Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Emerging Technology & The 5-Minute Charge

  • 29-09-2017 10:35pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭


    It's become clear that Li-Ion technology can't deliver a five-minute charge, otherwise the latest Samsung Galaxy would have it already.

    I keep a passive eye on emerging battery technologies, but aside from Sodium batteries, which should be hugely cheaper but no quicker, I can't see any obvious candidates.

    Anyone feel like backing a horse?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,702 ✭✭✭✭BoatMad


    It's become clear that Li-Ion technology can't deliver a five-minute charg

    I dont think any such thing is clear at all


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    BoatMad wrote: »
    I dont think any such thing is clear at all

    If you can tell me about a Li-Ion battery in a commercial product that can do a 90% charge in 5 minutes, at least 2000 times, I'm all ears!

    My observation is that even the latest mobile phones with fast charging can't gain that significant a charge in less than 30 mins.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,629 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    n97 mini wrote: »
    If you can tell me about a Li-Ion battery in a commercial product that can do a 90% charge in 5 minutes, at least 2000 times, I'm all ears!

    My observation is that even the latest mobile phones with fast charging can't gain that significant a charge in less than 30 mins.
    If we limited all possibilities to what was technically possible now, there would be no improvements anywhere. What would the world be like if someone had your viewpoint 250 years ago. We'd be bemoaning the shortage of whale oil I'd say


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,310 ✭✭✭Pkiernan


    ELM327 wrote: »
    If we limited all possibilities to what was technically possible now, there would be no improvements anywhere. What would the world be like if someone had your viewpoint 250 years ago. We'd be bemoaning the shortage of whale oil I'd say

    We're at peak whale!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,702 ✭✭✭✭BoatMad


    n97 mini wrote: »
    If you can tell me about a Li-Ion battery in a commercial product that can do a 90% charge in 5 minutes, at least 2000 times, I'm all ears!

    My observation is that even the latest mobile phones with fast charging can't gain that significant a charge in less than 30 mins.

    Li can be charged exceedingly quickly , in the lab , we charged them in 30 seconds ( small LI )

    The problem is charge termination and issues around any fault in the battery as well as heat gain , any failure results in explosion !

    SO manufactures play it safe and design in controls and limits

    also its a function of cost, high power charging in a mobile device would add considerable costs

    so its not necessarily a technological issue per se


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,295 ✭✭✭n97 mini


    ELM327 wrote: »
    If we limited all possibilities to what was technically possible now, there would be no improvements anywhere. What would the world be like if someone had your viewpoint 250 years ago. We'd be bemoaning the shortage of whale oil I'd say

    Oi, we moved to Nickel Metal Hydride because Nickel Cadmium wasn't good enough. NiMH has faded because Li-ion is much better. I don't believe battery evolution will stop at Li-Ion as, like the others, it's not perfect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,702 ✭✭✭✭BoatMad


    n97 mini wrote: »
    Oi, we moved to Nickel Metal Hydride because Nickel Cadmium wasn't good enough. NiMH has faded because Li-ion is much better. I don't believe battery evolution will stop at Li-Ion as, like the others, it's not perfect.

    of course not, but battery tech is slow to materialise, rechargeable LI is around for over 30 years ( 1976 ) its not " new" tech

    There are several candidates for next gen batteries solid state Li, Sodium, Silicon
    but again it takes time to get the tech sorted

    whats clear is that BEVs are the future, that decision has been taken, everything else is dropping by the wayside

    Changing battery tech still leaves us with a BEV


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,629 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    n97 mini wrote: »
    Oi, we moved to Nickel Metal Hydride because Nickel Cadmium wasn't good enough. NiMH has faded because Li-ion is much better. I don't believe battery evolution will stop at Li-Ion as, like the others, it's not perfect.

    we moved away from NIMH due to patent issues, and the subsequent Li advances. LI Ion batteries are around for decades. Not new tech.

    The next stage is rumoured - for some time - for LI-Air "solid state" batteries. Theoretically it has the same properties as ICE as regards energy density, energy per stored wait, and recharge times. However it has been around a while and has not been made viable. Yet.
    BoatMad wrote: »
    of course not, but battery tech is slow to materialise, rechargeable LI is around for over 30 years ( 1976 ) its not " new" tech

    There are several candidates for next gen batteries solid state Li, Sodium, Silicon
    but again it takes time to get the tech sorted

    whats clear is that BEVs are the future, that decision has been taken, everything else is dropping by the wayside

    Changing battery tech still leaves us with a BEV
    +1
    Seems like it really, the last 18-24 months have seen a massive shift both in terms of policy and also the manufacturers themselves.


Advertisement