Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Could Europe be self sufficient

  • 28-04-2018 8:51pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,061 ✭✭✭


    Could Europe be self sufficient?
    In regards to energy, food, quality of life.
    Obviously the way we live now would have to change, but could we live a relatively good life without turning into a more communist like society.
    Is there even enought natural resources to keep the lights on, coal, oil, Gas. Even with fracking and green energy sources included.
    And re food, we often herd of the food mountain in Europe (dont bother looking, you wont find it on Google earth.)would there be enough to sustain Europe's population, keeping in mind Europe's low birth rates and as mentioned earlier the big changes in current lifestyles.
    Could we keep enought people employed in the cultivation and harvesting of these natural resources to keep unemployment low.

    Could there be a kind of happy middle ground between complete isolationism and unpredictable globalism.
    Is there a balance to be had?

    If we take a look at north America, basically USA and Canada, those nations would be in a much better position to be more isolated with vast oil and gas reserves and much more scope for green energy, think the deserts for solar energy, and vast tracts of land for farming and access to tropical and cold water on both sides of the landmass.

    So could Europe not just survive, but exist with a relatively good quality of life aswell?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    Too many ifs for it to be realistic. Likewise Canada and USA would never accept the hardships of isolationism either. There's more to modern living that having energy sources.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,061 ✭✭✭gw80


    Too many ifs for it to be realistic. Likewise Canada and USA would never accept the hardships of isolationism either. There's more to modern living that having energy sources.

    So we are too entangled in the modern world,
    Does it have to be hardship?
    Living simply does not have to be simply living.

    What if hypothetically we had no choice in the matter like in the case of some global catastrophe(dont worry, im not planning anything ;) )


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,453 ✭✭✭Shenshen


    Europe without tea or coffee?

    Sorry, I can't see that happening anytime soon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,564 ✭✭✭✭whiskeyman


    No Chinese takeaways?

    Feck off you anti-globalisationist!!
    I need my chicken balls and curry sauce!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,570 ✭✭✭Ulysses Gaze


    gw80 wrote: »
    Could Europe be self sufficient?
    In regards to energy, food, quality of life.
    Obviously the way we live now would have to change, but could we live a relatively good life without turning into a more communist like society.
    Is there even enought natural resources to keep the lights on, coal, oil, Gas. Even with fracking and green energy sources included.
    And re food, we often herd of the food mountain in Europe (dont bother looking, you wont find it on Google earth.)would there be enough to sustain Europe's population, keeping in mind Europe's low birth rates and as mentioned earlier the big changes in current lifestyles.
    Could we keep enought people employed in the cultivation and harvesting of these natural resources to keep unemployment low.

    Could there be a kind of happy middle ground between complete isolationism and unpredictable globalism.
    Is there a balance to be had?

    If we take a look at north America, basically USA and Canada, those nations would be in a much better position to be more isolated with vast oil and gas reserves and much more scope for green energy, think the deserts for solar energy, and vast tracts of land for farming and access to tropical and cold water on both sides of the landmass.

    So could Europe not just survive, but exist with a relatively good quality of life aswell?

    Militarily, it will always rely on the US & UK.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,061 ✭✭✭gw80


    Shenshen wrote: »
    Europe without tea or coffee?

    Sorry, I can't see that happening anytime soon.

    Surely nettle tea would suffice.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    Yes but it would be quite different - plenty of what we consume isn't easily produced in a European climate while other foods etc could be but only in hothouse conditions which means using resources that might be better spent elsewhere. Would we be ready to pay far more than we do for clothing, electronic goods etc which are now made in the Far East, SE Asia and India for half what we can make them?

    Could we turn enough of Southern Europe into energy farms for sun and enough of northern Europe into energy farms for wind?

    Of course the really breaking point would be raw materials - timber, iron ore, gypsum, nitrates, gold, silver, various other heavy metals and trace elements - Europe is very poorly resourced for almost all of them


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,888 ✭✭✭Atoms for Peace


    The USA had a much higher standard of living or at least more a more equal society after WW ii than it does today.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 32,688 ✭✭✭✭ytpe2r5bxkn0c1


    gw80 wrote: »
    Surely nettle tea would suffice.

    You see? That's the whole point. Of course we could survive if we had to but why should we move to survival mode?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,061 ✭✭✭gw80


    The USA had a much higher standard of living or at least more a more equal society after WW ii than it does today.

    Yes, i believe it was a lot more isolated before ww2, could it gave remained in that path,


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,007 ✭✭✭s7ryf3925pivug


    Romania managed to be pretty self sufficient under Ceausescu. It wasn't a model to envy. Self sufficiency for its own sake is stupid.

    However the dependence of most of Europe on Russian gas is more stupid, and it was obviously stupid even back when they ignored Reagan and built the pipelines. Exploiting renewable resources and developing nuclear power is the best direction I think, phasing out fossil fuels altogether.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 403 ✭✭bizidea


    Fek europe could ireland be self sufficent


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,453 ✭✭✭Shenshen


    gw80 wrote: »
    Surely nettle tea would suffice.

    That in itself would see me emigrate - to somewhere where there's real tea.

    I think as a theoretical exercise it's interesting, but while I think it certainly would be possible with a massive reduction in quality of living, it won't make for a good place to live.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,070 ✭✭✭Franz Von Peppercorn


    Militarily, it will always rely on the US & UK.

    The U.K.? Nonsense.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,681 ✭✭✭Try_harder


    bizidea wrote: »
    Fek europe could ireland be self sufficent

    Dev tried that, didn't work, wasn't a Good Life for anyone


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,061 ✭✭✭gw80


    Romania managed to be pretty self sufficient under Ceausescu. It wasn't a model to envy. Self sufficiency for its own sake is stupid.

    However the dependence of most of Europe on Russian gas is more stupid, and it was obviously stupid even back when they ignored Reagan and built the pipelines. Exploiting renewable resources and developing nuclear power is the best direction I think, phasing out fossil fuels altogether.
    This partly why i am thinking about this.
    What if somthing happened in russia that was beyond our control and they switched off the gas, is there even a plan in place for this event,

    Is there a limit on how far we should go with globalism, should we let it get to the stage where some unstable country on the other side of the world could hold us to ransom per say for some resource we rely on them for.
    Or are we past the point of no return in that regards


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,579 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    There is no need for complete self-sufficiency and it can be destabalising to be completely self-sufficient - what if there is a bad harvest and you don't have the ability to import?
    gw80 wrote: »
    What if somthing happened in russia that was beyond our control and they switched off the gas,
    Ireland doesn't use Russian gas, we use gas from Ireland and the North Sea.
    gw80 wrote: »
    is there even a plan in place for this event
    Each EU state retains 90 days stocks of oil for such an eventuality. If there was a 25% cut in energy supplies, this would last a year. Add conservation measures, demand management, altering maintenance schedules and alternative supplies it would last much longer.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,567 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Europe is not self sufficient. Nowhere it's size is. We are just a peninsula off Asia.

    It could be though. Except it cheaper to import some stuff balanced out by exporting stuff.

    EU is a major exporter of food. Norway is producing lots of natural gas. And places like Italy and Germany are using tonnes of solar, ourselves and Denmark are big into wind. (We could probably reduce our electricity use by 1GW by insulating all buildings.) Oil use will be reduced as we move to hybrids and electrical cars and public transport. Or bicycles if things get really though. Remember it's not peak oil, it's Peak Cheap Oil.


    It's just a matter of economics. We could be just about self sufficient but it's cheaper to import the stuff we miss.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    Militarily, it will always rely on the US & UK.

    EU has 1.4 million active troops.

    And outspends Russia 3:1 while on a tiny 1-2% spend.

    Now armchair general me with some noise about co-ordination.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,314 ✭✭✭KyussB


    The entire point of Globalization is not to accept mere self-sufficiency - it's to pillage the rest of the worlds resources (from weaker nations), in order to serve you - so that you don't have to be self sufficient, you get others to do the work and provide the resources for you.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,500 ✭✭✭✭DEFTLEFTHAND


    I'd rather hook back up with our neigbours.

    When the EU comes apart I want us to be at the forefront of an anglosphere Union.

    They're the people we know and have everything in common with.


  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'd rather hook back up with our neigbours.

    When the EU comes apart I want us to be at the forefront of an anglosphere Union.

    They're the people we know and have everything in common with.
    Our neighbours are the ones going off wandering in the night and you want us to join them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,500 ✭✭✭✭DEFTLEFTHAND


    Our neighbours are the ones going off wandering in the night and you want us to join them?
    Brits are always ahead of the curve. They didn't rule half the world for 200 years for nothing.

    Insignificant member euro states and net drains like ourselves cannot compare to what they experienced.


    But I know when the time comes they will welcome us back into the fold. We're not Europeans.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 35,731 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Brits are always ahead of the curve. They didn't rule half the world for 200 years for nothing.

    Insignificant member euro states and net drains like ourselves cannot compare to what they experienced.


    But I know when the time comes they will welcome us back into the fold. We're not Europeans.

    You sound like someone emerging from a rape dungeon and wondering why everyone doesn't love 'Daddy' like you do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,634 ✭✭✭✭Graces7


    Used to be and could be again if we changed our way of life.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    You sound like someone emerging from a rape dungeon and wondering why everyone doesn't love 'Daddy' like you do.

    I believe he may be ....playing an internet joke, to elicit a response.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,567 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    Graces7 wrote: »
    Used to be and could be again if we changed our way of life.
    We can't all afford to be poor.

    Only rich people can afford passive houses and full electric cars (subsidised by the rest of us, less tax and free ESB chargers) and other goodies that use less resources in the long run.

    Fibre to the home could have been rolled out during the last boom to all the new estates built then. Could have lots of people tele-commuting by now. Could also have insisted on proper insulation and other stuff in those overpriced houses , but we didn't.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 482 ✭✭badtoro


    Shenshen wrote: »
    Europe without tea or coffee?

    Sorry, I can't see that happening anytime soon.

    Tea will grow in Europe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,172 ✭✭✭EPAndlee


    It wouldn't last long before Germany would try take over the whole of Europe


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,567 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    badtoro wrote: »
    Tea will grow in Europe.
    Iceland exports bananas.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,480 ✭✭✭wexie


    Iceland exports bananas.

    which were grown where exactly?

    Not in Iceland


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,567 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    wexie wrote: »
    which were grown where exactly?

    Not in Iceland
    In greenhouses. Geothermal heat.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,480 ✭✭✭wexie


    In greenhouses. Geothermal heat.

    Really? I thought you were talking in the same way that Ireland used to 'export' bananas.

    That's bananas!


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,567 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    wexie wrote: »
    Really? I thought you were talking in the same way that Ireland used to 'export' bananas.

    That's bananas!
    They don't anymore though because it's cheaper to import these days. But they could.



    The best bit about the Irish banana business is that they were manufactured here. We didn't grow them, we made them.

    That tax loophole was closed a while back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,063 ✭✭✭wexandproud


    badtoro wrote: »
    Tea will grow in Europe.
    Shur don't we have irish tea all ready as in barry's and lyons . I believe a fella called 'paddy fields ' down in cork grows it for them although i have yet to see it


  • Advertisement
Advertisement