Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Burn "stream" crossing (best method)

  • 17-12-2016 11:59pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 831 ✭✭✭


    Fields on each side of a burn at the minute im
    Crossing by driving through it.
    Going to bridge it someway.
    Neighbour used 2 1/2 foot concrete and it was unable to carry water 1 day (3 years ago)
    So I'll need a 3 foot pipe.
    Plastic is mad price
    Not sure of concrete pipe price yet or do I just shutter a bridge.
    Someone will have done this recently.
    Ideas welcome


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,611 ✭✭✭Mooooo


    satstheway wrote: »
    Fields on each side of a burn.
    Crossing by driving through it.
    Going to bridge it someway.
    Neighbour used 2 1/2 foot concrete and it was unable to carry water 1 day (3 years ago)
    So I'll need a 3 foot pipe.
    Plastic is mad price
    Not sure of concrete pipe price yet or do I just shutter a bridge.
    Someone will have done this recently.
    Ideas welcome

    We crossed a stream but put in 4 big concrete pipe and poured concrete over them. We widened it at that point to fit in the 4th one. If the banks are suitable would a concrete slab be better maybe? May have to pour walls either side for it tho


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,345 ✭✭✭Grueller


    Did this with 3 foot pipes and gravel filling over it. Put in 32' of pipe and covered it in filling. By the time the filling made the angle of repose on either side and was tracked in I got a 17' roadway. I will stick up a pic for you next time I am out there as it's on the out farm.
    Condren concrete in Tullamore provided the pipes. 4 pipes 8' long cost circa €1000 for seconds (just not airtight but perfect otherwise) delivered to Wexford.
    I had the filling from a demolition job for free. €450 for the digger.
    I priced bridges steel and concrete and box culverts. This was a mile the cheapest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 831 ✭✭✭satstheway


    Grueller wrote: »
    Did this with 3 foot pipes and gravel filling over it. Put in 32' of pipe and covered it in filling. By the time the filling made the angle of repose on either side and was tracked in I got a 17' roadway. I will stick up a pic for you next time I am out there as it's on the out farm.
    Condren concrete in Tullamore provided the pipes. 4 pipes 8' long cost circa €1000 for seconds (just not airtight but perfect otherwise) delivered to Wexford.
    I had the filling from a demolition job for free. €450 for the digger.
    I priced bridges steel and concrete and box culverts. This was a mile the cheapest.

    Must price seconds up my way.
    It must be very deep if you have 5' repose on each side.

    Were they the normal concrete pipes or the high grade type the construction company's use?

    If they were the high grade type would a 6 ton digger lift them into place?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,345 ✭✭✭Grueller


    satstheway wrote: »
    Must price seconds up my way.
    It must be very deep if you have 5' repose on each side.

    Were they the normal concrete pipes or the high grade type the construction company's use?

    If they were the high grade type would a 6 ton digger lift them into place?

    14' to the bottom of the gripe/stream from the level of the field.
    They were the high grade reinforced concrete ones used by construction companies.
    I used a 14 ton digger but had the jib extended a long way out due to the depth. I don't think that a 6 ton would have lifted them though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,980 ✭✭✭Genghis Cant


    There's legislation governing when you can and can't carry out instream works. Make sure you don't fall foul of this.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,433 ✭✭✭darragh_haven


    Get an old tipper lorry body. Neighbour has it done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 831 ✭✭✭satstheway


    Get an old tipper lorry body. Neighbour has it done.

    Did he tip it upside down and concrete over or did he just drive through body. Needs to be strong for wagon and tanker


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 831 ✭✭✭satstheway


    There's legislation governing when you can and can't carry out instream works. Make sure you don't fall foul of this.

    Neighbour few fields up and less water has piped his completely over the years.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,433 ✭✭✭darragh_haven


    satstheway wrote: »
    Did he tip it upside down and concrete over or did he just drive through body. Needs to be strong for wagon and tanker

    He has one of each now. The original one, was where he drove through the body. The most weight he'd have put through it was a 135.
    The one done a few years ago eas upside down and concreted over.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 165 ✭✭parishsavings


    He has one of each now. The original one, was where he drove through the body. The most weight he'd have put through it was a 135.
    The one done a few years ago eas upside down and concreted over.

    Any pics? Sounds like a great idea


  • Advertisement
Advertisement