Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Right of way

  • 06-10-2016 10:58am
    #1
    Archaeoliz
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭


    Just wondering in general terms if anyone knew whether you can deny access across your own land to a tenant living on a property whilst continuing access to the landowner of the other property? If we can the tenant will still have foot access to the property but not vehicular.


Comments

  • #2
    Michael D Not Higgins
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,223 ✭✭✭Michael D Not Higgins


    This is likely to very much depend on the history of the right of way and what has been agreed in writing. This would constitute legal advice above that which we are permitted to give on boards. I suggest speaking to a solicitor.


  • #3
    Archaeoliz
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭Archaeoliz


    Ok, thanks will do then.


  • #4
    4ensic15
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,691 ✭✭✭4ensic15


    As a general rule, a private right of way is a personal right and so can be confined to individuals or classes of individuals.


  • #5
    Archaeoliz
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭Archaeoliz


    I've got conflicting advice so am going to go and ask a professional! It's a lane and there are a series of private rights of way over each owners part of the lane. It's not been registered as a right of way under the 2009 Act. My parents had a field which the owners of another field had a right of way over and I know that they successfully and legally refused access to the tenant they rented the field to. That was in the UK so I don't know if the principle is the same or not. It might help several other neighbours out if we're to be gently difficult about it you see.

    Don't really want to breach AUP as it's obviously a legal advice issue and I'll go and get the right advice from the right place.

    Thanks for replying though.


  • #6
    Right2Write
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,356 ✭✭✭Right2Write


    Archaeoliz wrote: »
    My parents had a field which the owners of another field had a right of way over and I know that they successfully and legally refused access to the tenant they rented the field to.

    Just curious but why would you wish to restrict a right of way to your own tenant? Seems a bit bizarre!


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    Archaeoliz
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭Archaeoliz


    Right2Write wrote: »
    Just curious but why would you wish to restrict a right of way to your own tenant? Seems a bit bizarre!

    We don't have a tenant in either of the scenarios. Tenant belongs to the neighbour and accesses the tenanted property on the neighbour's land over our land using an unregistered right of way. Hope that clarifies for you.


  • #8
    Right2Write
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,356 ✭✭✭Right2Write


    Archaeoliz wrote: »
    We don't have a tenant in either of the scenarios. Tenant belongs to the neighbour and accesses the tenanted property on the neighbour's land over our land using an unregistered right of way. Hope that clarifies for you.

    So you want to respect the private right of way for your neighbour, but not their tenant? Odd :)


  • #9
    Archaeoliz
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 142 ✭✭Archaeoliz


    Right2Write wrote: »
    So you want to respect the private right of way for your neighbour, but not their tenant? Odd :)

    Yup they certainly are.


Advertisement