Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

COW Cows Own Worth

  • 31-10-2017 6:46pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,190 ✭✭✭


    Had a look through our own profile earlier today. No definitive correlation between EBI and COW but must do up a graph to see if we can see more clarity on this.

    I rang to ask, but of course no one qualified in office today to answer some queries(launch today). For accuracy of this profile, I would think it very important that ICBF would use your own coops milk payment formula when applying lactation values to the cows. There is quiet a difference in the way the payment formula is made up by each processor in terms of fat, protein and volume subtraction, and would be vital when making cull decisions that the proper values are attributed. I fearvtheybwill use some kind of standard national formula.

    It becomes more important because the value is not only made up of the value of this year's milk, but the value of all possible future lactations, so for instance an inaccuracy of 5percent on one lactation could be huge over six to ten lacerations.

    I also see that older cows, while they may still be delivering quiet well, have a low future lactation figure, which is obvious, however, these are the ladies that we strive to keep replacements from so we are going to be scratching the head a little on this. With us these older cows are still delivering more than a heifer that would replace them, and it is difficult to come to terms with getting rid of them.

    This could be a useful tool of the figures and assumptions used are very accurate and specific to your farm, the only place where these figures will have any relevance.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,225 ✭✭✭charolais0153


    Theres going to be a big input from beef farmers from this icbf venture


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,396 ✭✭✭✭Timmaay


    What does it mean if the COW is negative ha? The cow will cost more to keep than she will give in milk ha?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,194 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    Only for spring calving herds....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,881 ✭✭✭mf240


    Just a warning. We put in cctv in the dairy and caught two low ebi cows taking milk out of the tank.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,752 Mod ✭✭✭✭blue5000


    Theres going to be a big input from beef farmers from this icbf venture

    I think this might be what you're talking about https://www.independent.ie/business/farming/beef/icbf-beef-bull-ratings-are-flawed-and-breeders-demand-answers-36276636.html

    Highest ebi bull has only carcase weights from 4 calves?

    If the seat's wet, sit on yer hat, a cool head is better than a wet ar5e.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,763 ✭✭✭White Clover


    mf240 wrote: »
    Just a warning. We put in cctv in the dairy and caught two low ebi cows taking milk out of the tank.

    I'm assuming that you got rid of them pronto and replaced them with high ebi cows that you bought over the phone without going to see them ??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,225 ✭✭✭charolais0153


    blue5000 wrote: »
    I think this might be what you're talking about https://www.independent.ie/business/farming/beef/icbf-beef-bull-ratings-are-flawed-and-breeders-demand-answers-36276636.html

    Highest ebi bull has only carcase weights from 4 calves?

    That and that icbf prioritise dairy farmers once again


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,194 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    That and that icbf prioritise dairy farmers once again

    I pay each year herdplus fee, icbf tag levy, icbf levy of 50 cent on each ai serve done through the handheld device- which is them all- 87c icbf levy on milk recording. I assume there's alot of other dairy farmers paying for the same. How do beef farmers contribute to icbf? I assume dairy farmers get more information as they put more information in and pay more towards icbf.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,447 ✭✭✭Never wrestle with pigs


    whelan2 wrote: »
    I pay each year herdplus fee, icbf tag levy, icbf levy of 50 cent on each ai serve done through the handheld device- which is them all- 87c icbf levy on milk recording. I assume there's alot of other dairy farmers paying for the same. How do beef farmers contribute to icbf? I assume dairy farmers get more information as they put more information in and pay more towards icbf.


    Same except for milk recordings, I think they are taking a cut of the genomics scheme too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,225 ✭✭✭charolais0153


    whelan2 wrote: »
    I pay each year herdplus fee, icbf tag levy, icbf levy of 50 cent on each ai serve done through the handheld device- which is them all- 87c icbf levy on milk recording. I assume there's alot of other dairy farmers paying for the same. How do beef farmers contribute to icbf? I assume dairy farmers get more information as they put more information in and pay more towards icbf.

    If i give them 87c per head so ,will they do it for me?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,194 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    If i give them 87c per head so ,will they do it for me?

    I assume they know their income is coming from the volume in the,dairy sector. Have you ever complained to them? I didn't know of the levy on milk recording or ai serves until I was told last year


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,135 ✭✭✭kowtow


    Are they calculating an actual figure or a notional figure to rank the herd on? If it's an actual figure I wonder what discount rate they are using to value the future cashflows.

    I can't get the figure on herd-plus because more than 10% of my herd were born the wrong side of the blanket - I've explained to icbf that they are victims of their own hyper-fertility but it doesn't get me anywhere.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,190 ✭✭✭alps


    kowtow wrote: »
    Are they calculating an actual figure or a notional figure to rank the herd on? If it's an actual figure I wonder what discount rate they are using to value the future cashflows.

    I can't get the figure on herd-plus because more than 10% of my herd were born the wrong side of the blanket - I've explained to icbf that they are victims of their own hyper-fertility but it doesn't get me anywhere.

    I rang this morning, but no one I spoke to knew the answers..they are to ring back..

    You'll introduce a whole new concept with having to discount the value of future cashflows....go on,,dare you to ring with that one...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 332 ✭✭GiantPencil


    blue5000 wrote: »
    Theres going to be a big input from beef farmers from this icbf venture

    I think this might be what you're talking about https://www.independent.ie/business/farming/beef/icbf-beef-bull-ratings-are-flawed-and-breeders-demand-answers-36276636.html

    Highest ebi bull has only carcase weights from 4 calves?
    Wouldn't believe all you read in that article, that bulls figures are high beacause data has been imported from France....look that bull up on the french system and you'll see his doing the business over there. the # in the prev eval tab in icbf means that data was imported. That article was just ICBF bashing without doing any investigation as to why the numbers are the way they are


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,190 ✭✭✭alps


    Graph of EBI v COW on our herd....consistent to be fair with about 4 outliers...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 811 ✭✭✭yewtree


    alps wrote: »
    Graph of EBI v COW on our herd....consistent to be fair with about 4 outliers...

    Thats a really nice piece of work.
    Had a look for my herd, its picking out the rubbish here anyway.
    I think it will be a useful tool for culling anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,135 ✭✭✭kowtow


    alps wrote: »
    Graph of EBI v COW on our herd....consistent to be fair with about 4 outliers...

    Now if you were to add another set of dots in a different colour for milk solids across the lactation.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,190 ✭✭✭alps


    kowtow wrote: »
    Now if you were to add another set of dots in a different colour for milk solids across the lactation.....

    My mind is only 2 dimensional.....what axis would i run the milk solids on?..and scale? Even that question is mixed up...

    Should you go milk solids v COW


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,135 ✭✭✭kowtow


    alps wrote: »
    My mind is only 2 dimensional.....what axis would i run the milk solids on?..and scale? Even that question is mixed up...

    Should you go milk solids v COW

    You could put a second horizontal scale on it for milk solids but you'd have to find a way of normalising the figure a bit - so that your median or average milk solids was in the same spot as the median or mean COW if you see what I mean (no pun intended) and the high and low of the range occupy about the same space as the high and low of the COW. Not sure if that makes sense!

    Edit: another way of looking at it is to put the EBI and the COW on the same scale (or rather axis) if you can re-scale them because you have already established that they seem to be quite linear. Then see how the both of them compare to what the girls are producing in the present lactation.

    It would be easier if they were in a spreadsheet, then you'd just get a figure for the correlation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,396 ✭✭✭✭Timmaay


    You can usually export icbf data in excel or csv format, and work away to your hearts content then.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement