Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Firebird Popular 150

  • 27-03-2019 5:42pm
    #1
    Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 6,378 Mod ✭✭✭✭


    My first time working on one of these. Does this baffle information mean that those baffles should be removed for the 120 firing range?


    476465.jpg


    476466.jpg

    Please follow site and charter rules. "Resistance is futile"



Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,590 ✭✭✭agusta


    The book says to remove the second row of baffles when the output is at lower half of range.Maybe the reason for this is the burner combustion head is different at the lower end.
    if it were me,id be setting up the burner with the 4 baffles and see what flue gas reading i get,plus looking for a smooth burner start up


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 6,378 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wearb


    agusta wrote: »
    The book says to remove the second row of baffles when the output is at lower half of range.Maybe the reason for this is the burner combustion head is different at the lower end.
    if it were me,id be setting up the burner with the 4 baffles and see what flue gas reading i get,plus looking for a smooth burner start up


    Thanks. The PDF that I have doesn't give that information. It does however show a head change at the 120,000 firing rate. And strangely, the same airbox at 150 and 120, but different on the firing rates in between. Also nozzle angle changes on anything below 150.



    PDF dated '06

    Please follow site and charter rules. "Resistance is futile"



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,590 ✭✭✭agusta


    Is the burner a G5


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 6,378 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wearb


    agusta wrote: »
    Is the burner a G5

    Not an original setup

    Please follow site and charter rules. "Resistance is futile"



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,590 ✭✭✭agusta


    I serviced the same boiler a few months back.The owner had bought the house a year previously but had intermittent lockouts on the burner.Burner was rdb2.2 t3 head.i serviced boiler but noticed the flame took a couple of seconds to establish.i change the combustion head to ld3 and burner started perfect.No lockouts since.
    Looking at the S range firebird with a rdb2.2 burner ,the combustion head below 120kbtu is LD3,over 120kbtu combustion head T5.For output 125kbtu= 1.00 80s nozzle at 9bar with no mention of removing 2 baffles


  • Advertisement
  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 3,496 ✭✭✭DGOBS


    Look at your FGA temp when flow is up near temp, will be a good indication of removal or not


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 6,378 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wearb


    DGOBS wrote: »
    Look at your FGA temp when flow is up near temp, will be a good indication of removal or not

    Too low = remove?

    Please follow site and charter rules. "Resistance is futile"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,974 ✭✭✭jimf


    stick a .60x80s in it and forget them ould baffles


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators Posts: 6,378 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wearb


    jimf wrote: »
    stick a .60x80s in it and forget them ould baffles

    At about 17 bar lol 😂

    Please follow site and charter rules. "Resistance is futile"



Advertisement