Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

adapting literature

  • 06-09-2018 9:54am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭


    Hi Folks,

    Question, I'm attempting to have my thesis published. However, I would like to rewrite some of the content in the lit review, and also add some new content to the lit review. I'm not going near the primary research obviously. My question is, would this be considered ok? And would it be ok to utilise the existing primary data to compare against the new literature?

    Thanks


Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 47,532 CMod ✭✭✭✭Black Swan


    dar100 wrote: »
    Question, I'm attempting to have my thesis published. However, I would like to rewrite some of the content in the lit review, and also add some new content to the lit review. I'm not going near the primary research obviously. My question is, would this be considered ok?
    Published masters with literature revisions and citations seems appropriate.
    dar100 wrote: »
    And would it be ok to utilise the existing primary data to compare against the new literature?
    Is the existing primary data your intellectual property, or does it belong to others? If yours, there should be no problems using it. As far as comparing it to new studies/literature, such comparisons are done, especially in meta-analysis of studies on a particular research topic, along with citations.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭dar100


    Black Swan wrote: »
    Published masters with literature revisions and citations seems appropriate.

    Is the existing primary data your intellectual property, or does it belong to others? If yours, there should be no problems using it. As far as comparing it to new studies/literature, such comparisons are done, especially in meta-analysis of studies on a particular research topic, along with citations.

    Thanks Black Swan.

    Basically I have added a couple of paragraphs into the lit review, and taken a little bit of an angle of interpretation of the findings. Well I have synthesised the findings into a chart type format to develop a framework. I sent it to a local journal, so see what happens


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 47,532 CMod ✭✭✭✭Black Swan


    dar100 wrote: »
    Thanks Black Swan.

    Basically I have added a couple of paragraphs into the lit review, and taken a little bit of an angle of interpretation of the findings. Well I have synthesised the findings into a chart type format to develop a framework. I sent it to a local journal, so see what happens
    Best of luck dar100.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭dar100


    Black Swan wrote: »
    Best of luck dar100.

    Thanks,

    And thank you for all your help, you are a fountain of knowledge and very generous with passing it on.

    Working on a new PhD proposal. I may be in need again:)


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 47,532 CMod ✭✭✭✭Black Swan


    dar100 wrote: »

    Working on a new PhD proposal. I may be in need again:)
    You are welcome dar100. Start a new thread when you wish.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement