Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

High court legal Jargon

  • 22-03-2018 4:57pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 834 ✭✭✭


    I have two simple questions. What does it mean when the final result of a high court case says:

    "Motion Refuse & Costs" and no judgement is issued. My guess is that the plaintiff motion has been refused without granting a full hearing and costs awarded against the plaintiff. Correct?

    "Judicial Review-Certiorari Final Granted" and no judgement has been published after more than two months. My guess is that the judicial review requested by the plaintiff has been successful. Correct? Shouldn't a judgement be published in such case?

    Thank you


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,798 ✭✭✭Mr. Incognito


    Costs follow the event.

    Motion refused- costs against the plaintiff

    Judicial review- Certiorari means that the decision was quashed.

    An order issues in due course whenever the Registrar feels like drafting it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,554 ✭✭✭Really Interested


    GGTrek wrote: »
    I have two simple questions. What does it mean when the final result of a high court case says:

    "Motion Refuse & Costs" and no judgement is issued. My guess is that the plaintiff motion has been refused without granting a full hearing and costs awarded against the plaintiff. Correct?

    "Judicial Review-Certiorari Final Granted" and no judgement has been published after more than two months. My guess is that the judicial review requested by the plaintiff has been successful. Correct? Shouldn't a judgement be published in such case?

    Thank you

    All motions and hearings result in an order not all cases end with a written judgement.

    I believe only parties can get copies of any order.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭4ensic15


    In many cases there is no written judgement. In the High Court, this is because the judge is able to make the decision on the spot after hearing the case. In some cases there is consent for the orders. Unusual but it sometimes happens in judicial review that the Respondents decide that they have no arguable defence and they fold their tent rather than run a doomed case. In that case there is no need for any kind of judgement.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,581 Mod ✭✭✭✭Robbo


    There's no standardisation of this shorthand and it varies entirely from registrar to registrar.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,405 ✭✭✭Dandelion6


    4ensic15 wrote: »
    Unusual but it sometimes happens in judicial review that the Respondents decide that they have no arguable defence and they fold their tent rather than run a doomed case. In that case there is no need for any kind of judgement.

    Not unusual.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭4ensic15


    Dandelion6 wrote: »
    Not unusual.

    It is far from common.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,554 ✭✭✭Really Interested


    4ensic15 wrote: »
    It is far from common.


    It is common call into the Immigration list any Monday and hear the cases where the matter is struck out with an order for the applicants costs many before a statement of opposition.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,405 ✭✭✭Dandelion6


    It is common call into the Immigration list any Monday and hear the cases where the matter is struck out with an order for the applicants costs many before a statement of opposition.

    More often struck out with no order on the basis of a costs agreement between the parties, but yes, it is particularly common in the Asylum list. Less common in the ordinary JR list but I still wouldn't call it "unusual".


Advertisement