Loitering teenagers doing pretend karate kicks at girls

Frank101

I was leaving a shopping center last night, when outside it, there were these two teens loitering (male & female). It's funny because I knew it was going to happen before I passed. He did some sort of kung fu kick, pretending to hit the girl in the face. She laughed at it. I know they say girls are impressed by fellas who have natural contempt towards them, but seriously!

Perhaps you could say it's none of my business, but what's with this? And why did he do it, just as someone was passing? You see it often. I don't like it - perhaps because the passer has to account for worst case scenario. It's not exactly something you'd see in a movie with Sylvester Stallone walking down the street with something like this occurring in the background!

Supposing I had said "don't be doing that lad"? Nothing probably might have happened... or he might have just thrown a sweet or something at me as I walked on. Hmm

super_furry

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6gZUZIhug0

suicide_circus

Mace the little f*cker, wont be laughing then

GerryDerpy

We don't call them shopping malls in Ireland.

Dtp1979

Very disappointed. Misleading headline. So it wasn't a karate kick after all, but a Kung fu kick?

padd b1975

'white knight' the bejesus out of him.

jamesbere

suicide_circus wrote: »

Mace the little f*cker, wont be laughing then

Are we taking the shop or the spray.

Hahahaha bombard the little f**ker with leaflets on deals

the_pen_turner

If they were loitering together then they are people friends.
You only saw one instance. This could be their thing. Once they both are happy them what's the problem. It's not like they were doing it to people passing.

Jimmy Garlic

A good tenderising with a hurley would soon sort them out. I'm serious, the likes of that need a good solid beating, something to remember.

Mod: banned

RobbingBandit

suicide_circus wrote: »

Mace the little f*cker, wont be laughing then

Might have been more appropriate to spar with them.

Sir Osis of Liver.

riffmongous

GerryDerpy wrote: »

We don't call them shopping malls in Ireland.

There's a mall in kilkenny

Outlaw Pete

Maybe the girl was Sinead Kavanagh. Don't worry about it so, she can handle herself.

GerryDerpy

riffmongous wrote: »

There's a mall in kilkenny

It's far more likely that OP prefers to sound American.

Summer wind

It's step 1 of the great mating ritual.

percy212

Self hatred for hanging around with a girl when he would rather be holding hands with the OP.

Frank101

the_pen_turner wrote: »

If they were loitering together then they are people friends.
You only saw one instance. This could be their thing. Once they both are happy them what's the problem. It's not like they were doing it to people passing.

oh shut up

Frank101

Frank101 wrote: »

oh shut up

Uh-oh, straight in with that spinning-axe kick.

The_pen_turner wasn't expecting that one.

Now we wait for the backlash.

Robsweezie

The spawn of facekicker???!!!

the groutch

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAtUw6lxcis

Pawwed Rig

He is just showing off trying to entertain the girl. Kids being kids. Leave em at it. They are probably smooching as we speak.

Grandeeod

the groutch wrote: »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAtUw6lxcis

That's about ****.

The flying mouse

Sir Osis of Liver. wrote: »

That brought back memories :)

mansize

It's basic mating ritual - guy showing girl how fit and agile he is, and his alpha male credentials

Frank101

mansize wrote: »

It's basic mating ritual - guy showing girl how fit and agile he is, and his alpha male credentials

But it's a bit offensive to the girl. Not exactly something Prince William would do to Kate Middleton.

Turtyturd

He had the butler pretend karate kick her in the face.

Collie D

Frank101 wrote: »

But it's a bit offensive to the girl. Not exactly something Prince William would do to Kate Middleton.

I'd say the English upper classes are into some seriously depraved ****.

Frank101

Collie D wrote: »

I'd say the English upper classes are into some seriously depraved ****.

We'll never know.

professore

He's showing the girls in one smooth move he's a guy with low intelligence, genuinely misogynistic and a douchebag, I.e. the sort of guy girls go crazy for and actually sleep with.

the_pen_turner

Frank101 wrote: »

oh shut up

touched a nerve did I .

come on now how is this any of your business.
next you will be saying that kids playing cowboys and Indians are being aggressive towards each other

maudgonner

professore wrote: »

He's showing the girls in one smooth move he's a guy with low intelligence, genuinely misogynistic and a douchebag, I.e. the sort of guy girls go crazy for and actually sleep with.

Not all girls 'go crazy for and actually sleep with' guys who are arseholes, and judging from that post you don't have the best attitude towards women yourself.

darkpagandeath

Suggest he does this.

Frank101

professore wrote: »

He's showing the girls in one smooth move he's a guy with low intelligence, genuinely misogynistic and a douchebag, I.e. the sort of guy girls go crazy for and actually sleep with.

But doesn't that imply that girls are stupid?

As you get older though, you've to show you're contempt towards women in different ways.

Frank101

the_pen_turner wrote: »

touched a nerve did I .

come on now how is this any of your business.
next you will be saying that kids playing cowboys and Indians are being aggressive towards each other

I didn't necessarily say it was my business, and that was why I stayed out of it at the time. And I didn't hint at aggression - I hinted at contempt.

Frank101

maudgonner wrote: »

Not all girls 'go crazy for and actually sleep with' guys who are arseholes, and judging from that post you don't have the best attitude towards women yourself.

Just because they're not thugs doesn't mean they're not arseholes! You have to be some sort of an arsehole to qualify though.

Esel

Frank101 wrote: »

Really? Well then picture Ann Robinson's, or Gillian Anderson's reaction?

Perhaps you're very tolerant and try to see the good in people, or maybe you're poor at picking up on social queues!

Never a good idea to try to pick up on social queues. The people there are usually broke....

professore

maudgonner wrote: »

Not all girls 'go crazy for and actually sleep with' guys who are arseholes, and judging from that post you don't have the best attitude towards women yourself.

Jeez it's After Hours, chill ! It is a thing though you have to admit. Otherwise 50 shades would have zero sales, and James Dean would be an anonymous car mechanic.

maudgonner

professore wrote: »

Jeez it's After Hours, chill ! It is a thing though you have to admit. Otherwise 50 shades would have zero sales, and James Dean would be an anonymous car mechanic.

Some women like arseholes. Some women like guys who look like James Dean. Many, many women prefer a guy who's a decent human being. Shock horror not all women are the same! :eek:


As for the success of 50 Shades - nobody can work that one out, it's completely inexplicable.


(And yes, this is AH. Where there's another thread that recently said women who are abused deserve little sympathy because they should just get out at the first sign of trouble and if they fail to do so, tough. Any wonder some of the women on this forum might be feeling a little sensitive on this topic right now?)

The Wolverine

The lads saying women only go for arseholes are probably the self labelled "nice guys"

:pac:

professore

maudgonner wrote: »

Some women like arseholes. Some women like guys who look like James Dean. Many, many women prefer a guy who's a decent human being. Shock horror not all women are the same! :eek:


As for the success of 50 Shades - nobody can work that one out, it's completely inexplicable.


(And yes, this is AH. Where there's another thread that recently said women who are abused deserve little sympathy because they should just get out at the first sign of trouble and if they fail to do so, tough. Any wonder some of the women on this forum might be feeling a little sensitive on this topic right now?)

Well whoever said that was a complete ass. And thankfully not all women are the same, as are not all men. I've met many decent people over the years and some real assholes of both genders (or both main genders lest I offend someone)

professore

The Wolverine wrote: »

The lads saying women only go for arseholes are probably the self labelled "nice guys"

:pac:

Well my women chasing days are long gone so I've no personal involvement but I have seen genuine brutes being chased frantically by some girls in a way that no other type of guy was. And I mean violent brutes, not "guys who play by their own rules". And you couldn't tell them these guys were just bad even though it was obvious to everyone else.

This isn't some excuse for violence against women being their own fault; it's just something I've seen several times.

maudgonner

professore wrote: »

Well whoever said that was a complete ass. And thankfully not all women are the same, as are not all men. I've met many decent people over the years and some real assholes of both genders (or both main genders lest I offend someone)

Exactly, that's all I'm saying

professore

The Wolverine wrote: »

The lads saying women only go for arseholes are probably the self labelled "nice guys"

:pac:

The problem with that attitude is that guys who are genuinely nice are either giving up on women or treating them badly as they are ridiculed for being "nice guys that will find some great girl one day, just not me" lol sure that's what they all want to hear

Then going off with Shane who "just hit her once this week he's a good person deep down and she deserved it anyway" It was painful to watch

mansize

Does all AH threads end up as low level women bashing?

professore

mansize wrote: »

Does all AH threads end up as low level women bashing?

Who is bashing women?

mansize

professore wrote: »

He's showing the girls in one smooth move he's a guy with low intelligence, genuinely misogynistic and a douchebag, I.e. the sort of guy girls go crazy for and actually sleep with.

That's offensive and degrading to women!

professore

mansize wrote: »

That's offensive and degrading to women!

It's true for some women. I'm not offended or degraded when someone posts something negative about some men that's true. It's AH so should be taken with a grain of salt. Here's a song about it, sung by a woman ..

https://youtu.be/i6zE2kZRKlo

If I actually believed all women were like that, that would be another story entirely. Equally if the other person believed all men are the same.

mansize

professore wrote: »

It's true for some women. I'm not offended or degraded when someone posts something negative about some men that's true. It's AH so should be taken with a grain of salt. Here's a song about it, sung by a woman ..

https://youtu.be/i6zE2kZRKlo

You didn't say some though

professore

mansize wrote: »

You didn't say some though

After hours ???? Groan. It's not supposed to be backed up by peer reviewed journals. Just as someone might say Germans have no sense of humour. It's one of those silly comments people make that are not meant seriously.

mansize

professore wrote: »

After hours ???? Groan. It's not supposed to be backed up by peer reviewed journals. Just as someone might say Germans have no sense of humour. It's one of those silly comments people make that are not meant seriously.

You can't be sexist either- it's in the charter apparently...

professore

OK I was not trying to be sexist. I can see that my initial comment could be seen as sexist. I will clearly state in future if I try to make a joke that it is actually a joke in future. I apologise if I offended anyone, it was not my intention.