Is the new generation of animal rights supporters to the right on social issues?

ILoveYourVibes

Its just a trend I have been noticing.

I am not saying being to the right is incorrect etc. But its just that is used to be so much to the opposite.

In the states its noticeable too.

klaaaz

No. Being right wing means a person prefers personal greed over compassion for all which includes compassion for animals.

BeerWolf

klaaaz wrote: »

No. Being right wing means a person prefers personal greed over compassion for all which includes compassion for animals.

And yet many claiming to be left leaning are a bunch of altruists stroking their pseudo morality ego.

nthclare

Well you'll get the factual animal supporters more middle towards the right.

And the emotionally immature,triggered, goons more left leaning.

I notice there's a fine line between them, but the middle to right aren't as nasty and hateful as the lefty Sjw types.

The lefty's and sjw's give animal rights a bad name because it's not the animals they're worried about,it's just another fight or tantrum for them to crave attention for.

ytpe2r5bxkn0c1

BeerWolf wrote: »

And yet many claiming to be left leaning are a bunch of altruists stroking their pseudo morality ego.

Claiming is the operative word.

ILoveYourVibes

klaaaz wrote: »

No. Being right wing means a person prefers personal greed over compassion for all which includes compassion for animals.

I don't think that is what right wing means.

I would think it means more socially conservative and a more lassaiz fair attitude to social justice.

Lower taxes etc. Obv lower taxes means less funding for animals etc.

Gachla

ILoveYourVibes wrote: »

Its just a trend I have been noticing.

I am not saying being to the right is incorrect etc. But its just that is used to be so much to the opposite.

In the states its noticeable too.

4,599 posts in 3 months! :eek:

Gachla

ILoveYourVibes wrote: »

I don't think that is what right wing means.

I would think it means more socially conservative and a more lassaiz fair attitude to social justice.

Lower taxes etc. Obv lower taxes means less funding for animals etc.

4,600!

ILoveYourVibes

nthclare wrote: »

Well you'll get the factual animal supporters more middle towards the right.

And the emotionally immature,triggered, goons more left leaning.

I notice there's a fine line between them, but the middle to right aren't as nasty and hateful as the lefty Sjw types.

The lefty's and sjw's give animal rights a bad name because it's not the animals they're worried about,it's just another fight or tantrum for them to crave attention for.

I have actually noticed a change the more immature ones are now right.

And the left doesn't really have time for animals.

RMAOK

Gachla wrote: »

4,599 posts in 3 months! :eek:

You'd better get posting if you want to catch up to her(?)

ILoveYourVibes

Gachla wrote: »

4,600!

New troll account?

I wonder if the animal thing is the rights front or get in.

Gachla

RMAOK wrote: »

You'd better get posting if you want to catch up to her(?)

Would have to spend day and night on this?

ILoveYourVibes

Gachla wrote: »

4,599 posts in 3 months! :eek:

Yeah i am not really into this. back and forth thing. Its just drama.

Gachla

ILoveYourVibes wrote: »

New troll account?

I wonder if the animal thing is the rights front or get in.

No.

How can you post that much? How many posts per day?

ILoveYourVibes

Gachla wrote: »

Would have to spend day and night on this?

Every single waking moment. You must never leave your computer.
If you want to be .....the best.

Gachla

ILoveYourVibes wrote: »

Yeah i am not really into this. back and forth thing. Its just drama.

What do you mean?

Chris_Heilong

ILoveYourVibes wrote: »

I don't think that is what right wing means.

I would think it means more socially conservative and a more lassaiz fair attitude to social justice.

Lower taxes etc. Obv lower taxes means less funding for animals etc.

From some studies in the states people who identify as rightwing give far more to charities then the left but they did not specify it that had anything to do with Animal right charities.

ILoveYourVibes

Gachla wrote: »

No.

How can you post that much? How many posts per day?

I think fast i type fast. Other people think slow and type slow.

Gachla

ILoveYourVibes wrote: »

Every single waking moment. You must never leave your computer.
If you want to be .....the best.

The best? Not sure I want to be.

Gachla

ILoveYourVibes wrote: »

I think fast i type fast. Other people think slow and type slow.

Ok, I'll leave you to it.

klaaaz

ILoveYourVibes wrote: »

I think fast i type fast. Other people think slow and type slow.

You never multi quote which helps your post count

ILoveYourVibes

Chris_Heilong wrote: »

From some studies in the states people who identify as rightwing give far more to charities then the left but they did not specify it that had anything to do with Animal right charities.

Yeah i heard that. NY times


https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/03/your-money/republicans-democrats-charity-philanthropy.html




Maybe that is why. Charities are influenced by who gives them donations etc.

ILoveYourVibes

klaaaz wrote: »

You never multi quote which helps your post count

That's true I am going to have to remember to do that.

But do i really want my post count to suffer for that?:cool:

Boom_Bap

why does it even matter?

Bigbagofcans

Gachla wrote: »

No.

How can you post that much? How many posts per day?

Around 50 posts a day.

Gachla

Boom_Bap wrote: »

why does it even matter?

It all seems a kind of pointless but if your aim is to boost your post count, then it makes sense?

Gachla

Bigbagofcans wrote: »

Around 50 posts a day.

I could probably do that for one day, maybe a week I could try but for 3 months and no sign of stopping? Would need a big bag of cans alright.

klaaaz

Bigbagofcans wrote: »

Around 50 posts a day.

How is that even possible, guess they post in their sleep too!

Will I Am Not

klaaaz wrote: »

No. Being right wing means a person prefers personal greed over compassion for all which includes compassion for animals.

For someone that spends their time here labelling people right wing or far-right, you should probably find out what they mean.

Autecher

Gachla wrote: »

It all seems a kind of pointless but if your aim is to boost your post count, then it makes sense?

Why do you care though?

pq0n1ct4ve8zf5

Chris_Heilong wrote: »

From some studies in the states people who identify as rightwing give far more to charities then the left but they did not specify it that had anything to do with Animal right charities.

Sorry I'll just translate that into...what's it called...truth!

From a study in the states, republican voters living in republican counties report more charitable donations on their tax returns than democrat voters living in democrat counties. This doesn't apply to republican voters in democrat counties. Democrat counties typically have higher government funding through taxation for charitable causes, republican counties rely a lot more heavily on private donation, which typically does not match funding through taxation.

Gachla

Autecher wrote: »

Why do you care though?

I don't care except that they seem to post in every thread I read. No harm to them but their contributions aren't exactly unmissable either. Anyway, let them at it I suppose.

ILoveYourVibes

Gachla wrote: »

I could probably do that for one day, maybe a week I could try but for 3 months and no sign of stopping? Would need a big bag of cans alright.

Be all you can be.

Das Reich

Maybe the older generation was right wing as Germany was one of first countries to worry about those things. USSR and China instead had done a big damage to the environment like the end of the Aral sea and I think chinese people don't worry to much about animal rights.

nthclare

Anybody know where the toilets are ?

Boom_Bap

nthclare wrote: »

Anybody know where the toilets are ?

Second door down the corridor there in the right wing, no the left wing, no the right wing of the building.

topper75

Blaizes

Boom_Bap wrote: »

Second door down the corridor there in the right wing, no the left wing, no the right wing of the building.

Brilliant!!