Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Buy property with tenant in situ

  • 22-10-2017 4:37pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭


    Hi all, I am interested in a property that is currently on sale with a tenant in situ, I will need 20K mortgage only (based on the current price advertised) and I can pay it easily with my salary regardless of any complications getting the tenant out - I plan to use this property for myself and I can wait 1 year or more if necessary to evict the tenant.
    Will the bank give me a 20k to 30K mortgage in this situation? is it a bad idea altogether as in should I just run from such property? any other recommendation? thanks!!


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 101 ✭✭VonBeanie


    I'm not saying its right, but I wouldn't expect a bank to give a mortgage for any amount without vacant possession. For 20k, it may be possible to get an unsecured personal loan. An expensive option, but probably more achievable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,825 ✭✭✭LirW


    A bank won't give you a mortgage under 40-50k and even then banks are quite hesitant giving out such small mortgages because they earn little from it.
    But you definitely couldn't secure a mortgage against a property that's occupied.

    Unsecured loan is the way to go.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 32,286 Mod ✭✭✭✭The_Conductor


    alwald wrote: »
    is it a bad idea altogether as in should I just run from such property? any other recommendation? thanks!!

    Yes, its a bad idea.
    Insist on vacant possession before closing the sale- its nuts to even consider buying a property you intend to use yourself- if it has a sitting tenant- if the sitting tenant decided to play the system- it might take you a 2 years + to get vacant possession- all the while they may not be paying rent- but regardless, you are legally obliged to maintain the property for them.........

    Its vacant possession- or just walk, its not the hassle.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭alwald


    Wise words...I will see the property and if I like it I will ask for it to be vacant as suggested here...otherwise I won't put an offer. Thank you all for the help!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,424 ✭✭✭garhjw


    I can't see a bank granting a mortgage, no matter how small, on a property without vacant possession - too much risk.

    As a buyer, I wouldn't close without vacant possession - too much risk.

    You could have a very good tenant or it could turn into a nightmare. With the current RTB process for hearings taking so long and then enforcement of adjudications, it could take a long time to remove a difficult tenant.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭4ensic15


    A lot depends on the lease. In some cases there is no lease and it is very difficult to even begin an eviction process because there is information such as the start date of the letting and even the amount of the rent missing. A serious discount on the purchase price would be necessary to justify taking a chance.


Advertisement