do 150km and used is 20,000 euro, but not an SUV and probably not worth the hassle on charging for no real savings . public chargers are often bust, blocked or broken so the Ioniq would need public charging for trips over 160km.

Lex Luthor

JPA wrote: »

What will be the daily and weekly mileage?

Seems like a large budget for small mileage based on what you have said.

probably 20km per day mid week on average, that might go up to 30km depending on the bus situation when the schools go back and they can provide a service meaning a double trip to the school

theres a weekly round trip to the MIL which is 60km and also a weekly trip to dublin approx 80km round trip

so apprx 250-275km per week

Lex Luthor

kanuseeme wrote: »

The Kia e-Niro
Go Electric with Kia

From €39,495

Ireland's Best Selling Plug-In Hybrid Niro phev

From €32,495

Just get the petrol kona and save 20 k or so

Outlander, Grandland,

You could save a few bob, by going to the uk and buying a year old car ect.

Not a SUV but give a look at this https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-details/202008052113714?onesearchad=New&onesearchad=Nearly%20New&onesearchad=Used&year-from=2020&transmission=Automatic&radius=1500&body-type=MPV&body-type=SUV&make=BMW&fuel-type=Hybrid%20%E2%80%93%20Petrol%2FElectric%20Plug-in&sort=price-asc&advertising-location=at_cars&postcode=ls298jn&page=1

its only 6 months old and vrt should be under 2000 euro with 50 km range on battery.

not a fan of hyundai's
also same with BMW

had considered Niro but looks a bit dated now

Lex Luthor

zg3409 wrote: »

I would have thought a diesel is not suited to such short trios. .

diesel is not being used by her, I have it and use it but due to job change and company vehicle it would be surplus

she has a small petrol hatch that my son will be using more often so need a motor for her and also between us

the company vehicle possibly gonna be a van so may or not work at weekends as more than 2 travelling together and occasionally need 4 seats and some good space

ELM327

I think an outlander PHEV would suit here.
Get your normal weekly miles covered by electric but have the petrol engine for longer trips so you don't have the hassle of charging en route.

sumo12

For such small mileage I think it should be EV. Why go PHEV when you still have an engine to service etc? I just can't see the benefit of PHEV at all, maybe I'm missing something. And I drive a Hybrid.

ELM327

sumo12 wrote: »

For such small mileage I think it should be EV. Why go PHEV when you still have an engine to service etc? I just can't see the benefit of PHEV at all, maybe I'm missing something. And I drive a Hybrid.

Get the benefit of small trips on full EV, without the hassle of charging en route. And I'm a (B)EV owner.

kanuseeme

ELM327 wrote: »

I think an outlander PHEV would suit here.
Get your normal weekly miles covered by electric but have the petrol engine for longer trips so you don't have the hassle of charging en route.

The OP is in for a bit of a surprise if he thinks the Niro is dated.:D:D:D

The opel grandland?

Reports of the kuga plug in catching fire recently?

Lex Luthor

ELM327 wrote: »

I think an outlander PHEV would suit here.
Get your normal weekly miles covered by electric but have the petrol engine for longer trips so you don't have the hassle of charging en route.

friend of mine has the Outlander, his wife drives it and says its barely using the petrol engine
The inside of them looks like its from the 90's

for me I think he would have been better off with an EV as he also has a CR-V diesel in the house if they need to take a trip

kanuseeme

https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2057978477

MG ZS BEV, 44kWh only problem is you have to import it from GB or maybe there is a dealer in the North.

liamog

Before making a decision I'd wait to see what the Skoda Enyaq pricing comes in at. My own guess is starting under 40k but that's based on nothing.
Reveal is on September 1st, so we should hopefully find out more then.

Lex Luthor

Spec'd up an Opel Grandland X SRi 5-door SUV 1.6 (225hp) on their config tool with a few extras for €1400 & metallic paint for €600 and total price comes in at just shy of €49k

however on their main page on their website the starting price is €36,645 after rebates & grants

I presume the online config tool isnt taking these grants etc into consideration?

Low mileage perfect for 2nd hand but equally perfect for PCP because you will pay a lot less because you pay based on the calculated depreciation + interest, so, if your yearly mileage is low they you will pay a lot less than if you drive a lot more like I do.

Go with the lowest deposit you can, the idea is to pay as little as possible over the 3 years, after year 3 you can hand it back or pay the balloon to own or get another car.

A lot of cars already mentioned.

Lex Luthor

my wife has averaged 10,000km per year in her petrol hatch the last 6yrs and we estimate this could drop to about 8,000 going forward mainly due to having less to drive as one son will soon be driving himself

So the PCP sounds like a viable option, never thought of it

Have always saved up and bought cars outright

Just as an example I had a look at the Corsa-e offer on the Opel website

am I right in saying that they work out the GFV based on what mileage you estimate at the time of taking the car ?

They currently have an example and a GFV of €10,102 after 3yrs. That sounds very low to me for a car value after 3yrs costing over €28k?

I suppose at the end of the day, you have to pay the full value anyway no matter what the balloon payment is if you intend to renew the car or keep it

Lex Luthor

Lex Luthor wrote: »

my wife has averaged 10,000km per year in her petrol hatch the last 6yrs and we estimate this could drop to about 8,000 going forward mainly due to having less to drive as one son will soon be driving himself

So the PCP sounds like a viable option, never thought of it

Have always saved up and bought cars outright

Just as an example I had a look at the Corsa-e offer on the Opel website

am I right in saying that they work out the GFV based on what mileage you estimate at the time of taking the car ?

They currently have an example and a GFV of €10,102 after 3yrs. That sounds very low to me for a car value after 3yrs costing over €28k?

I suppose at the end of the day, you have to pay the full value anyway no matter what the balloon payment is if you intend to renew the car or keep it

Buying with cash is always good and saves interest but it's a lot of cash to put towards a car, I'd rather pay a lump of cash towards the house, cars depreciate heavily.

PCP, spend as little cash as possible, after year 3 you decide whether to keep it or pay off balloon but because you do such little mileage the balloon will be a lot higher for you than for me because I drive a lot more.

Pay minimum deposit and pay per month keeping cash for more important things than dumping 40 odd K on a car.

You should also be able to get PCP on a year old car too saving more.

The 10 K GFMV at the end is too low and this is not a good deal for such low mileage meaning you'll be paying most of the car off making buying the car a lot more attractive than if the GFMV was say 20-25K, you're less likely to pay that off.

So what's happening here is that Opel are unsure what the depreciation is going to be at the end of 3 years and fear it will be a lot so they make sure you're taking the risk.

Usually it's in their interest to get you into a new car after 3 years and paying so much for the car in 3 years having a low balloon at the end isn't much of an incentive to change.

Sometimes I don't think even the dealers know how pcp works because the idea is to pay as little for the car as possible and that's not the case in this example so I'd look elsewhere for better deals, you have a big advantage considering the low mileage you're Wife drives.

So Opel are saying by this that the car will be worth 10K after 3 years, however, the car might be worth more and if that's the case then anything over is yours but don't take the risk because it's what's on paper which you sign is what matters.

peposhi

My 2 pence...
By the look of it you’d like to get a new/newer car for your OH and have the funds for it, otherwise you would not have bothered asking on here.
PHEV - while it makes some sense with your low mileage it is a waste of money when you can get a good EV with long range that covers all your needs and avoids petrol pumps and maintenance related visits completely.
BEV is the answer. Plenty of options out there. €33-35k you can easily snap a year old eSoul with 400km in the tank available to you every morning. New one is well within your budget, should you wish to go that road.

Have you test-driven any so far?

njburke

peposhi wrote: »

My 2 pence...
BEV is the answer. Plenty of options out there. €33-35k you can easily snap a year old eSoul with 400km in the tank available to you every morning. New one is well within your budget, should you wish to go that road.

Have you test-driven any so far?

33 -35 k is New VW ID3 pricing for 400Km range, PCP, trade in and warranty. Plenty of other options out there too for buyers at the moment.

Lex Luthor

peposhi wrote: »

My 2 pence...
By the look of it you’d like to get a new/newer car for your OH and have the funds for it, otherwise you would not have bothered asking on here.
PHEV - while it makes some sense with your low mileage it is a waste of money when you can get a good EV with long range that covers all your needs and avoids petrol pumps and maintenance related visits completely.
BEV is the answer. Plenty of options out there. €33-35k you can easily snap a year old eSoul with 400km in the tank available to you every morning. New one is well within your budget, should you wish to go that road.

Have you test-driven any so far?

pretty much sums it up

my own car (the diesel SUV) is probably worth about €15/16k so that could be used partially or fully towards a deposit and the rest on PCP over a 3yr period

BEV seems to be the best option based on the mileage she does which will reduce down from middle of next year as the odd school run will be a thing of the past

Havent driven anything yet

went into the local Opel dealership yesterday and had a look around the Corsa-e but nothing available to drive
To be honest, the sales guy was barely letting us sit in it
Just said have a look there and then after 5min came over and asked if we had any questions. I asked could he unlock it so I could see inside

They said they would have one available to drive in a week or so

liamog

Lex Luthor wrote: »

my wife has averaged 10,000km per year in her petrol hatch the last 6yrs and we estimate this could drop to about 8,000 going forward mainly due to having less to drive as one son will soon be driving himself

So the PCP sounds like a viable option, never thought of it

Have always saved up and bought cars outright

Just as an example I had a look at the Corsa-e offer on the Opel website

am I right in saying that they work out the GFV based on what mileage you estimate at the time of taking the car ?

They currently have an example and a GFV of €10,102 after 3yrs. That sounds very low to me for a car value after 3yrs costing over €28k?

I suppose at the end of the day, you have to pay the full value anyway no matter what the balloon payment is if you intend to renew the car or keep it

It's not unusual for a car to be worth between 40% and 65% of it's purchase price after 3 years. By setting the GFV at 35%, they are trying to ensure you have enough equity at the end of the PCP to trade up to a newer model. The way I look at PCP deals, is can I afford the monthly cost. If the answer is yes, then the lower the GFV the better, because it means I'm more like to have equity at the end of the term. When PCPs first rolled out, some manufacturers set very high GFVs, it made the car cheaper by the month, but meant you ended up with no equity at the end.

liamog

liamog wrote: »

It's not unusual for a car to be worth between 40% and 65% of it's purchase price after 3 years. By setting the GFV at 35%, they are trying to ensure you have enough equity at the end of the PCP to trade up to a newer model. The way I look at PCP deals, is can I afford the monthly cost. If the answer is yes, then the lower the GFV the better, because it means I'm more like to have equity at the end of the term. When PCPs first rolled out, some manufacturers set very high GFVs, it made the car cheaper by the month, but meant you ended up with no equity at the end.

No that's not true, the low GFMV simply means they expect high depreciation and to buy expecting more than the GFMV is very foolish. It may or may not depreciate less but unless there's more on the PCP contract then the GFMV which there won't of course then assume and expect there to be nothing more above the GFMV.

You see, the thing dealers and finance companies in Ireland fail to understand is that PCP is the way to drive a car for as little as possible for 3 years and a high GFMV means someone has to pay a high deposit and high monthly payments or paying a significant proportion of the cost of the car over 3 years while doing low mileage is not the way it's done. So beware of PCP with Low GFMV at the end because you still have to pay most of the cost of the car while taking most of the risk on depreciation.

liamog

Deleted User wrote: »

No that's not true, the low GFMV simply means they expect high depreciation and to buy expecting more than the GFMV is very foolish. It may or may not depreciate less but unless there's more on the PCP contract then the GFMV which there won't of course then assume and expect there to be nothing more above the GFMV.

It looks to me like there are two models, high GMFV where you should be doing a personal lease instead, and the low GMFV where the intent is to sell you another car at the end of the term. Many people got stung by not understanding PCP the first time round. They had high GMFVs and people didn't save money for their next deposit. BMW and Nissan were particularly known for the high GMFV low monthlies approach.

Other manufacturers went with using PCP as a way to turn over new cars every 3 years, in that case it's better to guarantee equity at the end. Looks like Opel are just trying to ensure they can sell you another car in 3 years time.

liamog

liamog wrote: »

It looks to me like there are two models, high GMFV where you should be doing a personal lease instead, and the low GMFV where the intent is to sell you another car at the end of the term. Many people got stung by not understanding PCP the first time round. They had high GMFVs and people didn't save money for their next deposit. BMW and Nissan were particularly know for the high GMFV low monthlies approach.

Other manufacturers went with using PCP as a way to turn over new cars every 3 years, in that case it's better to guarantee equity at the end. Looks like Opel are just trying to ensure they can sell you another car in 3 years time.

I mean absolutely no disrespect to you at all but this isn't the way PCP is designed or supposed to be, Yes a lot of People don't understand PCP but that goes for the dealers too.

As I said, PCP is designed for minimum deposit and minimum monthly payments to attract People to new cars every 3 years and the High GFMV is the Stick to get people into a new car instead of paying this high GFMV, they'll most likely put this money towards a new car for another 3 years, the carrot is the low deposit and low monthly payments, this of course is dependent on the mileage driven, obviously for me, driving 35-45K Kms a year or more will suffer massive depreciation which is calculated into my PCP payments and GFMV. But for those driving the National average or less should expect to pay a lot less per month with a much higher GFMV at the end meaning they expect to pay as little cash for the car as possible.

You see, hoping the car is worth more in the end is madness because it's only on paper where the signature is that counts and it certainly won't say the car will be worth more at the end ( we promise with a ;-) )

unkel

Deleted User wrote: »

No that's not true, the low GFMV simply means they expect high depreciation and to buy expecting more than the GFMV is very foolish. It may or may not depreciate less but unless there's more on the PCP contract then the GFMV which there won't of course then assume and expect there to be nothing more above the GFMV.

You see, the thing dealers and finance companies in Ireland fail to understand is that PCP is the way to drive a car for as little as possible for 3 years and a high GFMV means someone has to pay a high deposit and high monthly payments or paying a significant proportion of the cost of the car over 3 years while doing low mileage is not the way it's done. So beware of PCP with Low GFMV at the end because you still have to pay most of the cost of the car while taking most of the risk on depreciation.

FYP :pac:

unkel

I'm afraid it is you who doesn't really understand Mad_Lad. Liamog is spot on, the purpose of PCP is to entrap a person into buying a brand new car from them every three years. Obviously at a huge cost compared to buying a car outright. Didn't you pay over €22k for a 24kWh Leaf over 3 years and did not even own the car at the end of it? My depreciation of my 28kWh Ioniq was less than €6k over 3 years

unkel

unkel wrote: »

I'm afraid it is you who doesn't really understand Mad_Lad. Liamog is spot on, the purpose of PCP is to entrap a person into buying a brand new car from them every three years. Obviously at a huge cost compared to buying a car outright. Didn't you pay over €22k for a 24kWh Leaf over 3 years and did not even own the car at the end of it? My depreciation of my 28kWh Ioniq was less than €6k over 3 years

You're right about one thing and that's entrapment, so tell me, how is it entrapment if the GFMV is low instead of being high ? if the Person pays the brint of the car payments they might as well pay off the rest, the idea of a high GFMV is to make it far less attractive for someone to want to pay this high GFMV and instead put it towards another car, this fantasy thinking the car will be worth more than the GFMV is foolish because it's only the agreement on paper is what counts.

Yeah, I paid a lot for the Leaf but I am on record in saying I did not expect the Leaf to be worth more than the GFMV. I knew exactly what I was getting into mainly because I had nearly 90,000 Kms on it, this is my greatest issue is high mileage which is even higher now but I'm still glad I didn't pay the full cost of the Leaf. The interest was way higher than today too.

unkel

unkel wrote: »

FYP :pac:

Indeed beware if someone doesn't know what PCP is or is supposed to be. You're quite correct there.

https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/car-news/90794/pcp-personal-contract-purchase-car-deals-explained

A PCP finance deal will see buyers paying instalments that cover part of the cost of a new car – usually around a third of the list price – which means that these monthly outgoings will be lower than if you take out a loan to buy a car outright.

If you'd like to own the car at the end of the PCP, then you’ll need to stump up a substantial final payment – the GMFV payment – to take the keys. If you're looking to buy a car to keep for the long term, then a PCP probably isn't the right kind of finance for you.

liamog

It's just a bit of mathematical trickery.
The manufacturer will forecast the expected value of the car at the end of the term.
Then they'll then use this to give a GMFV. They can then manipulate this number to help you make a future decision.

Let's say I'm selling a car for €50k and predict it will be worth around €25k after three years. If I set the GMFV at €25k then you're left with nothing, but your monthlies were cheaper because you only had to finance the €20k (50k - 5k (deposit) - 25k (GMFV))
Now if I set the GMFV at €20k, then I'm predicting you'll have €5,000 equity, which I can use to sell you another €50k car, without you having to dip your hand in to your pocket.

PCP can be a great way to finance the car if you intend to buy it at the end, because there are incentives built into the deal to entice you to keep trading up (0%APR, Scrappage etc ...), if you are savvy you can take advantage of these to pay less.

Jesus.

liamog

Anyway back to OP's question ...

liamog

If you do go down the PCP route, and feel like you may get another car in 3 years. Try to keep aside enough to have saved a new 10% deposit by the end of the term.
That way you won't be desperate at the end of the finance. You'll be able to choose between refinancing the GMFV (to keep the car) or taking a new car.

Lex Luthor

some great info here guys, debate is good

from what I can make it there are 2 schools of thought

I think going forward the intention would be probably to change every 3yrs

I would imagine and this is just from reading above, that a high GMFV would give the owner more of an incentive to renew the car

for me a low GMFV, would probably depending on the market value make me consider paying the amount off to own it
But that depends if you have 10k sitting around to do that which in essence most people wont

Now to start driving and choose, car size & type will largely depend on the car with the company which is an unknown yet

Lex Luthor

Lex Luthor wrote: »

I would imagine and this is just from reading above, that a high GMFV would give the owner more of an incentive to renew the car

Yes and that's exactly the way PCP was thought up, to make it less attractive to pay a big lump sum after year 3 and put some of that towards another new car.

Lex Luthor wrote: »

for me a low GMFV, would probably depending on the market value make me consider paying the amount off to own it
But that depends if you have 10k sitting around to do that which in essence most people wont

A low GFMV isn't the way PCP is supposed to work out at the end, the idea is to get you into a new car not pay off the existing one, it's in the best interest of the dealer and finance company to get you into a new car.

PCP means paying as little as possible to drive the car for the 3 years putting in as little cash as possible and with your low mileage you're in a great position because depreciation will be far lower for you than it would be for me with 120-130k Kms at the end of the contract, you'd probably have 30-40K Kms big difference and a big reason as to why my GFMV would be a lot lower which I think will be 15K at the end of December 2020, even that's enough of an incentive for me to think twice about paying off the i3 but I am considering it because 15K and it's mine and I can let a car work for me for a change the only thing that worries me is costly repair if something should go wrong now that it's out of warranty.

championc

Go Full EV, or don't bother. And if you go full EV, I guarantee you that you'll never go back.

PHEV's have lower power, lower charging speed and above all, added complexity and the same potential issues with ICE's

+ PHEV needs much more plugging in.

championc

A friend of mine bought an Outlander PHEV. He referred to the PHEV part as a "gimmick"

Deleted User

Deleted User wrote: »

+ PHEV needs much more plugging in.

Unless of course it's an i3 Rex

championc

championc wrote: »

A friend of mine bought an Outlander PHEV. He referred to the PHEV part as a "gimmick"

It's a big inefficient tank. Our Diesel can hardly do 35 imp Mpg.

The PHEV Outlander has one of the largest batteries out there but it's just too inefficient.

kanuseeme

championc wrote: »

Go Full EV, or don't bother. And if you go full EV, I guarantee you that you'll never go back.

PHEV's have lower power, lower charging speed and above all, added complexity and the same potential issues with ICE's

I posted this earlier for the KIA Niro/ E-Niro

PHEV
32,494.89 €

Electric Long range 485 km 150 kW (204 PS)
39,494.87 €

I don't know if all these drawbacks are worth 7000 euro less, as for the known issues with ICE's are they any worse than unknown electric car issues, like battery degradation, slowing down of charging speeds like they done on the tesla's or just even finding a charger that works, has not got 3 cars waiting to charge or has not been turned into a car parking space beside a picnic table.

I know this is only for the Niro, but you take the OP's choice of a kuga and look for something from ford thats not a gimmick you find the ford mach-e which is nearly double the price for none of these disadvantages you mention.

7000 euro's worth of petrol @ 1.3 euro and assuming a gimmick doing 7l/100 km (40mpg) which is what my gimmick does on petrol is 75 000 km.

As for your friend, why not get him here and tell us about his gimmick,:D:D:D

Lex Luthor

I think originally we were looking at the Kuga as it was a PHEV and it might probably suit our needs sizewise, however after a bit more thought, the BEV seems to be a better solution. I think her having to remember to plug in every night I know she will forget and tell me its a nuisance and will end up driving it more on petrol mode than electric

Car size will depend on what I end up with company car wise, so considering other options in size ie. Corsa-e

I dont think we will ever need a car in the size of a Outlander PHEV going forward

We'll probably take a look at the Niro this week as the Ceed is in for a service at the local dealer

Looking online at their PCP offer, if I put a 10k deposit, its €471/month for 36 months with a final payment of €15798
Cost of credit at 3.9% is €2720

Am I out of touch a little on car pricing or do these GMFV seem lower than they will be?
I would have though a sought after car like this after 3yrs would be worth a few grand more than 16k, maybe I'm wrong

liamog

Lex Luthor wrote: »

Am I out of touch a little on car pricing or do these GMFV seem lower than they will be?
I would have though a sought after car like this after 3yrs would be worth a few grand more than 16k, maybe I'm wrong

Kia are in the camp of manufacturers that want you to have another 10% deposit at the end of the 3 years, in order to do that they have to set the GMFV lower so that you are more likely to have enough equity to trade up.

liamog

liamog wrote: »

Kia are in the camp of manufacturers that want you to have another 10% deposit at the end of the 3 years, in order to do that they have to set the GMFV lower so that you are more likely to have enough equity to trade up.

That's a risk, someone should always assume the car will be worth 0 over the GFMV or less.

The lower GFMV isn't Kia being thoughtful, that's Kia looking out for themselves so that if the car is worth less you pay for it by higher monthly payments and if it is worth more then that's all nice and dandy but no one should expect more than the GFMV at the end. Kia are making sure they're not stung with a car that's worth less.

Someone driving high mileage like me can expect a very low GFMV regardless and expect to pay a lot more PM but to someone like the OP who drives very little it makes no sense to get trapped into paying most of the cost of the car.

So if the car is 40K and there's very little kms on it one should expect a higher GFMV after 3 years.

Have we any PCP figures to go by, different mileage etc ?

Diseased toe

Am I reading this correctly for the BMW

£22,000 in the UK and approx €50,000 here?

liamog

Deleted User wrote: »

That's a risk, someone should always assume the car will be worth 0 over the GFMV or less.

The lower GFMV isn't Kia being thoughtful, that's Kia looking out for themselves so that if the car is worth less you pay for it by higher monthly payments and if it is worth more then that's all nice and dandy but no one should expect more than the GFMV at the end. Kia are making sure they're not stung with a car that's worth less.

We had that discussion a few posts ago, you don't need to revisit it.

kanuseeme

Diseased toe wrote: »

Am I reading this correctly for the BMW

£22,000 in the UK and approx €50,000 here?

No, its 2nd hand for that price, 6 months old, I believe there £36 000 pounds new in the UK, don't know the price here.

I honestly think they are great value 2nd hand.

:D:D