Political Correctness gone mad

Big Gerry

A prisoner in the UK who put down one of the worst ever child sex beasts has been charged with murder.

The beast who had raped 191 children including babies was serving 22 life sentences and had also written a book for other child sex beasts about how to abuse children and get away with it.

You think they would of given the prisoner a medal or time off his sentence for putting down this animal.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7925257/Man-29-charged-murder-Britains-worst-paedophile-Richard-Huckle.html

SaintLeibowitz

I don't think you understand what political correctness is.

Ironicname

No. No they shouldn't have given a criminal an award for murder.

Silly thread really.

Padre_Pio

And the Academy Award for best murder goes to...

I says

Guess you could say he did the Huckle buck.

biko

Paul Fitzgerald should get some time off for good behaviour.

Big Gerry

Ironicname wrote: »

No. No they shouldn't have given a criminal an award for murder.

Silly thread really.

Putting down a child sex beast who rapes babies is not murder in my book its a public service.

circadian

Big Gerry wrote: »

A prisoner in the UK who put down one of the worst ever child sex beasts has been charged with murder.

The beast who had raped 191 children including babies was serving 22 life sentences and had also written a book for other child sex beasts about how to abuse children and get away with it.

You think they would of given the prisoner a medal or time off his sentence for putting down this animal.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7925257/Man-29-charged-murder-Britains-worst-paedophile-Richard-Huckle.html

Man you could work for the daily mail with that rhetoric.

Oh, wait... Is that a Daily Mail link?

Big Gerry

Big Gerry wrote: »

Putting down a child sex beast who rapes babies is not murder in my book its a public service.

Thank God your book isn't widely available.

The man was a monster but to suggest that another criminal should be rewarded for murder is bizarre.

It's not Roman times and jails aren't Colosseums.

circadian

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Thank God your book isn't widely available.

The man was a monster but to suggest that another criminal should be rewarded for murder is bizarre.

It's not Roman times and jails aren't Colosseums.

Book? Am I missing out on something here?

SaintLeibowitz

From a quick Google. The guy who allegedly killed the pedophile was a sexual predator himself.

Ironicname

circadian wrote:

Book? Am I missing out on something here?

Big Gerry wrote:

Putting down a child sex beast who rapes babies is not murder in my book

His book

circadian

Ironicname wrote: »

His book

Bedtime for me I think.

SaintLeibowitz

SaintLeibowitz wrote: »

From a quick Google. The guy who allegedly killed the pedophile was a sexual predator himself.

Yeah but he should have a medal....... Or something.

Big Gerry

biko wrote: »

Paul Fitzgerald should get some time off for good behaviour.

In the Philippines he probably would of been granted early release for his public service.

circadian

circadian wrote: »

Bedtime for me I think.

In fairness, my retort works better in speech rather than text. I can see how you missed it. My bad.

Better Than Christ

Big Gerry wrote: »

Putting down a child sex beast who rapes babies is not murder in my book its a public service.

If that sentence is anything to go by, your book could do with a proofreader.

magma69

Bloody PC brigade with their criminalisation of murder. MADNESS!

biko

SaintLeibowitz wrote: »

From a quick Google. The guy who allegedly killed the pedophile was a sexual predator himself.

You forgot to add your source

SaintLeibowitz

biko wrote: »

You forgot to add your source

I didn't.

Raconteuse

Big Gerry wrote: »

Putting down a child sex beast who rapes babies is not murder in my book its a public service.

I don't feel a bit sorry for the piece of sh1t but it is still murder. Murder is the deliberate killing of someone, no matter what they have done. Opinion doesn't negate that fact.

Guy:Incognito

Big Gerry wrote: »

.

You think they would of given the prisoner a medal or time off his sentence for putting down this animal.


[]

Do we just aim for the prison system to be some sort of hunger games? Murder someone with crimes above a certain level and get rewarded? Does the table of bounties get published so they can pick and know how much time they earn for each murder?

CrabRevolution

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

Do we just aim for the prison system to be some sort of hunger games? Murder someone with crimes above a certain level and get rewarded? Does the table of bounties get published so they can pick and know how much time they earn for each murder?

Every criminal murders the prisoner he judges worse than him, till the most innocent prisoner is left.

Plumbthedepths

Do two wrongs make a right? was the killer before the event a saint?

CrabRevolution

CrabRevolution wrote: »

Every criminal murders the prisoner he judges worse than him, till the most innocent prisoner is left.

Finally, garlic man gets his justice

jimmycrackcorm

OP, stop watching "The purge" movies

jimmycrackcorm

jimmycrackcorm wrote: »

OP, stop

Fyp

wakka12

Big Gerry wrote: »

A prisoner in the UK who put down one of the worst ever child sex beasts has been charged with murder.

The beast who had raped 191 children including babies was serving 22 life sentences and had also written a book for other child sex beasts about how to abuse children and get away with it.

You think they would of given the prisoner a medal or time off his sentence for putting down this animal.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7925257/Man-29-charged-murder-Britains-worst-paedophile-Richard-Huckle.html

Cop on!! You can't just go around murdering people no matter who it is. At what point is a crime bad enough randomers can kill without consequence? Its why we have laws and not vigilantes! Nobody gives a **** the prick died but you cant just be letting people away with unlawful murder

ILoveYourVibes

wakka12 wrote: »

Cop on!! You can't just go around murdering people no matter who it is. At what point is a crime bad enough randomers can kill without consequence? Its why we have laws and not vigilantes! Nobody gives a **** the prick died but you cant just be letting people away with unlawful murder

i dunno tho...makes you think

MrAbyss

SaintLeibowitz wrote: »

From a quick Google. The guy who allegedly killed the pedophile was a sexual predator himself.

Yes it is always this way. Self-proclaimed Paedo-Hunters are generally Kiddie Fiddlers themselves. In fact, they almost always are. I recall a thread on here a few years back about about the death penalty for paedophiles and some oddball comes on and after four of five posts about him wanting to 'murder perverts' he made a post asking others if they ever think about what acts these paedophiles do to little kids. It was a total giveaway.

These paedophile hunters hang out on message board exchanging lurid stories on the topic but it is all turning them on. They are extremely dangerous bastards as well. They will accuse anyone of being a nonce and several innocent men have been murdered by their actions of these self-proclaimed 'defenders of children' as they call themselves.

Raconteuse

Remember a few years ago in the UK, two prisoners disemboweled a fellow prisoner who raped a young girl.

One of them was in prison for breaking into a care home and battering two patients. Don't know what the other guy was in for. But the first guy was hardly in a position to take the moral high ground - he likely just tortured the rapist to death to look like a hero.

RWCNT

Big Gerry wrote: »

A prisoner in the UK who put down one of the worst ever child sex beasts has been charged with murder.

The beast who had raped 191 children including babies was serving 22 life sentences and had also written a book for other child sex beasts about how to abuse children and get away with it.

You think they would of given the prisoner a medal or time off his sentence for putting down this animal.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7925257/Man-29-charged-murder-Britains-worst-paedophile-Richard-Huckle.html

You could probably find out what prison he's in easily enough, send him one yourself.

biko

SaintLeibowitz wrote: »

I didn't.

Don't worry, maybe next time you'll get it right.

If he was dispatched by a parent of one of the abused, fair enough. But, by a fellow Paedophile, no. But, when his extended sentence is handed out a "cheers bud, for saving the tax payers some money" may be in order.

SaintLeibowitz

biko wrote: »

Don't worry, maybe next time you'll get it right.

What did I get wrong biko?.

Snow Garden

Why are people using the phrase 'putting down' ?
Who do they think they are?

Big Gerry

I'm surprised so many people think it was a bad thing that a serial Nonce was put down:eek:

Edgware

wakka12 wrote: »

Cop on!! You can't just go around murdering people no matter who it is. At what point is a crime bad enough randomers can kill without consequence? Its why we have laws and not vigilantes! Nobody gives a **** the prick died but you cant just be letting people away with unlawful murder

Is there a lawful murder?

Pub Supremacy

He really did have that sub-human nonce look about him.

Pub Supremacy

Edgware wrote: »

Is there a lawful murder?

Self defence.

Deleted User

Deleted User wrote: »

But, when his extended sentence is handed out a "cheers bud, for saving the tax payers some money" may be in order.

How much money do you think two English rapists sitting in an English prison cell is costing the Irish tax payer?

Anyway, no one knows the reasons why one dangerous rapist knifed another even more dangerous one. Everyone farting and moaning about "prison justice" FFS, it could have been an argument about borrowing the other guy's hair curling thongs for all we know, or leaving the toilet seat up. These are not exactly stable people after all.

But taking a wild guess, a slightly less onerous scumbag shanking the more prolific scumbag could be an effort to regain some jailhouse cred with the other lags on the block. Probably now avoids getting the old sock of pool balls across the skull for being a rapist himself, extending his sentence by 5 years but his life by 40.

El_Duderino 09

Big Gerry wrote: »

I'm surprised so many people think it was a bad thing that a serial Nonce was put down:eek:

Oh don't worry. We get it, you're fierce edgy all-together-so-you-are.

But yes, most people still see murder, as murder.

ILoveYourVibes

Raconteuse wrote: »

Remember a few years ago in the UK, two prisoners disemboweled a fellow prisoner who raped a young girl.

One of them was in prison for breaking into a care home and battering two patients. Don't know what the other guy was in for. But the first guy was hardly in a position to take the moral high ground - he likely just tortured the rapist to death to look like a hero.

The Hierarchy of prison is all about how hard you are.

Deleted User

Deleted User wrote: »

How much money do you think two English rapists sitting in an English prison cell is costing the Irish tax payer?

Why are you mentioning Irish taxpayers? I don't think English tax payers particularly like paying the cost of incarceration.

ILoveYourVibes

ILoveYourVibes wrote: »

The Hierarchy of prison is all about how hard you are.

Just remember to punch the biggest guy to show how fearless you are. Be grand.

Deleted User

Deleted User wrote: »

Why are you mentioning Irish taxpayers? I don't think English tax payers particularly like paying the cost of incarceration.

I'm not. I was quoting you. I neither know nor care what English tax payers think, that's between them and their elected officials. I was just quoting you saying "cheers bud for saving the tax payers some money". What tax payer is saving money? I'll give you a head start - not the PAYE workers in Ireland. Say what you like about what our taxes get pissed away on but this isn't it.

Deleted User

Deleted User wrote: »

I'm not. I was quoting you. I neither know nor care what English tax payers think, that's between them and their elected officials. I was just quoting you saying "cheers bud for saving the tax payers some money". What tax payer is saving money? I'll give you a head start - not the PAYE workers in Ireland. Say what you like about what our taxes get pissed away on but this isn't it.

Are you well? I hate to interrupt, but you're having an argument with yourself. I never mentioned Ireland. Why are YOU mentioning Ireland specifically?

Go back and read the OP. The 5th word is UK in this particular case.

CrabRevolution

Deleted User wrote: »

I'm not. I was quoting you. I neither know nor care what English tax payers think, that's between them and their elected officials. I was just quoting you saying "cheers bud for saving the tax payers some money". What tax payer is saving money? I'll give you a head start - not the PAYE workers in Ireland. Say what you like about what our taxes get pissed away on but this isn't it.

This is a pretty bizarre argument to get so worked up about. I'd imagine 99.9% of people would interpret his sentence to mean "Saving the taxpayers who are paying for your imprisonment some money".

He didn't say "Saving us taxpayers" or "Saving the Irish taxpayer". It goes without saying he was referring to the British taxpayer.

Ulysses Gaze

Deleted User wrote: »

Just remember to punch the biggest guy to show how fearless you are. Be grand.