Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The 12 mins test

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,595 ✭✭✭✭Murph_D


    Interesting. Numbers seems a bit off though. I can do nearly 8 laps but there’s no way my VO2Max is near 60.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 435 ✭✭Coffee Fulled Runner


    Murph_D wrote: »
    Interesting. Numbers seems a bit off though. I can do nearly 8 laps but there’s no way my VO2Max is near 60.

    I often wonder how accurate Garmin are with their V02max. Mine is 58 on Garmin but I doubt it would be at that level if I done a test


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,595 ✭✭✭✭Murph_D


    I often wonder how accurate Garmin are with their V02max. Mine is 58 on Garmin but I doubt it would be at that level if I done a test

    My watch seems to give very inaccurate HR information (unless my fitness levels have increased really dramatically), so its VO2Max calculation, which surely must be at least partly based on HR, would not inspire me with confidence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,772 ✭✭✭jameshayes


    I often wonder how accurate Garmin are with their V02max. Mine is 58 on Garmin but I doubt it would be at that level if I done a test

    I think there are some forums out that quote some research - seems the numbers might be +1 or 2 points on garmins from their findings but I dont think the studies were very robust iirc


Advertisement