Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Insurance Claim Situation

  • 18-04-2016 11:39pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭


    Am I correct with the following?

    A learner driver with comprehensive insurance was driving accompanied by a full licensed passenger. They are involved in a accident, accepting full liability.

    The insurance company will pay out to the 3rd Party as well as the driver?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,412 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    Why wouldn't they?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,761 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    On the face of it yes but they shouldn't admit liability, your not supposed to do this.

    The insurer will though try to wiggle their way out of the claim on with the basics they will check...
    Valid NCT on insured vehicle
    Tyre condition on insured vehicle
    Any non declared modifications on the car


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭retweet


    So I was correct, I just had someone telling me otherwise.

    What would be the situation if they weren't accompanied by a full licensed driver?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,761 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    retweet wrote: »
    So I was correct, I just had someone telling me otherwise.

    What would be the situation if they weren't accompanied by a full licensed driver?

    If not accompanied it would be up to the insurer based on their terms and conditions, most likely they would be covered to not pay the insureds damage. They will pay the 3rd party damage regardless.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 398 ✭✭IsaacWunder


    retweet wrote: »
    So I was correct, I just had someone telling me otherwise.

    What would be the situation if they weren't accompanied by a full licensed driver?

    Probably the same. Your insurance isn't automatically invalidated if you break the law. Unaccompanied driving isn't that serous an offence. Even if your speed or drive drunk your insurance isn't invalidated. L plates or none.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭retweet


    I see!

    Thanks for confirming :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,273 ✭✭✭UsedToWait


    retweet wrote: »
    I see!

    Thanks for confirming :)

    I wouldn't count the above as confirmation.
    The apposite word in that post was 'probably'...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 275 ✭✭retweet


    UsedToWait wrote: »
    I wouldn't count the above as confirmation.
    The apposite word in that post was 'probably'...

    I know! Just wanted to see if I was even a bit right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,554 ✭✭✭Pat Mustard


    retweet wrote: »
    A learner driver with comprehensive insurance was driving accompanied by a full licensed passenger. They are involved in a accident, accepting full liability.

    The insurance company will pay out to the 3rd Party as well as the driver?

    In this scenario:
    1. Is there another party who is also involved in the accident?
    2. Who caused the accident?
    3. Who admitted liability for the accident?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,688 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Alot of the insurers have not changed their policy wording to state that you are not insured if unaccompanied.
    They would still be liable to pay other parties but would not pay out on own damage.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,273 ✭✭✭UsedToWait


    mickdw wrote: »
    Alot of the insurers have not changed their policy wording to state that you are not insured if unaccompanied.
    They would still be liable to pay other parties but would not pay out on own damage.

    I suspect a typo on one word has completely changed what you meant there :)


Advertisement