Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

This is ****ing infuriating!!

«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    Theres no fear of the law.

    No deterrent.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 18,678 Mod ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    That's appalling, leaving someone with permanent scarring, damaged sight and facing burns treatment and yet walking off scot free.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,122 ✭✭✭BeerWolf


    greencap wrote: »
    Theres no fear of the law.

    No deterrent.

    Yeah well these Judges shouldn't be shocked when vigilantism becomes a thing. And I honestly would condone it, because of said Judges incompetency... such as that fella defending himself with a Hurley stick causing brain damage to a thug... **** that thug. The Laws protect them more than law abiding Joe...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 965 ✭✭✭CucaFace


    Honestly soon the only hope of actual justice in this country will be our own form of it.

    The country is turning into a joke and in reality is going to need vigilante justice otherwise the scum will just take over.

    Our 'justice system' is totally useless and totally unaccountable from the Garda on the streets right up to the judges. You only have to see the number of convictions by so many people out free at the moment who are running amok around the place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,093 ✭✭✭Krombopulos Michael


    I read this article yesterday and the guy himself who robs house says. “It’s sad to say it, but if I’m in your house and you wake up and hit me with a hammer or whatever, you’ll get done [prosecuted] more than me.”

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/burglars-secrets-i-love-creeping-around-houses-when-people-are-in-bed-1.4108789


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko


    It’s sad to say it, but if I’m in your house and you wake up and hit me with a hammer or whatever, you’ll get done [prosecuted] more than me.”
    "If they find your body.
    No-one knows you're here but you and me.."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,032 ✭✭✭tastyt


    How do the judges look at themselves in the mirror eh.

    Probably because they know the little scrotes that they let back out on the streets won't be walking around their neighbourhoods in howth, dalkey and killiney.

    They don't give a **** about normal working people having to deal with anti social and criminal behaviour everyday because its a different world to them.

    They can sit there smugly in their sheltered life and lecture people about rehabilitation and giving people chances .

    **** off


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,761 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    Saying that this is a disgrace does not do justice to how bad this is. A juvenile caution for a very serious offence will do feck all to stop this happening again and the punishment in no way fits the crime. Totally ridiculous.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,900 ✭✭✭✭Riskymove


    tastyt wrote: »
    How do the judges look at themselves in the mirror eh.

    just to point out that this decision is nothing to do with a Judge

    its the DPP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,597 ✭✭✭tdf7187


    Not their fault, it's their culture.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,399 ✭✭✭✭ben.schlomo


    Riskymove wrote: »
    just to point out that this decision is nothing to do with a Judge

    its the DPP

    Ah ya but why read the article when that'll get in the way of a good misplaced rant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    It really depends on their age. Juveniles generally tend not to be locked up unless they are at the psychopathic end of things.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,779 ✭✭✭1o059k7ewrqj3n


    Acid attacks, regardless of age, need to be seen as attempted murder, and carry life sentences. End of.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,542 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    Riskymove wrote: »
    just to point out that this decision is nothing to do with a Judge

    its the DPP

    Stop - you're ruining it for everyone.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,281 ✭✭✭CrankyHaus


    Kudos to the victims and their families for not taking this lying down and demanding answers from the DPP, though I doubt they'll get anything more than a contemptous brush off. Much of our state seems to view citizens as serfs, whose only purpose is to pay taxes and then F-Off. I'd be very interested to see what the DPP's basis not pursuing a prosecution was.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Steyr 556 wrote: »
    Acid attacks, regardless of age, need to be seen as attempted murder, and carry life sentences. End of.

    Some people aren't afraid of prison time, and honestly, life sentences don't mean much in Ireland. That's unlikely to change any time soon.

    Honestly, if we want these attacks to stop, the best method would be to punish them as they did their victims. Acid on the face and body of the convicted. The attacks would dry up quickly then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,802 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    what acid was used?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,710 ✭✭✭Corvo


    Acid attack the judge and shrug your shoulders when you arrested.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,140 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    surely using acid goes over the line of leniency


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭Vic_08


    Ah ya but why read the article when that'll get in the way of a good misplaced rant.

    The whole legal system is a joke, if it's not one branch failing the public and victims it is the other. DPP in this instance, do you really think they would have been punished appropriately had they been convicted? Being U18 here is a guaranteed free ride in a system that won't even hand out appropriate sentences to adults.

    Using the misunderstanding of who let them off as a way to dismiss people's righteous contempt at this decision is odious.

    Throwing acid at someone is one of the worst crimes possible, the damage done destroys people's lives as well as causing unimaginable physical pain and suffering. It is an act that requires preparation and planning and cannot in any way be justified.

    The only appropriate justice for this is to be locked up for life, as a punishment for the damage done to the victim, to keep other members of the public safe and as a deterrent for others who consider carrying out a chemical attack.

    I don't wish these acts on anyone but if it were Judges, senior solicitors and TDs families being killed and disfigured by scum like this we'd soon see a change in the attitude to them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,921 ✭✭✭buried


    The treat the criminals softly approach doesn't work for society but it sure works well for the law racket's greasy pockets. Keep the scum free outside so they can keep coming back for the same offences using the same free legal aid we all pay for. Its a F**king disgrace but what can you do. The law society racket has the game sown up and not one political party wants to do anything about it. And sure why would they when they all hang out together laughing their holes off at the rest of us.

    Make America Get Out of Here



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭Vic_08


    biko wrote: »
    "If they find your body.
    No-one knows you're here but you and me.."

    Dead men tell no sob stories.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,969 ✭✭✭✭alchemist33


    Riskymove wrote: »
    just to point out that this decision is nothing to do with a Judge

    its the DPP

    The article also mentions cautions for "two of the alleged perpetrators". There may be prosecutions coming for others. We don't know the full story yet (before anyone has a go at me, SOMEBODY should be getting a long sentence here)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,583 ✭✭✭LeBash


    charles.flanagan@oir.ie

    There is the Minister for Justices email. Get onto him for it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,080 ✭✭✭Vic_08


    Steyr 556 wrote: »
    Acid attacks, regardless of age, need to be seen as attempted murder, and carry life sentences. End of.

    Proper only leave prison in a cheap wooden box life sentences. Not Irish dog-year out in 10 life sentences.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,635 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    What an absolutely appalling decision from our legal system. A young man who was meant to be having a career in football now has his career as a players in ruins because of the actions from these vile wastes of human excrement. There should minimal sentences coming from our legal system of at least 15 years for scumbags who carry out this crime on innocent victims in our country. There should be no deterrent for the types of scum who do this crime.

    Shame on the legal system who let people to get away scot free from carrying out this crime.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,217 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    HangHighGallows.jpg
    Problem solved. And yes I'd quite happily pull the lever.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭Duke of Url


    BeerWolf wrote: »
    we all know how corrupt the DPP is...

    Am I missing something. Can you expand on this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,874 ✭✭✭Edgware


    tastyt wrote: »
    How do the judges look at themselves in the mirror eh.

    Probably because they know the little scrotes that they let back out on the streets won't be walking around their neighbourhoods in howth, dalkey and killiney.

    They don't give a **** about normal working people having to deal with anti social and criminal behaviour everyday because its a different world to them.

    They can sit there smugly in their sheltered life and lecture people about rehabilitation and giving people chances .

    **** off
    They and their pals couldnt afford to live in Killiney etc unless they made their money frm these scrotes on the free legal aid scheme


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,235 ✭✭✭Dave147


    LeBash wrote: »
    charles.flanagan@oir.ie

    There is the Minister for Justices email. Get onto him for it.

    I emailed him, never emailed any minister before but I'm particularly pissed off by this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,921 ✭✭✭buried


    Email Charlie Flanagan thinking he gives a $hit?

    You may as well stand on the Cliffs of Moher and take a piss off the edge hoping your pants don't get wet.

    Make America Get Out of Here



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,381 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    I really can't see how the DPP came to this decision. I really can't. The juvenile program, I've used it (whatever good it does, only seems to work on young fellas from good backgrounds, scrote kids nearly laugh while pretending to be genuine in the remorse). I just really cannot see how this can fall under the remit of the juvenile program. I was under the impression that the injured party, or their parent/guardian was supposed to accept this. A quick Google tells me otherwise. It should definitely be a prerequisite for a caution to be administered; acceptance by the injured party. Still baffling to think this could even be considered under the program. I would consider this 'serious harm' as per the Non-Fatal Offences Act 97:

    "“serious harm” means injury which creates a substantial risk of death or which causes serious disfigurement or substantial loss or impairment of the mobility of the body as a whole or of the function of any particular bodily member or organ;"

    And I was pretty sure Assault Causing Serious Harm is not something that can be considered, but a quick Google again lets me know that all crimes can be considered. Jesus I'm happy I left when I did, I couldn't face the parents of this child and tell them the scum walk free.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,417 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    RobertKK wrote: »
    Saying that this is a disgrace does not do justice to how bad this is. A juvenile caution for a very serious offence will do feck all to stop this happening again and the punishment in no way fits the crime. Totally ridiculous.

    The Healy Raes just the other day were essentially told "first conviction, you walk" after battering an English tourist and leaving him with scars.

    Vigilantism is the end point here because the justice system is not protecting the people of Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭Optimalprimerib


    Are there many pedophiles jailed? We should try to make use of them by giving them a cellmate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,447 ✭✭✭Calhoun


    I really can't see how the DPP came to this decision. I really can't. The juvenile program, I've used it (whatever good it does, only seems to work on young fellas from good backgrounds, scrote kids nearly laugh while pretending to be genuine in the remorse). I just really cannot see how this can fall under the remit of the juvenile program. I was under the impression that the injured party, or their parent/guardian was supposed to accept this. A quick Google tells me otherwise. It should definitely be a prerequisite for a caution to be administered; acceptance by the injured party. Still baffling to think this could even be considered under the program. I would consider this 'serious harm' as per the Non-Fatal Offences Act 97:

    "“serious harm” means injury which creates a substantial risk of death or which causes serious disfigurement or substantial loss or impairment of the mobility of the body as a whole or of the function of any particular bodily member or organ;"

    And I was pretty sure Assault Causing Serious Harm is not something that can be considered, but a quick Google again lets me know that all crimes can be considered. Jesus I'm happy I left when I did, I couldn't face the parents of this child and tell them the scum walk free.

    Crazy to think this is happening during the watch of the so called party of law and order.

    Not surprising though as too many in Ireland make a living from giving scum a second chance.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,473 ✭✭✭✭Blazer


    buried wrote: »
    The treat the criminals softly approach doesn't work for society but it sure works well for the law racket's greasy pockets. Keep the scum free outside so they can keep coming back for the same offences using the same free legal aid we all pay for. Its a F**king disgrace but what can you do. The law society racket has the game sown up and not one political party wants to do anything about it. And sure why would they when they all hang out together laughing their holes off at the rest of us.

    And there you’ve hit the nail on the head.
    Between lawyers , Judges and the Gardaí they’re all on nice little earners at the top and it’s a whole merry go around.
    Not to mention the scum themselves.
    I’d quite happily put all 4 segments onto their own little island and then see how they handle the vermin.
    Somehow I doubt they’d be so lenient then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,273 ✭✭✭twowheelsonly


    Vic_08 wrote: »
    Proper only leave prison in a cheap wooden box life sentences. Not Irish dog-year out in 10 life sentences.

    Can you name anyone doing a life sentence that got out in 10 years ? I can't.
    It's closer to 20 these days with many doing even longer.
    I really can't see how the DPP came to this decision. I really can't. The juvenile program, I've used it (whatever good it does, only seems to work on young fellas from good backgrounds, scrote kids nearly laugh while pretending to be genuine in the remorse). .

    That's the million dollar question in this instance. I'd love to know the background of the perpetrators in this case. Everyone presuming that it's the 'usual suspects' but in my experience the 'usual suspects' would have been packed off to Oberstown by now. It tends to be the 'good kids' from 'good families' that benefit most from Juvenile Cautions. The fact that the perpetrators seem to have reached 16/17 without coming to Garda attention would suggest that they may indeed come from 'good' families.

    Disgraceful decision from the DPP.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,381 ✭✭✭✭Potential-Monke


    Seems to be the case here. Wish I stayed in proper contact with a few ex-colleagues, they might have been able to fill me in!

    Still doesn't excuse it though. Will the same apply to all crimes if you've never come to Garda attention before? I'd love to know the cut-off, like which crime would be just over the limit for caution. Again, bring in the requirement that the injured party has to agree, will solve a lot of this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,126 ✭✭✭NewbridgeIR


    Have the Left condemned this yet? They’re frequently silent when it comes to
    violent crime.

    In this instance, I presume the attackers are from posh backgrounds


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,878 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Have the Left condemned this yet? They’re frequently silent when it comes to
    violent crime.

    In this instance, I presume the attackers are from posh backgrounds
    I am not sure what this has got to do with left or right? Most sane people would think this is horrendous and the lack of any sentence vile nothing to do with left or right


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,183 ✭✭✭tritriagain


    So dunnes stores have to pay 56k to a woman cos they didn't put a warning on a box but these scumbags get away scott free. Seems fair.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,127 ✭✭✭✭Idbatterim


    BeerWolf wrote: »
    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/crime-and-law/alleged-perpetrators-of-acid-attack-on-teenagers-will-not-be-charged-1.4112087?mode=amp

    That boy who had a promising football career that was attacked with acid earlier this year in Waterford, the ****ers that did it are only receiving a caution???

    WTF?!!!

    The absolute leniency on juvenile delinquents in Ireland's "Justice" system is so ****ing repugnant...

    But you can get 56k for a bloody jug from dunnes exploding. The “ justice” system ? It’s primary purpose is a gravy train for all involved !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,301 ✭✭✭Lewis_Benson


    tastyt wrote: »
    How do the judges look at themselves in the mirror eh.

    Probably because they know the little scrotes that they let back out on the streets won't be walking around their neighbourhoods in howth, dalkey and killiney.

    They don't give a **** about normal working people having to deal with anti social and criminal behaviour everyday because its a different world to them.

    They can sit there smugly in their sheltered life and lecture people about rehabilitation and giving people chances .

    **** off

    It's a business.
    They need scumbags on the streets to keep themselves in a job.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,126 ✭✭✭NewbridgeIR


    gmisk wrote: »
    I am not sure what this has got to do with left or right? Most sane people would think this is horrendous and the lack of any sentence vile nothing to do with left or right


    Yes - most people would consider this an appalling attack. Sentencing is weak across the board and left wing politicians (and their supporters) do not appear to have any appetite to tackle this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,405 ✭✭✭Airyfairy12


    DPP make decisions about cases based on their own opinion - opinions can be wrong, unethical and stupid and shouldnt be given such weight. There needs to be clearly outlined rules and punishment for crimes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,646 ✭✭✭washman3


    tastyt wrote: »
    How do the judges look at themselves in the mirror eh.

    Probably because they know the little scrotes that they let back out on the streets won't be walking around their neighbourhoods in howth, dalkey and killiney.

    They don't give a **** about normal working people having to deal with anti social and criminal behaviour everyday because its a different world to them.

    They can sit there smugly in their sheltered life and lecture people about rehabilitation and giving people chances .

    **** off


    This post sums it all up in a nutshell. This is unfortunately where Ireland is at today.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,583 ✭✭✭LeBash


    buried wrote: »
    Email Charlie Flanagan thinking he gives a $hit?

    You may as well stand on the Cliffs of Moher and take a piss off the edge hoping your pants don't get wet.

    Of course he doesnt give a $hit. He does want to have good public opinion going into the next election though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 463 ✭✭Jonybgud


    Wibbs wrote: »
    HangHighGallows.jpg
    Problem solved. And yes I'd quite happily pull the lever.

    Too good for them, imo.

    There are some instances where mob justice is the only answer. This is one of those cases, imo.

    The entire judicial system needs to be overhauled. A lot of crusty old has-beens imposing their self assumed state of importance and lording it over all and sundry, need to be forcibly retired.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 349 ✭✭X111111111111


    If the acid was thrown at an ATM the sentence would have been harsher.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,646 ✭✭✭washman3


    So dunnes stores have to pay 56k to a woman cos they didn't put a warning on a box but these scumbags get away scott free. Seems fair.


    Add another €20-25k they have to pay on top of that to the legal profession, sorry i mean legal industry. :mad:


  • Advertisement
Advertisement