Skoda superb 2015 opinions

uck51js9zml2yt

Guys I'm seriously thinking about a Skoda superb ESTATE AMBITION 1.6 TDI 105HP
107k , for €15,000.
It's the ambition with leather seats and heating in seats.
Serviced by main dealer from new.
I'm taking it for a spin tomorrow and probably sealing the deal.

Is there anything to say I shouldn't buy it?

Nikki Sixx

Lamar Better Leopard wrote: »

Guys I'm seriously thinking about a Skoda superb ESTATE AMBITION 1.6 TDI 105HP
107k , for €15,000.
It's the ambition with leather seats and heating in seats.
Serviced by main dealer from new.
I'm taking it for a spin tomorrow and probably sealing the deal.

Is there anything to say I shouldn't buy it?

Would you get a better deal in the North?

uck51js9zml2yt

Nikki Sixx wrote: »

Would you get a better deal in the North?

Slightly higher spec but nothing that would be a deal breaker.
The previous owner got the trim upgrade on the ambition.
Plus it's 12 months warranty from a local dealer. Bought my last car off him.

pajosjunkbox

I used to own an ambition estate. Great car couldn't fault it. But I always regretted not getting the 2 litre engine which has proven to be a great engine. It's a big solid car and is better served with the 2.0 TDI engine.

uck51js9zml2yt

pajosjunkbox wrote: »

I used to own an ambition estate. Great car couldn't fault it. But I always regretted not getting the 2 litre engine which has proven to be a great engine. It's a big solid car and is better served with the 2.0 TDI engine.

I saw a 2.0 elsewhere . I'll make a call tomorrow.

r3nu4l

I'd also be inclined to suggest the 2L would be better. 105PS in a car that big is not ideal. The 2L engine comes in 140PS or 170PS varieties, either would be fine as both offer that extra pulling power in terms of increased torque.

drunkmonkey

Had a lend on one while my car was being repaired. Found it to be a horrible car, loads of space but handled like a boat and the engine wouldn't pull your socks up. It was comfortable and Android auto was a bonus. If you like driving I wouldn't pick that engine. Maybe the 2.0L is a bit better but doubt it improves that handling.

boombang

I like the Superb and the leather interior is very nice. Does anyone else think 15k sounds a bit much for a car with more than 100k on the clock? I've not looked into these at all; that's just the first thing that occurred to me reading the post.

drunkmonkey

It's about right milage wise, diesel should be doing 30k + a year.

jmreire

I have one, 152 reg, 1.6 cr saloon, ambition spec's... I have no fault with the car, 6 speed box give's s good return fuel wise, loads of room and will drive away all day long at 120 Kph ( assuming you have that kind of road ) As far as I am concerned, it handles very well on the road...a comfortable roomy car, with a good infotainment system. Happy out so far. But I agree that the 2.0 ltr engine would be the icing on the cake....you miss it when you face an incline, and have to down shift a gear or two. If I am ever replacing it, I will go for the 2.0 Ltr engine next time.

Stallingrad

We have two saloons, 2015 and 2016 1.4 ACT petrol. I would be no fan of the 1.6D, but horses for courses. A 2015 may have been subject to a few recalls to do with chrome trim on the doors catching, wiper nozzles, folding mirrors denting the chrome trim, nothing major. All probably done by now.

With regard to ride and handling I have no issue at all, its a very comfortable and quiet car. I prefer it to the 5 series it replaced.

My 2015 SE 1.4 with 12,000 miles was €17,000 cleared.

W123-80's

Our main car is a 132 Superb estate with 1.6 105bhp engine. It's facelift model, but the 152 is possibly facelifted again!
I brought it in from UK Feb '18 with 104k miles and we have 126k miles on it now. Wife drives it 90% of the time.
It came with a full Skoda service history and I use an ex VW/Skoda Indy to carry out my servicing now.
I find the car completely reliable, loads of room, it's a nice spec so cream leather, heated seats, reversing sensors, Sat nav, blue tooth. Nice place to be in general. The 1.6 is completely underpowered though, no question about it. I'm thinking of upgrading to a 2015 myself and whilst I would have no major issue with another 1.6, I will be edging towards a 2.0.
I find it a great car overall for our current needs.

uck51js9zml2yt

I was onto the dealer with the 2.0 and going up to see it tomorrow.
It's a 3 hour drive.
It's. UK import.4x4. A 2014 car but the mileage is ok.

Stallingrad

Lamar Better Leopard wrote: »

I was onto the dealer with the 2.0 and going up to see it tomorrow.
It's a 3 hour drive.
It's. UK import. A 2014 car but the mileage is ok.

2014 would be the previous model. 2015 on is a far better car.

Belfast

This one looks nice, but a bit over budget.

2014 Skoda Superb 2.0 TDI ELEGANCE 4X4 MANUAL [FOUR WHEEL DRIVE • IVORY LEATHER INTERIOR • VERY HIGH SPECIFICATION • €280 ROAD TAX]
€16,995
Odometer: 72,010 miles /
115,886 km

https://www.carsireland.ie/detail.php?ad_id=2212903&r=s.php%3Fm%5B%5D%3D80%26o%5B%5D%3D683%26f%3D2%26nn%3D12%26b%3D3%26t%3D1%26yn%3D2014%26yx%3D2017%26f1%3D4x4%26g%3D0

jmreire

Stallingrad wrote: »

We have two saloons, 2015 and 2016 1.4 ACT petrol. I would be no fan of the 1.6D, but horses for courses. A 2015 may have been subject to a few recalls to do with chrome trim on the doors catching, wiper nozzles, folding mirrors denting the chrome trim, nothing major. All probably done by now.

With regard to ride and handling I have no issue at all, its a very comfortable and quiet car. I prefer it to the 5 series it replaced.

My 2015 SE 1.4 with 12,000 miles was €17,000 cleared.

I've had the door ( both rear doors ) done in mine, but same problem appeared again after awhile... The rubber seal around the front door's is the culprit...seems that the front doors sag slightly over time, allowing the rubber seal to catch in the chrome trim when the front door is being opened, and pulling it out of place, where it gets bent very easy. After having both replaced under warranty, and when it happened again, I fixed it myself, and so far, no problem.
What did you think of the 1.4 Petrol? How is it working out for power and economy?

mgbgt1978

Lamar Better Leopard wrote: »

I was onto the dealer with the 2.0 and going up to see it tomorrow.
It's a 3 hour drive.
It's. UK import.4x4. A 2014 car but the mileage is ok.

On a 2014 I would be checking to see if the emissions recall was carried out (if applicable).

I'd be hoping for a 'No' BTW.

uck51js9zml2yt

Belfast wrote: »

This one looks nice, but a bit over budget.

2014 Skoda Superb 2.0 TDI ELEGANCE 4X4 MANUAL [FOUR WHEEL DRIVE • IVORY LEATHER INTERIOR • VERY HIGH SPECIFICATION • €280 ROAD TAX]
€16,995
Odometer: 72,010 miles /
115,886 km

https://www.carsireland.ie/detail.php?ad_id=2212903&r=s.php%3Fm%5B%5D%3D80%26o%5B%5D%3D683%26f%3D2%26nn%3D12%26b%3D3%26t%3D1%26yn%3D2014%26yx%3D2017%26f1%3D4x4%26g%3D0

That was one I was considering. They dropped it 10% over night on car zone which makes you wonder why they wanted rid of it so quickly.

Anyway, I decided against it figuring it was better to go with a local main dealer who could service it and fix any issues. I also know one of the mechanics there who have me all I needed to know on the car.
I got the 151 for €15k straight price. It's an ambient with leather heated seats and a few extras.12 months warranty, road assist.
A voucher towards half the cost of the timing belt when due next year as well.

I took it for a spin and it comfortably did more than I should have on the straight.

750 for my own 08 Octavia.i bought it off this dealer for 6k 5 years ago, so 5250 for 5 years trouble free driving. Could have got a bit more privately but I didn't want the hassle of tyre kickers etc etc.

Thanks for all the input.

The tax man

Well wear. They're a great car, super comfy and more space than you'll ever need. I went the other way, traded in my 151 Superb for a 2.0 petrol Octavia vRS.

kravmaga

Lamar Better Leopard wrote: »

Guys I'm seriously thinking about a Skoda superb ESTATE AMBITION 1.6 TDI 105HP
107k , for €15,000.
It's the ambition with leather seats and heating in seats.
Serviced by main dealer from new.
I'm taking it for a spin tomorrow and probably sealing the deal.

Is there anything to say I shouldn't buy it?

Have you a link to the Superb

Belfast

Lamar Better Leopard wrote: »

That was one I was considering. They dropped it 10% over night on car zone which makes you wonder why they wanted rid of it so quickly.

May day sale? 10% off all stock. not just that car.

**MAYDAY SALE PRICE IS STRICTLY FOR STRAIGHT SALES ONLY - IF YOU HAVE A SUITABLE TRADE IN WE MAY BUY IT FROM YOU AS A SEPARATE TRANSACTION AT ITS TRADE PRICE** **SALE ENDS CLOSE OF BUSINESS 09/05/2019**

Stallingrad

jmreire wrote: »

I've had the door ( both rear doors ) done in mine, but same problem appeared again after awhile... The rubber seal around the front door's is the culprit...seems that the front doors sag slightly over time, allowing the rubber seal to catch in the chrome trim when the front door is being opened, and pulling it out of place, where it gets bent very easy. After having both replaced under warranty, and when it happened again, I fixed it myself, and so far, no problem.
What did you think of the 1.4 Petrol? How is it working out for power and economy?

Good to know re the doors, thanks for that.

I think the 1.4 is a real gem. I had a 1.4tsi Passat a while back and always rated its smoothness, performance and economy. This ACT engine is the same, just better in every respect, averaging 6.4l/100, power is fine, plenty of poke and so smooth with it too, at idle you can't hear the engine.

I traded the Passat for an 2014 BMW 5 series, while my wife had her petrol Superb. Her car was nicer to drive, smoother, quieter, not as luxurious of course. After a few unexpected hassles with the BMW, and a great dislike of the noisy diesel, I sold it and bought the same car as the wife, have never looked back. It's a brilliant car.

jmreire

Stallingrad wrote: »

Good to know re the doors, thanks for that.

I think the 1.4 is a real gem. I had a 1.4tsi Passat a while back and always rated its smoothness, performance and economy. This ACT engine is the same, just better in every respect, averaging 6.4l/100, power is fine, plenty of poke and so smooth with it too, at idle you can't hear the engine.

I traded the Passat for an 2014 BMW 5 series, while my wife had her petrol Superb. Her car was nicer to drive, smoother, quieter, not as luxurious of course. After a few unexpected hassles with the BMW, and a great dislike of the noisy diesel, I sold it and bought the same car as the wife, have never looked back. It's a brilliant car.

What kind of driving do you ( and your Wife ) do? or average yearly mileage? 6.4 / 100 Klms would be considered good even for many diesels. I average about 15 /20'000 klms per year, which is borderline mileage for justification of a diesel. Might go petrol next time round. That kind of consumption, and comfort in a car is hard to beat. Friend of mine has the older body Superb, it was the last of that type...but by God..it was packed inside with goodies, especially the trim and seats. But appearance-wise the rear end in the saloon was not very appealing, In the estate version it looked much better, IMHO.

Stallingrad

jmreire wrote: »

What kind of driving do you ( and your Wife ) do? or average yearly mileage? 6.4 / 100 Klms would be considered good even for many diesels. I average about 15 /20'000 klms per year, which is borderline mileage for justification of a diesel. Might go petrol next time round. That kind of consumption, and comfort in a car is hard to beat. Friend of mine has the older body Superb, it was the last of that type...but by God..it was packed inside with goodies, especially the trim and seats. But appearance-wise the rear end in the saloon was not very appealing, In the estate version it looked much better, IMHO.

We both do similar mileage to you, 20,000km a year. Hers is a DSG so he consumption is a bit better than mine. About 60% motorway, 40% town.We both prefer the petrol as it is so much more refined than the diesel, the car is whisper quiet all the time. As you say the comfort and overall package is hard to equal. Annual oil changes are a must, but Skoda servicing is cheap so that is not an issue.

uck51js9zml2yt

kravmaga wrote: »

Have you a link to the Superb

He had just put up the as when I bought it so only 1 photo.

https://liamlynchskoda.ie/used-cars/?make=50034&mdel=52055&yearrange=2010%2C2019&pricerange=0%2C75000

I'm getting 800 km on a tank of petrol in my Octavia so this will be interesting to watch with the diesel.

awec

I drive a Superb Estate as well, but mine is the 120 HP version.

Great car to drive, spacious inside, plenty of gadgets, comfortable and the boot space is incredible. Our buggy fits in length wise, and our buggy is not small!

uck51js9zml2yt

awec wrote: »

I drive a Superb Estate as well, but mine is the 120 HP version.

Great car to drive, spacious inside, plenty of gadgets, comfortable and the boot space is incredible. Our buggy fits in length wise, and our buggy is not small!

Talking to my mechanic friend he was saying that out of all the superbs they had in the lot, my engine was the best of them.different engine.

jmreire

Stallingrad wrote: »

We both do similar mileage to you, 20,000km a year. Hers is a DSG so he consumption is a bit better than mine. About 60% motorway, 40% town.We both prefer the petrol as it is so much more refined than the diesel, the car is whisper quiet all the time. As you say the comfort and overall package is hard to equal. Annual oil changes are a must, but Skoda servicing is cheap so that is not an issue.

The car with the DSG transmission, is actually better on fuel than the manual??? Normally,,it's the other way round,,,but in all cases, a lot depends on the driver too. Same as in any car, correct and on time servicing is the secret. I have seen many high mileage engines, but they all had one thing in common...regular servicing...but I have never seen badly serviced high mileage engine. We have 4 Skoda's in the Family....2 x Octavia's and 2 x Superb's, and I service them myself , at least oil changes, brake pad's etc. And we had one 2008 Roomster from new, which had in excess of 400'000 Klms on it when it was "Retired", still starting and running well,engine and gearbox fine, but a lot of other things showing their age,,, suspension's etc, but even at that mileage....no rust !!!. Great car, pound for pound !!!

Belfast

jmreire wrote: »

The car with the DSG transmission, is actually better on fuel than the manual??? Normally,,it's the other way round,,,but in all cases, a lot depends on the driver too. Same as in any car, correct and on time servicing is the secret. I have seen many high mileage engines, but they all had one thing in common...regular servicing...but I have never seen badly serviced high mileage engine. We have 4 Skoda's in the Family....2 x Octavia's and 2 x Superb's, and I service them myself , at least oil changes, brake pad's etc. And we had one 2008 Roomster from new, which had in excess of 400'000 Klms on it when it was "Retired", still starting and running well,engine and gearbox fine, but a lot of other things showing their age,,, suspension's etc, but even at that mileage....no rust !!!. Great car, pound for pound !!!

The low down on dsg.

Operationally, they’re more fuel efficient than conventional autos - so you’re saving 6-10 per cent on fuel there.

Transmission Comparison: Manual - Auto - Dual Clutch - CVT | Auto Expert John Cadogan | Australia

jmreire

mgbgt1978 wrote: »

On a 2014 I would be checking to see if the emissions recall was carried out (if applicable).

I'd be hoping for a 'No' BTW.

And if it was a "NO", would you allow them to change the computer settings?

jmreire

Belfast wrote: »

The low down on dsg.

Operationally, they’re more fuel efficient than conventional autos - so you’re saving 6-10 per cent on fuel there.

Transmission Comparison: Manual - Auto - Dual Clutch - CVT | Auto Expert John Cadogan | Australia

Yes, those Vids show the different type transmission's very well. In fact, the DSG is a mechanical transmission, with electronic manual shifting ( developed from race car technology, where shift time is measured in micro-seconds ) So, yes, that should lead to better consumption figures. Effectively, you are using two gearboxes linked together for smoother and more effective changes.....always in the right gear at the right time.
"True" automatics are oil driven, and there is always a lag between shifts, meaning that the engine is working away and burning fuel, while the car is " slipping" ( its not really slipping as such, but the engine is "Revving" for a few sec's before the speed matches the Revs. So fuel consumption suffer's because of this.
According to the VID, CVT transmission is to way to go. Well maybe they have improved massively, but the one's I remember ( going way way back ) were not very impressive . Technically though, they look the part.

mgbgt1978

jmreire wrote: »

And if it was a "NO", would you allow them to change the computer settings?

Not sure what exactly you mean JM. But if you're asking if I would allow the recall ECU change done by a VAG Dealer then it's an emphatic NO.
Basically they are trying to get an engine to produce emissions that it was never designed to produce (because they cheated in the 1st place). All this does is 'force' components to wear out a lot faster.


Not specifically aimed at yourself, but if you google VW emissions recall issues there is a ridiculous amount of Owners with issues.

jmreire

mgbgt1978 wrote: »

Not sure what exactly you mean JM. But if you're asking if I would allow the recall ECU change done by a VAG Dealer then it's an emphatic NO.
Basically they are trying to get an engine to produce emissions that it was never designed to produce (because they cheated in the 1st place). All this does is 'force' components to wear out a lot faster.


Not specifically aimed at yourself, but if you google VW emissions recall issues there is a ridiculous amount of Owners with issues.

I know very well what's involved with the emission issue's...Lot's of Vag owners complaining of loss of power, not the same car at all since " The Emission Rectification Recall" were done etc. I just wondered what your take on in would be. Same as mine : NO WAY . My understanding is that in order to reduce the emissions... they have to reduce the performance too.

Belfast

Lamar Better Leopard wrote: »

That was one I was considering. They dropped it 10% over night on car zone which makes you wonder why they wanted rid of it so quickly.

Anyway, I decided against it figuring it was better to go with a local main dealer who could service it and fix any issues. I also know one of the mechanics there who have me all I needed to know on the car.
I got the 151 for €15k straight price. It's an ambient with leather heated seats and a few extras.12 months warranty, road assist.
A voucher towards half the cost of the timing belt when due next year as well.

I took it for a spin and it comfortably did more than I should have on the straight.

750 for my own 08 Octavia.i bought it off this dealer for 6k 5 years ago, so 5250 for 5 years trouble free driving. Could have got a bit more privately but I didn't want the hassle of tyre kickers etc etc.

Thanks for all the input.

The car is still on sale at the higher price again.Price: €18,995
Looking like it did not sell in the May sale so price is back up again.
https://www.auto-point.ie/vehicles/skoda/superb/galway/2229407

uck51js9zml2yt

Belfast wrote: »

The car is still on sale at the higher price again.Price: €18,995
Looking like it did not sell in the May sale so price is back up again.
https://www.auto-point.ie/vehicles/skoda/superb/galway/2229407

Different car. It was a 141.

I picked up my 151 this evening. A really nice drive.