Dashcams and Data Protection

80j2lc5y7u6qs9

https://www.dataprotection.ie/sites/default/files/uploads/2019-06/190606%20Guidance%20for%20Drivers%20on%20the%20use%20of%20Dash%20Cams.pdf


Am I right to think this means someone with a dash cam should have contact details on the windscreen In the first instance, there should be a clearly visible sign or sticker on and/or inside the vehicle, as applicable, to indicate that filming is taking place. A policy sheet detailing your contact details, the basis on which you are collecting the images and audio of others, the purposes for which the data is being used and how long you will retain it for

BobbyBingo

FFS. Probably!

Atlantic Dawn

Soon you will need to fill out a report on the contents of your toilet each time you flush it.

80j2lc5y7u6qs9

are the motor forum showing reg of bad parking in breach of DP

Glass fused light

Ok my question is why only a forward facing camera is "allowed".
If i am worried that any car crash will be rear ended why can't I have a rear facing dashcam?

Keith186

Melissa Deafening Nose wrote: »

https://www.dataprotection.ie/sites/default/files/uploads/2019-06/190606%20Guidance%20for%20Drivers%20on%20the%20use%20of%20Dash%20Cams.pdf


Am I right to think this means someone with a dash cam should have contact details on the windscreen In the first instance, there should be a clearly visible sign or sticker on and/or inside the vehicle, as applicable, to indicate that filming is taking place. A policy sheet detailing your contact details, the basis on which you are collecting the images and audio of others, the purposes for which the data is being used and how long you will retain it for

Or read the part after that quote.

Victor

Glass fused light wrote: »

Ok my question is why only a forward facing camera is "allowed".

Do you mean in this bit? Read the second sentence.

Dash cams can be outward-only facing and record video of the road ahead. Equally,
versions exist that record both audio and video, and that record both inside the vehicle
and the road outside.

Mr. Incognito

Look

There's the law and there's the enforcment of the law

This will not be enforced. It's technically right but practically worthless.

Riskymove

Melissa Deafening Nose wrote: »

Am I right to think this means someone with a dash cam should have contact details on the windscreen

No just a sticker indicating that there is a camera recording

runawaybishop

Melissa Deafening Nose wrote: »

https://www.dataprotection.ie/sites/default/files/uploads/2019-06/190606%20Guidance%20for%20Drivers%20on%20the%20use%20of%20Dash%20Cams.pdf


Am I right to think this means someone with a dash cam should have contact details on the windscreen In the first instance, there should be a clearly visible sign or sticker on and/or inside the vehicle, as applicable, to indicate that filming is taking place. A policy sheet detailing your contact details, the basis on which you are collecting the images and audio of others, the purposes for which the data is being used and how long you will retain it for

I thought that was only for commercial drivers but with the horse**** ruling of the Rynes case I wouldn't be surprised. The original, and appropriate, intent of GDPR has been bastardised by daftness

80j2lc5y7u6qs9

Keith186 wrote: »

Or read the part after that quote.

You mean "should be prepared by you and made available on request to anyone who asks for further information. Alternatively, you may provide the information verbally. In the event of an accident, you should advise the other party that you have recorded footage of the accident"

Keith186

Melissa Deafening Nose wrote: »

You mean "should be prepared by you and made available on request to anyone who asks for further information. Alternatively, you may provide the information verbally. In the event of an accident, you should advise the other party that you have recorded footage of the accident"

Yeah, so just use the alternative method of providing your info to someone who asks if you don't want to out up a sticker (which is understandable).
You're only likely to be asked for those details if you've got footage of an accident.

80j2lc5y7u6qs9

Keith186 wrote: »

Yeah, so just use the alternative method of providing your info to someone who asks if you don't want to out up a sticker (which is understandable).
You're only likely to be asked for those details if you've got footage of an accident.

It says a policy sheet should be made... then you can give the info verbally. So should you have the sheet even if you give details verbally?


Can't see many people asking unless an accident they would hardle be aware they are on camera. My camera writes over the data anyway unless press a button to save

Robbo

Riskymove wrote: »

No just a sticker indicating that there is a camera recording

The general consensus with CCTV is that the notice requires:

1. Notification that CCTV is in use
2. The purposes for the use of CCTV
3. Contact details for the controller

runawaybishop wrote: »

I thought that was only for commercial drivers but with the horse**** ruling of the Rynes case I wouldn't be surprised. The original, and appropriate, intent of GDPR has been bastardised by daftness

Rynes was a pre-GDPR case so it very much informed the drafting of the GDPR.

Riskymove

Robbo wrote: »

The general consensus with CCTV is that the

I simply giving a view on what the DPC says in the link in the OP

they do not say you need to have a long notice about purposes and contact details displayed

punisher5112

What camera?
Right there.... No sd card....

No comment also works well.