Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Timber frame v block work wide cavity.

  • 01-12-2016 7:12pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 263 ✭✭


    Planning to build soon and have to make up my mind on the type of construction. I am considering timber frame twin wall with cellulose insulation or block with wide cavity. Where I live 90% build in block. Very hard to make a decision both have advantages and disadvantages.

    I have looked for threads on timber frame but they all appear to be old.

    Thoughts on the above would be appreciated.


Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,354 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Weigh up what you want with regards to BER and air tightness.
    Then evaluate costs involved in both methods.

    In a detached one off Build I would be happy with either method as long as costs and my expected outcome are met.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 602 ✭✭✭bertie 56


    lolliedog wrote: »
    Planning to build soon and have to make up my mind on the type of construction. I am considering timber frame twin wall with cellulose insulation or block with wide cavity. Where I live 90% build in block. Very hard to make a decision both have advantages and disadvantages.

    I have looked for threads on timber frame but they all appear to be old.

    Thoughts on the above would be appreciated.



    Ask yourself this simple question :

    Who in the world, is still using cavity walls nowadays ???

    ... You'll have the answer ;) ...





    Happy timber build ! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 748 ✭✭✭Johnnyhpipe


    In theory - both fine.

    In reality - Based on personal experiences as a structural engineer - we don't have the timber frame construction expertise in this country when compared to Canada/US.

    Of course there are plenty of specialist timber frame companies etc etc etc etc but the things I've seen when it comes to the guys on the ground...If I ever build my own house it certainly won't be timber frame.

    I know many here will disagree.... so take your own view on it.

    My friend just moved out of her rented timber frame semi-d house - sick of listening to the neighbours telly! Granted it was a celtic tiger era thrown together house...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 263 ✭✭lolliedog


    bertie 56 wrote: »
    Ask yourself this simple question :

    Who in the world, is still using cavity walls nowadays ???

    ... You'll have the answer




    Happy timber build ! :D

    Still very popular in Ireland.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,043 ✭✭✭me_right_one


    I think this timber frame craze is insane! Concrete block is the only way IMO.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,888 ✭✭✭✭Calahonda52


    lolliedog wrote: »
    ...Very hard to make a decision both have advantages and disadvantages.

    Thoughts on the above would be appreciated.

    Your thoughts on the above would be appreciated also.

    “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 263 ✭✭lolliedog


    Your thoughts on the above would be appreciated also.
    My views!!

    Timber frame
    Advantages

    Precision factory controlled
    Guaranteed airtightness
    Minimising Cold bridges easier
    Speed of construction
    Ease of programming
    Ease of running sevices

    Disadvantages

    No thermal mass
    Sound transmission
    Not conducive to conc floors
    Hanging stuff/fixing to walls
    Some insurance companies view as non standard const.

    Block built advantages

    Thermal mass
    Concrete floors to reduce sound transmission
    No issue with fixing to Walls
    Less damages as a result of flooding
    Builders have a better understanding
    Insurance companies view as standard const
    Perception

    Disadvantages

    Workmanship varies
    Airtightnees can be difficult
    Programming more difficult
    Insulation often poorly fitted
    Possibly slower
    Builders not very clear on cold bridge detailing

    There are just some issue that spring to mind, I'm sure I will think of more.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,354 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    lolliedog wrote: »
    My views!!

    Timber frame
    Advantages

    Precision factory controlled
    Guaranteed airtightness
    Minimising Cold bridges easier
    Speed of construction
    Ease of programming
    Ease of running sevices

    Disadvantages

    No thermal mass
    Sound transmission
    Not conducive to conc floors
    Hanging stuff/fixing to walls
    Some insurance companies view as non standard const.

    Block built advantages

    Thermal mass
    Concrete floors to reduce sound transmission
    No issue with fixing to Walls
    Less damages as a result of flooding
    Builders have a better understanding
    Insurance companies view as standard const
    Perception

    Disadvantages

    Workmanship varies
    Airtightnees can be difficult
    Programming more difficult
    Insulation often poorly fitted
    Possibly slower
    Builders not very clear on cold bridge detailing

    There are just some issue that spring to mind, I'm sure I will think of more.

    Some of those are incorrect.
    Insurance for example see timber frame as standard build as long as there's a brick or block outer skin.

    Hanging items on wall is simple enough once you use the correct fixings or fix in the right place, exactly like a block house.
    Sound transmission should be a non issue in a one off build. It's only when you are terraced in a timber frame that increased attention to detail with regards sound transmission needs to be perfect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 263 ✭✭lolliedog


    kceire wrote: »
    Some of those are incorrect.
    Insurance for example see timber frame as standard build as long as there's a brick or block outer skin.

    Hanging items on wall is simple enough once you use the correct fixings or fix in the right place, exactly like a block house.
    Sound transmission should be a non issue in a one off build. It's only when you are terraced in a timber frame that increased attention to detail with regards sound transmission needs to be perfect.

    Having lived in various houses with timber upper floors and concrete and now with 4 young boys there is no comparison. Day and night.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,354 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    lolliedog wrote: »
    Having lived in various houses with timber upper floors and concrete and now with 4 young boys there is no comparison. Day and night.

    Hang on, this is a different set up again.
    Are you talking about concrete intermediate floors also? If so, then timber frame it completely out of the question and to b hinets, not an option.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 263 ✭✭lolliedog


    kceire wrote: »
    Hang on, this is a different set up again.
    Are you talking about concrete intermediate floors also? If so, then timber frame it completely out of the question and to b hinets, not an option.

    Not sure what you mean, just to clarify,

    I lived in houses with timber upper floors and I lived in houses with concrete upper floors.

    The concrete upper floors were excellent in reducing noise transmission..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,504 ✭✭✭BarneyMc


    bertie 56 wrote: »
    Ask yourself this simple question :

    Who in the world, is still using cavity walls nowadays ???

    ... You'll have the answer ;) ...





    Happy timber build ! :D

    Lots.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,354 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    lolliedog wrote: »
    Not sure what you mean, just to clarify,

    I lived in houses with timber upper floors and I lived in houses with concrete upper floors.

    The concrete upper floors were excellent in reducing noise transmission..

    Are you talking noise from an upstairs bedroom to downstairs?
    Concrete floors will require concrete/block external walls so that rules out any form of timber frame.

    Google "precast concrete floors" or hollow core slabs in houses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,688 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Timber frame can be designed for concrete screed first floor which if used with right floor finishes can be a very reasonable solution in terms of noise reduction etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 263 ✭✭lolliedog


    kceire wrote: »
    Are you talking noise from an upstairs bedroom to downstairs?
    Concrete floors will require concrete/block external walls so that rules out any form of timber frame.

    Google "precast concrete floors" or hollow core slabs in houses.

    Yes,

    I have built twice before both block built, one had concrete upper floors the other had timber upper floors.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,725 ✭✭✭Metric Tensor


    Although there are always specifics and small but important variations I think for the uninitiated lolliedog's quick list is reasonable.

    Of course there will always be differences - every build is bespoke - but in broad strokes I think a fair picture has been painted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,888 ✭✭✭✭Calahonda52


    This thread also shows that its not as simple as just T/F vs B/B.
    The devil is in the detail.

    It is also important to specify the internal walls construction in a B/B as well as the internal finish on external walls in a B/B: it they are drylined for a service cavity then the thermal mass point is moot.

    “I can’t pay my staff or mortgage with instagram likes”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 263 ✭✭lolliedog


    This thread also shows that its not as simple as just T/F vs B/B.
    The devil is in the detail.

    It is also important to specify the internal walls construction in a B/B as well as the internal finish on external walls in a B/B: it they are drylined for a service cavity then the thermal mass point is moot.

    Agreed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,175 ✭✭✭kieran.


    lolliedog wrote: »
    My views!!

    Timber frame
    Advantages

    Guaranteed airtightness.

    I wouldn't be so sure on this point. With the closed panel systems being supplied by the main players in the market, i believe there is a over reliance on silicone sealants to air tight joints between external panel etc.. Given timbers natural tendency to shrink I can't help wondering how the performance of these methods will deteriorate of the lifespan of the building.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 748 ✭✭✭Johnnyhpipe


    mickdw wrote: »
    Timber frame can be designed for concrete screed first floor which if used with right floor finishes can be a very reasonable solution in terms of noise reduction etc.

    In terms of loadings - yes. Differential thermal movements between concrete and timber in this case are a disaster.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,688 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    How so?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,011 ✭✭✭ht9zni1gs28crp


    bertie 56 wrote: »
    Ask yourself this simple question :

    Who in the world, is still using cavity walls nowadays ???

    ... You'll have the answer ;) ...





    Happy timber build ! :D

    Quite a wide sweeping misinformed statement :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 602 ✭✭✭bertie 56


    Quite a wide sweeping misinformed statement :D


    I'll be happy to read your list of countries where the cavity wall technique is the main technique used to build houses ...

    And for the craic, you can make the same list with TF ...

    ;)

    Looking forward to hear from you ...:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,011 ✭✭✭ht9zni1gs28crp


    bertie 56 wrote: »
    I'll be happy to read your list of countries where the cavity wall technique is the main technique used to build houses ...

    And for the craic, you can make the same list with TF ...

    ;)

    Looking forward to hear from you ...:D

    Ill get the list as soon as you produce your argument propping up list alongside the country v climate v build technique comparison.

    I too look forward to seeing your evidence to back up that sweeping statement.


  • Subscribers Posts: 42,171 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    bertie 56 wrote: »
    I'll be happy to read your list of countries where the cavity wall technique is the main technique used to build houses ...

    And for the craic, you can make the same list with TF ...

    ;)

    Looking forward to hear from you ...:D

    the vast majority of Timber frame construction systems in countries with a similar climate to ireland use a cavity wall system. Single skin systems have been shown to be very problematic in humid wet climates like ours.

    http://www.housing.gov.ie/sites/default/files/migrated-files/en/Publications/DevelopmentandHousing/BuildingStandards/FileDownLoad,1679,en.pdf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,725 ✭✭✭Metric Tensor


    The number of countries/regions across the world that have the level of wind driven rain and temperate maritime climate experienced in Ireland are limited. Add into that the dispersed low-rise nature of Irish dwellings and the number of similar regions is further reduced.

    Off hand I can think of UK, NZ, Tasmania, Parts of Argentina.

    Most of us are familiar with the UK style and I can't comment on the building stock of the other regions but I think for our climate and dwelling style cavity wall construction (be it full masonry or timber frame) has been proven itself effective.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,050 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    lolliedog wrote: »
    Having lived in various houses with timber upper floors and concrete and now with 4 young boys there is no comparison. Day and night.
    Our timber fram has a sand/cement screeded floating floor and I can't say noise from my 4 year old son and pals has been an issue. We have a concrete ground floor (over basement) so have a basis for a comparison and I can't say I've noticed sound from 1st floor to ground floor being worse than ground floor to basement, but I expect if I measured it it would be worse, just not perceptibly so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,050 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    bertie 56 wrote: »
    I'll be happy to read your list of countries where the cavity wall technique is the main technique used to build houses ...
    Not a country but in wind zone 4 here in Germany it is common enough to build like that (but nowhere else). I'd say all of Ireland is as windy as wind zone 4 here though ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 602 ✭✭✭bertie 56


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    the vast majority of Timber frame construction systems in countries with a similar climate to ireland use a cavity wall system. Single skin systems have been shown to be very problematic in humid wet climates like ours.

    http://www.housing.gov.ie/sites/default/files/migrated-files/en/Publications/DevelopmentandHousing/BuildingStandards/FileDownLoad,1679,en.pdf


    First of all, by " timber frame system ", I'm talking about the real timber frame system, not the one that has the external wall in blocks.
    And of course, yes, with a ventilated space behind the external cladding, this one being in wood or not. That is pretty obvious... :rolleyes:

    And at least with this system, the space is well ventilated, from down and up .
    And the humidity that could appears behind the first layer ( cladding) falls straight outside the wall.
    That is really a key point in the advantage of the TF.

    I don't understand the cavity wall system in blocks where you let the humidity entering the first layer, and staying unvented inside half of the wall .

    ( It's always a very funny moment to see the face of a person when you show him the drip of a wall tie , saying to him : " That little thing is what will keep the Irish rain out of your house... :D )


  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 42,171 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Sounds like you've a dog in they fight Bertie.

    As someone who doesn't, I can completely see the point of a cavity wall system. A system that has been used in this climate for over 1000 years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,504 ✭✭✭BarneyMc


    bertie 56 wrote: »
    ( It's always a very funny moment to see the face of a person when you show him the drip of a wall tie , saying to him : " That little thing is what will keep the Irish rain out of your house... :D )

    Maybe that's why it's so popular!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 602 ✭✭✭bertie 56


    Yes , it's popular ...

    Binge drinking is popular too ...

    And for what I see here, threats with problems related to cavity walls are extremely popular too ...

    Yes, 1000 years old, maybe... Not with blocks, I suppose... Maybe with wood cladding ??? ;)

    And I'm always smile inside when I hear this sentence coming from a building guy : " we are always doing like this, for the last 20 - 40 - 100 years " . It often means " I'm too thick to evolve in my work, with new materials and practice ... "

    Cement ... that's the answer... From floors to walls , to slates... everything in cement, because that the only thing we know ...

    We build a cavity block house, like our parents, like the neighbors, because we know only this method ... because the architect reproduce what he has been taught , and because the engineer is not comfortable to calculate with other materials ...
    Because it was an effective method back in the 1920's ...
    Because the building sector is very conservative .
    Because of the lobbies ( Quinn - Kingspan , etc...) too ... ( " concrete built is better built " ).
    Because we think that all houses in the world are made of blocks ( don't laugh, I saw some ! You have to travel abroad and talk to foreigners to see that it's not true :confused: ... )
    And because there is only blocks in the shop ...

    That's why houses here are made out of blocks ...

    But that's not enough to make the cavity-wall method a good method !

    If you are a bit curious at other methods around, you'll see that there is far better .

    Far better than a method where half of your wall is continuously soaked . A block is a sponge, and has no way of drying . The few barriers to keep the water out are laughable . If fitted right at the start, are you sure the DPC is intact everywhere after the block-layers job ?
    Relaying on this piece of plastic to keep the water out the house is a bit dangerous to me...

    About the insulation, what to say ?
    Just a question, maybe : Would you employ a blind guy to fit some insulation ?
    That's exactly what happens when you fit some rigid panels in the cavity : you see f.ck all if what you are doing is right ... A lump of mortar fells ? You'll have a hole between your panels ...
    And the best : cavity pumping ... it's like blindfolding the blind ! ...
    ( plenty of nice pictures of thermal imaging available...:rolleyes: )

    I can go ahead for hours , between thermal looping in the cavity to the UK cavity wall scandal ( 3 millions houses affected, coming to Ireland soon ??? )

    There is no fix answer for a proper method or material, but OP, check at least these two things :
    - That the water is kept out of the house. The best way is not to let it entered at all at the first place . That should be common sense...
    Plenty of simple solutions exists from the timber frame methods .

    - That the insulation you have is fitted right . That means the guy that did it and your engineer / yourself is able to see that the job has been properly done . No shortcuts here, no " it should be fine " from the builder, that means in reality " it won't be seen from my house " !!!

    If you have these two things ( house warm and dry ), that's a good start .

    You won't regret your former rented cold and damp cavity wall house... ;)

    PS : a couple of things about the Irish climate . We are lucky ! :eek:
    No extreme conditions, despite what you think .
    Actually, there is as many countries in the world where it rains more, than countries where it rains less. We are in the average ... No big freeze,so easy work on foundations, and we often need to rise the temperature of only 10 or 15 degrees , which is not a lot.
    No problem with the heat neither, which is architecturally easier ( shading and aesthetic are not often friends :cool: ... )
    And for the wind, it really depends on years and locations .
    And well, what about stopping building on top of hills , for a start ? :P

    Just one example : Bergen in Norway . About the same temperatures as here, roughly , a bit more windy , and more than twice the amount of rain that we have here in the West ( 3 times Dublin rain ! ) .
    No cavity walls there. Houses are timber frame . And it works ... Dry and warm , without the need to " open the windows one hour per day " , as I read here few days ago as a solution to a damp problem... :rolleyes:


    That's it for me, happy building all of ye ...;)


  • Subscribers Posts: 42,171 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    i hope you realise the complete irony of your posts is that Timber Frame construction over here is generally built WITH A CONCRETE EXTERNAL LEAF AND CAVITY because of timbers huge susceptibility to moisture damage.

    your post is filled with nothing but pro timber frame rhetoric so its obvious your either a manufacturer or salesman.

    and ill augment what i said earlier in this thread
    cavity walls have been built in these parts for over 2000 years


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 602 ✭✭✭bertie 56


    sydthebeat wrote: »
    i hope you realise the complete irony of your posts is that Timber Frame construction over here is generally built WITH A CONCRETE EXTERNAL LEAF AND CAVITY because of timbers huge susceptibility to moisture damage.

    your post is filled with nothing but pro timber frame rhetoric so its obvious your either a manufacturer or salesman.

    and ill augment what i said earlier in this thread
    cavity walls have been built in these parts for over 2000 years



    No, nothing to sell ... ;) , knowledge sharing only ... ( What about you, by the way ??? ;-) )
    And the OP question was block vs timber, no ??? So we talk blocks, and timber , no ?

    I like Poroton too, that could be an answer, too ...

    And I'm plenty aware of what you call " timber frame ", please read my first sentence of post #30, thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,504 ✭✭✭BarneyMc


    bertie 56 wrote: »
    Yes , it's popular ...

    Binge drinking is popular too ...

    And for what I see here, threats with problems related to cavity walls are extremely popular too ...

    Yes, 1000 years old, maybe... Not with blocks, I suppose... Maybe with wood cladding ??? ;)

    And I'm always smile inside when I hear this sentence coming from a building guy : " we are always doing like this, for the last 20 - 40 - 100 years " . It often means " I'm too thick to evolve in my work, with new materials and practice ... "

    I prefer block build but see the merits of TF also. You seem very bitter when it comes to block builds. It is something personal?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,529 ✭✭✭BoardsMember


    Anyone got any opinions/experience with -snip- as a timber frame provider for extensions?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,555 ✭✭✭antiskeptic


    What's the lifespan of a timber framed home of the type the OP is considering?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 602 ✭✭✭bertie 56


    BarneyMc wrote: »
    I prefer block build but see the merits of TF also. You seem very bitter when it comes to block builds. It is something personal?


    No, nothing personal, I don't work at selling/erecting TF houses ...
    And I'm not looking at a house neither...

    It's just a bit of anger seeing the state of the building industry in 2016 in Ireland ...
    Very poor ! And it's not only my point of view .
    By talking to people who did spend some time in other countries, you'll see that , yes, the Irish way of building is a bit of a shame...
    Same sh.tty damp and cold houses, same out of date techniques, with the same workers that don't have any interest whatsoever at what they are doing ... ( boards.ie is really an exception in all this !!! )

    You want to buy or rent a house : what choice do you have ?
    You will still need to burn your ton of oil per year to heat it !

    You want to get stuff in a hardware ? Yes, you have Portland cement, breeze blocks, Kingspan slabs, fake slates, ****ty C16 carboard timber , and MDF/chipboard ... Not much else , and they all have the same...

    And I'm sad to see that buyers (who don't have a clue , but it's normal...) will spend 40 years of they wages for a sh.tty house that won't probably even last their mortgage length...

    And I'm sick of hearing pseudo " professionals " looking at a black spot of mold in a house , saying : " ah , yeah, it's normal, it rains in Ireland ! "

    No intention to re-invent the wheel, but God, a bit of diversity is needed !
    A bit of mind-opening !!! There is solutions to have a warm and dry house in Ireland . With simple techniques that exist for ages in other countries...
    Its just time to let go the cavity-wall stuff with all their related problems ( that all of us perfectly knows ! ) . That's a last century technique ...

    Last thing, the " green " part .
    I was lucky few years ago , some neighbors were putting down a 20 years old timber frame house ( the real one, no blocks/bricks here ).
    Nearly everything was salvaged .
    Windows,all doors, wooden flooring, cement tiles has been re-used .
    Outside walls studs , all roof structure, all insulation ( Rockwool-type), outside wooden cladding , inside cladding ,has been saved for future use .
    Copper and plumbing equipment re-used or sold :p

    The only stuff that went in the skip was :concrete slab with the EPS insulation ( destroyed with the digger ), roofing membrane, floor and wall tiles and plasterboard that were covering all the walls ( that could have maybe been properly recycled, by the way ).
    And I did heat my house for three winters with all the wood leftover ...

    This is just to compare with the volume of waste that a block house would make when destroyed .
    Yes, that could be used to fill holes around ...But not sure it's allowed, first of all. And surely not the greenest thing ever considering the amount of paints and products in it ...
    And it's still a waste...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,504 ✭✭✭BarneyMc


    Some of us Bertie are building very good block houses. They're not all damp ruins that drink oil. But I do agree that the industry needs regulation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 638 ✭✭✭Skommando


    BarneyMc wrote: »
    Some of us Bertie are building very good block houses. They're not all damp ruins that drink oil. But I do agree that the industry needs regulation.

    the industry is choc a bloc with regulation, what it needs is some actual enforcement of regulations

    can you imagine if the nct was self certification, or of the speed / drink driving limits were self certification, and never policed in practice by the authorities ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 638 ✭✭✭Skommando


    In theory - both fine.

    In reality - Based on personal experiences as a structural engineer - we don't have the timber frame construction expertise in this country when compared to Canada/US.

    Of course there are plenty of specialist timber frame companies etc etc etc etc but the things I've seen when it comes to the guys on the ground...If I ever build my own house it certainly won't be timber frame.

    I know many here will disagree.... so take your own view on it.

    My friend just moved out of her rented timber frame semi-d house - sick of listening to the neighbours telly! Granted it was a celtic tiger era thrown together house...

    That's it in a nutshell, in theory both should be ok, in practice finding a contractor honest, interested enough, and good enough to do cavity block work to the proper standard in Ireland properly is a struggle, never mind timber frame. Bearing in mind said honest professional contractor then has to compete with those who pay as little heed as possible to building regs and paying taxes, and somehow he has remain in business. God knows how there is an left at this stage.


Advertisement