Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

BMW X5 E70 engine damage

  • 30-11-2016 9:04am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,135 ✭✭✭


    Hi folks, looking for opinions / guidance here.

    Put too much oil into my X5 E70, oil got through the system and clogged the catalytic convertor and wrecked the turbo, melted a lot of loom and the electronics aren't working any longer either. Garage said a lot of stuff had been melted, I haven't had a look in the engine bay yet.

    They're saying €8,000+ for repairs and insurance won't cover it. Needs a new turbo, a new catalytic convertor and there may be ECU damage. I don't think the mechanic I took it to can fix the car. Engine and gearbox will need to come out he says. Should I contact BMW for another opinion?

    The car is worth more than that at the moment and it's not bad enough to be written off (I think).

    Yes I know it was stupid of me, the sensor was telling me there was no oil so I overdid it. Turns out the sensor was misreporting.

    Please any advice or help would be appreciated. :o


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,226 ✭✭✭Stallingrad


    Jayzuz OP, nightmare! What is the value of the car? Going to BMW would be ruinously expensive, but your repair needs a BMW specialist, especially if the ECU is damaged.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,135 ✭✭✭fifth


    Jayzuz OP, nightmare! What is the value of the car? Going to BMW would be ruinously expensive, but your repair needs a BMW specialist, especially if the ECU is damaged.

    Bought it earlier in the year for around 17.5k so not sure but maybe 13-14k no idea really? It was in great condition and running very well prior to this.

    Yeah it's a nightmare alright.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,641 ✭✭✭cml387


    Repair cost seems like more than half the value of the car.
    I'm afraid it looks like a write off.
    My commiserations, it's really bad luck.:(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,472 ✭✭✭✭Blazer


    cml387 wrote: »
    Repair cost seems like more than half the value of the car.
    I'm afraid it looks like a write off.
    My commiserations, it's really bad luck.:(

    Surely if the sensor was misreporting there's a case there? I hate these sensors from oil.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,135 ✭✭✭fifth


    Garage said I couldn't get it written off because it didn't go up in flames or crash badly, is this accurate? I can't really afford the repair bill so the car is a dead weight to me at the moment.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,135 ✭✭✭fifth


    Blazer wrote: »
    Surely if the sensor was misreporting there's a case there? I hate these sensors from oil.

    Would you think so? There's no BMW warranty on it - and my garage warranty ran out a few weeks prior to this. Sensors weren't covered anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,226 ✭✭✭Stallingrad


    Still, new cat, turbo and loom €8000? Seems excessive, but hard to know without knowing what is melted in the engine bay.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,135 ✭✭✭fifth


    Still, new cat, turbo and loom €8000? Seems excessive, but hard to know without knowing what is melted in the engine bay.

    Am going to head out tomorrow for a look at it as I haven't seen it since it was towed on saturday. I'll get a second opinion before I make any decisions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,135 ✭✭✭fifth


    Sorry to double post - mechanic says to get a fair assessment he needs to remove the gearbox to see how much of the loom is damaged. He says currently there's no ABS brakes etc and all the warning lights are on, no electrics.

    300-400e to remove the gearbox and assess and then the same money to put it back in. He said maybe the damage wouldn't be too bad but he'd have to see first by removing the gearbox.

    This is not really something I'd know lots about so wondering if it's worth doing that.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,135 ✭✭✭fifth



    Cheers, rang a guy I know who's a BMW enthusiast and he told me the garage are probably a bit out of their depth with this engine and he's going to check it over. He said 8k is outrageous and doesn't think the damage could be that bad.

    Fingers crossed.

    edit: actually Stalingrad it's a single turbo in mine, 3.0D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,569 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    Blazer wrote: »
    Surely if the sensor was misreporting there's a case there? I hate these sensors from oil.

    I think that would be any reasonable person's expectation - if you only provide me with a oil level sensor and no dipstick, and the sensor lies leading to overfilling... this is surely not the owner's fault?

    In my opinion this is an engineering fault - there should be some error checking / double checking of the oil level. If you don't provide a dipstick there should at least be some failsafe backup to the main sensor that kicks in when overfilled and informs you "actually I'm way above max, DO NOT START OR DRIVE".
    It's not like it's the washerbottle level or something.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,135 ✭✭✭fifth


    I think that would be any reasonable person's expectation - if you only provide me with a oil level sensor and no dipstick, and the sensor lies leading to overfilling... this is surely not the owner's fault?

    In my opinion this is an engineering fault - there should be some error checking / double checking of the oil level. If you don't provide a dipstick there should at least be some failsafe backup to the main sensor that kicks in when overfilled and informs you "actually I'm way above max, DO NOT START OR DRIVE".
    It's not like it's the washerbottle level or something.

    Yeah definitely a fair point - so I was just told there is in fact a dipstick in there somewhere, but I wasn't able to find it myself. So I'd not have a leg to stand on with that angle unfortunately.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,135 ✭✭✭fifth


    Well folks there's a twist in the tail.

    Called a friend of mine who has a few BMW's and does all his own servicing and is generally a bit of a hobbyist BMW owner as well. He had an hour free to come and look at the car.

    Got the key, turned it on. Engine was running fine, he said it sounded healthy, no smoke coming out of the exhaust now really the oil was burning off.

    The problem is the loom going from the gearbox to the ECU had sort of melted.. so the car was throwing up a 'Central Electrical Failure' and the brakes didn't work and the window wipers wouldn't turn off. So there's some electrical issues.

    Putting the car into drive and reverse worked fine. Taking the car to a guy who knows his way around BMW electronics (have used him before) tomorrow - the cost should hopefully be much more reasonable now like 500-600e if i'm lucky.

    Edit: I should add that I confronted the original garage owner - about his 'catastrophic engine damage' comment. He said that honestly he didn't really know what he was looking at and would have recommended just writing the car off. It seems I have been very lucky on this occasion, not out of the woods just yet though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,016 ✭✭✭adocholiday


    You'll want to have all of the seals checked for damage. Overfilling the oil can put pressure on the seals causing them to break/bust/whatever terminology you want to use. Car could be leaking oil all over the engine bay then. I don't know much about the rest of the problems but I'd still be reluctant to even turn it on until it's had a full oil change, the correct level restored and all seals checked.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,135 ✭✭✭fifth


    You'll want to have all of the seals checked for damage. Overfilling the oil can put pressure on the seals causing them to break/bust/whatever terminology you want to use. Car could be leaking oil all over the engine bay then. I don't know much about the rest of the problems but I'd still be reluctant to even turn it on until it's had a full oil change, the correct level restored and all seals checked.

    Hi you are correct, so the oil was drained and it's at the correct level now. Tomorrow all the seals are being checked as there may be a leak somewhere - there is oil in the engine bay that needs to get sorted also. Once the electrics are sorted I'm getting the oil changed and a full service done on it. Thanks for the post.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,852 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    Moral of this story is that it's always good to get an expert second opinion. I hope it works out ok O.P.


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 7,730 Mod ✭✭✭✭delly


    I really hope you get out of jail on this op and the repair cost is low. The feeling of doing something like this is gut wrenching, so fingers crossed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,135 ✭✭✭fifth


    delly wrote: »
    I really hope you get out of jail on this op and the repair cost is low. The feeling of doing something like this is gut wrenching, so fingers crossed.

    Car is in with the electrics expert now - on first look he reckons yes we can repair the loom and clear the faults. Just a waiting game now. Will report back!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,882 ✭✭✭sc86


    great news

    cant beat typical irish attitude of blame somebody else
    op puts to much oil in the car, which can happen anybody
    people try say its the sensors fault so somebody else should be responsible
    laughable


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,043 ✭✭✭Wossack


    delighted for ya OP!

    heart sank when I was reading page 1 - fuggin useless original garage! Wish they'd just admit they're out of their depth at the outset


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,381 ✭✭✭vintagevrs


    I had an issue with the oil level sensor this week on an F10 520d. The car was reporting too much oil and get it looked at. Car had recently been serviced by a reputable indy. Called him and he said take it down and he will have a look but it's a bit of a spin for me so thought I would have a go myself. I believed that the engine had no dipstick as I had read that somewhere online (apparently applies to petrol models but the 520d does have a dipstick). Anyway, I drained a little oil and rechecked computer, still reading high. Did this 3 times until I had drained so much oil I knew it couldn't have been overfilled that much. Computer still saying too much oil. Then I thought I would look for a dipstick as it would be silly not to have one, and sure enough there is one hidden at at the rear. Now showing less than min oil whilst the Idrive said I had too much.

    So turns out there were two dipsticks, the one in the engine and the eejit taking oil out of an engine that was perfectly fine only to put it back in :o


    I won't be trusting the IDrive again for oil level.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,342 ✭✭✭seagull


    vintagevrs wrote: »
    So turns out there were two dipsticks, the one in the engine and the eejit taking oil out of an engine that was perfectly fine only to put it back in :o

    You left out the third and fourth. The piss poor designer and the half witted programmer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,472 ✭✭✭✭Blazer


    sc86 wrote: »
    great news

    cant beat typical irish attitude of blame somebody else
    op puts to much oil in the car, which can happen anybody
    people try say its the sensors fault so somebody else should be responsible
    laughable

    well if you don't have a dipstick and you're relying on a sensor to tell you the oil levels...and then it reports it incorrectly it's the op's fault?
    Go away and don't back in here again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,569 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    Blazer wrote: »
    well if you don't have a dipstick and you're relying on a sensor to tell you the oil levels...and then it reports it incorrectly it's the op's fault?
    Go away and don't back in here again.

    That poster comes out of the woodwork every now and then for a sly dig, never seen them to contribute anything else, laughable indeed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,661 ✭✭✭Voodoomelon


    The iDrive oil reading on my E66 is at least 20% off by comparison to the dipstick, so I never pay attention to it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,667 ✭✭✭wersal gummage


    I have a bmw, an old e60.

    I drive flashed up and told me oil level low and to top up. I rang the garage (main bmw dealer where it has been serviced only a few weeks beforehand) as this seemed odd. He said to top up a bit so I did. A few weeks later, I drive asks for another top up. Brought it to a garage, they manually checked for oil level and it was fine (a bit high due to earlier top up). Sensor problem. Stupid bmw design and I would never trust an I drive again on oil level, I could easily have caused damage like happened here. People blaming the car owner are being unreasonable I think.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,569 ✭✭✭Special Circumstances


    Are problems more prevalent in very cold weather with those sensors btw???


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,135 ✭✭✭fifth


    Hi all, sorry to bump but I have an update.

    Finally got the car back today. The garage repaired the damaged wiring, which restored the ECU connection and reset the warnings. They checked the DPF and the CAT, remapped the engine and provided me with a second spare key.

    The car is running beautifully this evening. I've had it checked over by my friend and he's very happy with it.

    I am so relieved to have it back and I'll be treating it like a baby from now on! The remap is very nice also.

    Edit: Came to 530e
    Double edit: I'll be getting all the sensors checked but I've located the dipstick and will be using that in future.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,707 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    Not too bad of an outcome all things considered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,661 ✭✭✭Voodoomelon


    Great result. So what are you going to spend the €8,000 on? :D


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 40,339 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Great result. So what are you going to spend the €8,000 on? :D

    Dropping a 40d engine into it!


Advertisement