Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Clonkeen College - Land sell off

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭RosieJoe


    More news on this here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,433 ✭✭✭Needs Must


    Selling of land for residential purposes is a consequence of the upturn in property prices. Only recently RTE put a portion of it's Montrose site up for sale. Looking likely that flats will be built in an effort to maximise return. Similar scenario here I would guess.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,990 ✭✭✭Seaswimmer


    My old Alma Mater..............

    I think with the chronic shortage of housing it is a little bit of a luxury to hold on to land that effectively is under utilised. I could understand the anger and opposition if it was a public park or public green space but these pitches are only used for small periods of time and only by pupils in the school.

    There are council owned Gaelic and soccer pitches within a few hundred metres which could be used for training/matches.

    On a slightly different point there are a huge amount of 4 bedroom homes in the immediate area with one or 2 elderly people in them. An imaginative scheme in Clonkeen College which provides a number of high quality 2/3 bedroom apartments/bungalows/townhouses marketed locally to this demographic may yield up some of these homes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,118 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    Seaswimmer wrote: »
    My old Alma Mater..............

    Mine too

    I might buy one ;)


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 21,693 Mod ✭✭✭✭helimachoptor


    Seaswimmer wrote: »
    My old Alma Mater..............

    I think with the chronic shortage of housing it is a little bit of a luxury to hold on to land that effectively is under utilised. I could understand the anger and opposition if it was a public park or public green space but these pitches are only used for small periods of time and only by pupils in the school.

    There are council owned Gaelic and soccer pitches within a few hundred metres which could be used for training/matches.

    On a slightly different point there are a huge amount of 4 bedroom homes in the immediate area with one or 2 elderly people in them. An imaginative scheme in Clonkeen College which provides a number of high quality 2/3 bedroom apartments/bungalows/townhouses marketed locally to this demographic may yield up some of these homes.

    Im split on it tbh, I live on clonkeen road, if i ever have a boy he'd likely go there, so i would prefer it stay as is, but they will still retain a lot of land, though it will be overlooked by blocks of apartments, assume these would be 3/4 stories high based on the school height.

    Not sure how many apartments will go up, but no doubt it will bring increased traffic to the area around rush hour.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,990 ✭✭✭Seaswimmer


    Im split on it tbh, I live on clonkeen road, if i ever have a boy he'd likely go there, so i would prefer it stay as is, but they will still retain a lot of land, though it will be overlooked by blocks of apartments, assume these would be 3/4 stories high based on the school height.

    Not sure how many apartments will go up, but no doubt it will bring increased traffic to the area around rush hour.

    Yes. Will be interesting to see where the access will be.

    I think Dun Laoghaire Golf Club is a good example of what can be achieved in modern developments although I accept that it is a much larger area than Clonkeen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,118 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,606 ✭✭✭schemingbohemia


    Well if the CBs had actually stumped up the money they owed for facilitating kiddy fiddlers move around the country a few years ago this wouldn't have to happen.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 21,693 Mod ✭✭✭✭helimachoptor


    Well if the CBs had actually stumped up the money they owed for facilitating kiddy fiddlers move around the country a few years ago this wouldn't have to happen.

    This is what it comes down to, they owe money for what happened, Oatlands college looks like it has a lot of space, however the rest of their schools after looking through the ones in Dublin on google dont have a lot unless you want to remove any green areas.

    With their 3.5 acres CC probably still have more than a lot of the other dublin schools on the Rice list, and with the council pitches across the road i'd say it was an easy choice


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 709 ✭✭✭wowy


    Well if the CBs had actually stumped up the money they owed for facilitating kiddy fiddlers move around the country a few years ago this wouldn't have to happen.

    Public insist the CBs sell land to settle their liability to the state. CBs decide to sell land they have that is valuable and developable (this land has residential zoning and importantly development access which a lot of their other lands adjacent to schools won't) and people give out. The CBs are damned if they do, damned if they don't....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,812 ✭✭✭mailforkev


    I went there too and am still in the area. I think half the local anger is the underhand way that the CBs did the deal with Durkan without even the school themselves knowing anything about it.

    I hear the meeting the other night was one step away from pitchforks and flames.

    I reckon whoever owns Texaco is hoping they get PP anyway, nice payday on the cards if they want to knock it for access. Is probably the best spot for it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,718 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    mailforkev wrote: »

    I reckon whoever owns Texaco is hoping they get PP anyway, nice payday on the cards if they want to knock it for access. Is probably the best spot for it.

    I dont agree. Half way down Monaloe Park Road there is a currently pointless cul-de-sac which only needs a wall knocking down to get into the playing pitches. Someone was thinking ahead many years ago! Was it once a back gate into the school or something?

    Im sure the people of Monaloe Park Road mightnt like that, but theres plenty of precedent, for instance the recent row over rear access to the Oatlands College plot from Cherrygarth


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,812 ✭✭✭mailforkev


    Larbre34 wrote: »
    I dont agree. Half way down Monaloe Park Road there is a currently pointless cul-de-sac which only needs a wall knocking down to get into the playing pitches. Someone was thinking ahead many years ago! Was it once a back gate into the school or something?

    Im sure the people of Monaloe Park Road mightnt like that, but theres plenty of precedent, for instance the recent row over rear access to the Oatlands College plot from Cherrygarth

    I used to hop over that wall to school occasionally. It was never anything but a wall. There's a little stream behind it.

    Monaloe couldn't take the increased volume of traffic in my opinion, it's narrow and already overcrowded with cars parked on the road. Also, it's a bit of an awkward route to access the site.

    Is the brother's house still beside the school? If so perhaps that could be knocked.

    I think main access directly from Clonkeen Road would be much preferable to the developers though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73 ✭✭Boca


    I believe the CBs are expecting €18m for the land - €10m to the redress board, €1m to the school, leaving them €7m to add to their cash reserves
    They don't need to sell this land, 
    Seaswimmer wrote: »

    I think with the chronic shortage of housing it is a little bit of a luxury to hold on to land that effectively is under utilised. I could understand the anger and opposition if it was a public park or public green space but these pitches are only used for small periods of time and only by pupils in the school.

    There are council owned Gaelic and soccer pitches within a few hundred metres which could be used for training/matches.



    Not true, a substantial amount of money (some public, some raised by parents) has been invested in leveling and draining the playing fields.  Plenty of local clubs actively use them


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,118 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    Boca wrote: »
    Not true, a substantial amount of money (some public, some raised by parents) has been invested in leveling and draining the playing fields. ?Plenty of local clubs actively use them

    500k+ I believe


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,132 ✭✭✭spillit67


    This is what it comes down to, they owe money for what happened, Oatlands college looks like it has a lot of space, however the rest of their schools after looking through the ones in Dublin on google dont have a lot unless you want to remove any green areas.

    With their 3.5 acres CC probably still have more than a lot of the other dublin schools on the Rice list, and with the council pitches across the road i'd say it was an easy choice

    In 2010 the Edmund Rice Schools Trust did an evaluation of their lands.

    CBC Monkstown and St Fintans Sutton were found to have the most valuable lands. Given that the Brothers are trying to get €18m now for Clonkeen I suspect they would be worth an awful lot more than that now, particularly Monkstown, but they're not able to sell Monkstown.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73 ✭✭Boca


    ... they're not able to sell Monkstown.

    Out of interest, why?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,132 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Boca wrote: »
    ... they're not able to sell Monkstown.

    Out of interest, why?

    They need to change the use of the lands and that requires Council approval.
    http://www.irishtimes.com/news/brothers-seek-land-sale-to-fund-redress-1.1134795


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    mailforkev wrote: »
    I used to hop over that wall to school occasionally. It was never anything but a wall. There's a little stream behind it.

    Monaloe couldn't take the increased volume of traffic in my opinion, it's narrow and already overcrowded with cars parked on the road. Also, it's a bit of an awkward route to access the site.

    Is the brother's house still beside the school? If so perhaps that could be knocked.

    I think main access directly from Clonkeen Road would be much preferable to the developers though.

    Its now the ERST HQ which has also been bought by the developer afaik so that will most likely be used for access.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 616 ✭✭✭Gareth Keenan


    Boca wrote: »
    ... they're not able to sell Monkstown.

    Out of interest, why?
    spillit67 wrote: »
    They need to change the use of the lands and that requires Council approval.
    http://www.irishtimes.com/news/brothers-seek-land-sale-to-fund-redress-1.1134795

    a parent there told me that they did try to sell off the back pitch (1 of 3 there) a few years back. But as you say, it would need a change of use which does seem pretty unlikely to be granted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,132 ✭✭✭spillit67


    a parent there told me that they did try to sell off the back pitch (1 of 3 there) a few years back. But as you say, it would need a change of use which does seem pretty unlikely to be granted.

    Yes that's what the article states.

    It will be granted when the school wants it....wait a few years when the Brothers are out of the picture completely and I can see it happening. It's a long strip of land that used to be a second entrance to the school. It's too narrow to be a proper functioning rugby pitch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,132 ✭✭✭spillit67


    The Council looked to have failed in their bid to block the sale.
    Mr Devlin said that should the councillors succeed in their bid to create a mid-term variation of the development plan, it could halt development on some 95 of the 103 schools in the council area which are on, or surrounded, by residentially zoned land.

    How many have highly restricted zoning like CBC do is up in the air, I'd expect if any Orders are going to sell they will try and squeeze it through in the next few months.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,567 ✭✭✭✭Fratton Fred


    it makes sense to me for them to just hand over the schools to the state and the state lets them off any additional monies they owe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,165 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    How these lands got zoned residential in the first place is the issue, they'd not have been worth selling otherwise.

    Also, why they would spend so much on levelling/draining the fields without legally having ownership in place is stupid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 849 ✭✭✭petronius


    It is a scandal that school land in Clonkeen College and st. paul's, raheny were sold off by their owners - i can guarantee it wont be used for social housing - but developed for a large profit.
    School land should be just that school land, or sporting and educational use - not a cash bank - any land transfer should be only allowed by dept. approval with community consultation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,901 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    petronius wrote: »
    It is a scandal that school land in Clonkeen College and st. paul's, raheny were sold off by their owners - i can guarantee it wont be used for social housing - but developed for a large profit.
    School land should be just that school land, or sporting and educational use - not a cash bank - any land transfer should be only allowed by dept. approval with community consultation.
    Was it not should of off to pay for redress? Plenty saying that it’s a scandal it all hadn’t being paid. Damned if they dammed if they don’t


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,537 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    ted1 wrote: »
    Was it not should of off to pay for redress?

    schools shouldn't have to pay the price for that. sell off churches / church lands to pay for their crimes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,901 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    ted1 wrote: »
    Was it not should of off to pay for redress?

    schools shouldn't have to pay the price for that. sell off churches / church lands to pay for their crimes.
    Isn’t the land in question church land.
    In my opinion It shouldn’t have been rezoned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73 ✭✭Boca


    ted1 wrote: »
    Isn’t the land in question church land.
    In my opinion It shouldn’t have been rezoned.

    The land in question was promised to the school, the school invested in draining /levelling the land and expanding the school on that basis


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,901 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Boca wrote: »
    ted1 wrote: »
    Isn’t the land in question church land.
    In my opinion It shouldn’t have been rezoned.

    The land in question was promised to the school, the school invested in draining /levelling the land and expanding the school on that basis
    That’s really is irrelevant and actually reflects badly on the people who signed off the spend.

    Look it I don’t agree with it. I have no connection what so ever. Merely highlighting why it was sold.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,118 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    ted1 wrote: »
    Isn’t the land in question church land.
    In my opinion It shouldn’t have been rezoned.

    its not church land
    its school football pitchs and has been for 40+ years since the school was built


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,606 ✭✭✭schemingbohemia


    It is Church land and reflects badly on how we fund schools 100% that the State doesn't own and has no say in the management of. That's a whole other kettle of fish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,901 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Seve OB wrote: »
    ted1 wrote: »
    Isn’t the land in question church land.
    In my opinion It shouldn’t have been rezoned.

    its not church land
    its school football pitchs and has been for 40+ years since the school was built
    If it wasn’t church land then how did the church sell it ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,118 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    there is no church anywhere near the place - it is not church land, nor ever was

    it was a christian brothers school, now run by ERST.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,606 ✭✭✭schemingbohemia


    So Church does not equal Christian Brothers? You do realise that most normal people would understand the use of the phrase "Church" as a religious organisation rather than say the Dublin Diocese?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,118 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    So Church does not equal Christian Brothers? You do realise that most normal people would understand the use of the phrase "Church" as a religious organisation rather than say the Dublin Diocese?

    No church does not equal Christian Brothers. Well I spent 6 years of my life there, never ever did I hear any reference to church.... But maybe I missed the memo. 1 Christian brother was all that was left.
    Oh but we did have a Chaplin!

    I consider myself normal and have never heard of the word church being used as a phrase. If you want to say religious.... Then use the word religious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,901 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Seve OB wrote: »
    there is no church anywhere near the place - it is not church land, nor ever was

    it was a christian brothers school, now run by ERST.

    Christian Brothers are part of the church.

    If it wasn’t their land , they couldn’t sell it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,901 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Seve OB wrote: »
    So Church does not equal Christian Brothers? You do realise that most normal people would understand the use of the phrase "Church" as a religious organisation rather than say the Dublin Diocese?

    No church does not equal Christian Brothers. Well I spent 6 years of my life there, never ever did I hear any reference to church.... But maybe I missed the memo. 1 Christian brother was all that was left.
    Oh but we did have a Chaplin!

    I consider myself normal and have never heard of the word church being used as a phrase. If you want to say religious.... Then use the word religious.
    In that 6 years did you ever look up the land folio?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭RosieJoe




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 21,693 Mod ✭✭✭✭helimachoptor


    seems like an extremely bad settlement for the school


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,118 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    seems like an extremely bad settlement for the school

    Whatever was ever going to happen was always going to be bad for the school. :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,901 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    seems like an extremely bad settlement for the school
    4 acres is two pitches , not a bad deal 400% times better than last deal


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 826 ✭✭✭DublinCJM


    Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but did anyone hear if planning permission was granted for this site? Can't find anything on the planning website.

    Wondering if the expectation is apartments or houses.....


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 21,693 Mod ✭✭✭✭helimachoptor


    DublinCJM wrote: »
    Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but did anyone hear if planning permission was granted for this site? Can't find anything on the planning website.

    Wondering if the expectation is apartments or houses.....

    iirc think they had wanted to do both, but the given how low rise it is around the area, probably, 3/4 stories max.


Advertisement