Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Coaching athletics in Ireland

  • 09-03-2017 9:54am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭


    Pulling a few interesting comments out of the trainwreck -
    A specific problem for field events is one of capacity. A lot of athletics coaching is one to one. Take a bunch of 10 year olds - say 20 of them join a soccer club; they have a practice match 10 v 10, they practice skills they are all involved. Conversely, say they join an athletics club, especially re field events. They want to practice the long jump - the 20 kids line up. First kid jumps. Then second kid jumps. 10 minutes later the 20th kid jumps. 10 minutes later the 20th kid jumps again. So a child is standing there 15-20 minutes; jumps twice. Mentor spends more time trying to stop the group messing than looking at jumps.

    (just to add to this, this is one reason why so much time in athletics clubs is spent on running events, sprints and distance. They lend themselves better to large groups)
    A second problem re capacity is the age that kids start. Most sports clubs that deal with underage have capacity for taking kids in from age 5 upwards. That's not just GAA/ Soccer. Its Jiu Jitsu, karate, basketball, tennis, gymnastics. Athletics clubs don't seem to do that, rightly or wrongly. The problem then is that by the time they get to 8 or 9 or 10.....most kids that are sporty are already doing 2 or 3 different sports already. And when parents have been bringing their kid twice weekly to gaa or basketball or whatever for the past 4 years, there is a reluctance to say 'well that was a waste of time, why don't we try the athletics instead'.
    I sometimes feel that AI are putting so much emphasis on juvenile athletics (partly because there's so much support/goodwill towards that) that athletics becomes a juvenile (or juvenile and masters) sport i.e. those graduating from junior ranks get neglected - the point at which specialist and professional coaching does really make a difference and when athletes need to be able to compete internationally. We're now importing senior athletes to cover over the cracks.

    (Ask me about this again in a few years, when the kids I'm coaching reach that age!)
    I don't think the coaching standard is up to scratch in this country in athletics, I can see it all around me and I think some serious investment needs to be made in coaching the coaches.

    (I don't know how much I agree on this one. I know there are a lot of interesting coach education events that I don't get to. The coaches have to find the time to go to these events when they're on. Then again, maybe if there were more short events, in more locations, it would be easier for people to make time.)


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    An observation that I was going to make on the previous thread but will make on this one. We all have opinions, but to my mind some peoples opinions carry more weight than others.

    I know Myles and Sacksian, having chased them around muddy fields and usually not caught up. I know Ray to be actively involved in coaching the sport and being on the frontline of this discussion. Absolute respect for any opinions from you guys.

    Enjoy!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,896 ✭✭✭Sacksian


    Thanks for resurrecting this, Ray.

    I'm not a coach or a parent of an athlete but I am involved in the administration side of a club and am aware of the restrictions and limitations that clubs and coaches have to work with and juggle. So, I'm more interested in learning from the experiences of yourself, Wottle, pconn and Myles who are more involved with the AI structures.

    I do follow the Coach Education initiatives and I believe the poster formerly known as Tergat is heavily involved in that side of things (maybe I'm wrong about that?), particularly the endurance junior squads.

    However, one thing I would say is that any suggestion as to how coaching (juvenile or otherwise) should be done within clubs has to take into account that we don't live in an ideal world:

    - 99% of club coaches don't (and can't) get paid. Clubs can't afford it, neither can AI;
    - the majority of club coaches are essentially helpers, rather than coaches. Coaching is not their priority;
    - everyone thinks it can be improved, you will struggle to find a coach, never mind a club, that thinks that juvenile coaching and competition structures are perfect and cannot be improved upon.

    From my own club, I know that, once you put the hours in, people will listen to you if you have ideas as to how things can be changed or should be done differently. I would imagine most clubs are the same.

    So, with no additional resources, what would you like to - and can - do differently in your own club?

    (note to self: discount tombo's opinion as long as he's finishing behind me!)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    cheating a bit on the "no additional resources", but at the moment we have a lot of juvenile coaches, and even though most of them are inexperienced it really helps. Sometimes it means that instead of 3 coaches with 30 kids, you have 2 groups of 2 coaches with 15 kids - suddenly you're able to coach, not just do crowd control. (It can take a bit of prodding sometimes to get the newer coaches to split like this :) ) So it is really worth chasing up parents as much as possible to get them to help. Especially in the younger groups, the parents are more likely to accept that as normal!

    And following on from that, what we're trying to do more of is get the new coaches to shadow the experienced coaches in more technical work. That's obvious, I know, but it usually means getting people to switch out of their regular age groups - the more experienced coaches all tend to move up to older kids, the newer coaches are often parents of younger kids and tend to stay with them.

    Putting on my adult hat - we've an ongoing problem with a lack of coaches in the distance runners group. Most of the time, people want to run themselves, not stand around and watch. And yes, the adults are more self-sufficient, but it would be good to have people watching to give advice, tell people to move up or down groups, adjust sessions when necessary etc.

    We're thinking of getting in a "professional" to come along to some sessions, maybe once or twice a month. Has anyone tried this? Good and bad points?

    We do pay someone for strength and conditioning coaching each month, so it would be the same kind of thing.

    (this comes back to the paid coaches idea. I think it's less problematic to get someone external, part-time like this than paying someone in the club)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,477 ✭✭✭youngrun


    Agree that coaching/coaches needs upskilling and specific event coaches also needed .
    AI should assist here- The Endurance and other network events are great . Maybe bring these on a roadshow and even at a more practical level , on the track training ?
    RDOs are needed to train and help the coaches as part of their job . More investment needed here in personnel. And in event specific development officers eg in throws /jumps .
    Might need more funding but teh structures have to be put in place at top leevl so that clubs have someone/where to go to upskill/help


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,896 ✭✭✭Sacksian


    re: no additional resources.

    I meant no additional financial resources, although I really mean not unlimited financial resources! As I think paying external coaches whether S&C or senior distance is likely to become more commonplace.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,240 ✭✭✭Wottle


    Getting more parents involved is a no brainer but should we just be trying to keep the kids in the sport or is there a way to keep these parents (now coaches with a couple of years under their belt) in the club instead of having to upskill the next batch of parents?

    The new coach serving an apprenticeship is a great idea from Raycun and one that I've fallen upon by luck, firstly with Jonny Fox (over 50 yrs in the game) and then most recently with Eddie McDonagh and Donal Hennigan.

    Are we getting the most out of our International/National - senior/master runners?
    Doesn't even have to be coaching, could be a monthly talk on a particular section. We're lucky to have a sub 4 miler hanging around our training as his daughter is in the club and he gave a talk about his time in the U.S on scholarship, the kids were engrossed.
    Being able to ask him questions as a coach is priceless and it's not just him. We are one of the biggest clubs in the country, so perhaps very fortunate to have a lot of top athletes about.

    Do neighbouring clubs help one another or is there a fear of athletes being poached? Are kids from all clubs being sent to development squads or does the same fear exist?
    Why not work alongside each other every now and again and learn from each other. I'd love to be able to teach one of my U14 girls to jump over 5m :)


    I think we need to do a better job at developing a more complete program that develops a pathway to get a kid from 7 into the senior ranks and have their love of athletics intact.

    Are we doing a good enough job developing our kids physically and emotionally?
    I see no issue with kids competing at 7 but lets make it a stress free environment for them. Have an ice cream van at the side of the track.
    Do we sit the kids down and talk about expectations, does a kid realise that if he's last, that he's not really last?
    It's very important that if a child isn't winning that they understand that that's ok, not to compare one's self to others but to their own improvement.


    What do kids need out of Athletics to help them to keep going?

    A social side - If you start them early enough, most of their friends will come from this group. I've had a group since they were 7, they live in each others houses, they go to discos together, they have a 600 day snapchat streak with each other :)

    Role models - Take the same group above, they're now training in the same group as some of the country's best U17 & 18 middle distance/distance runners. They see them going to Sardinia and Portugal most recently, of course they're thinking "I want some of that". They travelled over to the UK with them at the end of last year and the older girls were cheering them on as they raced.

    A purpose - What's it all for. Have they got clear goals?, do they understand the health benefits? Do they realise that kids in organised sports perform better in school. Can they see progression in their training or is it all just rolled into one.


    Post above is a bit all over the place, apologies.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,137 ✭✭✭El Caballo


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    An observation that I was going to make on the previous thread but will make on this one. We all have opinions, but to my mind some peoples opinions carry more weight than others.

    I know Myles and Sacksian, having chased them around muddy fields and usually not caught up. I know Ray to be actively involved in coaching the sport and being on the frontline of this discussion. Absolute respect for any opinions from you guys.

    Enjoy!

    I wholeheartedly disagree, not about the posters in question but I think this opinion stunts the scope for discussion and improvement. How good an idea is should be based on content rather than who wrote it. This is not the first time something like this has being brought up in threads about juvenile training and club coaching. The last thread we had, I was specifically called out as not being a juvenile coach to devalue my points, that doesn't seem to happen when I give advice or thoughts around here on anything else training related.

    If you want to talk about weight, here's a John Downes quote (13:29 5k and one of Irelands top coaches) on Athletics Ireland:

    "Anybody from outside who has good ideas or feels there’s an injustice are blacklisted and isolated straight away"

    Just because you happen to think that this person and that persons opinions carry more weight doesn't make it true for everyone else. Your post is directly intended to devalue others opinions who you don't agree with which stunts discussion. Content is much more important than author


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    El Caballo wrote: »
    I wholeheartedly disagree, not about the posters in question but I think this opinion stunts the scope for discussion and improvement. How good an idea is should be based on content rather than who wrote it. This is not the first time something like this has being brought up in threads about juvenile training and club coaching. The last thread we had, I was specifically called out as not being a juvenile coach to devalue my points, that doesn't seem to happen when I give advice or thoughts around here on anything else training related.

    If you want to talk about weight, here's a John Downes quote (13:29 5k and one of Irelands top coaches) on Athletics Ireland:

    "Anybody from outside who has good ideas or feels there’s an injustice are blacklisted and isolated straight away"

    Just because you happen to think that this person and that persons opinions carry more weight doesn't make it true for everyone else. Your post is directly intended to devalue others opinions who you don't agree with which stunts discussion. Content is much more important than author




    My view is that the opinions of those who have a broad experience of a particular topic carry more weight than someone who has a narrow experience of a particular topic. For me personally.

    I'm saying that without caveats. If you put caveats on it, then it changes things.

    If you disagree with me fine. That's your view, its not my view, I'm not saying either of us is right or wrong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,624 ✭✭✭Working class heroes


    El Caballo wrote: »
    I wholeheartedly disagree, not about the posters in question but I think this opinion stunts the scope for discussion and improvement. How good an idea is should be based on content rather than who wrote it. This is not the first time something like this has being brought up in threads about juvenile training and club coaching. The last thread we had, I was specifically called out as not being a juvenile coach to devalue my points, that doesn't seem to happen when I give advice or thoughts around here on anything else training related.

    If you want to talk about weight, here's a John Downes quote (13:29 5k and one of Irelands top coaches) on Athletics Ireland:

    "Anybody from outside who has good ideas or feels there’s an injustice are blacklisted and isolated straight away"

    Just because you happen to think that this person and that persons opinions carry more weight doesn't make it true for everyone else. Your post is directly intended to devalue others opinions who you don't agree with which stunts discussion. Content is much more important than author

    Agree with this. If people are not willing to consider all views/opinions but only the views/opinions of a certain few, what's the point? Might as well close the thread and take it to PM. But what the hell do I know, eh....

    Racism is now hiding behind the cloak of Community activism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    Agree with this. If people are not willing to consider all views/opinions but only the views/opinions of a certain few, what's the point? Might as well close the thread and take it to PM. But what the hell do I know, eh....

    That's fine, because nobody suggested any opinions should be dismissed, so we are all on the same wavelength.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,624 ✭✭✭Working class heroes


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    That's fine, because nobody suggested any opinions should be discounted, so we are all on the same wavelength.

    You said that opinions from certain posters carry more weight than others. By implication that's discounting opinions to me.

    Racism is now hiding behind the cloak of Community activism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    You said that opinions from certain posters carry more weight than others. By implication that's discounting opinions to me.

    Ok fine.

    Maybe I should have used the word dismissing instead of discounting.

    Edit, have changed my post to reflect this.

    In addition, I said opinions from some posters carry more weight with me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    I sometimes feel that AI are putting so much emphasis on juvenile athletics (partly because there's so much support/goodwill towards that) that athletics becomes a juvenile (or juvenile and masters) sport i.e. those graduating from junior ranks get neglected - the point at which specialist and professional coaching does really make a difference and when athletes need to be able to compete internationally. We're now importing senior athletes to cover over the cracks.

    on this question, I wonder is it something that could be addressed at the club or county level, through the use of part-time professionals?

    Just to take Derval O'Rourke as an example of someone who could provide specialist high-level coaching (and bear in mind, I have no special insight into her situation, this is all just off the top of my head and using her as a well-known athlete)

    I don't know if AAI could pay her as much as Munster rugby does. I'm guessing that it can't pay her that much for a hurdles-only, Cork-and-Limerick-only position. Maybe it could hire her for a hurdles coaching position but it would mean travelling all the time and she wouldn't like that. Maybe a local position would mean doing lots of things that don't relate closely to hurdles.

    But maybe she'd be open to coaching an hour a week, or an hour a month, for a club? Or a county board?

    There seems to be some cultural resistance to the idea of bringing in experts from outside the club, which is breaking down a bit for 'non-core' activities like strength and conditioning, but is maybe still strong for a core activity like event coaching?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,137 ✭✭✭El Caballo


    I think with coaching, there has to be a system of knowledge instilled in clubs that can be passed on to future coaches and generations within the club.

    The reason I say the standard of training within clubs is poor is because many habits of bad training ideals are passed on thus the inexperienced coach/parent does not know any better so the chain is never broken. I bet I could walk into 80+% of clubs juvenile sessions and they would have young kids running hard intervals every week of the year, maybe even twice a week, this is not a good approach to kids training, I'd go as far as to say it's not even healthy.

    Kids have an extremely sensitive and delicate nervous system and one sure fire way to mess with is by having them running hard interval workouts. Many will be familar with the term overtraining syndrome but fewer will probably be familar with the term CNS fatigue (they are both one in the same, CNS standing for central nervous system). Kids are essentially being challenged where they are extremely underdeveloped by running these hard intervals and which lets face are not really fun either.

    People hear of kids running 20mpw of aerobic running and there's an outcry of burning the kid out even though children have a great capacity for aerobic training, most active kids will outperform athletically fit adults in Vo2max tests. This is where I see the major issue with coaching in juvenile athletics, misinformation.

    We've had this conversation before so I want to make a point on what aerobic training is as many will say that kids need a mix or things like speed and form etc. Aerobic does not mean slow, you can teach good speed and form aerobically through aerobic intervals. These are low intensity, high volume and short distance intervals run fast(think Diagonals that you see many Kenyans do) and aerobic intervals are a great tool for a 400m runner during the winter too. This is what I mean by aerobic. It's a mix of endurance, speed and form. It's a longterm approach to development, is more fun and doesn't have all the negative effects on kids health that blazing hard intervals do.

    I don't think it's a case of AI needing to setup more and shorter courses but more that they need to get the right information out there in the first place. If all these clubs still have their juveniles running hard intervals everyweek, I don't think they have achieved it. They need to set a system in place what is healthy and good for kids and ingrain it into clubs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,921 ✭✭✭Kennyg71


    Just a thought from GAA experience, I know it's a different set up, but they have
    Games Promotion Officers, part paid by county board and part by club they liaise
    with schools and arrange coaching sessions with local schools near the clubs to encourage kids into the sport, these in a lot of cases are players finished with
    Playing careers. We also have outside s&c that comes in to work with players from
    U14 onwards, each player pays €2 each for session and he takes them in groups of 10-15 trough out the week. GPO's also encourage willing parents to get involved and send them on coaching courses, which County board pay for as they
    See the merit of the returns against the small financial investment. But it ultimately works because willing people give their time, energy and etusiasim for
    the return of seeing achievements, no matter how big or small of kids or adults they coach, but I think maybe like Most amateur sports, the blazers get the best while the talent and lost talent fend for themselves.

    Also when on a child protection course, a guy from basketball Ireland made the point that AI and local clubs, could do worse than show case the different disaplins, javelin, shot put etc, at local Jnr Park Runs, let them try high jump,long jump. And you have an audience of parents who drag them selves to the park
    early Sunday morning so they are all ready motivated to some degree.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,896 ✭✭✭Sacksian


    RayCun wrote: »
    on this question, I wonder is it something that could be addressed at the club or county level, through the use of part-time professionals?

    Just to take Derval O'Rourke as an example of someone who could provide specialist high-level coaching (and bear in mind, I have no special insight into her situation, this is all just off the top of my head and using her as a well-known athlete)

    I don't know if AAI could pay her as much as Munster rugby does. I'm guessing that it can't pay her that much for a hurdles-only, Cork-and-Limerick-only position. Maybe it could hire her for a hurdles coaching position but it would mean travelling all the time and she wouldn't like that. Maybe a local position would mean doing lots of things that don't relate closely to hurdles.

    But maybe she'd be open to coaching an hour a week, or an hour a month, for a club? Or a county board?

    There seems to be some cultural resistance to the idea of bringing in experts from outside the club, which is breaking down a bit for 'non-core' activities like strength and conditioning, but is maybe still strong for a core activity like event coaching?

    In an ideal world, Derval O’Rourke, Ciaran McDonagh, David Gillick, etc, etc would be permanently employed by AI to provide specialist coaching for talented juveniles and senior professionals, etc. But it’s a practical problem for AI - and these athletes - not an ideological one. As you say, Ray, how much would AI have to pay Derval O’Rourke for her to do it? How many hours a week could they afford or could she guarantee? What would the job actually be? Would it be more attractive for her than her current lifestyle? Others are already professional coaches - do they continue that alongside the AI gig or do they have to drop it?

    Equally, almost every juvenile coach is agreed that the emphasis should be on enjoyment (and it is for 99%) rather than serious training, on being introduced to a range of events, on skills acquisition and development, etc, etc. Despite that ideological consensus, the practical questions raised by Wottle recur.

    On all of these, I think the problems are more practical than theoretical, which is why I (personally, can’t speak for anyone else) am especially interested in the experiences of people actually dealing with these problems in clubs, rather than a theoretical ideal of what should happen.

    Which - I’m fairly sure - is what the quote by John Downes is actually about (it's in the context of AI's treatment of HP rather than juvenile coaching, but it applies to both). As a former national xc champion and someone who raced against the best in the UK and Europe before becoming a highly respected and successful coach, AI should listen to people like him who have put the hours in in their club and have a track record. It’s not dissimilar to complaints made by ex-professional footballers in the UK; that the expertise and experience of high achieving athletes is not sought by sporting bodies.

    Personally, I'd like to see more cooperation between clubs at every level, pooling resources for bringing in specialist/technical coaching or specialist sessions, especially for field and jumps, and for S&C. Wasn't there an idea at some point to establish superclubs, too? Not sure if I'd go that far, but there's merit in shared efforts.

    There is a fear of professionalism within clubs, because 99% of people involved are volunteers. So, do you pay one club coach and not the guy who's been there for the last 50 years but is happy to do it for free? Not the people who are ensuring there is a club there? It might be more acceptable to share a professional coach between a few clubs, who could do x of sessions/hours with each club a month or work with them programming sessions.

    So, while clubs are threatened by this, people outside the AI structures are paying for professional coaching, personal training, gym membership, etc, etc. Parents paying for lessons in other sports while club memberships are basically free and kids have to be turned away.

    Anyone want to go splits on a Jerry Kiernan?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,896 ✭✭✭Sacksian


    El Caballo wrote: »

    I'm not trying to have an argument with you, EC (or anyone else). I'm just more interested in what coaches are doing or struggling to do in their clubs, because it's something I can relate to. That's not a dig at you (or anyone else). I (personally) don't find the theoretical stuff of how things should be done in an ideal world that interesting because - for me - it ignores the real environment that clubs operate in and the constraints that exist which prevent them from applying those ideal principles.

    And in the same way that I think people who enjoy running should join clubs, I think people who have ideas about how clubs should operate should share them with their local clubs and see if they can be implemented. Again, that's not being smart - every club needs people to help, and they also need new ideas. And, in my experience, clubs want - and are receptive to - new ideas, as long as they have (or can find) the resources necessary to implement them.

    Apologies for any offence caused, I'll go back to silently nodding or shaking my head at the rest of the contributions to the thread!

    Edit - I appear to be talking to myself but I was replying to a post there!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,137 ✭✭✭El Caballo


    Sacksian wrote: »
    I'm not trying to have an argument with you (or anyone else). I'm just more interested in what coaches are doing or struggling to do in their clubs, because it's something I can relate to. That's not a dig at you (or anyone else). I (personally) don't find the theoretical stuff of how things should be done in an ideal world that interesting because - for me - it ignores the real environment that clubs operate in and the constraints that exist which prevent them from applying those ideal principles.

    And in the same way that I think people who enjoy running should join clubs, I think people who have ideas about how clubs should operate should share them with their local clubs and see if they can be implemented. Again, that's not being smart - every club needs people to help, and they also need new ideas. And, in my experience, clubs want - and are receptive to - new ideas, as long as they have (or can find) the resources necessary to implement them.

    I'll go back to silently nodding or shaking my head at the rest of the contributions to the thread.

    Ah no, I picked you up completely wrong which is why I deleted the post. My mistake and apologies. Don't let my eagerness to get frustrated stop you from posting on this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    El Caballo wrote: »
    The reason I say the standard of training within clubs is poor is because many habits of bad training ideals are passed on thus the inexperienced coach/parent does not know any better so the chain is never broken. I bet I could walk into 80+% of clubs juvenile sessions and they would have young kids running hard intervals every week of the year, maybe even twice a week, this is not a good approach to kids training, I'd go as far as to say it's not even healthy.

    This is something discussed on coaching courses - the stages in youth development and the importance of doing the appropriate training at different ages. I know it comes up in the level 1 course and the endurance course, and is probably a subject of discussion in the endurance track of the level 2. And also in some of the meetings at the endurance coaching network.

    Kids are not small adults, and shouldn't do the same training as adults. If that's the information you want the AAI to get out - they're doing it.

    I'm sure part of the reason they emphasise this so much is that a lot of new coaches/parents, come from an endurance background and need to be told!

    A training program of "run 20 aerobic miles per week, with some strides" is completely impractical for juvenile training though.

    1. Clubs don't have kids for that long. A lot of kids, particularly younger kids, are at training for maybe two hours a week. Warm-up, drills, cooldown, and general messing around means you have maybe 40 minutes per session for your core training. You could say, "okay, training today is 40 minutes easy running, with some strides", but that leads to more problems.

    2. Kids are not small adults. Yes, this is true physically but is also true psychologically. I can tell a bunch of adult runners to go out and run easy for an hour and throw in some strides, and do that 6 days of 7 - and most of them will do it. Kids won't. The ones who are capable of that (see below) might run easy for 5 minutes, maybe 10, and then they will be running steady, and then tempo, and as soon as they see something resembling a finish line it will be an all-out sprint. Kids like to run, and they like to run fast.

    3. Supervision. There are 20-30 kids in the u14/u15 group I coach. I like to bring them for an easy run of 2/3 miles. Some of the kids can run run that at 8, 9, 10 minute miles, whatever you like. Some of them can't. Some could maintain 11 minute miles for that distance, some 12, some can barely run that distance at all. I can't possibly watch them all as I run - if I stay at the back, the gang in front will speed up and be out of sight in minutes. If I keep the pace easy at the front, I can't see most of the group. It takes 3 coaches, minimum, to do this safely.
    And when can we do this? Weekday evenings in winter? Not a chance, visibility is too low, you'd need 6 coaches at least (or run 20 laps of a tiny loop). Weekday evenings in summer? Possibly. When do we usually do it? Sunday morning sessions, when we have light and a smaller group. (and judging by comments at coaching events, that's when most clubs have an easy run)

    4. Time and other events. Okay, maybe we can't do easy runs through the winter. But the days are getting brighter now. I could, in theory, spend every session doing an easy run with the kids. We still wouldn't get near 20 mpw, for most of them anyway, but we could do a fair bit. But then, when do they learn to sprint? When do they learn how to use starting blocks? What happens to high jump? Long jump? Throws? Yes, I could spend a lot more time at training sessions on developing an aerobic base, but that is all I would be doing.

    5. Remember everything we said about keeping kids engaged, providing variety, not specialising too early? If four club sessions a week were aerobic development, the kids would be bored out of their skulls and the ones who weren't interested in/good at distance running would drop out (probably closely followed by the ones who do like distance running, because ****, wouldn't you?) because we would be completely specialised. It would be like making every session a long jump session - not good for anyone, even the long jumpers!

    I completely agree, by the way, that kids should be doing lots of aerobic running. But it should be outside, and supplemental to, what goes on in club sessions. It is often pointed out that kids are doing more structured exercise than ever before, but also doing less unstructured exercise. The growth in structured exercise is not driving the shortage of unstructured exercise, it's a response to that shortage.

    As for running hard intervals, 400s... What makes an interval hard depends on a lot of things - the pace, the recovery, the number of intervals you do. I would have no problem getting kids to do intervals as long as those things were monitored. There is a massive difference between an adult session of 10 x 400 with 60 seconds recovery and a juvenile session of (for example) 200, 300, 400, 300, 200 at different paces and long recoveries.

    This is not just more practical from a coaching point of view (you control the start and end points, you have more control over the pace they run, you can keep all kids in sight, everyone is capable of completing the session but you can adapt it as you go to make it easier for some and harder for others) it is also something that a lot of kids enjoy. They like to race, some are better at longer distances than sprints, and (just like adults) they often like to end a session knowing that they've worked hard.

    I'm not suggesting a steady diet of intervals for kids, I like to see them doing more short distance work, but as one session, or part of one session, among many? Sure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    A quick thought experiment -

    What if I told you, El Caballo, that I had a great training plan for you.
    For the first year, you would do all easy and recovery miles, and twice a week you could throw in some strides.
    Second year, you would add some steady paced miles.
    Third year, we could start doing some race-paced work.

    Great for your aerobic development.

    No races at all until the end of the third year.

    Would you do it? How long do you think you'd stick it out?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,907 ✭✭✭woody1


    It is often pointed out that kids are doing more structured exercise than ever before, but also doing less unstructured exercise. The growth in structured exercise is not driving the shortage of unstructured exercise, it's a response to that shortage.

    without a shadow of a doubt i have 2 small boys and as a little athletics coach i see loads of kids of that age we go to swimming / karate / football and athletics weekly and see all the same kids .. but i know from my own experience and from asking other parents kids arent doing anything of their own accord they are brought to athletics football whatever but they dont get out and run around play ball etc during the week .. if theres a boom in athletics and other fixed regular classes its down to parents trying to get their kids off their asses ..

    coaching.. i did little athletics for 18 months 2 summers we ran it across a full summer and then the following year we ran it in 2 6 week blocks
    yeah it is effectively babysitting warm ups mostly games warm down but if it gets 10% of those attending to stay at it and go on to the older groups then i think its a success ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    I think more clubs need to start little athletics programmes. As said above, other sports are starting early, if you don't take kids until 8 or 9, a lot of them will have their week booked solid already


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,624 ✭✭✭Working class heroes


    RayCun wrote: »
    A quick thought experiment -

    What if I told you, El Caballo, that I had a great training plan for you.
    For the first year, you would do all easy and recovery miles, and twice a week you could throw in some strides.
    Second year, you would add some steady paced miles.
    Third year, we could start doing some race-paced work.

    Great for your aerobic development.

    No races at all until the end of the third year.

    Would you do it? How long do you think you'd stick it out?

    Good post, I can relate to this.
    I was training for a 24hr race and the continuous miles with no variation in pace and no races to look forward to in the short term got to me, I just couldn't handle it. had to change tack.

    Racism is now hiding behind the cloak of Community activism.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,137 ✭✭✭El Caballo


    Ray, I don't have much time now but I will get back to it later. You are completely misinterpreting what aerobic means, you are stuck in the mindframe of thinking it is easy or steady and slow. You proved this point by saying that intervals don't have to be hard depending on pace and recoveries etc which is exactly the point I am making when I talk about aerobic intervals. You picked up a point about mileage which was only used as an example by me. I'm not saying to have kids run a load of mileage or easy runs, the suggestion of diagonals and the likes in my post suggests otherwise, a lot of low intensity fast running that both sprinters and long distance runners use.

    I am not treating kids as mini adults either, quite the opposite in fact, my post clearly references the strengths and weaknesses of kids and is based around that. The training is much less specific than the stmystem of hard intervals used by most clubs out there, it develops basic speed and basic endurance and is as unspecific as you can get. Having children peak by using race intensity intervals is highly specific.

    Apoligies for the messiness of the post but I'm up the walls at the minute.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    I know, I'm simplifying by describing this as all long, easy runs. But these problems apply to any diet of high volume, low intensity training. There isn't time for high volume, it is hard to manage in groups of mixed ability, it doesn't interest all kids, and we need to do other training too.

    I don't think clubs should be doing all hard intervals either, and once we start agreeing that "yes, kids can do 400s if... " I think we're getting closer to what actually happens in a lot of clubs.

    If you were to try putting this into practice, maybe you'd still have lots of large points of difference to what other clubs are doing, maybe the parts where you converge would be relatively minor.

    So try it!

    Really, I mean it! I'm not suggesting this in a "Ha ha, yeah, try that and you'll find out it's not so easy!" way. I mean try it. Adapt as necessary to fit the limitations you are working with, change those limits while you can, keep your coaching principles in mind and use those as a guide.

    If it works, I guarantee people will want to know what you're doing and will start copying you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,907 ✭✭✭woody1


    RayCun wrote: »
    I think more clubs need to start little athletics programmes. As said above, other sports are starting early, if you don't take kids until 8 or 9, a lot of them will have their week booked solid already

    needs a lot of coaches 5-7 year olds are hard to handle get bored easy get teary easily if turns are skipped etc
    i would say 1 coach for every 8 kids max

    youl get a few parents to do the course but what ive seen is that as the kids move up mum or dad want to move up too so you need a constant stream of people

    the loo... cant be letting 5-7 year olds wander off to the clubhouse on their own so someone needs to go with them more bodies needed

    sessions need to be thought out before hand even if its just in your head just to be clear on whats going to happen if you leave them idle for 2 seconds theres madness

    whatever equipment needs to be out for at least the first 10 minutes should be out beforehand again small kids waiting round standing still is not good
    ( ive had to warm up 50 odd small ones on my own whilst waiting for other coaches to arrive .. ive learned the hard way :D )

    i said in the last post i think we ran it almost across the school year maybe end october to easter and it was too long we went indoors in the winter things got very repetitive kids got bored the next summer we ran 2 blocks of 6 weeks and we limited the numbers of kids in line with how many coaches we had worked far better

    junior parkrun is another great idea if you can get a club to give a hand in getting it going


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    Child protection guidelines for that age are 1:8 anyway :)

    Going back to the older kids, here's just an example, my own kid, about to turn 14.

    What do the AAI guidelines say? That at 14, he should be doing a range of events (and other sports), and that he's training now to peak in about 10 years time.

    I agree with that.

    He doesn't.

    Ten years is an unimaginably long time away for him. Finished school, finished college, could be living somewhere else :(

    He used to do all of the events, but now he's mainly a distance runner because he's much better at that than at the other events. He'll do sprint training, hurdle drills, general conditioning because he sees how they benefit distance running. No interest in continuing jumps or throws, because he's not going to compete in them, because he doesn't do well in them.

    He is going to compete in track championships and cross country, because he wants to. And the closer we get to those races, the more he will want to do specific training for them. Not because I am focused on getting a certain number of medals at the championships, but because he wants to race and he wants to do well when he races.

    If he doesn't race, he'll get bored and quit.

    If he doesn't do race-specific training, if all his training is aimed at building a base that will pay off eventually, he will get discouraged and quit.

    And he is, in many ways, the ideal candidate for a programme based on aerobic development (which is a lot of his training). All the other kids in his age group? They are less interested in middle distance, and want to do more of different kinds of training. Or are at training less often. Or are training at a different standard, and we have to figure out how to make the session work for them too.

    (and some of them have the same motivation issues too, of course. They want to compete, and they want to do well when they compete, so we need to prepare them for competition. Some of them need more encouragement to compete, but if they stop competing the next thing that happens is they stop training altogether.)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,137 ✭✭✭El Caballo


    RayCun wrote: »
    Child protection guidelines for that age are 1:8 anyway :)

    Going back to the older kids, here's just an example, my own kid, about to turn 14.

    What do the AAI guidelines say? That at 14, he should be doing a range of events (and other sports), and that he's training now to peak in about 10 years time.

    I agree with that.

    He doesn't.

    Ten years is an unimaginably long time away for him. Finished school, finished college, could be living somewhere else :(

    He used to do all of the events, but now he's mainly a distance runner because he's much better at that than at the other events. He'll do sprint training, hurdle drills, general conditioning because he sees how they benefit distance running. No interest in continuing jumps or throws, because he's not going to compete in them, because he doesn't do well in them.

    He is going to compete in track championships and cross country, because he wants to. And the closer we get to those races, the more he will want to do specific training for them. Not because I am focused on getting a certain number of medals at the championships, but because he wants to race and he wants to do well when he races.

    If he doesn't race, he'll get bored and quit.

    If he doesn't do race-specific training, if all his training is aimed at building a base that will pay off eventually, he will get discouraged and quit.

    And he is, in many ways, the ideal candidate for a programme based on aerobic development (which is a lot of his training). All the other kids in his age group? They are less interested in middle distance, and want to do more of different kinds of training. Or are at training less often. Or are training at a different standard, and we have to figure out how to make the session work for them too.

    (and some of them have the same motivation issues too, of course. They want to compete, and they want to do well when they compete, so we need to prepare them for competition. Some of them need more encouragement to compete, but if they stop competing the next thing that happens is they stop training altogether.)


    I really don't think our differences of opinion are that big tbh. Just the implementation is where we are getting stuck. I don't see an issue with a 14 year old having a few interval training sessions, my issue lies with having specifically 8-12 year olds doing a good amount of hard intervals and pretty much all kids under the age of 15 doing hard intervals every week all year round. The amount of hard intervals should be age appropriate and never year round, a sprinkling here and there to mix it up. The vast majority of clubs are not doing this and running hard intervals all the time is very monotonous too.

    I am not talking about strict base training with no racing or speedwork like you keep saying, I don't know how many more times I have to say this but you keep going back to it. Let the kids blow it out occasionally in a race or training, less often for the very young kids and more so as they get older, mix it up with variety. My ideas are not based around creating long distance runners but in creating healthy young individuals who have the capacity to built for most events for the times when a decision comes to specialise. A balance has to be struck somewhere between different sessions with it shifting slightly as the kids get older.

    You are contradicting yourself, you called me out saying that my ideas were too specific (which they weren't) and now you are saying kids need specifity. You disagreed that AI were implenting a poor system of training but now you are saying that what's good for keeping kids in the sport goes against that, my question on that is where is the breakdown between juveniles/coaches and AI guidelines? There has to be one somewhere judging by your last post. What is the point of teaching the coaches one thing if it cannot be implemented successfully at grassroots level? Is this not a problem within club coaching?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,137 ✭✭✭El Caballo


    For anyone interested and those who might think my thoughts are out there and against the grain.

    https://www.brianmac.co.uk/mobile//articles/scni4a3.htm


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    At this stage, I'm mainly wondering why you are so sure what the vast majority of clubs are doing week in and out.

    Because we do seem to agree that you need aerobic base training, that you do intervals sometimes, that you need variety and interest and development of different aspects of young athletes. We do that, as much as possible, and I don't think we're doing anything particularly different.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    RayCun wrote: »
    I think more clubs need to start little athletics programmes. As said above, other sports are starting early, if you don't take kids until 8 or 9, a lot of them will have their week booked solid already

    Its an interesting challenge.

    THe challenge in particular with running is that...

    say compared to hurling. At 8/9 years old, you are learning the lift, the handpass, hitting it out of your hand, the catch etc etc etc...

    There is a range of skills there.

    For running - there isn't that range of skills to teach an 8 year old. Correct me if I'm wrong, I don't see it.

    Its a stamina game.

    So the challenge is - how to create drills that will bring variety, that will keep kids interested, and importantly for me, will put them in competitive situations occasionally.

    Obviously for 'athletics' its different. But for me, there is no real synergy between javelin or shot and running a lap around a track. That might be sacrilege to some here. Having said that, there are plenty of kids in GAA for example who play both football and hurling, but are only really interested in one of the two.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    Additional point - they must be doing something right in Mullingar, I see they cleaned up at the schools cross country. I've seen them bring monster teams to athletics meets recently, and obviously they have some very talented young athletes, JackO'Leary etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    For running - there isn't that range of skills to teach an 8 year old. Correct me if I'm wrong, I don't see it.

    Its a stamina game.

    So the challenge is - how to create drills that will bring variety, that will keep kids interested, and importantly for me, will put them in competitive situations occasionally.

    It isn't stamina you're training at that age though, it's balance, agility, and speed.

    There are a lot of games you can play to work on those (which are fairly competitive), as well as races (which could be straight sprint races, or obstacle courses that bring in a few different skills)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,864 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    RayCun wrote: »
    I think more clubs need to start little athletics programmes. As said above, other sports are starting early, if you don't take kids until 8 or 9, a lot of them will have their week booked solid already


    And there you go, the best post here.

    All other sports are doing this. Before it used to be GAA and soccer only. Rugby has caught on to this, now they don't have 4 year olds tackling head first or anything, just fun games.

    The same with the hockey club out by us. My daughter six is playing and they accepted my 4 year old into the nursey. He won't start school till September, but now plays GAA and hockey. This is the second year of the nursey.

    He is doing some basic skills, but its mainly just fun games they are playing that any running club could replicate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    And there you go, the best post here.

    All other sports are doing this. Before it used to be GAA and soccer only. Rugby has caught on to this, now they don't have 4 year olds tackling head first or anything, just fun games.

    The same with the hockey club out by us. My daughter six is playing and they accepted my 4 year old into the nursey. He won't start school till September, but now plays GAA and hockey. This is the second year of the nursey.

    He is doing some basic skills, but its mainly just fun games they are playing that any running club could replicate.

    On the one hand I think clubs have a great opportunity to do this because masters athletics is now so popular, and there is a natural transition if mam and dad are running for a club for the kids to come along too.

    On the other hand, I wouldn't take a little athletics programme lightly. The commitment is huge, you need a lot of bodies to make it work.

    Athletics clubs usually don't have either the numbers or the facilities that a GAA club might have.

    (And I know I'm arguing against myself here).

    But overall, the point is well made. Most kids that are sporty are involved in 2 or 3 sports by the time they are eight. They (and their parents in terms of logistics) wont have the capacity to take something new on when they are twelve.

    I think clubs need to be innovative in this regard.

    A great option for me is to tie in with the Junior Parkruns. (I feel like a broken record on that one).

    Another is that a lot of the clubs shut down in the summer - and as we all know, there is nothing that beats being on a running track on a warm summer evening.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,864 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    On the one hand I think clubs have a great opportunity to do this because masters athletics is now so popular, and there is a natural transition if mam and dad are running for a club for the kids to come along too.

    On the other hand, I wouldn't take a little athletics programme lightly. The commitment is huge, you need a lot of bodies to make it work.

    Athletics clubs usually don't have either the numbers or the facilities that a GAA club might have.

    (And I know I'm arguing against myself here).

    But overall, the point is well made. Most kids that are sporty are involved in 2 or 3 sports by the time they are eight. They (and their parents in terms of logistics) wont have the capacity to take something new on when they are twelve.

    I think clubs need to be innovative in this regard.

    A great option for me is to tie in with the Junior Parkruns. (I feel like a broken record on that one).

    Another is that a lot of the clubs shut down in the summer - and as we all know, there is nothing that beats being on a running track on a warm summer evening.


    In fairness our Hockey club is small. We have 2 coaches for 40 kids between 4-6 years old.

    For the GAA club, yeah its a bigger structure, the girls nursey has about 50 kids and 8 coaches, as girls are easy.

    The boys have about 12 coaches for about 60 kids, as boys are a bit more crazy.

    But the coaches are the parents that brings the kids at the GAA club


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    In fairness our Hockey club is small. We have 2 coaches for 40 kids between 4-6 years old.

    For the GAA club, yeah its a bigger structure, the girls nursey has about 50 kids and 8 coaches, as girls are easy.

    The boys have about 12 coaches for about 60 kids, as boys are a big more crazy.

    But the coaches are the parents that brings the kids at the GAA club

    That's a fairly tight ratio.

    The one thing I'd be saying to you though is, 2 mentors.....40 kids.....that's 40 parents that could be helping out but aren't.

    I would feel for athletics it would need to be 1 adult to 10 kids at most, especially at age 8 and under.....obviously track being different to field also.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,825 ✭✭✭IvoryTower


    if a kid has to go to the toilet thats 1 adult with 39 kids

    edit: i dont think thats even legal?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    IvoryTower wrote: »
    if a kid has to go to the toilet thats 1 adult with 39 kids

    edit: i dont think thats even legal?!

    It isn't!

    At that age the child protection guidelines say it has to be one adult per 8 kids. One kid needs to go to the toilet, another kid falls and starts crying, and then...?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,825 ✭✭✭IvoryTower


    and also there has to be a women to bring females to the toilet and a man cant be left with girls so there has to be a women there to stay with the girls, you're talking 4 adults including 2 females for a group up 32 kids


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    RayCun wrote: »
    It isn't stamina you're training at that age though, it's balance, agility, and speed.

    There are a lot of games you can play to work on those (which are fairly competitive), as well as races (which could be straight sprint races, or obstacle courses that bring in a few different skills)

    What are the drills as a matter of interest?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    One other issue Ray......a lot of clubs use a local park for training purposes.

    Ie they have a clubhouse, but no facilities?

    Can athletics clubs do that with kids?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,307 ✭✭✭ariana`


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    That's a fairly tight ratio.

    The one thing I'd be saying to you though is, 2 mentors.....40 kids.....that's 40 parents that could be helping out but aren't.

    I would feel for athletics it would need to be 1 adult to 10 kids at most, especially at age 8 and under.....obviously track being different to field also.

    The problem for parents if when they have more than 1 child. So say for example a family where there is an 9, 7 and 5 year olds. Where does the parent help out. One might prefer to go between the different age groups that the kids are in, particularly where younger kids are involved.

    As a parent i prefer to bring them to the toilet myself or if they fall/get hurt i like to be nearby & available. And in some cases, there will be a baby/toddler/pre-school siblings, if the parent is helping out a babysitter is required if the 2nd parent isn't available. It's not always possible for parents to help even if they have the interest/ability.

    In my case my eldest son started football at 4, rugby at 5 and hurling at 6. He also does swimming, scouts... He falls into the bracket now of having no more room his schedule. My husband does help out with GAA but it is an additional strain for the reasons outlined above. While my husband is coaching U8, i have to supervise the 4 yr old in that age-group and I have to mind my very active under 2 year old at the side of the pitch in all sorts of weather conditions :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,864 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    IvoryTower wrote: »
    if a kid has to go to the toilet thats 1 adult with 39 kids

    edit: i dont think thats even legal?!


    The parent brings the kid to the toilet. They don't just bring the kids and walk away.
    The coaches are happy with the system. The parents are there for the whole session and attend to the kids when they are needed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,864 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    RayCun wrote: »
    It isn't!

    At that age the child protection guidelines say it has to be one adult per 8 kids. One kid needs to go to the toilet, another kid falls and starts crying, and then...?


    Parents are there all the time to deal with stuff like that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,307 ✭✭✭ariana`


    Parents are there all the time to deal with stuff like that.

    I was watching my son's karate class once and a little 4 yr old girl needed the toilet and no parent there, just 2 male instructors. They looked around clueless and eventually asked me to bring her. I felt quite uncomfortable about the situation but i did bring her. Thought it was strange to leave a just turned 4 year old there on her own :(

    But i do agree for the most part parents are there and a lot of the time they prefer to do that stuff themselves, toilet runs and dealing with an upset/hurt child.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,864 ✭✭✭✭average_runner


    ariana` wrote: »
    I was watching my son's karate class once and a little 4 yr old girl needed the toilet and no parent there, just 2 male instructors. They looked around clueless and eventually asked me to bring her. I felt quite uncomfortable about the situation but i did bring her. Thought it was strange to leave a just turned 4 year old there on her own :(

    But i do agree for the most part parents are there and a lot of the time they prefer to do that stuff themselves, toilet runs and dealing with an upset/hurt child.


    When they step into the 6-8 year old group its a coach per 6 kids. Parents are asked to ref some matches, which should be fun, can't wait.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    What are the drills as a matter of interest?

    You would only do 'drills ' with older kids, with the younger ones it could be as simple as running in circles and clapping, jumping, touching the ground, on cue.

    The athletics leader course is basically a load of games to play. We've also had some primary school teachers involved, great for ideas


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,704 ✭✭✭✭RayCun


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    One other issue Ray......a lot of clubs use a local park for training purposes.

    Ie they have a clubhouse, but no facilities?

    Can athletics clubs do that with kids?

    Yes, and loads do. The kids who need to go to the toilet all the time indoors don't need to go when they discover there are no toilets! (But you do have to emphasise that to parents )

    And you have to consider how bright it will be, are there places kids could go that are out of sight, are there roads nearby, how are parents dropping off and collecting, what happens if the weather turns... all of that in combination with the age of the kids


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,737 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    ariana` wrote: »
    The problem for parents if when they have more than 1 child. So say for example a family where there is an 9, 7 and 5 year olds. Where does the parent help out. One might prefer to go between the different age groups that the kids are in, particularly where younger kids are involved.

    As a parent i prefer to bring them to the toilet myself or if they fall/get hurt i like to be nearby & available. And in some cases, there will be a baby/toddler/pre-school siblings, if the parent is helping out a babysitter is required if the 2nd parent isn't available. It's not always possible for parents to help even if they have the interest/ability.

    In my case my eldest son started football at 4, rugby at 5 and hurling at 6. He also does swimming, scouts... He falls into the bracket now of having no more room his schedule. My husband does help out with GAA but it is an additional strain for the reasons outlined above. While my husband is coaching U8, i have to supervise the 4 yr old in that age-group and I have to mind my very active under 2 year old at the side of the pitch in all sorts of weather conditions :rolleyes:
    I understand the point Ariana. However in a group of 40 parents, I would guess no more than half are in a position where neither parent can help out. A minority of families have more than two kids. Really the situation you described only applies where there are three kids or more. It depends on the attitude of the parent really, a lot will see the sports drop off as an opportunity for a chat or a coffee. As mentioned, any juvenile training is simply made up of 'parents helping out' and nothing else. Nobody is being paid for it, as such nobody should take it for grAnted that other parents will do all the work. Just because a parent has never done the sport themselves doesn't mean they can't help.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement